AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ledermann, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Stuckmann, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ledermann, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Stuckmann, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2000; 174:107-115
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Review

Bowel Wall Thickening on Transabdominal Sonography

Hans Peter Ledermann1, Norbert Börner2, Holger Strunk3, Georg Bongartz1, Christoph Zollikofer4 and Gerd Stuckmann4

1 Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland.
2 Gastroenterologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Parcusstr. 8, 55116 Mainz, Germany.
3 Department of Radiology, Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-str. 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
4 Department of Radiology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Brauerstr. 15, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland.

Received January 27, 1999; accepted after revision June 7, 1999.

 
Address correspondence to H. P. Ledermann.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 
The potential value of transabdominal sonography in the diagnosis of bowel diseases is often not sufficiently appreciated and is even underestimated. Bowel gas artifacts and the somewhat confusing sonographic appearance of the gastrointestinal tract may render orientation and interpretation of sonographic structures difficult. Bowel wall thickening, the main sonographic correlate of bowel disorders, seems at first glance a very nonspecific sign, which may explain why inexperienced investigators do not feel confident in the sonographic evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract. However, it has been shown that transabdominal sonography achieves good to excellent results as a directed tool for evaluating potential bowel disorders: appendicitis can be diagnosed with a sensitivity ranging from 80% to 93% and a specificity between 94% and 100% [1, 2]. Reported sensitivity rates for evaluating inflammatory bowel disease range between 67% and 96%, with specificities of 79-97% [3, 4]. Equal diagnostic accuracy of 84% was found for CT and for sonography in the workup of diverticulitis, with sensitivities of 91% and 85%, respectively, and specificities of 84% and 77%, respectively [5]. Although the sonographic appearance of bowel wall thickening of different diseases sometimes overlaps, careful examination of the thickened bowel segment in context with the clinical information often leads to a limited differential diagnosis or to the correct diagnosis.

The differential diagnoses of small-bowel wall thickening and of colonic wall thickening are shown in Appendixes 1 and 2, respectively.

This article provides a systematic overview of diseases that may cause bowel wall thickening. Typical sonographic features of these disorders are discussed and compared. A review of the literature further summarizes the reported diagnostic potential of sonography and its limitations.


Technique
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 
Examination of the intestinal tract usually begins with a systematic standardized survey using a curvilinear 3.5-5-MHz transducer. In patients with localized abdominal pain, however, it may be helpful and timesaving to let patients indicate the position of maximum pain with their fingers on the abdominal wall and begin the examination there. In case of diffuse abdominal pain, the frame of the colon is identified by its strong gas artifacts and is screened from the cecum to the sigmoid colon. The rest of the abdomen is examined in an individual standardized fashion to assure complete coverage of the entire gastrointestinal tract. If intestinal wall thickening is found, detailed evaluation of the diseased segment is performed with a linear or curved high-frequency (7.5-13 MHz) transducer. When the affected bowel segment is far from the abdominal surface and when the patient is obese, a fair amount of pressure must be applied to the transducer to get acceptable images. For optimal results, it may be necessary to change the patient's position several times during the examination. Only careful methodic examination of the entire abdomen leads to acceptable results; the accuracy of the examination depends largely on the radiologist's experience and patience [5]. Ideally, patients fast overnight before the examination, but at least 4-5 hr of fasting are needed to avoid excessive gas in the intestinal lumen.


Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall Anatomy
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 
The typical sonographic appearance of the normal bowel wall consists of five concentric, alternately echogenic and hypoechoic layers that we describe from the lumen outward (Fig. 1). First, a small echogenic layer is seen that reflects the superficial mucosal interface. The deep mucosa, including the muscularis mucosa, is seen as a second hyperechoic layer. A third hyperechoic layer is produced by the submucosa and the muscularis propria interface. The muscularis propria is seen as a fourth hypoechoic layer. Finally, the marginal interface to the serosa is seen as the fifth small hyperechoic layer. The average thickness of the normal gut wall is 2-4 mm [6].



View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. —4-year-old girl with gastroenteritis. Sagittal sonogram shows normal gut wall layering of rectum (RE) from lumen outward. Note small echogenic layer in lumen that reflects superficial mucosal interface (short thin arrow). Deep mucosa, including muscularis mucosa, is seen as second hypoechoic layer (long thin arrow). Third broad hyperechoic layer is produced by submucosa and muscularis propria interface (open arrow). Muscularis propria is seen as fourth hypoechoic layer (short thick arrow). Marginal interface to serosa is seen as small fifth hyperechoic layer (curved arrow). ASC = ascites in retrovesical space, B = bladder.

 


Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 
The classic sonographic feature of Crohn's disease is the "target" sign (Fig. 2A, Fig. 2B, Fig. 2C) on transverse images, which means a strong echogenic center surrounded by a relatively sonolucent rim of more than 5 mm. This transmural inflammation or fibrosis can lead to complete circumferential loss of the typical gut wall layers, which results in a thick hypoechoic rim on axial images. Strictures are shown as marked thickening of the gut wall with a fixed hyperechoic narrowed lumen (Fig. 3A), dilatation, and hyperperistalsis of the proximal gut. Peri-intestinal inflammation leads to the "creeping fat" sign, which appears as a uniform hyperechoic mass typically seen around the ileum and cecum. Mesenteric lymphadenopathy is seen as multiple oval hypoechoic masses, usually in the right lower quadrant. In contrast to other forms of colitis, Crohn's disease is suggested by skip areas and involvement of the distal ileum [7]. Possible complications of Crohn's disease comprise fistulas, abscess formation, mechanical bowel obstruction, and perforation [8]. Abscesses are seen as poorly defined, mostly hypoechoic focal masses that can contain hyperechoic gas (Fig. 3B). Fistulas are a hallmark of Crohn's disease and are seen in as many as one third of patients with advanced disease as hypoechoic tracts with gas inclusions connecting bowel loops or adjacent structures (bladder, abdominal wall, vagina, psoas muscle) (Fig. 3C). Detection of gas bubbles in abnormal locations raises the possibility of fistulous communication.



View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. —25-year-old woman with Crohn's disease who presented with new onset of crampy abdominal pain.

A, Transverse sonogram shows concentric echolucent wall thickening producing typical "target" sign.

 


View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. —25-year-old woman with Crohn's disease who presented with new onset of crampy abdominal pain.

B, Close-up longitudinal sonogram of same segment as A shows circular hypoechoic wall thickening and loss of stratification that, together with clinical information, led to diagnosis of Crohn's disease.

 


View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. —25-year-old woman with Crohn's disease who presented with new onset of crampy abdominal pain.

C, Small-bowel contrast-enhanced enema shows segmental bowel wall edema (arrow) with "thumbprinting" and narrowing of jejunal lumen in left lower abdomen. Diagnosis of Crohn's disease was later clinically confirmed.

 


View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. —Complications of Crohn's disease.

A, Stricture with obstruction in 52-year-old man. Transverse sonogram of ileum (arrows) shows severe narrowing of small hyperechoic central lumen caused by excessively echolucent wall thickening and loss of stratification, indicating scarring of entire bowel wall.

 


View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. —Complications of Crohn's disease.

B, Hypoechoic ileal abscess (A) in highly hypertrophic and inflamed hyperechoic fat of mesentery of 25-year-old woman.

 


View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. —Complications of Crohn's disease.

C, Sonogram obtained at time of suspected relapse of 31-year-old woman shows hypoechoic fistula with small hyperechoic gas inclusion (arrow).

 

In expert hands, the distribution of frank lesions of inflammatory bowel disease can be determined with a sensitivity of 73-87% on sonography [3, 9, 10]. However, mild lesions that produce less bowel wall thickening are frequently not diagnosed, and the sensitivity for these lesions drops to 52% [3]. These results indicate that sonography cannot replace a contrast-enhanced examination or endoscopy when highly accurate assessment of the extent of the inflammatory lesion is requested [3].

Determination of disease activity by sonography is controversial. Whereas some investigators showed correlation with disease activity [4, 10, 11], others found only a loose correlation between bowel wall thickening and disease activity [9]. The ranges of reported sensitivities and specificities in the diagnosis of Crohn's disease are 67-96% and 79-97%, respectively [4, 12, 13, 14]. The relatively wide range in the values of sensitivity and specificity may be explained by the use of low-frequency transducers (3.5 MHz) in older studies and the use of high-resolution equipment using 5-10-MHz broadband linear transducers. In ulcerative colitis, sensitivity reaches 89% and specificity reaches 100% [11]. Differentiation between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis based on sonographic findings includes the location of the disease, the presence of skip lesions, and the presence of pericolic abscesses [14]. Bowel wall thickening is usually less marked in ulcerative colitis with preserved stratification [15] (Fig. 4A, Fig. 4B). However, definite differential diagnosis is difficult on transabdominal sonography [4, 16].



View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. —26-year-old man with ulcerative colitis and new onset of bloody diarrhea.

A, Sagittal sonogram of descending colon reveals only subtle thickening of bowel wall (4.2-mm-thick submucosa between crosses) with preserved stratification and normal echo texture of adjacent mesenteric fat.

 


View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. —26-year-old man with ulcerative colitis and new onset of bloody diarrhea.

B, Large-bowel enema with fine granularity of mucosa reflecting hyperemia and edema confirms suspected sonographic diagnosis of early changes in ulcerative colitis.

 


Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the Gastrointestinal Tract
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 
The gut is the most commonly involved extranodal site of lymphoma [17]. The most common sites, in order of descending frequency, are stomach, small intestine, and colon, especially cecum [17]. Eighty percent of gastrointestinal lymphomas are of B-cell origin. In patients with underlying celiac disease, however, T-lymphocyte origin predominates. Sonography classically shows transmural circumferential, profoundly hypoechoic wall thickening up to 4 cm in diameter [18], with loss of normal stratification (Fig. 5A). This pattern, also known as the "pseudokidney" sign in longitudinal views, is observed in 70% of patients [19] (Fig. 5B). The pseudokidney sign is often seen in lymphoma because of extensive hypoechoic bowel wall thickening, but it can be seen in any bowel disorder leading to marked bowel wall thickening [20, 21]. Other findings include nodular or bulky tumor spread caused by extraluminal involvement [18] (Fig. 5C). Mesenteric tumor spread and bulky tumor growth need biopsy for definite diagnosis because they cannot be reliably differentiated from other diseases such as primary bowel tumors or metastases. Isolated mucosal involvement is rare and leads to hyperechoic thickening of the mucosa (Fig. 5D). Sonographic patterns favoring the diagnosis of a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma over adenocarcinoma are transmural circumferential, profoundly hypoechoic wall thickening with preserved peristalsis; lack of intestinal obstruction, because narrowing of the lumen is uncommon; involvement of a long stretch of the gut; and the presence of multiple prominent regional lymph nodes [22]. Typical complications are mucosal ulceration leading in 10-50% of patients to bleeding, perforation of the small intestine, and intussusception of the bowel [23]. The most commonly involved nodal groups in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract are the celiac, retrocrural, perirenal, perisplenic, perihepatic, and mesenteric nodes [22].



View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. —Four typical sonographic variants of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

A, Most common circular involvement of entire wall with preserved peristalsis in 45-year-old man with uncharacteristic abdominal pain. Transverse sonogram reveals profound hypoechoic wall thickening.

 


View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. —Four typical sonographic variants of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

B, "Pseudokidney" sign in ileocecal region: marked hypoechoic thickening of bowel wall resembling form of kidney in longitudinal sonogram of cecum. Patient is 57-year-old woman.

 


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. —Four typical sonographic variants of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

C, Bulky disease in cecum in 63-year-old woman. Axial sonogram reveals large eccentric hypoechoic mass with compression of hyperechoic lumen.

 


View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. —Four typical sonographic variants of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

D, Isolated mucosal involvement in 43-year-old man. Transverse sonogram of ileum with marked hyperechoic gyral thickening of mucosa and preserved layering of bowel wall.

 


Acute Terminal Ileitis
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 
The clinical symptoms of acute ileitis are right-sided lower abdominal pain, diarrhea, and nausea, with an accelerated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, positive C-reactive protein, and leukocytosis. Only careful evaluation in the preoperative workup for suspected appendicitis can prevent an unnecessary operation [24]. Acute ileitis is caused by Yersinia species but Campylobacter and Salmonella species may also be cultured. Reported sonographic features include hypoechogenic mural thickening of the terminal ileum and cecum between 6 and 10 mm with hypoechoic swollen ileal folds in the edematous mucosa [24, 25]. Hypoechoic enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes ranging from 7 to 21 mm in diameter were found in most patients. Color Doppler sonography in patients with infectious ileitis shows increased flow centrally rather than peripherally (as in appendicitis) [26].

Tuberculous enteritis and Behçet's syndrome also predominantly affect the ileocecal region [27]. In a series of 45 patients suffering from ileocecal tuberculosis, sonography showed segmental predominantly concentric thickening of the terminal part of the ileum and cecum in 43 patients [13], with enlargement of the regional mesenteric lymph nodes in 50% of these patients.


Appendicitis
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 
The typical finding of acute appendicitis in transverse sonograms is the target sign with a hypoechoic center, an inner hyperechoic ring, and an external thicker hypoechoic ring (Fig. 6A). In sagittal images, the inflamed appendix is seen as a blind-ending noncompressible tubular structure (Fig. 6B). Focal or circumferential loss of the inner layer of echoes usually indicates gangrenous inflammation and ulceration of the submucosa. Several studies achieved sensitivities of 80-93% and specificities of 94-100% in the sonographic workup of acute appendicitis [1, 2]. On the other hand, CT has shown sensitivities of 90-100% with specificities of 83-98% 28, 29, 30]. In one study with a low (76%) sensitivity for sonography, CT was found to be more accurate than sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis [28]. Graded compression sonography gained widespread acceptance as a useful technique to examine patients with atypical signs of appendicitis [31]. In a prospective study, the proposed treatment after clinical examination changed in 26% of all patients after sonographic examination [2]. The diagnosis can be established with confidence if the appendix is noncompressible, shows no peristalsis, and measures more than 6 mm in diameter [32] on axial images, and if compression leads to a localized pain response. The surrounding mesentery is often inflamed, which can be seen as a hyperechoic diffuse halo sign around the appendix (Fig. 6A). If an appendicolith is identified in an appendix of any size, the findings of the examination are always considered positive [33] (Fig. 6C). A simple additional color Doppler examination may be helpful in the diagnosis of early acute appendicitis [34]. The presence of visible hyperemia or increased flow in the hypoechoic muscular layer of the bowel wall may be a marker of appendicitis, whereas increased flow in the mucosal layer most likely represents enteritis [26]. Increased flow in the fat surrounding the appendix is indicative of transmural extension of the inflammation with mesenteric response. An inflamed appendix rarely measures more than 15 mm in transverse diameter [33], which usually allows differentiation from ileitis. A markedly enlarged or perforating appendix or dilated fallopian tubes may lead to interpretive pitfalls [33].



View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6. —Sonographic findings in acute appendicitis.

A, "Target" sign (curved arrows) in acute appendicitis in 12-year-old girl. On transverse image, inflamed appendix is seen with hypoechoic center, inner hyperechoic ring, and outer hypoechoic ring. Note hyperechoic circular area (straight arrows) of inflamed mesentery ("halo" sign).

 


View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6. —Sonographic findings in acute appendicitis.

B, Longitudinal sonogram of inflamed appendix in same patient shows blind-ending tubular structure (arrow) of at least 6 mm in diameter.

 


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6. —Sonographic findings in acute appendicitis.

C, Multiple appendicoliths in 6-year-old girl. Longitudinal section of inflamed appendix reveals five round hyperechoic appendicoliths with acoustic shadows.

 

Perforation occurs in 20-30% of young patients with appendicitis (Fig. 6D). A statistically significant association exists between perforation and two sonographic findings: loculated pericecal fluid and loss of the echogenic submucosa [35]. Abscess formation is the major complication of perforating appendicitis. Abscesses may extend into the pelvis or into the peritoneal spaces of the upper abdomen. They may be sonolucent or appear as a complex mass. Advantages of sonography are wide availability, lack of radiation, and lack of contrast administration. Limitations of sonography occur in obese and extremely meteoristic patients and in patients with severe pain due to peritonitis. Retrocecal appendicitis may be difficult to diagnose on sonography. Because CT has been shown to be more accurate in staging periappendiceal inflammation and abscesses [5, 28, 36], CT may be preferred in patients with suspected perforation or abscess; CT reliably differentiates phlegmon from abscess and serves as an accurate "road map" for potential abscess drainage.



View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6. —Sonographic findings in acute appendicitis.

D, Perforating appendicitis in 6-year-old girl. Longitudinal sonogram of inflamed appendix shows typical blind-ending tubular structure and hypoechoic collection around tip, indicative of perforation.

 


Small-Bowel Diseases
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 
Mesenteric infarction in its late stages leads to small-bowel wall thickening [37, 38]. In the early stages, however, no bowel wall thickening may be seen. Doppler sonography can aid in differentiating ischemic and inflammatory bowel wall thickening. In approximately 90% of cases, small-bowel infarctions are due to arterial hypoperfusion; only 10% are caused by mesenteric vein occlusion. Acute intramural intestinal hematoma leads typically to a homogeneous hypoechoic symmetric thickening of a long stretch of the affected bowel segment, with reduced or absent peristalsis and marked luminal narrowing [39] (Fig. 7). In the subacute stage, strong internal echoes caused by thrombi may mimic an abscess [40].



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7. —72-year-old woman with intramural hematoma due to anticoagulant drug therapy. Patient was sent for sonography to rule out atypical appendicitis. Transverse sonogram of small-bowel segment discloses circumferential hypoechoic thickening of bowel wall with loss of stratification and compression of lumen.

 

Amyloidosis is a rare condition; however, gastrointestinal involvement in patients with amyloid is frequently seen [41]. Marked hypoechoic thickening of the affected bowel segments is found [42, 43].

Eosinophilic enteritis is a rare disease characterized by infiltration of the stomach or bowel wall with eosinophilic leukocytes. In three reported cases, hypoechoic thickening of multiple ileal loops, narrowing of the lumen, and loss of layer structure were described [44, 45].

The sonographic features of primary lymphangiectasia have been described in four patients [46, 47]. Diffuse hypoechoic small-bowel wall thickening, ascites, mesenteric edema, and thickened walls of the gallbladder and urinary bladder are found.

One case report describes the sonographic findings of nontropical sprue (celiac disease) as diffuse hypoechoic thickening of the entire small-bowel wall that disappears completely after 3 months of a gluten-free diet [48].

Sonographic findings in a patient with Whipple's disease (intestinal lipodystrophy) disclosed hyperechoic concentric thickening of the small bowel with enlarged hyperechoic lymph nodes [49]. The hyperechoic structure of the intestinal wall and the enlarged lymph nodes are explained by fat accumulation in these structures [50] (Fig. 8A, Fig. 8B, Fig. 8C).



View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8. —50-year-old man with Whipple's disease (intestinal lipodystrophy) presenting with steatorrhea.

A, Longitudinal sonogram depicts marked hyperechoic jejunal fold thickening.

 


View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8. —50-year-old man with Whipple's disease (intestinal lipodystrophy) presenting with steatorrhea.

B, Transverse sonogram shows jejunal thickening and hyperechoic lobulated lymph node (arrow).

 


View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8. —50-year-old man with Whipple's disease (intestinal lipodystrophy) presenting with steatorrhea.

C, CT scan shows prominent jejunal folds and enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes. (Courtesy of Disler M, Kantonsspital Liestal, Switzerland)

 

Markedly thickened hypoechoic bowel loops, preferentially in the distal ileum, were found in intestinal anisakiasis, a parasitic disease of the gastrointestinal tract caused by ingestion of Anisakis larvae in raw or undercooked fish [51].

Hypoechoic small-bowel wall thickening reaching 11 mm and revealing a pseudokidney appearance was found in a patient suffering from intestinal Behçet's disease [21]. Cytomegalovirus enteritis in AIDS patients leads to wall thickening of the small and large bowels with preserved stratification.


Tumors of the Small Intestine Other Than Lymphomas
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 
Peritoneal carcinomatosis is the most frequent malignant lesion of the small bowel and may lead to irregular wall thickening with the typical contraction of several bowel loops to a conglomerate. Most frequent primary tumors originate from the ovary, stomach, colon, pancreas, gallbladder, lung, and uterus. Primary small-bowel tumors constitute only 3-6% of gastrointestinal neoplasms. Abdominal symptoms are usually vague and poorly defined, and conventional radiography of the upper and lower intestinal tract often has normal results. These factors may lead to a delayed diagnosis. Carcinoid tumor is the most frequent small-bowel tumor [52] and occurs in 80% of cases in the distal ileum (Fig. 9A, Fig. 9B). All small-bowel carcinoids are considered malignant because they eventually grow, invade, and metastasize. Metastases will occur in 10% of lesions smaller than 1 cm and 95% of lesions larger than 2 cm [53]. Only 4% of patients present with the typical carcinoid syndrome [54]. In a series of six patients, small bowel carcinoids presented as hypoechoic, homogeneous predominantly intraluminal masses with smooth intraluminal contour [54]. The tumors were attached to the wall by a broad base, with interruption of the submucosa and thickening of the muscularis propria in all cases. Carcinoid tumors of the appendix were described in two cases [55] as hypoechoic, well-delineated elongated masses in the distal lumen and the tip of the appendix.



View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9. —57-year-old man with ileal carcinoid tumor presenting with mechanical small-bowel obstruction.

A, Transverse sonogram of terminal ileum reveals hypoechoic, homogeneous intraluminal mass with smooth intraluminal contour and broad-based hypoechoic infiltration of submucosa posteriorly. Note fluid-distended small-bowel segments ventral to tumor, indicating mechanical obstruction.

 


View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9. —57-year-old man with ileal carcinoid tumor presenting with mechanical small-bowel obstruction.

B, CT scan reveals strongly enhancing mass (arrow) in terminal ileum, with infiltration of mesenteric fat dorsally and mechanical obstruction of small bowel.

 

Lipomas are the second most common tumors of the small intestine and occur with greatest frequency in the distal ileum and at the ileocecal valve. The location of these tumors is submucosal, or, less frequently, is subserosal. In three fourths of cases, the tumors are clinically silent [56]. If the lipoma becomes larger than 4 cm, chronic hemorrhage caused by ulceration of the mucosa or intestinal obstruction resulting from intussusception may cause symptoms [57, 58]. Typical sonographic features are a well-circumscribed hyperechoic round or oval mass with deformation under compression. Leiomyomas and schwannomas are seen as hypoechoic intramural round structures with smooth boundaries [52, 58, 59]. Ulceration of the mucosa may cause gastrointestinal hemorrhage of varying severity. Leiomyosarcomas were described as large irregular masses with a heterogeneous echo pattern [58]. Adenocarcinoma is the second most common small intestine malignancy and the peak incidence is in the seventh decade of life [52]. A series of four cases with duodenal adenocarcinomas showed moderately large intraluminal masses with medium echogenicity [58]. The authors report improved sonographic detection of small-bowel tumors by intermittent observation of the small-bowel lesions during the first hour after water ingestion. Transabdominal sonography reached excellent sensitivity in detecting small-bowel tumors in unexplained gastrointestinal bleeding [59] and in small-bowel obstruction [60]. In most cases, the tumors were seen as round and smoothly delineated hypoechoic masses.


Colitis
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 
The sonographic features of pseudomembranous colitis have been described in a number of reports [61, 62]. Striking thickening of the colonic wall with a wide inner circle of heterogeneous medium echogenicity surrounded by a narrow hypoechoic muscularis propria is found in all patients, reflecting the gross submucosal edema. The lumen of the colon is almost completely effaced by the mural edema, and 64-77% of the patients have ascites [61, 62]. The presence of these sonographic features in a patient with watery diarrhea and a history of antibiotic therapy strongly suggests the diagnosis of pseudomembranous colitis. Pseudomembranous colitis shows typically a strong folding or gyral pattern of the swollen submucosa.

Ischemic colitis cannot be differentiated solely by sonography from inflammation or any other form of colonic wall thickening. However, duplex and color Doppler sonography may be helpful in differentiating between ischemic and inflammatory bowel wall thickening [63]. Absence of or barely visible color Doppler flow and absence of arterial signal suggest ischemia. On the other hand, readily visible color Doppler flow and a stratified echo texture suggest inflammation. Various case reports have described colonic wall thickening in different forms of infectious and noninfectious colitis [24, 64, 65, 66, 67].


Diverticulitis
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 
Sonographic features of diverticulitis include visualization of diverticula (Fig. 10A), thickening of the bowel wall, inflammatory changes in the pericolic fat (typically on the mesenteric side of the colonic wall) (Fig. 10B), intramural or periocolic abscess (Fig. 10C), and (usually) severe local tenderness induced by graded compression. Diverticula are round or oval echogenic foci seen in or right next to the gut wall, mostly with internal acoustic shadowing. Thickening of the bowel wall is usually considered present when the distance from the echogenic lumen interface to the hyperechogenic serosa and pericolic fat exceeds 4 mm [5]. Inflammatory changes in the pericolic fat are seen as ill-defined echogenic areas surrounding the thickened colon segment. Pericolic abscesses typically present as hypoechoic masses adjacent to the inflamed bowel. The major sonographic finding in patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis of the right colon has been found to be a hypoechoic round or oval focus protruding from the segmentally thickened colonic wall and representing small abscesses in the pericolic fat [68]. The sensitivity of sonography in the diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis ranges in the literature from 84% to 100% [5, 69, 70, 71]. In a recent study comparing sonography and CT in the evaluation of acute colonic diverticulitis, both techniques reached a similar sensitivity (85% and 91%, respectively) and specificity (84% and 77%, respectively) [5]. False-negative results may occur if inflammatory bowel wall thickening is only mild [3]. False-positive results are reported in adenocarcinoma, lymphoma, Crohn's disease, ischemic colitis, and extracolic inflammatory conditions adjacent to the colonic wall [69, 71]. False-positive results may be reduced with Doppler sonography [63]. Potential pitfalls in diagnosing pericolic abscesses are collections smaller than 2.5 cm in diameter [5], interloop abscesses, and abscesses with gas inclusions [69]. CT is more accurate than sonography in revealing abscesses [5, 28, 36] and is helpful in planning percutaneous drainage by exactly delineating the bowel loops [5].



View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10. —Sonographic features of diverticulitis.

A, Diverticulum of sigmoid colon in 63-year-old man is seen as focal hyperechoic intramural structure with acoustic shadow.

 


View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10. —Sonographic features of diverticulitis.

B, Massive hyperechoic inflammatory infiltration in 76-year-old woman is seen on mesenteric side of sigmoid colon.

 


View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10. —Sonographic features of diverticulitis.

C, Echolucent fistula in 67-year-old woman is seen in mesentery with small, hyperechoic, gas-containing abscess (arrow).

 



View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11. —Sonographic features of colonic carcinoma.

D, CT correlation of lesion in C.

 

Colonic Carcinoma
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 
Abdominal sonography may be the first imaging method that patients with colonic cancer undergo when they present with nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms. Careful sonographic evaluation of the bowel may disclose a focal mass or mural thickening. Sonographic diagnosis of colonic carcinoma has been described by several authors [72, 73, 74]. Colonic carcinomas have two typical sonographic appearances [75]. The first type is seen as a localized hypoechoic mass up to 10 cm or more with an irregular shape and a lobulated contour. The intraluminal gas, seen as a cluster of high amplitude, is usually eccentrically located around the mass (Fig. 11A). The second type shows segmental eccentric or circumferential thickening of the colonic wall. The mural thickening may be irregular but not as severe as in the first type (Fig. 11B). The central echo clusters are small because the diseased lumen is usually narrow. This type leads frequently to colonic obstruction. Rectum carcinomas are seen only when the bladder is well-filled (Figs. 11B and 11C). Sonography enables localization of large-bowel obstruction in 85% of patients and diagnosis of the cause of large-bowel obstruction in 81% of patients [76]. Shirahama et al. [77] described four sonographic patterns that allowed correct diagnosis of colonic carcinoma in 90% of patients: localized irregular thickening of the colonic wall with heterogeneous low echogenicity; irregular contour; lack of movement or change in configuration on real-time scanning; and absence of a layered appearance of the colonic wall. Other findings include lymphadenopathy in most patients and abscess formation in 10% of patients. In a recent publication, malignant conditions of the colon showed the following characteristics: loss of stratification, absence of perigut findings, and involvement of a short bowel segment with significantly greater wall thickness than is present in benign processes [62]. However, negative findings on sonographic examinations do not rule out the diagnosis of colonic carcinoma because small masses and overlying bowel gas can lead to false-negative results [72, 76]. Because of these limitations, mainly in sensitivity, abdominal sonography is not an effective screening technique in the diagnosis of colonic cancer.



View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11. —Sonographic features of colonic carcinoma.

A, Eccentric type in 52-year-old man. Transverse sonogram shows typical irregular eccentric thickening of cecum wall and loss of stratification. Note eccentrically located intraluminal air (arrow).

 


View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11. —Sonographic features of colonic carcinoma.

B, Circumferential type in 66-year-old man. Longitudinal sonogram of sigmoid colon with irregular circumferential thickening (arrows) of short colonic wall segment.

 


View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11. —Sonographic features of colonic carcinoma.

C, Polypoid rectal carcinoma in 59-year-old man. Transvesical transverse sonogram of rectum shows endoluminal round polypoid tumor measuring 3 cm in diameter (between crosses).

 


Intussusception
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 
Only 5-10% of all intussusceptions occur in adults [78, 79]. The clinical symptoms may suggest partial obstruction of the intestine, but diagnosis may be difficult because symptoms are often nonspecific [79]. The ileocecal region is the most commonly affected area in children, whereas there is no clearly preferred anatomic site in adults. Most intussusceptions in children are idiopathic and are presumed to be the result of enlarged lymphoid follicles in the terminal ileum. An organic cause can be shown in as many as 90% of cases in adults [78, 79]. The leading mass is nearly always a tumor of the intestinal wall, usually malignant in intussusceptions of the colon [80] and benign in intussusceptions of the small intestine [57, 78]. The sonographic hallmark of intussusception has been described as the target [81], "doughnut," or "bull's-eye" sign [82]. Typically, one finds two hypoechoic rings separated by a hyperechoic ring or crescent on axial images (Fig. 12A, Fig. 12B). On longitudinal images, a pseudokidney structure or layering of hypoechoic lines with hyperechoic areas is observed. The outer hypoechoic ring is formed by the intussuscipiens and the everted returning limb of the intussusceptum, with their mucosal surfaces face to face [83]. The center of the intussusception varies with the scan level. At the apex, the center is hypoechoic because of the entering limb of the intussusceptum. At the base, the entering bowel wall forms a hypoechoic center that is surrounded by the hyperechoic mesentery [83]. In a case of surgically proven triple jejunojejunocolonic intussusception [84], three hypoechoic rings separated by two hyperechoic rings were found on sonography.



View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12. —57-year-old man with intussusception of anastomosed jejunum into remaining stomach after a Billroth II procedure (subtotal gastrectomy).

A, Transverse sonogram shows hypoechoic kidney-shaped mass reflecting remnant of stomach with intussusception in its lumen. Small hyperechoic ring formed by invaginated mesentery divides intussuscipiens (gastrojejunal anastomosis) on outside from intussusceptum (jejunum) and leads to a "ring-in-ring" structure.

 


View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12. —57-year-old man with intussusception of anastomosed jejunum into remaining stomach after a Billroth II procedure (subtotal gastrectomy).

B, CT correlation confirms intussusception.

 


Conclusion
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 
Sonography of the gastrointestinal tract should be included in abdominal sonography of patients presenting with abdominal pain of unknown origin to look for potential bowel disorders. Careful analysis of the sonographic changes of a thickened bowel segment in context with the clinical information often leads to a limited differential diagnosis or even to the correct diagnosis. If a bowel disorder is detected, targeted use of barium enemas, CT, endoscopy, or biopsy can be performed if additional workup is needed.

More large-scale studies are needed to compare the use of sonography with other methods for imaging the various diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.


APPENDIX 1: Differential Diagnosis of Small-Bowel Wall Thickening
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 
Common:

Less common:

Rare:


APPENDIX 2: Differential Diagnosis of Colonic Wall Thickening
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 
Common:

Less common:

Rare:


References
Top
Introduction
Technique
Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the...
Acute Terminal Ileitis
Appendicitis
Small-Bowel Diseases
Tumors of the Small...
Colitis
Diverticulitis
Colonic Carcinoma
Intussusception
Conclusion
APPENDIX 1: Differential...
APPENDIX 2: Differential...
References
 

  1. Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC, Lewis FR. Acute appendicitis: high-resolution real-time US findings. Radiology 1987;163:11-14[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Puylaert JB, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI, et al. A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Engl J Med 1987;317:666-669[Abstract]
  3. Pradel JA, David XR, Taourel P, Djafari M, Veyrac M, Bruel JM. Sonographic assessment of the normal and abnormal bowel wall in nondiverticular ileitis and colitis. Abdom Imaging 1997;2:167-172
  4. Hata J, Haruma K, Suenaga K, et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:443-447[Medline]
  5. Pradel JA, Adell JF, Taourel P, Djafari M, Monnin DE, Bruel JM. Acute colonic diverticulitis: prospective comparative evaluation with US and CT. Radiology 1997;205:503-512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Fleischer AC, Muhletaler CA, James AE Jr. Sonographic assessment of the bowel wall. AJR 1981;136:887-891[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. DiCandio G, Mosca F, Campatelli A, Bianchini M, D'Elia F, Dellagiovampaola C. Sonographic detection of postsurgical recurrence of Crohn disease. AJR 1986;146:523-526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Sarrazin J, Wilson SR. Manifestations of Crohn disease at US. RadioGraphics 1996;16:499-520[Abstract]
  9. Maconi G, Parente F, Bollani S, Cesana B, Bianchi PG. Abdominal ultrasound in the assessment of extent and activity of Crohn's disease: clinical significance and implication of bowel wall thickening. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:1604-1609[Medline]
  10. Brignola C, Belloli C, Iannone P, et al. Comparison of scintigraphy with indium-111 leukocyte scan and ultrasonography in assessment of X-ray-demonstrated lesions of Crohn's disease. Dig Dis Sci 1993;38:433-437[Medline]
  11. Arienti V, Campieri M, Boriani L, et al. Management of severe ulcerative colitis with the help of high resolution ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:2163-2169[Medline]
  12. Sonnenberg A, Erckenbrecht J, Peter P, Niederau C. Detection of Crohn's disease by ultrasound. Gastroenterology 1982;83:430-434[Medline]
  13. Lim JH, Ko YT, Lee DH, Lim JW, Kim TH. Sonography of inflammatory bowel disease: findings and value in differential diagnosis. AJR 1994;163:343-347[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Worlicek H, Lutz H, Heyder N, Matek W. Ultrasound findings in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: a prospective study. J Clin Ultrasound 1987;15:153-163[Medline]
  15. Bozkurt T, Richter F, Lux G. Ultrasonography as a primary diagnostic tool in patients with inflammatory disease and tumors of the small intestine and large bowel. J Clin Ultrasound 1994;22:85-91[Medline]
  16. Hata J, Haruma K, Yamanaka H, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the bowel wall in inflammatory bowel disease: comparison of in vivo and in vitro studies. Abdom Imaging 1994;19:395-399[Medline]
  17. Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Pantongrag-Brown L, Buck JL, Herlinger H. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract: radiographic findings. AJR 1997;168:165-172[Free Full Text]
  18. Georg C, Schwerk WB, Georg K. Gastointestinal lymphoma: sonographic findings in 54 patients. AJR 1990;155:795-798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Sener RN, Alper H, Demirci A, Diren HB. A different sonographic "pseudokidney" appearance detected with intestinal lymphoma: "hydronephrotic-pseudokidney." J Clin Ultrasound 1989;17:209-212[Medline]
  20. Dorak AC, Alp E, Deviren MU. Hydronephrotic pseudokidney sign: is it specific for intestinal lymphoma? J Clin Ultrasound 1991;19:561-563[Medline]
  21. Akhan O, Haliloglu M, Ozmen M. Diagnosis of enterobehcet's disease from a pseudo-kidney appearance in ultrasonography (letter). J Clin Ultrasound 1991;19:451-452[Medline]
  22. Smith C, Kubicka RA, Thomas CR Jr. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract. RadioGraphics 1992;12:887-899[Abstract]
  23. Rubesin SE, Gilchrist AM, Bronner M, et al. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma of the small intestine. RadioGraphics 1990;10:985-998[Abstract]
  24. Puylaert JB, Van der Zant FM, Mutsaers JA. Infectious ileocecitis caused by Yersinia, Campylobacter, and Salmonella: clinical, radiological and US findings. Eur Radiol 1997;7:3-9[Medline]
  25. Puylaert JB. Mesenteric adenitis and acute terminal ileitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 1986;161:691-695[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Quillin SP, Siegel MJ. Appendicitis in children: color Doppler sonography. Radiology 1992;184:745-747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Lee DH, Ko YT, Yoon Y, Lim JH. Sonographic findings of intestinal tuberculosis. J Ultrasound Med 1993;12:537-540[Abstract]
  28. Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, Megibow AJ, Roshkow J, Gray C. Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 1994;190:31-35[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 1998;338:141-146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Balthazar EJ, Rofsky NM, Zucker R. Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:768-771[Medline]
  31. Yacoe ME, Jeffrey RB Jr. Sonography of appendicitis and diverticulitis. Radiol Clin North Am 1994;32:899-912[Medline]
  32. Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC, Townsend RR. Acute appendicitis: sonographic criteria based on 250 cases. Radiology 1988;167:327-329[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Jeffrey RB, Jain KA, Nghiem HV. Sonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis: interpretive pitfalls. AJR 1994;162:55-59[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Lim HK, Lee WJ, Kim TH, Namgung S, Lee SJ, Lim JH. Appendicitis: usefulness of color Doppler US. Radiology 1996;201:221-225[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Quillin SP, Siegel MJ, Coffin CM. Acute appendicitis in children: value of sonography in detecting perforation. AJR 1992;159:1265-1268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Jasinski RW, Glazer GM, Francis IR, Harkness RL. CT and ultrasound in abscess detection at specific anatomic sites: a study of 198 patients. Comput Radiol 1987;11:41-47[Medline]
  37. Clautice ET, Jeffrey RB Jr, Li KC, Barth RA. Power Doppler imaging of focal lesions of the gastrointestinal tract: comparison with conventional color Doppler imaging. J Ultrasound Med 1996;15:63-66[Abstract]
  38. Siegel MJ, Friedland JA, Hildebolt CF. Bowel wall thickening in children: differentiation with US. Radiology 1997;203:631-635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Lee TG, Brickman FE, Avecilla LS. Ultrasound diagnosis of intramural intestinal hematoma. J Clin Ultrasound 1977;5:423-424[Medline]
  40. Chau WK, Na AT, Loh IW, Chang CW, Wong KB. Real-time ultrasound diagnosis of intramural intestinal hematoma. J Clin Ultrasound 1989;17:382-384[Medline]
  41. Ectors N, Geboes K, Kerremans R, Desmet V, Janssens J. Small bowel amyloidosis, pathology and diagnosis. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 1992;55:228-238[Medline]
  42. Shirahama M, Morita S, Koga T, et al. Gastrointestinal amyloidosis associated with multiple myeloma: sonographic features. J Clin Ultrasound 1991;19:493-497[Medline]
  43. Whitby EH, Peck RJ. Case report: ultrasound of primary generalised AL amyloid of the small bowel. Clin Radiol 1996;51:447-448[Medline]
  44. Tuncali K, Erzen C, Gurmen N, Tuzuner N, Ulusoy NB. Eosinophilic gastroenteropathy: ultrasonographic features and the role of ultrasonography in follow-up. J Clin Ultrasound 1992;20:475-478[Medline]
  45. Seelen JL, You PH, de VA, Puylaert JB. Eosinophilic enteritis presenting as acute abdomen: US features of two cases. Gastrointest Radiol 1992;17:19-20[Medline]
  46. Dorne HL, Jequier S. Sonography of intestinal lymphangiectasia. J Ultrasound Med 1986;5:13-16[Abstract]
  47. Maya MM, Friedwald J. Intestinal lymphangiectasia: ultrasound evaluation of a case simulating appendicitis. Abdom Imaging 1993;18:27-28[Medline]
  48. Peck RJ, Jackson A, Gleeson D. Case report: ultrasound of coeliac disease with demonstration of response to treatment. Clin Radiol 1997;52:244-245[Medline]
  49. Bruggemann A, Burchardt H, Lepsien G. Sonographical findings in Whipple's disease: a case report with regard to the literature. Surg Endosc 1992;6:138-140[Medline]
  50. Carroccio A, Soresi M, Montalto G, et al. Whipple's disease: a non-invasive approach for suspected diagnosis—case report. Ital J Gastroenterol 1996;28:229-231[Medline]
  51. Shirahama M, Koga T, Ishibashi H, Uchida S, Ohta Y, Shimoda Y. Intestinal anisakiasis: US in diagnosis. Radiology 1992;185:789-793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Ashley SW, Wells SA. Tumors of the small intestine. Semin Oncol 1988;15:116-128[Medline]
  53. Moertel CG. Karnofsky memorial lecture: an odyssey in the land of small tumors. J Clin Oncol 1987;5:1502-1522[Free Full Text]
  54. Rioux M, Langis P, Naud F. Sonographic appearance of primary small bowel carcinoid tumor. Abdom Imaging 1995;20:37-43[Medline]
  55. Rioux M, Duchesne N, Langis P. Carcinoid tumor of the appendix: ultrasound findings in two cases. J Clin Ultrasound 1994;22:129-133[Medline]
  56. Taylor AJ, Stewart ET, Dodds WJ. Gastrointestinal lipomas: a radiologic and pathologic review. AJR 1990;155:1205-1210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Urbano J, Serantes A, Hernandez L, Turegano F. Lipoma-induced jejunojejunal intussusception: US and CT diagnosis. Abdom Imaging 1996;21:522-524[Medline]
  58. Bin W, Jianguo L, Baowei D. The sonographic appearances of small bowel tumors. Clin Radiol 1992;46:30-33[Medline]
  59. Bozkurt T, Butsch B, Schmiegelow P, Lux G. Ultrasound imaging of mesenchymal small intestine tumors in diagnosis of unexplained gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Ultraschall Med 1993;14:264-268[Medline]
  60. Ko YT, Lim JH, Lee DH, Lee HW, Lim JW. Small bowel obstruction: sonographic evaluation. Radiology 1993;188:649-653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Downey DB, Wilson SR. Pseudomembranous colitis: sonographic features. Radiology 1991;180:61-64[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Truong M, Atri M, Bret PM, et al. Sonographic appearance of benign and malignant conditions of the colon. AJR 1998;170:1451-1455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Teefey SA, Roarke MC, Brink JA, et al. Bowel wall thickening: differentiation of inflammation from ischemia with color Doppler and duplex US. Radiology 1996;198:547-551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Matsumoto T, Iida M, Matsui T, et al. Ultrasonic and CT findings in penicillin-induced nonpseudomembranous colitis. Gastrointest Radiol 1990;15:329-332[Medline]
  65. Suarez B, Kalifa G, Adamsbaum C, Saint MC, Barbotin LF. Sonographic diagnosis and follow-up of diffuse neutropenic colitis: case report of a child treated for osteogenic sarcoma. Pediatr Radiol 1995;25:373-374[Medline]
  66. Mathis G, Metzler J. Sonography in Salmonella enterocolitis. Ultraschall Med 1992;13:106-109[Medline]
  67. Hussain S, Dinshaw H. Ultrasonography in amebic colitis. J Ultrasound Med 1990;9:385-388[Abstract]
  68. Wada M, Kikuchi Y, Doy M. Uncomplicated acute diverticulitis of the cecum and ascending colon: sonographic findings in 18 patients. AJR 1990;155:283-287[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Wilson SR, Toi A. The value of sonography in the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis of the colon. AJR 1990;154:1199-1202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Zielke A, Hasse C, Nies C, et al. Prospective evaluation of ultrasonography in acute colonic diverticulitis. Br J Surg 1997;84:385-388[Medline]
  71. Schwerk WB, Schwarz S, Rothmund M. Sonography in acute colonic diverticulitis: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:1077-1084[Medline]
  72. Schwerk W, Braun B, Dombrowski H. Real-time ultrasound examination in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal tumors. J Clin Ultrasound 1979;7:425-431[Medline]
  73. Bluth EI, Merritt CR, Sullivan MA. Ultrasonic evaluation of the stomach, small bowel, and colon. Radiology 1979;133:677-680[Abstract]
  74. Price J, Metreweli C. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of clinically non-palpable primary colonic neoplasms. Br J Radiol 1988;61:190-195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Lim JH. Colorectal cancer: sonographic findings. AJR 1996;167:45-47[Free Full Text]
  76. Lim JH, Ko YT, Lee DH, Lee HW, Lim JW. Determining the site and causes of colonic obstruction with sonography. AJR 1994;163:1113-1117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Shirahama M, Koga T, Ishibashi H, Uchida S, Ohta Y. Sonographic features of colon carcinoma seen with high-frequency transabdominal ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 1994;22:359-365[Medline]
  78. Weilbaecher D, Bolin JA, Hearn D, Ogden W. Intussusception in adults: review of 160 cases. Am J Surg 1971;121:531-535[Medline]
  79. Prater JM, Olshemski FC. Adult intussusception. Am Fam Physician 1993;47:447-452[Medline]
  80. Kojima Y, Tsuchiyama T, Niimoto S, Nakagawara G. Adult intussusception caused by cecal cancer and diagnosed preoperatively by ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound 1992;20:360-363[Medline]
  81. Weissberg DL, Scheible W, Leopold GR. Ultrasonographic appearance of adult intussusception. Radiology 1977;124:791-792[Abstract]
  82. Holt S, Samuel E. Multiple concentric ring sign in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of intussusception. Gastrointest Radiol 1978;3:307-309[Medline]
  83. Del Pozzo G, Albillos JC, Tejedor D. Intussusception: US findings with pathologic correlation—the crescent-in-doughnut sign. Radiology 1996;199:688-692[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  84. Rapaccini GL, Grattagliano A. Echographic diagnosis of bowel intussusception. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:2143-2144

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. W. Lee, Y. J. Kim, H. J. Jeon, S. W. Park, S. I. Jung, and J. G. Yi
Sonography of Acute Right Lower Quadrant Pain: Importance of Increased Intraabdominal Fat Echo
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2009; 192(1): 174 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N H Park, C S Park, E J Lee, M S Kim, J A Ryu, J M Bae, and J S Song
Ultrasonographic findings identifying the faecal-impacted appendix: differential findings with acute appendicitis
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 872 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L. Tarantino, V. Nocera, M. Perrotta, G. Balsamo, A. Schiano, P. Orabona, I. F. M. Sordelli, C. Ripa, D. Parmeggiani, and P. Sperlongano
Primary Small-Bowel Melanoma: Color Doppler Ultrasonographic, Computed Tomographic, and Radiologic Findings With Pathologic Correlations
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2007; 26(1): 121 - 127.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
T. Hamada, M. Tanaka, Y. Hashimoto, M. Yamauchi, N. Shigeoka, K. Nakai, and K. Suenaga
Contrast-enhanced sonographic findings of gangrenous meckel diverticulitis.
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2006; 25(9): 1227 - 1231.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E M Danse, J Jamart, P Hoang, P F Laterre, A Kartheuser, and B E Van Beers
Focal bowel wall changes detected with colour Doppler ultrasound: diagnostic value in acute non-diverticular diseases of the colon
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2004; 77(923): 917 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. E. O'Malley and S. R. Wilson
US of Gastrointestinal Tract Abnormalities with CT Correlation
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2003; 23(1): 59 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. P. Ledermann, C. Binkert, E. Fröhlich, N. Börner, C. Zollikofer, and G. Stuckmann
Diagnosis of Symptomatic Intestinal Metastases Using Transabdominal Sonography and Sonographically Guided Puncture
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2001; 176(1): 155 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ledermann, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Stuckmann, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ledermann, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Stuckmann, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS