AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yigla, M.
Right arrow Articles by Madison, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yigla, M.
Right arrow Articles by Madison, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Vibration Response Imaging Technology in Healthy Subjects

Mordechai Yigla1, Merav Gat2, Jean-Jacques Meyer3, Paul J. Friedman4, Toby M. Maher5 and J. Mark Madison6

1 Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 8 Ha'Aliyah St., 35254 Haifa, Israel.
2 Department of Clinical Affairs, Deep Breeze, Or Akiva, Israel.
3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Clalit Health Service, Haifa and West Galilee, Israel.
4 Department of Radiology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
5 Interstitial Lung Disease Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
6 Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.


Figure 1
View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A Vibration response imaging device (VRIxp, Deep Breeze). Photograph shows placement and attachment of low-suction vacuum of planar arrays on patient's back. Each planar array is composed of seven rows of three sensors except top row, which has dummy sensor at outside corner. Distance between centers of sensors is 5 cm.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B Vibration response imaging device (VRIxp, Deep Breeze). Graph shows arrangement of left and right sensor matrices. Quantitative lung data were calculated by integrating energy over matching sensors for upper region (sensor rows 1 and 2), middle region (sensor rows 3, 4, and 5) and lower region (sensor rows 6 and 7).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C Vibration response imaging device (VRIxp, Deep Breeze). Quantitative lung data output of right and left lungs is shown in table of percentages for breath sound distribution.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Seventeen frames show normal imaging findings for healthy 63-year-old man obtained using normal vibration response imaging device (VRIxp, Deep Breeze). Imaging progresses and regresses vertically and in synchronized manner from top to bottom in both inspiration (Ins) and expiration (Exp). Projections of right and left sides of image are same as standard posteroanterior chest radiograph—that is, left lung is shown on right side of image. Right and left sides of images develop simultaneously from early frames (frame 1, 2, or 3) to maximum energy frame. Shape of maximum-energy-frame image is smooth (e.g., frame 5) and rounded and has uninterrupted contour. Area and gray-scale intensity of right and left sides of maximum-energy-frame image are similar. Normal maximum-energy-frame image does not have missing areas.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 Breathing graphs generated by vibration response imaging device (VRIxp, Deep Breeze) show data for 32-year-old healthy man (top graph) and 60-year-old healthy man (bottom graph): x-axis is time (12 seconds) and y-axis is breathing intensity bar. Subjects were instructed to target breathing to range of 1.5–3.5 on breathing intensity bar and to breathing cycle rate of 16–24 cycles per minute. Dot depicts time of shown frame. Arrow points to recordings of maximum breathing intensity.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 Bar graph shows distribution of image features shown by vibration response imaging device (VRIxp, Deep Breeze) for study population (n = 151). Most images from study population were rated as having good dynamic appearance, good image development, good maximum-energy-frame shape, symmetric maximum-energy-frame area, symmetric maximum-energy-frame intensity, no missing parts, and normal final assessment. MEF = maximum energy frame.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5 Bar graph shows proportions of flawed features seen on vibration response images (VRIxp device, Deep Breeze) that had final assessment of abnormal (n = 17). MEF = maximum energy frame.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6 Bar graph shows proportions of maximum-energy-frame area and maximum-energy-frame intensity scored as symmetric (right lung [R] = left lung [L]) or as asymmetric (R < L or R > L) by qualitative assessment of 149 vibration response images (VRIxp device, Deep Breeze) and quantitative assessment (pixel-count analysis) of 135 vibration response images (VRIxp device). MEF = maximum energy frame.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7 Graph shows distribution of image features seen on vibration response images (VRIxp device, Deep Breeze) among smoker and nonsmoker subpopulations. MEF = maximum energy frame. Asterisks indicate significant differences between smokers and nonsmokers (p < 0.05) for assessment of features.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.