AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shetty, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Balasubramaniam, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shetty, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Balasubramaniam, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Contrast Volume Reduction with Superior Vena Cava Catheter-Directed Coronary CT Angiography: Comparison with Peripheral IV Contrast Enhancement in a Swine Model

Anil N. Shetty1, Kostaki G. Bis1, Amit R. Vyas1, Arun Kumar1, Andrew Anderson2 and Mamtha Balasubramaniam3

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, William Beaumont Hospital, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd., Royal Oak, MI 48073.
2 Division of Cardiovascular Disease, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI.
3 Research Institute-Biostatistics, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI.


Figure 1
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Photograph shows 5-French Vanguard diffusion catheter (Medrad) with 640 laser-drilled side holes (arrows) and distal tip constrictor (white end).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A Bar graphs of proximal (blue), mid (red), and distal (yellow) coronary attenuation values. Bar graphs show coronary attenuation values for right coronary artery (RCA) (A), left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (B), and left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) (C) on superior vena cava (SVC) (25-mL and 50-mL studies) and IV (100-mL) studies. Significance of grouped segments (proximal, mid, and distal) for each injection is compared with threshold value of 250 H.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B Bar graphs of proximal (blue), mid (red), and distal (yellow) coronary attenuation values. Bar graphs show coronary attenuation values for right coronary artery (RCA) (A), left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (B), and left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) (C) on superior vena cava (SVC) (25-mL and 50-mL studies) and IV (100-mL) studies. Significance of grouped segments (proximal, mid, and distal) for each injection is compared with threshold value of 250 H.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C Bar graphs of proximal (blue), mid (red), and distal (yellow) coronary attenuation values. Bar graphs show coronary attenuation values for right coronary artery (RCA) (A), left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (B), and left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) (C) on superior vena cava (SVC) (25-mL and 50-mL studies) and IV (100-mL) studies. Significance of grouped segments (proximal, mid, and distal) for each injection is compared with threshold value of 250 H.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 Bar graph shows pooled mean coronary attenuation values compared for each vessel on superior vena cava (SVC) (25-mL and 50-mL studies) and IV (100-mL) studies. In comparison of 25 mL SVC and 100-mL IV studies, for left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), p = 0.0055; for left circumflex coronary artery (LCX), p = 0.0113; and for right coronary artery (RCA), p = 0.0017. Also, in comparison between SVC 50-mL and IV 100-mL studies, for LAD, p = 0.7664; for LCX, p = 0.5724; and for RCA, p = 0.9797. Blue = RCA, Red = LAD, Yellow = LCX. Note: Although some of pairwise comparisons are statistically significant, there is no significant difference in overall full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) because of interactive (i.e., combined) effect of segment x concentration (p value of type 3 test of fixed effects = 0.9102).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A Coronary artery CT angiography with superior vena cava (SVC) (50 mL) injection. RA = right atrium, RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract. 10-mm maximum-intensity-projection images of left main bifurcation (A), left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (B), proximal and middle right coronary artery (RCA) (C), and distal RCA (D) are shown using central SVC injection of 50 mL of contrast material at 10 mL/s. Coronary arteries are displayed with similar attenuation as in Figures 5A, 5B, 5C, and 5D (peripheral IV injection) but with much lower enhancement of right heart structures.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B Coronary artery CT angiography with superior vena cava (SVC) (50 mL) injection. RA = right atrium, RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract. 10-mm maximum-intensity-projection images of left main bifurcation (A), left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (B), proximal and middle right coronary artery (RCA) (C), and distal RCA (D) are shown using central SVC injection of 50 mL of contrast material at 10 mL/s. Coronary arteries are displayed with similar attenuation as in Figures 5A, 5B, 5C, and 5D (peripheral IV injection) but with much lower enhancement of right heart structures.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C Coronary artery CT angiography with superior vena cava (SVC) (50 mL) injection. RA = right atrium, RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract. 10-mm maximum-intensity-projection images of left main bifurcation (A), left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (B), proximal and middle right coronary artery (RCA) (C), and distal RCA (D) are shown using central SVC injection of 50 mL of contrast material at 10 mL/s. Coronary arteries are displayed with similar attenuation as in Figures 5A, 5B, 5C, and 5D (peripheral IV injection) but with much lower enhancement of right heart structures.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4D Coronary artery CT angiography with superior vena cava (SVC) (50 mL) injection. RA = right atrium, RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract. 10-mm maximum-intensity-projection images of left main bifurcation (A), left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (B), proximal and middle right coronary artery (RCA) (C), and distal RCA (D) are shown using central SVC injection of 50 mL of contrast material at 10 mL/s. Coronary arteries are displayed with similar attenuation as in Figures 5A, 5B, 5C, and 5D (peripheral IV injection) but with much lower enhancement of right heart structures.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A Coronary artery CT angiography with peripheral IV (100 mL) injection. RA = right atrium, RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract. 10-mm maximum-intensity-projection images of left main bifurcation (A), left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (B), proximal and middle right coronary artery (RCA) (C), and distal RCA (D) are shown using peripheral IV injection of 100 mL of contrast material at 5 mL/s.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B Coronary artery CT angiography with peripheral IV (100 mL) injection. RA = right atrium, RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract. 10-mm maximum-intensity-projection images of left main bifurcation (A), left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (B), proximal and middle right coronary artery (RCA) (C), and distal RCA (D) are shown using peripheral IV injection of 100 mL of contrast material at 5 mL/s.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5C Coronary artery CT angiography with peripheral IV (100 mL) injection. RA = right atrium, RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract. 10-mm maximum-intensity-projection images of left main bifurcation (A), left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (B), proximal and middle right coronary artery (RCA) (C), and distal RCA (D) are shown using peripheral IV injection of 100 mL of contrast material at 5 mL/s.

 

Figure 13
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5D Coronary artery CT angiography with peripheral IV (100 mL) injection. RA = right atrium, RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract. 10-mm maximum-intensity-projection images of left main bifurcation (A), left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (B), proximal and middle right coronary artery (RCA) (C), and distal RCA (D) are shown using peripheral IV injection of 100 mL of contrast material at 5 mL/s.

 

Figure 14
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A Comparison between maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) and multiplanar reformatted (MPR) images for IV contrast-enhanced (100-mL) and superior vena cava (SVC) (50-mL) studies. MIP image (2 mm) for 100-mL IV contrast-enhanced study (A) and corresponding image from MPR (0.6 mm) (B) of same data set.

 

Figure 15
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B Comparison between maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) and multiplanar reformatted (MPR) images for IV contrast-enhanced (100-mL) and superior vena cava (SVC) (50-mL) studies. MIP image (2 mm) for 100-mL IV contrast-enhanced study (A) and corresponding image from MPR (0.6 mm) (B) of same data set.

 

Figure 16
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6C Comparison between maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) and multiplanar reformatted (MPR) images for IV contrast-enhanced (100-mL) and superior vena cava (SVC) (50-mL) studies. MIP (2 mm) for 50-mL SVC study (C) and corresponding image from MPR (0.6 mm) (D) of same data set.

 

Figure 17
View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6D Comparison between maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) and multiplanar reformatted (MPR) images for IV contrast-enhanced (100-mL) and superior vena cava (SVC) (50-mL) studies. MIP (2 mm) for 50-mL SVC study (C) and corresponding image from MPR (0.6 mm) (D) of same data set.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.