AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zou, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zou, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Quantitative Investigation of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Histopathologic Analysis

Yu Zou1, Minming Zhang1, Qidong Wang1, Desheng Shang1, Lijun Wang2 and Guowei Yu3

1 Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 79 Qinchun Rd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310003, China.
2 Department of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
3 Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Graph shows time–signal intensity curve types derived from various solitary pulmonary nodules after bolus injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Graph shows calculation of steepest slope value.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 Bar graph shows distribution of time–signal intensity curve types for malignant, benign, and active inflammatory lesions. Light gray indicates type A curve; dark gray, type B curve; white, type C curve.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A 48-year-old woman with adenocarcinoma. Axial dynamic MR image obtained 0 seconds after contrast injection shows hypointense nodule with indistinct margin.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B 48-year-old woman with adenocarcinoma. Axial dynamic MR image obtained 30 seconds after contrast injection shows lesion has marked increase in signal intensity.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C 48-year-old woman with adenocarcinoma. Photomicrograph shows microvessel density with antibodies against CD31 immunostaining is 47. Abundance of mostly immature tumor microvessels is evident. Vessels are stained brown. (x200)

 

Figure 7
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A 60-year-old woman with active tuberculosis. Axial dynamic MR image obtained 0 seconds after contrast injection shows hypointense nodule with indistinct margin.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B 60-year-old woman with active tuberculosis. Axial dynamic MR image obtained 30 seconds after contrast injection shows lesion has markedly increased signal intensity.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5C 60-year-old woman with active tuberculosis. Photomicrograph shows microvessel density with antibodies against CD31 immunostaining is 38. Abundance of dilated capillary vessels is evident. Vessels are stained brown. (x200)

 

Figure 10
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A Results of receiver operating characteristic analysis of steepest slope. Scattergram shows criteria for selecting cutoff point of steepest slope for greatest overall accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant or active inflammatory solitary pulmonary nodules with receiver operating curve analysis. When threshold value of 1.5%/s (≤ 1.5%/s indicating benign nodules) was selected, sensitivity and specificity were 81% (13 of 16 cases) and 98% (51 of 52 cases).

 

Figure 11
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B Results of receiver operating characteristic analysis of steepest slope. Graph shows relation between sensitivity and specificity and steepest slope. Diamonds indicate sensitivity; squares, specificity.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6C Results of receiver operating characteristic analysis of steepest slope. Graph shows area under receiver operating characteristic curve for steepest slope.

 

Figure 13
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7A Results of receiver operating characteristic analysis of enhancement ratio of signal intensity at fourth minute. Scattergram shows criterion for selecting cutoff point of enhancement ratios at the fourth minute for greatest overall accuracy in differentiating malignant from active inflammatory solitary pulmonary nodules by means of receiver operating curve analysis. When threshold value of 65% (≤ 65% indicated malignant nodules) was selected, sensitivity and specificity were 93% (37 of 40 cases) and 100% (12 of 12 cases).

 

Figure 14
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7B Results of receiver operating characteristic analysis of enhancement ratio of signal intensity at fourth minute. Graph shows relation between sensitivity and specificity and enhancement ratio of signal intensity at fourth minute. Triangles indicate sensitivity; diamonds, specificity.

 

Figure 15
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7C Results of receiver operating characteristic analysis of enhancement ratio of signal intensity at fourth minute. Graph shows area under receiver operating characteristic curve for enhancement ratio of signal intensity at fourth minute.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.