Neonatal Chest Computed Radiography: Image Processing and Optimal Image Display
Steven Don1,2,
Bruce R. Whiting2,
Jacquelyn S. Ellinwood3,
David H. Foos3,
Keith A. Kronemer1 and
Richard A. Kraus1
1 Mallinckrodt Institute for Radiology, St. Louis Children's Hospital,
Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway, St. Louis, MO,
63110.
2 Electronic Research Laboratory, Mallinckrodt Institute for Radiology,
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
3 Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY.

View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1A Normal neonatal chest radiographs illustrate response curve to
brightness adjustments for neonatal chest computed radiography. Lungs appear
progressively lighter from lowest brightness to highest brightness.
Low-brightness image.
|
|

View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1B Normal neonatal chest radiographs illustrate response curve to
brightness adjustments for neonatal chest computed radiography. Lungs appear
progressively lighter from lowest brightness to highest brightness. Reference
T-MAT G (Eastman Kodak Company) image.
|
|

View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1C Normal neonatal chest radiographs illustrate response curve to
brightness adjustments for neonatal chest computed radiography. Lungs appear
progressively lighter from lowest brightness to highest brightness.
High-brightness image.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1D Normal neonatal chest radiographs illustrate response curve to
brightness adjustments for neonatal chest computed radiography. Lungs appear
progressively lighter from lowest brightness to highest brightness. Graph
shows adjustment of characteristic curve from lowest to highest brightness. At
fixed input code value, lowest brightness images have higher or more lung
density output and highest brightness images have lower or more bone density
output.
|
|

View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2A Normal neonatal chest radiographs show detail contrast adjustment of
response curve for neonatal chest computed radiograph. See reference image in
Figure 1B for comparison.
Difference in contrast between air in stomach and ribs is evident. Low-detail
contrast image appears gray.
|
|

View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2B Normal neonatal chest radiographs show detail contrast adjustment of
response curve for neonatal chest computed radiograph. See reference image in
Figure 1B for comparison.
Difference in contrast between air in stomach and ribs is evident. High-detail
contrast image is more black and white than A.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2C Normal neonatal chest radiographs show detail contrast adjustment of
response curve for neonatal chest computed radiograph. See reference image in
Figure 1B for comparison.
Difference in contrast between air in stomach and ribs is evident. Graph shows
adjustment of response curve. As detail contrast increases, characteristic
curve becomes steeper (T-MAT G, Eastman Kodak Company).
|
|

View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 3A Normal neonatal chest radiograph with latitude adjustment of
response curve for neonatal chest computed radiograph. See reference image in
Figure 1B for comparison.
Difference in free-in-air exposure and soft tissue around humerus is evident.
Wide-latitude image appears gray.
|
|

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 3B Normal neonatal chest radiograph with latitude adjustment of
response curve for neonatal chest computed radiograph. See reference image in
Figure 1B for comparison.
Difference in free-in-air exposure and soft tissue around humerus is evident.
Graph shows adjustment of characteristic curve. As latitude increases,
steepness of response curve decreases. This finding applies to
low-spatial-frequency data only.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.