AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matsuoka, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nakajima, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matsuoka, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nakajima, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Quantitative Assessment of Air Trapping in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using Inspiratory and Expiratory Volumetric MDCT

Shin Matsuoka1,2, Yasuyuki Kurihara1, Kunihiro Yagihashi1, Makoto Hoshino3, Naoto Watanabe3 and Yasuo Nakajima1

1 Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-Ku, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa 216-8511, Japan.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115.
3 Division of Respiratory and Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.


Figure 1
View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 74-year-old man with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Three-dimensional images, anterior view, reconstructed from inspiratory and expiratory MDCT. Segmented whole-lung volume with voxels of attenuation values between –500 and –1,024 H on inspiratory CT (blue).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 74-year-old man with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Three-dimensional images, anterior view, reconstructed from inspiratory and expiratory MDCT. Segmented lung volume with attenuation values less than –860 H in inspiratory CT (red).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 74-year-old man with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Three-dimensional images, anterior view, reconstructed from inspiratory and expiratory MDCT. Segmented lung volume with attenuation values less than –860 H in expiratory CT (red). Relative volumes for whole lung with attenuation value less than –860 H are calculated as follows: relative volume on inspiratory CT (inspiratory relative volume<–860) = (red in B)/(blue in A), and relative volume on expiratory CT (expiratory relative volume<–860) = (red in C)/segmented whole-lung volume on expiratory CT. Relative volume change<–860 (%) = expiratory relative volume<–860 – inspiratory relative volume<–860.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D 74-year-old man with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Three-dimensional images, anterior view, reconstructed from inspiratory and expiratory MDCT. Segmented limited-lung volume with voxels having attenuation values between –500 and –950 H on inspiratory CT (yellow).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E 74-year-old man with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Three-dimensional images, anterior view, reconstructed from inspiratory and expiratory MDCT. Segmented lung volume with attenuation values between –860 and –950 H at upper threshold of –860 H on inspiratory CT (green).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1F 74-year-old man with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Three-dimensional images, anterior view, reconstructed from inspiratory and expiratory MDCT. Segmented lung volume with attenuation values between –860 and –950 H at upper threshold of –860 H on expiratory CT (green). Relative volume for limited lung is obtained as follows: relative volume on inspiratory CT (inspiratory relative volume860–950) = (green in E)/(yellow in D), and relative volume on expiratory CT (expiratory relative volume860–950) = (green in F)/segmented limited-lung volume on expiratory CT. Relative volume change860–950 (%) = expiratory relative volume860–950 – inspiratory relative volume860–950.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A Relationships with relative volume change. Excellent correlation is observed at upper threshold value of –860 H with pulmonary function tests that reflect peripheral airway obstruction and air trapping. Graphs show relationships between relative volume change860–950 and forced expiratory flow (FEF)25–75% (r = –0.75, p < 0.001) (A) and between relative volume change860–950 and ratio of residual volume to total lung capacity (RV/TLC) (r = 0.70, p < 0.001) (B).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B Relationships with relative volume change. Excellent correlation is observed at upper threshold value of –860 H with pulmonary function tests that reflect peripheral airway obstruction and air trapping. Graphs show relationships between relative volume change860–950 and forced expiratory flow (FEF)25–75% (r = –0.75, p < 0.001) (A) and between relative volume change860–950 and ratio of residual volume to total lung capacity (RV/TLC) (r = 0.70, p < 0.001) (B).

 

Figure 9
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 Frequency distribution of pixels in lung on inspiratory (•) and expiratory ({circ}) CT in this study. Percentages of pixels at attenuation of –860 H on both inspiratory and expiratory CT are equivalent; at more than –860 H, percentage of pixels on expiratory CT is greater than on inspiratory CT.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.