AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niemann, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bongartz, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Niemann, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bongartz, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Diagnostic Performance of Low-Dose CT for the Detection of Urolithiasis: A Meta-Analysis

Tilo Niemann1, Thilo Kollmann1 and Georg Bongartz1

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 1 —Diagram shows results of meta-analysis.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 2 —Graph shows sensitivity analysis for pooling the studies included in meta-analysis.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 3 —Graph shows specificity analysis for pooling studies included in meta-analysis.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 4 —Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve shows accuracy of low-dose CT for urolithiasis. Area under SROC curve (AUC) represents overall diagnostic accuracy of test. AUC was calculated as 99.32% (standard error [SE] = 0.0016).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.