AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caoili, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bowie, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caoili, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bowie, J. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 174:97-101
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Refractory Shadowing from Pelvic Masses on Sonography

A Useful Diagnostic Sign for Uterine Leiomyomas

Elaine M. Caoili1,2, Barbara S. Hertzberg1, Mark A. Kliewer1, David DeLong1 and James D. Bowie1

1 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.

Received May 7, 1999; accepted after revision June 23, 1999.

 
Address correspondence to E. M. Caoili.

2 Present address: Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Rm. TC-2910, Ann Arbor, Ml 48109-0326


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to determine the diagnostic usefulness of sonography for revealing a recurrent acoustic shadowing pattern when imaging for possible uterine leiomyoma.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. During an 18-month period, all pelvic masses discovered on sonography were prospectively examined for recurrent refractory shadows. Sonograms of 222 masses with a definitive final diagnosis were reviewed by two radiologists unaware of the follow-up results. Each mass was analyzed for the presence of three or more recurrent refractory shadows, each of which did not arise from an echogenic lead point. After all masses were rated independently, a consensus rating was reached for any discrepancy between observers.

RESULTS. Of the 222 masses, 152 (68%) were leiomyomas. The remainder resulted from a wide variety of other uterine and adnexal disorders. Agreement between the two observers regarding refractory shadows was excellent. Kappa coefficients were 0.86 at transabdominal and 0.96 at transvaginal approaches. Sensitivity of the refractory shadow pattern for leiomyomas was higher for transvaginal (87%) than for transabdominal (52%) sonography. Specificity of the refractory shadow pattern was 89% for transvaginal and 92% for transabdominal sonography. Using logistic regression analysis, we found a statistically significant association between a refractory shadowing pattern and leiomyoma for both transabdominal and transvaginal sonography (p << 0.001).

CONCLUSION. Recurrent refractory shadowing in a pelvic mass on sonography is highly suggestive of leiomyoma and can be a useful diagnostic clue for distinguishing leiomyomas from other pelvic masses.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Sonography plays an important role in identifying and distinguishing uterine leiomyomas from other pelvic masses. Solid leiomyomas located in the uterine body are usually easily identified and diagnosed, but exophytic or pedunculated leiomyomas can mimic adnexal or other pelvic disorders and can be misdiagnosed. Variability in the echo pattern of leiomyomas caused by cystic, fatty, hemorrhagic, or calcific degeneration further complicates the sonographic diagnosis and highlights the need for distinctive sonographic features.

Recently, a distinctive pattern of shadowing in which multiple discrete shadows originate from within the mass was described with leiomyomas [1]. Histopathologic correlation revealed that the shadows originated from transition points in the mass corresponding to edges between smooth muscle whorls and boundaries between smooth muscle and fibrous connective tissue. However, the sensitivity and specificity of this finding for the diagnosis of leiomyomas is not known. The goal of this study was to determine the diagnostic usefulness of this sonographic pattern in distinguishing leiomyomas from other pelvic masses.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
From February 1996 to July 1997, all pelvic masses discovered in women on sonography at our institution were prospectively examined for recurrent refractory shadows. Simple ovarian cysts measuring 2.5 cm or less were presumed to represent follicles and were excluded from this analysis. A total of 301 patients with masses were examined. An attempt was made to obtain follow-up for all patients with a pelvic mass. The final study group constituted those masses with a definitive final diagnosis: histopathologic proof, conclusive surgical correlation, or resolution of the mass on a subsequent sonographic examination. Masses that resolved on follow-up sonographic examinations were presumed to represent physiologic cysts. A total of 222 masses in 108 patients who were 21-89 years old (mean, 41 years) constituted the final study group.

Sonographic evaluation included both transabdominal and transvaginal sonography for 127 masses, only transabdominal imaging for 66 masses, and only transvaginal imaging for 29 masses. Transabdominal sonography was performed with electronically focused sector, vector, or curvilinear transducers ranging in frequency from 2.0 to 5.0 MHz, and transvaginal sonography with 5.0- or 7.0-MHz electronically focused transvaginal transducers (128 XP, Acuson, Mountain View, CA; and ATL 3000 and 5000, Advanced Technology Laboratories, Bothell, WA). Scanning frequencies were selected to optimize imaging of the masses. In each case a concerted effort was made to obtain images showing the maximum number of shadows per scan plane from both the transabdominal and transvaginal perspectives.

Sonograms were reviewed by two radiologists experienced in sonography who were unaware of the final diagnosis. The size of the mass and the transducer frequency were recorded. In cases in which a broadband frequency transducer (ATL 3000 and 5000) was used, the average frequency was recorded. In addition, the location of each mass in relation to the uterus was evaluated. Masses were categorized as intrauterine if the mass was clearly confined to the uterine contour; extrauterine if the mass was separate from the uterus; and indeterminate if its location could not be definitively categorized. The radiologists independently rated each mass for the presence or absence of shadows at each imaging approach used (transabdominal or transvaginal). The presence of three or more well-defined shadows originating from within a mass was defined as the "recurrent shadowing pattern" (Figs. 1 and 2). Shadows originating from echogenic lead points were not considered because they were presumed to arise from calcifications. For patients with multiple masses, the largest three masses seen at each scanning approach were assessed. When the initial ratings of the two reviewers were discrepant, the images were re-reviewed by the two reviewers together, and a consensus decision regarding the presence or absence of the shadowing pattern was reached.



View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 .—35-year-old woman with irregular bleeding. Axial transabdominal sonogram shows uterine leiomyoma (cursors) with recurrent shadowing pattern (arrows).

 


View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. —47-year-old woman with uterine enlargement. Transvaginal sonogram shows uterine leiomyoma with recurrent shadowing (arrows).

 

Data were analyzed separately for masses seen on transabdominal sonography and masses seen on transvaginal sonography. Additional data analysis was performed for the subgroup of masses in which a mass seen on transabdominal sonography could be confidently established as the same mass on transvaginal sonography. Because many of the patients had more than one mass, statistical analysis used generalized estimating equations to account for this clustering of masses. The presence or absence of the shadowing pattern was compared with the final diagnosis. Agreement between reviewers was measured with Cohen's kappa statistic. For cases with discrepant readings between the two reviewers, the consensus ratings were used for the calculations of sensitivity and specificity of the shadowing pattern for leiomyomas. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the strength of the association between the recurrent shadowing pattern and leiomyoma at each scanning perspective and to assess the effects of mass size and transducer frequency on the production of such shadows. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The final study group consisted of 222 pelvic masses in 108 women. Follow-up consisted of pathologic proof (195 masses), surgical examination (16 masses), or resolution on subsequent sonographic examination (11 masses). Of the 222 masses evaluated, 152 (68%) were subsequently proven to be leiomyomas. Of the remaining 70 nonleiomyomas (32%), a number of clinical entities were evaluated, including physiologic ovarian cyst (9.4%), endometrioma (5.4%), ovarian neoplasm (4.4%), and dermoid cyst (3.6%).

Using logistic regression analysis, a statistically significant association was noted between the refractory shadowing pattern and leiomyoma (p << 0.001) for both transabdominal and transvaginal sonography. Table 1 summarizes the relative occurrence of shadowing in leiomyomas and other masses. Using these data, sensitivity was 52% for transabdominal and 87% for transvaginal sonography. Specificity was 92% for transabdominal sonography and 89% for transvaginal sonography. The final diagnoses for all masses that exhibited the recurrent shadowing pattern are shown in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Recurrent Shadowing Pattern Revealed on Transabdominal and Transvaginal Sonography
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Final Diagnosis for Masses in Which Sonography Revealed Recurrent Shadowing Pattern
 

One hundred twenty-seven masses imaged from both transabdominal and transvaginal perspectives could be unambiguously correlated between the two sets of images. Seventy-three (57%) of these masses were leiomyomas. Forty-one leiomyomas exhibited the shadowing pattern on transvaginal but not on transabdominal sonography. None of the leiomyomas showed the pattern on transabdominal sonography that did not also show the pattern on transvaginal sonography. The sensitivity and specificity for recurrent shadowing seen on transabdominal and transvaginal imaging were 92% and 90%, respectively.

Agreement between the two independent reviewers for interpreting the presence or absence of recurrent shadows was excellent, with kappa coefficients of 0.86 (transabdominal) and 0.96 (transvaginal). Discrepancy in interpreting the presence of shadows between the reviewers occurred in only 17 (8%) of 222 masses. Interpretive discrepancies between the reviewers were more common with transabdominal (n = 14) than transvaginal sonography (n = 3) Discrepant ratings occurred with leiomyomas (n = 13), adenomyosis (n = 2), gastric metastasis to the ovary (n = 1), and a pelvic abscess (n = 1). All leiomyomas that had initial discrepant ratings between reviewers occurred in patients with multiple pelvic masses.

On transabdominal sonography, the mean size of leiomyomas that showed the shadowing pattern was 5.8 cm, whereas the mean size for leiomyomas without the pattern was 3.9 cm. On transvaginal sonography, leiomyomas that showed the shadowing pattern averaged 4.5 cm, and those that did not averaged 1.7 cm. Logistic regression analysis showed a statistically significant association between larger leiomyoma size and the recurrent shadowing pattern on transabdominal (p = 0.0001) and on transvaginal (p = 0.0001) sonography. The relationship is shown in Table 3, which shows an increase in the percentage of leiomyomas exhibiting the recurrent shadowing pattern with increasing leiomyoma size.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 Relationship Between Size of Leiomyoma and Shadowing Pattern as Revealed on Sonography
 

Of the 130 leiomyomas detected on transabdominal sonography, 94 (72%) were intrauterine, 20 (15%) were indeterminate, and 16 (12%) appeared extrauterine. The sensitivity of intrauterine location for leiomyoma on transabdominal sonography was 72% and the specificity was 89%. Recurrent shadowing was seen in 16 (44%) of 36 leiomyomas that were indeterminate or extrauterine in location on transabdominal sonography. Of the 95 leiomyomas evaluated on transvaginal sonography, 67 (71%) were intrauterine, 16 (17%) were indeterminate, and 12 (13%) appeared extrauterine. Sensitivity of intrauterine location for leiomyoma on transvaginal sonography was 70% and specificity was 90%. Recurrent shadowing was seen in 25 (89%) of 28 leiomyomas that were indeterminate or extrauterine on transvaginal sonography (Fig. 3).



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. —42-year-old woman with right-sided adnexal fullness. Axial transvaginal sonogram shows exophytic leiomyoma (cursors and arrows) with recurrent shadowing that mimics a right-sided adnexal mass. u = uterus.

 

On transabdominal sonography, the range of transducer frequencies varied from 2.0 to 5.0 MHz: 2.0 MHz (n =3), 2.5 MHz (n = 15), 3.0 MHz (n =5), 3.5 MHz (n = 12), 4.0 MHz (n = 29), 4.5 MHz (n = 0), and 5.0 MHz (n = 3). Transvaginal transducer frequency ranged from 5 to 7 MHz: 5.0 MHz (n = 80), and 7.0 MHz (n = 2). No significant relationship was noted between higher frequency transducers and the shadowing pattern on transabdominal sonography (p = 0.3859) or on transvaginal sonography (p = 0.1753).


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Leiomyomas are the most common gynecologic tumor, occurring in 20-40% of women [2,3,4]. Leiomyomas can present as a myriad of sonographic appearances [5,6, 7, 8]. Exophytic or pedunculated leiomyomas can have obscure origins, and degenerated leiomyomas can have confounding appearances. Such varied sonographic presentations may lead to diagnostic confusion with, if not frank misdiagnosis of, these common pelvic masses [9, 10, 11, 12]. The identification of reliable sonographic features of leiomyomas might facilitate the diagnosis in atypical cases.

A pattern of discrete recurrent sonographic shadowing was recently described with leiomyomas [1]. Pathologic correlation showed these shadows originate from transitional zones between the margins of smooth muscle whorls and the margins of fibrous connective tissue within the leiomyoma. The ultrasound beam is presumably refracted or distorted when it encounters different tissue types or curved surfaces. Although this pattern is frequently exhibited by leiomyomas, its diagnostic usefulness has not been previously studied. Particularly, the sensitivity and specificity of recurrent shadowing, and the ease of applying this finding in clinical use, has not yet been described to our knowledge.

This investigation shows that the recurrent shadowing pattern is highly associated with leiomyomas and that the pattern can be recognized with high interobserver correlation. A pelvic mass that exhibits this pattern has a high likelihood of being a leiomyoma. Recurrent shadowing can be particularly helpful in suggesting the possibility of leiomyoma in the setting of an exophytic or pedunculated lesion that otherwise might be confused with an adnexal mass. However, we found the absence of the shadowing pattern does not exclude the diagnosis of leiomyoma.

Although the shadowing pattern suggests the diagnosis of leiomyoma, it is not unique to leiomyomas. Recurrent shadowing was occasionally observed in a small number of other disorders including leiomyosarcoma, ovarian fibroma, ovarian metastasis, adenomyosis, and pelvic abscess (Fig. 4). In each of these cases, the underlying histopathology of the lesion suggests the cause of the shadowing pattern. For example, a leiomyosarcoma contains multiple swirling masses of smooth muscle cells producing multiple transition points [13]. Similarly, an ovarian fibroma consists of dense collagenous bundles of fibrous tissue [13], and the interfaces between these bundles could create the refractory shadows. Transition zones may also be found in the conglomerations of carcinomatous cells in metastasis to the ovary and in peritoneal deposits of ovarian carcinoma [13]. Interfaces between ectopic glandular tissue and the surrounding myometrium may produce the recurrent shadowing pattern in cases of adenomyosis [13]. Distinguishing between leiomyoma and other disorders that occasionally produce the shadowing pattern will not always be possible. In these cases, ancillary sonographic features could be helpful in making this distinction. For example, adenomyosis should be suspected when it is difficult to define the margins of the mass and if small myometrial cysts are seen [14, 15, 16]. Alternatively, leiomyosarcoma is notoriously difficult to distinguish from leiomyoma unless evidence of local invasion or metastasis is seen [3].



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. —55-year-old woman with persistent right adnexal mass. Transvaginal sonogram shows ovarian fibroma with recurrent shadowing.

 

Interobserver disagreement regarding the presence of recurrent shadows was infrequent but was more likely to occur with transabdominal imaging and when several leiomyomas were clustered together. The presence of additional masses made it difficult to unambiguously attribute particular shadows to particular masses. Additionally, the boundaries of any one mass were often difficult to define in a heterogeneous echo texture produced by contiguous shadowing masses.

The shadowing pattern is more commonly seen on transvaginal imaging, possibly because the mass is insonated in close proximity and with greater resolution using higher frequency probes than those used for transabdominal sonography. This said, no significant association between the shadowing pattern and transducer frequency was found when the effect of different probe frequencies was evaluated for the transabdominal and transvaginal shadows separately. In part, the lack of association may be a result of the small number of masses imaged using some of the probe frequencies in each group.

The larger the leiomyoma, the more likely the recurrent shadowing pattern will be evident on both transabdominal and transvaginal sonography, probably because of the greater abundance, density, and number of discrete shadows originating from the larger tumors. Smaller leiomyomas may have similar shadows that cannot be seen with current sonographic equipment, and therefore the recurrent shadowing pattern is less likely to be helpful in smaller masses.

The high prevalence of leiomyomas in our study reflects the high prevalence of leiomyomas in clinical practice. Despite this preponderance of leiomyomas in the study group, statistical analysis clearly shows the strong association of refractory shadowing with the diagnosis of leiomyomas (p << 0.001). In clinical practice, the diagnosis of leiomyomas will depend on several sonographic features, not least of which will be the location of the mass. Most leiomyomas are intrauterine, and most intrauterine masses are leiomyomas [17]. Conceding this, refractory shadows evident with transvaginal imaging signaled the diagnosis of 25 (89%) of 28 extrauterine leiomyomas that were otherwise nonspecific in appearance (Fig. 3).

In summary, we have shown that a pattern of sharp, discrete, recurring shadows is typical of leiomyomas and can be recognized with excellent interobserver agreement. Although a similar pattern can occasionally be produced by a small number of other pelvic masses, this pattern can provide useful corroborative evidence for leiomyomas in cases of diagnostic ambiguity.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank Susan Murray for assistance with manuscript preparation.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Kliewer MA, Hertzberg BS, George PY, McDonald JW, Bowie JD, Carroll BA. Acoustic shadowing from uterine leiomyomas: sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 196 :99-102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hall DA, Yoder IC. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterus. In: Callen PW, ed. Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1994:586-614
  3. Fried AF, Cosgrove DO. Uterine masses. In: Goldberg BB, ed. Textbook of abdominal ultrasound. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1993:458-461
  4. Mayer DP, Shiplov MS. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging of uterine fibroids. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1995;22:667-725[Medline]
  5. Gross BH, Silver TM, Jaffe MH. Sonographic features of uterine leiomyomas: analysis of 41 proven cases. J Ultrasound Med 1983;2:401-406[Abstract]
  6. Karasick S, Lev-Toaff AS, Toaff ME. Imaging of uterine leiomyomas. AJR 1992;158:799-805[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Fried AM, Kenney CM, Stigers KB, Kacki MH, Buckley SL. Benign pelvic masses: sonographic spectrum. RadioGraphics 1996;16:321-334[Abstract]
  8. Mendelsohn EB, Böhm-Vélez M, Neiman HL, Russo J. Transvaginal sonography in gynecologic imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1988;9:102-121[Medline]
  9. Baltarowich OH, Kurtz AB, Pennell RG, Needleman L, Vilaro MM, Goldberg BB. Pitfalls in the sonographic diagnosis of uterine fibroids. AJR 1988;151:725-728[Free Full Text]
  10. Borgenstein RL, Shaw JJ, Pearson RH. Uterine leiomyomata: sonographic mimicry. Br J Radiol 1989;62:1019-1021[Medline]
  11. Lande IM, Hill MC, Cosco FE, Kator NN. Adnexal and cul-de-sac abnormalities: transvaginal sonography. Radiology 1988;166:325-332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Levine CD, Patel UJ, Ghanekar D, Wachsberg RH, Simmons MZ, Stein M. Benign extraovarian mimics of ovarian cancer: distinction with imaging studies. Clin Imaging 1997;21:350-358[Medline]
  13. Prat J. Female genitalia. In: Kissane JM, ed. Anderson's pathology. St. Louis: Mosby, 1990:1663-1691
  14. Botsis D, Kassanos D, Antoniou G, Pyrgiotis E, Karakitsos P, Kalogirou D. Adenomyoma and leiomyoma: differential diagnosis with transvaginal sonography. J Clin Ultrasound 1998;26:21-25[Medline]
  15. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Zanotti F, Brioschi D, Carinelli S. Transvaginal ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of adenomyoma and leiomyoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:603-606[Medline]
  16. Reinhold C, Atri M, Henio A, et al. Diffuse uterine adenomyosis: morphologic criteria and diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal sonography. Radiology 1995;197:609-614[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Cramer SF, Patal A. The frequency of uterine leiomyomas. Am J Clin Pathol 1990;94:435-438[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Adusumilli, H. K. Hussain, E. M. Caoili, W. J. Weadock, J. P. Murray, T. D. Johnson, Q. Chen, and B. Desjardins
MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses.
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 732 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
D. L. Berridge and T. C. Winter
Saline Infusion Sonohysterography: Technique, Indications, and Imaging Findings
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2004; 23(1): 97 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caoili, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bowie, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caoili, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bowie, J. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS