AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dodd, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cury, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dodd, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cury, R. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Quantification of Nonculprit Coronary Lesions: Comparison of Cardiac 64-MDCT and Invasive Coronary Angiography

Jonathan D. Dodd1, Johannes Rieber2, Eugene Pomerantsev3, Vithaya Chaithiraphan2, Stephan Achenbach4, Javier M. Moreiras3, Suhny Abbara2, Udo Hoffmann2, Thomas J. Brady2 and Ricardo C. Cury2

1 Department of Radiology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
2 Department of Radiology, Cardiac MRI-PET-CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
3 Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
4 Department of Medicine 2, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Graph shows correlation between CT cross-sectional area and quantitative coronary angiography for degree of stenosis of nonculprit coronary lesions (R = 0.59, p < 0.05).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (177K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A 53-year-old man with acute coronary syndrome. Invasive coronary angiography showed culprit lesion (> 75% stenosis) in left anterior descending coronary artery territory (not shown), which was stented. Nonculprit coronary lesion was identified in proximal segment of right coronary artery (RCA). Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) image of proximal RCA shows 38% stenosis.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B 53-year-old man with acute coronary syndrome. Invasive coronary angiography showed culprit lesion (> 75% stenosis) in left anterior descending coronary artery territory (not shown), which was stented. Nonculprit coronary lesion was identified in proximal segment of right coronary artery (RCA). Corresponding maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) diameter-analysis CT image shows 45% stenosis. Measurements 1, 2, and 3 are of proximal, nonculprit lesion, and distal reference segments.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C 53-year-old man with acute coronary syndrome. Invasive coronary angiography showed culprit lesion (> 75% stenosis) in left anterior descending coronary artery territory (not shown), which was stented. Nonculprit coronary lesion was identified in proximal segment of right coronary artery (RCA). Cross-sectional MDCT multiplanar reformat (MPR) diameter-analysis images through proximal (C), nonculprit lesion (D), and distal reference (E) segments show 46% stenosis. Note that calcified plaque (arrow, D) was excluded from luminal diameter measurements.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D 53-year-old man with acute coronary syndrome. Invasive coronary angiography showed culprit lesion (> 75% stenosis) in left anterior descending coronary artery territory (not shown), which was stented. Nonculprit coronary lesion was identified in proximal segment of right coronary artery (RCA). Cross-sectional MDCT multiplanar reformat (MPR) diameter-analysis images through proximal (C), nonculprit lesion (D), and distal reference (E) segments show 46% stenosis. Note that calcified plaque (arrow, D) was excluded from luminal diameter measurements.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2E 53-year-old man with acute coronary syndrome. Invasive coronary angiography showed culprit lesion (> 75% stenosis) in left anterior descending coronary artery territory (not shown), which was stented. Nonculprit coronary lesion was identified in proximal segment of right coronary artery (RCA). Cross-sectional MDCT multiplanar reformat (MPR) diameter-analysis images through proximal (C), nonculprit lesion (D), and distal reference (E) segments show 46% stenosis. Note that calcified plaque (arrow, D) was excluded from luminal diameter measurements.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2F 53-year-old man with acute coronary syndrome. Invasive coronary angiography showed culprit lesion (> 75% stenosis) in left anterior descending coronary artery territory (not shown), which was stented. Nonculprit coronary lesion was identified in proximal segment of right coronary artery (RCA). CT cross-sectional luminal area analysis images through proximal (F), nonculprit lesion (G), and distal reference (H) segments show 56% stenosis. Note that plaque (arrow, G) was excluded from luminal diameter measurements.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2G 53-year-old man with acute coronary syndrome. Invasive coronary angiography showed culprit lesion (> 75% stenosis) in left anterior descending coronary artery territory (not shown), which was stented. Nonculprit coronary lesion was identified in proximal segment of right coronary artery (RCA). CT cross-sectional luminal area analysis images through proximal (F), nonculprit lesion (G), and distal reference (H) segments show 56% stenosis. Note that plaque (arrow, G) was excluded from luminal diameter measurements.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2H 53-year-old man with acute coronary syndrome. Invasive coronary angiography showed culprit lesion (> 75% stenosis) in left anterior descending coronary artery territory (not shown), which was stented. Nonculprit coronary lesion was identified in proximal segment of right coronary artery (RCA). CT cross-sectional luminal area analysis images through proximal (F), nonculprit lesion (G), and distal reference (H) segments show 56% stenosis. Note that plaque (arrow, G) was excluded from luminal diameter measurements.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2I 53-year-old man with acute coronary syndrome. Invasive coronary angiography showed culprit lesion (> 75% stenosis) in left anterior descending coronary artery territory (not shown), which was stented. Nonculprit coronary lesion was identified in proximal segment of right coronary artery (RCA). Coronary artery software area analysis of MDCT images for proximal (I), nonculprit lesion (J), and distal reference (K) segments shows 40% stenosis. Note software was unable to exclude some mixed plaque (arrow, J) from analysis despite manual window adjustments, resulting in some falsely high luminal measurements.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2J 53-year-old man with acute coronary syndrome. Invasive coronary angiography showed culprit lesion (> 75% stenosis) in left anterior descending coronary artery territory (not shown), which was stented. Nonculprit coronary lesion was identified in proximal segment of right coronary artery (RCA). Coronary artery software area analysis of MDCT images for proximal (I), nonculprit lesion (J), and distal reference (K) segments shows 40% stenosis. Note software was unable to exclude some mixed plaque (arrow, J) from analysis despite manual window adjustments, resulting in some falsely high luminal measurements.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2K 53-year-old man with acute coronary syndrome. Invasive coronary angiography showed culprit lesion (> 75% stenosis) in left anterior descending coronary artery territory (not shown), which was stented. Nonculprit coronary lesion was identified in proximal segment of right coronary artery (RCA). Coronary artery software area analysis of MDCT images for proximal (I), nonculprit lesion (J), and distal reference (K) segments shows 40% stenosis. Note software was unable to exclude some mixed plaque (arrow, J) from analysis despite manual window adjustments, resulting in some falsely high luminal measurements.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.