AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Beemath, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Beemath, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

CT Venography and Compression Sonography Are Diagnostically Equivalent: Data from PIOPED II

Lawrence R. Goodman1, Paul D. Stein2,3, Fadi Matta2, H. Dirk Sostman4,5, Thomas W. Wakefield6, Pamela K. Woodard7, Russell Hull8, David F. Yankelevitz9 and Afzal Beemath2

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53226-3596.
2 Department of Research, St. Joseph Mercy Hospital–Oakland, Pontiac, MI.
3 Department of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
4 Corporate Offices, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.
5 Office of the Dean, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
6 Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
7 Department of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
8 Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
9 Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY.


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Flowchart shows incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients with positive results for pulmonary embolism (PE) on digital subtraction angiography or ventilation–perfusion scanning. Table summarizes results. Data in table are numbers of patients with percentages in parentheses. All differences are not significant. Numbers indicate number of patients, + indicates positive, – indicates negative. CTV = CT venography, CTA = CT angiography.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Flowchart shows incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients with positive results for pulmonary embolism (PE) on CT angiography. Table summarizes results. Data in table are numbers of patients with percentages in parentheses. All differences are not significant. Numbers indicate number of patients, + indicates positive, – indicates negative. CTA = CT angiography, CTV = CT venography, DSA = digital subtraction angiography, V/Q = ventilation–perfusion scanning.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 Flowchart shows incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients without positive results for pulmonary embolism (PE) on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or ventilation–perfusion (V/Q) imaging. Table summarizes results. Data in table are numbers of patients with percentages in parentheses. All differences are not significant. Numbers indicate number of patients, + indicates positive, – indicates negative. CTA = CT angiography, CTV = CT venography.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.