AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michaely, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schoenberg, S. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michaely, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schoenberg, S. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Semiquantitative Assessment of First-Pass Renal Perfusion at 1.5 T: Comparison of 2D Saturation Recovery Sequences With and Without Parallel Imaging

Henrik J. Michaely1, Harald Kramer1, Niels Oesingmann2, Klaus-Peter Lodemann3, Maximilian F. Reiser1 and Stefan O. Schoenberg1

1 Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Munich, Grosshadern-Campus, Marchionistrasse 15, Munich, Germany, 81377.
2 Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA.
3 Bracco-Altana Pharma, Konstanz, Germany.


Figure 1
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 28-year-old man in good health. Axial slice of turbo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) perfusion sequence shows kidneys and phantom.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 28-year-old man in good health. Graph shows measured mean peak signal intensities in aorta and both kidneys. True fast imaging with steady-state free precession (FISP) sequence yields highest absolute signal from enhanced kidneys and enhanced aorta. Turbo FLASH sequences with and without parallel imaging (PI) perform in similar way. AU = arbitrary units.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 28-year-old man in good health. Graph shows calibration curve with measured signal intensities from first five vials (0.032-1.0 mmol/L of gadobenate dimeglumine). Peak signal intensity measured in aorta and kidneys (B) are well within increasing part of calibration curve. T2*-related loss of signal intensity can therefore safely be ruled out. Solid line indicates regression for true FISP sequence; dashed line, regression for turbo FLASH sequence; dotted line, regression for turbo FLASH sequence with parallel imaging.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 27-year-old man in good health. Coronal MR image shows sample of placement of region of interest over both renal cortices.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A 25-year-old man in good health. Signal intensity-time curves for three MRI sequences. Dotted lines indicate true fast imaging with steady-state free precession (FISP), solid gray lines indicate turbo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) without parallel imaging, and solid black lines indicate turbo FLASH with parallel imaging. Graph shows marked differences in configuration of first pass peak. AU = arbitrary units.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B 25-year-old man in good health. Signal intensity-time curves for three MRI sequences. Dotted lines indicate true fast imaging with steady-state free precession (FISP), solid gray lines indicate turbo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) without parallel imaging, and solid black lines indicate turbo FLASH with parallel imaging. Gamma variate fit of curves in A. True FISP sequence yielded lowest maximal signal intensity and slowest upslope of curve. Mean transit time and time to peak were equal for all techniques. Scale of x-axis is slightly different from that in A.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A Comparison of sequences. Graph shows comparison of measured signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at baseline and peak enhancement in renal cortex and abdominal aorta. True fast imaging with steady-state free precession (FISP) sequence yields highest SNR. Turbo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequences with and without parallel imaging (PI) behave similarly to each other.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B Comparison of sequences. Graph shows delta ratio comparisons for three sequences. True FISP yielded highest SNR at baseline and during peak enhancement. Relative enhancement—that is, delta ratio—however, was only 3.2 for true FISP. Turbo FLASH sequences had 59% higher delta ratios of 5.1 with and 5.0 without parallel imaging.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A 29-year-old man in good health. Unenhanced (A), early arterial phase (B), and medullary phase (C) MR images obtained with turbo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B 29-year-old man in good health. Unenhanced (A), early arterial phase (B), and medullary phase (C) MR images obtained with turbo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5C 29-year-old man in good health. Unenhanced (A), early arterial phase (B), and medullary phase (C) MR images obtained with turbo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5D 29-year-old man in good health. Unenhanced (D), early arterial phase (E), and medullary phase (F) MR images obtained with turbo FLASH sequence with parallel imaging show higher noise level than A-C.

 

Figure 13
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5E 29-year-old man in good health. Unenhanced (D), early arterial phase (E), and medullary phase (F) MR images obtained with turbo FLASH sequence with parallel imaging show higher noise level than A-C.

 

Figure 14
View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5F 29-year-old man in good health. Unenhanced (D), early arterial phase (E), and medullary phase (F) MR images obtained with turbo FLASH sequence with parallel imaging show higher noise level than A-C.

 

Figure 15
View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5G 29-year-old man in good health. Unenhanced (G), early arterial phase (H), and medullary phase (I) MR images obtained with true fast imaging with steady-state free precession sequence yield best signal-to-noise ratio, but because of higher background signal intensity, kidneys are difficult to differentiate.

 

Figure 16
View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5H 29-year-old man in good health. Unenhanced (G), early arterial phase (H), and medullary phase (I) MR images obtained with true fast imaging with steady-state free precession sequence yield best signal-to-noise ratio, but because of higher background signal intensity, kidneys are difficult to differentiate.

 

Figure 17
View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5I 29-year-old man in good health. Unenhanced (G), early arterial phase (H), and medullary phase (I) MR images obtained with true fast imaging with steady-state free precession sequence yield best signal-to-noise ratio, but because of higher background signal intensity, kidneys are difficult to differentiate.

 

Figure 18
View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A 29-year-old man in good health. MR image obtained with single true fast imaging with steady-state free precession sequence shows susceptibility artifacts that occur when kidney is close to air-filled large bowel. Margins of renal cortex (arrows) are not clearly defined on either side.

 

Figure 19
View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B 29-year-old man in good health. Medullary phase (D) MR images obtained with turbo fast low-angle shot sequence with parallel imaging show typical bandlike reconstruction artifact (arrows). Artifacts were seen especially in late phases of perfusion measurement after intravascular concentration of contrast agent had markedly decreased.

 

Figure 20
View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6C 29-year-old man in good health. Medullary phase (D) MR images obtained with turbo fast low-angle shot sequence with parallel imaging show typical bandlike reconstruction artifact (arrows). Artifacts were seen especially in late phases of perfusion measurement after intravascular concentration of contrast agent had markedly decreased.

 

Figure 21
View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6D 29-year-old man in good health. Medullary phase (D) MR images obtained with turbo fast low-angle shot sequence with parallel imaging show typical bandlike reconstruction artifact (arrows). Artifacts were seen especially in late phases of perfusion measurement after intravascular concentration of contrast agent had markedly decreased.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.