AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casciani, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gualdi, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casciani, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gualdi, G. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Endorectal and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Detection of Local Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy

Emanuele Casciani1, Elisabetta Polettini1, Enrico Carmenini2, Irene Floriani3, Gabriele Masselli1, Luca Bertini1 and Gian Franco Gualdi1

1 Department of Radiology, University of Rome "La Sapienza," Via del Policlinico, 155, 00166 Rome, Italy.
2 U.O.C. Osservazione Medica, Ospedale M. G. Vannini, Rome, Italy.
3 Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri," Milan, Italy.


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Diagram shows time–signal intensity curves from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for determination of initial signal increase and postinitial signal behavior; x-axis shows time in seconds and y-axis shows signal intensity in percent.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A Endorectal coil pelvic MR images obtained in 61-year-old man who had undergone radical prostatectomy 4 years earlier and had undetectable prostate-specific antigen level and unremarkable clinical examination. Transverse T2-weighted image reveals small moderately hyperintense nodule (arrow) posterior to vesicourethral anastomosis.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B Endorectal coil pelvic MR images obtained in 61-year-old man who had undergone radical prostatectomy 4 years earlier and had undetectable prostate-specific antigen level and unremarkable clinical examination. Transverse T1-weighted 3D spoiled gradient-echo image during IV bolus injection of paramagnetic gadolinium chelate at same level as A shows signal increase.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C Endorectal coil pelvic MR images obtained in 61-year-old man who had undergone radical prostatectomy 4 years earlier and had undetectable prostate-specific antigen level and unremarkable clinical examination. Time–signal intensity curve from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI shows faster and stronger enhancement and washout of small nodule posterior to vesicourethral anastomosis. Signal intensity on T2-weighted sequence and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI behavior of nodule suggest recurrence of prostatic cancer. Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)–guided biopsy was positive for recurrence of prostatic cancer.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A Endorectal coil pelvic MR images obtained in 65-year-old man who had undergone radical prostatectomy 1 year earlier. PSA level was 0.5 ng/dL. Transverse T2-weighted image reveals small hypointense nodule (arrow) posterior to bladder.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B Endorectal coil pelvic MR images obtained in 65-year-old man who had undergone radical prostatectomy 1 year earlier. PSA level was 0.5 ng/dL. Transverse T1-weighted 3D spoiled gradient-echo image during IV bolus injection of paramagnetic gadolinium chelate at same level as A shows signal increase.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C Endorectal coil pelvic MR images obtained in 65-year-old man who had undergone radical prostatectomy 1 year earlier. PSA level was 0.5 ng/dL. Time–signal intensity curve from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI shows moderate initial signal increase and postinitial continuous increase. Signal intensity on T2-weighted sequence and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI behavior of nodule suggest scar tissue with inflammatory changes. Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)–guided biopsy was negative for recurrence of prostatic cancer.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.