AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sabir, A.
Right arrow Articles by Clouse, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sabir, A.
Right arrow Articles by Clouse, M. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Measuring Noncalcified Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Using Voxel Analysis with MDCT Angiography: Phantom Validation

Adeel Sabir1, Chun-Shan Yam1, Norihiko Yoshimura1, Jacqueline L. Buros2, Alec M. De Grand3, Vassilios Raptopoulos1 and Melvin E. Clouse1

1 Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, One Deaconess Rd., WCC-302, Boston, MA 02215.
2 PERFUSE Core Laboratory and Data Coordinating Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
3 Small Animal Imaging Facility, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.


Figure 1
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A Voxel analysis using micro-CT. Cross-sectional micro-CT image of 4.07 mm3 phantom shows line drawn manually by reader. For this particular case, line was drawn across right side of phantom wall. A–B = phantom edges.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B Voxel analysis using micro-CT. Voxel (H) plot of phantom image shows locations of two boundaries (H1, inner wall and lumen; H2, outer wall and epicardial fat) determined by gradient changes. A–B = phantom edges.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C Voxel analysis using micro-CT. Color-coded 3D model of phantom shows three regions at these two boundaries representing arterial wall, lumen, and noncalcified plaque, as in clinical cases.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D Voxel analysis using micro-CT. Three-dimensional model shows final noncalcified plaque volume after removing (peeling off) arterial wall and lumen. Measured volume was 4.05 mm3.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A Voxel analysis using MDCT. Cross-sectional MDCT image of 4.07 mm3 phantom shows line drawn manually by reader. For this particular case, line was drawn across right side of phantom wall. A–B = phantom edges.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B Voxel analysis using MDCT. Voxel (H) plot of phantom image shows locations of two boundaries (H1, inner wall and lumen; H2, outer wall and epicardial fat) determined by gradient changes. A–B = phantom edges.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C Voxel analysis using MDCT. Color-coded 3D model of phantom shows three regions at these two boundaries representing arterial wall, lumen, and noncalcified plaque, as in clinical cases.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D Voxel analysis using MDCT. Three-dimensional model shows final noncalcified plaque volume after removing (peeling off) arterial wall and lumen. Measured volume was 3.71 mm3.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.