AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luck, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, I. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luck, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, I. O.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Breast Carcinoma with Basal Phenotype: Mammographic Findings

Angela A. Luck1, Andrew J. Evans1, Jonathan J. James1, Emad A. Rakha2, E. Claire Paish2, Andrew R. Green2 and Ian O. Ellis2

1 Nottingham International Breast Education Centre, Nottingham City Hospital, Hucknall Rd., Nottingham NG5 1PB, United Kingdom.
2 Department of Histopathology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom.


Figure 1
View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 1 —50-year-old asymptomatic woman with breast cancer detected through screening. Mammogram shows spiculated mass representing invasive carcinoma.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 2 —56-year-old woman with breast cancer. Mammogram shows ill-defined mass representing invasive carcinoma (dominant abnormality). Associated ductal microcalcification (nondominant abnormality) was high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 3 —52-year-old woman with breast cancer. Mammogram shows casting comedo calcification in areas of increased density. Histologic examination showed high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ with grade 3 invasive carcinoma.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 4A —Two patients with microcalcification representing ductal carcinoma in situ. Mammogram shows small cluster of pleomorphic calcifications in 62-year-old woman.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 4B —Two patients with microcalcification representing ductal carcinoma in situ. Mammogram shows comedo calcifications in ductal distribution in 57-year-old woman.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.