AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Kane, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hatch, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Kane, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hatch, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Differences in Sonographic Conspicuity According to Papillary Thyroid Cancer Subtype: Results of the Ukrainian–American Cohort Study After the Chornobyl Accident

Patrick O'Kane1, Evgeniy Shelkovoy2, Robert J. McConnell3, Victor Shpak2, Laurence Parker1, Tatiana I. Bogdanova2, Alina Brenner4, Yuri Naida2, Andrea Frangos1, Lydia Zablotska5, Jacob Robbins6,7, Ellen Greenebaum8, Lydia Y. Zurnadzhy2, Mykolo Tronko2 and Maureen Hatch9

1 Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 10th St. and Walnut St., 796 Main Bldg., Philadelphia, PA 19107.
2 Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Kyiv, Ukraine.
3 Department of Medicine, The Thyroid Clinic, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY.
4 Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
5 Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.
6 Clinical Endocrinology Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
7 Deceased.
8 Department of Pathology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY.
9 Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.


Figure 1
View larger version (173K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 1A —Photomicrographs show histologic subtypes of papillary carcinoma. Papillary variant.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (178K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 1B —Photomicrographs show histologic subtypes of papillary carcinoma. Follicular variant.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 1C —Photomicrographs show histologic subtypes of papillary carcinoma. Solid variant.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (174K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 1D —Photomicrographs show histologic subtypes of papillary carcinoma. Mixed papillary–follicular variant.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 2A —Reference examples for grading sonographic conspicuity of thyroid nodules. Sonogram shows grade 1 nodule (cursors): almost invisible, could easily be missed.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 2B —Reference examples for grading sonographic conspicuity of thyroid nodules. Sonogram shows grade 2 nodule: subtle, could be missed in some cases.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 2C —Reference examples for grading sonographic conspicuity of thyroid nodules. Sonogram shows grade 3 nodule: fairly visible, should be seen in most cases.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 2D —Reference examples for grading sonographic conspicuity of thyroid nodules. Sonogram shows grade 4 nodule: clearly visible, should rarely be missed.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 2E —Reference examples for grading sonographic conspicuity of thyroid nodules. Sonogram shows grade 5 nodule (cursors): completely obvious, should never be missed.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 3 —Graph shows mean conspicuity scores for papillary carcinoma subtypes by reader. Mean score for each subtype differed by reader, but there was fair agreement among readers on relative conspicuity of each subtype.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.