AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buijs, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kamel, I. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buijs, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kamel, I. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Chemoembolization of Hepatic Metastases from Ocular Melanoma: Assessment of Response with Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted MRI

Manon Buijs1, Josephina A. Vossen, Kelvin Hong, Christos S. Georgiades, Jean-Francois H. Geschwind and Ihab R. Kamel

1 All authors: Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 601 N Caroline St., Rm. 3235A, Baltimore, MD 21287.


Figure 1
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 60-year-old woman with hepatic metastases from ocular melanoma. Changes in enhancement and apparent diffusion coefficient after transarterial chemoembolization. Gadolinium-enhanced arterial phase MR image (TR/TE, 5.1/1.2) shows 3.1-cm mass (arrow) in left lobe with almost complete (100%) enhancement.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 60-year-old woman with hepatic metastases from ocular melanoma. Changes in enhancement and apparent diffusion coefficient after transarterial chemoembolization. Diffusion-weighted MR image (6,500/110) shows hyperintense mass (arrow).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 60-year-old woman with hepatic metastases from ocular melanoma. Changes in enhancement and apparent diffusion coefficient after transarterial chemoembolization. After placement of region of interest on entire mass (arrow), apparent diffusion coefficient is 0.00138 mm2/s.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D 60-year-old woman with hepatic metastases from ocular melanoma. Changes in enhancement and apparent diffusion coefficient after transarterial chemoembolization. Unenhanced CT scan of abdomen shows intense deposition of iodized oil in mass (arrow) after transarterial chemoembolization.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E 60-year-old woman with hepatic metastases from ocular melanoma. Changes in enhancement and apparent diffusion coefficient after transarterial chemoembolization. Gadolinium-enhanced arterial phase MR image (TR/TE, 5.1/1.2) after transarterial chemoembolization shows significant decrease in enhancement of mass (arrow), now less than 10%. Size of mass decreased slightly to 2.9 cm.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1F 60-year-old woman with hepatic metastases from ocular melanoma. Changes in enhancement and apparent diffusion coefficient after transarterial chemoembolization. Diffusion-weighted MR image (6,500/110) after transarterial chemoembolization.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1G 60-year-old woman with hepatic metastases from ocular melanoma. Changes in enhancement and apparent diffusion coefficient after transarterial chemoembolization. After placement of region of interest on entire mass (arrow), apparent diffusion coefficient is 0.00229 mm2/s, confirming increasing cellular necrosis.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Graph shows changes in apparent diffusion coefficient after treatment. ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.