AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kubo, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hatabu, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kubo, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hatabu, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Radiation Dose Reduction in Chest CT: A Review

Takeshi Kubo1,2, Pei-Jan Paul Lin1, Wolfram Stiller3, Masaya Takahashi1, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor4, Yoshiharu Ohno5 and Hiroto Hatabu6

1 Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
2 Present address: Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
3 Department of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
4 Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
5 Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
6 Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115.


Figure 1
View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 62-year-old man with pleural effusion. Standard-dose (A, 150 mA) and reduced-dose (B, 50 mA) CT images at same level. In 50-mA image, increased mottles and black streaks over mediastinum and soft tissues on right lung are noticeable. SD of CT attenuation in region of interest measured on ascending aorta (20 x 20 pixels) was 8.3 H for 150-mA image and 13.9 H for 50-mAs image.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 62-year-old man with pleural effusion. Standard-dose (A, 150 mA) and reduced-dose (B, 50 mA) CT images at same level. In 50-mA image, increased mottles and black streaks over mediastinum and soft tissues on right lung are noticeable. SD of CT attenuation in region of interest measured on ascending aorta (20 x 20 pixels) was 8.3 H for 150-mA image and 13.9 H for 50-mAs image.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Effect of helical pitch on radiation dose. A and B, Schematic presentations of scanning with standard (A) and high-pitch (x2) (B) protocols. Total scanning time (i.e., exposure time) for high-pitch protocol is half that of standard protocol. Consequently, total radiation dose will be halved in high-pitch protocol and tube current will be kept constant.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 Functions of automatic exposure control. A, Exposure adjustment to overall size of patient's body. B, Modulation of z-axis: tube current occurs between rotations as patient couch moves. C, In angular modulation, tube current is modulated during one tube rotation to account for attenuation inconsistencies at different angles of gantry rotation. {theta} = location of X-ray tube in gantry measured as angle from arbitrary place.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.