Contrast-Enhanced MR Mammography: Improved Lesion Detection and Differentiation with Gadobenate Dimeglumine
Federica Pediconi1,
Carlo Catalano1,
Simona Padula1,
Antonella Roselli1,
Valeria Dominelli1,
Sabrina Cagioli1,
Miles A. Kirchin2,
Gianpaolo Pirovano3 and
Roberto Passariello1
1 Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Rome "La
Sapienza," Viale le Regina Elena 324, 00161 Rome, Italy.
2 Worldwide Medical & Regulatory Affairs, Bracco Imaging SpA, Milano,
Italy.
3 Worldwide Medical & Regulatory Affairs, Bracco Diagnostics, Inc.,
Princeton, NJ.

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1 —Bar graph shows results for detection of malignant and benign
breast lesions on breast MRI with gadobenate dimeglumine (gray bars)
and gadopentetate dimeglumine (white bars) relative to histopathology
findings (black bars). Detection of malignant breast lesions was
significantly better with gadobenate dimeglumine (p = 0.0009; McNemar
exact test).
|
|

View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2A —42-year-old woman with two histologically confirmed invasive
carcinoma lesions in inferior outer quadrant of right breast. Nonsubtracted
(A), subtracted (B), and maximum-intensity-projection (MIP)
reconstruction of subtracted image (C) of enhanced T1-weighted
gradient-echo images (TR/TE, 8.1/4; flip angle, 30°) after 0.1 mmol/kg of
gadopentetate dimeglumine clearly show suspicious lesion (arrow,
B).
|
|

View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2B —42-year-old woman with two histologically confirmed invasive
carcinoma lesions in inferior outer quadrant of right breast. Nonsubtracted
(A), subtracted (B), and maximum-intensity-projection (MIP)
reconstruction of subtracted image (C) of enhanced T1-weighted
gradient-echo images (TR/TE, 8.1/4; flip angle, 30°) after 0.1 mmol/kg of
gadopentetate dimeglumine clearly show suspicious lesion (arrow,
B).
|
|

View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2C —42-year-old woman with two histologically confirmed invasive
carcinoma lesions in inferior outer quadrant of right breast. Nonsubtracted
(A), subtracted (B), and maximum-intensity-projection (MIP)
reconstruction of subtracted image (C) of enhanced T1-weighted
gradient-echo images (TR/TE, 8.1/4; flip angle, 30°) after 0.1 mmol/kg of
gadopentetate dimeglumine clearly show suspicious lesion (arrow,
B).
|
|

View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2D —42-year-old woman with two histologically confirmed invasive
carcinoma lesions in inferior outer quadrant of right breast. Lesion is more
conspicuous and more strongly enhanced on subtracted (D) and MIP
reconstruction of subtracted images (E and F) after 0.1 mmol/kg
of gadobenate dimeglumine (arrow, D). Additional small
histologically confirmed lesion (circle, E and F) that
is not seen on gradient-echo images after gadopentetate dimeglumine
administration is clearly visible in MIP reconstruction and subtracted image
after gadobenate dimeglumine administration. Signal intensity–time
curves (not shown) of two lesions after gadobenate dimeglumine revealed
similar washout behavior indicative of malignancy.
|
|

View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2E —42-year-old woman with two histologically confirmed invasive
carcinoma lesions in inferior outer quadrant of right breast. Lesion is more
conspicuous and more strongly enhanced on subtracted (D) and MIP
reconstruction of subtracted images (E and F) after 0.1 mmol/kg
of gadobenate dimeglumine (arrow, D). Additional small
histologically confirmed lesion (circle, E and F) that
is not seen on gradient-echo images after gadopentetate dimeglumine
administration is clearly visible in MIP reconstruction and subtracted image
after gadobenate dimeglumine administration. Signal intensity–time
curves (not shown) of two lesions after gadobenate dimeglumine revealed
similar washout behavior indicative of malignancy.
|
|

View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2F —42-year-old woman with two histologically confirmed invasive
carcinoma lesions in inferior outer quadrant of right breast. Lesion is more
conspicuous and more strongly enhanced on subtracted (D) and MIP
reconstruction of subtracted images (E and F) after 0.1 mmol/kg
of gadobenate dimeglumine (arrow, D). Additional small
histologically confirmed lesion (circle, E and F) that
is not seen on gradient-echo images after gadopentetate dimeglumine
administration is clearly visible in MIP reconstruction and subtracted image
after gadobenate dimeglumine administration. Signal intensity–time
curves (not shown) of two lesions after gadobenate dimeglumine revealed
similar washout behavior indicative of malignancy.
|
|

View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 3A —47-year-old woman with two histologically confirmed invasive
lobular carcinoma lesions in left breast. Suspicious contrast-enhancing lesion
(arrow) with correspondingly suspicious signal intensity–time
curve is clearly visible on subtracted T1-weighted gradientecho images after
administration of 0.1 mmol/kg of gadopentetate dimeglumine (A) and of
0.1 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine (B). Both degree of enhancement
and lesion conspicuity are greater after gadobenate dimeglumine. Signal
intensity–time curves for gadopentetate dimeglumine (A) and
gadobenate dimeglumine (B) show similar washout behavior, which is
characteristic for malignant lesion.
|
|

View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 3B —47-year-old woman with two histologically confirmed invasive
lobular carcinoma lesions in left breast. Suspicious contrast-enhancing lesion
(arrow) with correspondingly suspicious signal intensity–time
curve is clearly visible on subtracted T1-weighted gradientecho images after
administration of 0.1 mmol/kg of gadopentetate dimeglumine (A) and of
0.1 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine (B). Both degree of enhancement
and lesion conspicuity are greater after gadobenate dimeglumine. Signal
intensity–time curves for gadopentetate dimeglumine (A) and
gadobenate dimeglumine (B) show similar washout behavior, which is
characteristic for malignant lesion.
|
|

View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 3C —47-year-old woman with two histologically confirmed invasive
lobular carcinoma lesions in left breast. Additional small histologically
confirmed invasive lobular carcinoma lesion (arrow) that is not seen
on gradient-echo images after gadopentetate dimeglumine is clearly visible on
subtracted image after gadobenate dimeglumine.
|
|

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 3D —47-year-old woman with two histologically confirmed invasive
lobular carcinoma lesions in left breast. Maximum-intensity-projection
reconstruction (MIP) of subtracted images after gadopentetate dimeglumine
reveals just one lesion (arrow).
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 3E —47-year-old woman with two histologically confirmed invasive
lobular carcinoma lesions in left breast. Lesion shown in D(lower
arrow) and additional small lesion (upper arrow) are clearly
visible on subtracted MIP reconstruction after gadobenate dimeglumine.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.