AJR 2000; 174:425-426
© American Roentgen Ray Society
Lateral Access for CT-Guided Percutaneous Biopsy of the Lumbar Spine
Juan Garcés1 and
Galo Hidalgo2
1
Department of Radiology, Hospital Metropolitano, Av. Mariana de
Jesús y Occidental, Quito, Ecuador.
2
Department of Pathology, Hospital Metropolitano, Quito, Ecuador.
Received May 14, 1999;
accepted after revision July 9, 1999.
Address correspondence to J. Garcés.
Introduction
Current techniques for CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of the lumbar spine
[1,
2,
3,
4,
5] originate from the
paravertebral technique described by Walls et al. in 1948
[6] and from the transpedicular
technique described by Roy-Camille et al. in 1983
[7]; both techniques use a
posterior approach. Lateral decubitus abdominal CT shows the anterior
displacement of abdominal viscera, thereby providing a clear view of the
lateral aspect of the lumbar spine (Figs.
1A and
1B). Additionally, this view
provides a direct lateral approach to the lumbar spine. We describe a new and
possibly safer lateral access route for CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of the
lumbar spine.

View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1A. 18-year-old man with lytic lesion of L3. CT scan with patient in
prone position shows bowel viscera impeding lateral route of access to spine.
Only posterior approach is possible in this decubitus position.
|
|
Subjects and Methods
We studied 12 patients, nine male and three female, ranging in age from 17
to 82 years. All patients had lesions in the lumbar spine visible on CT.
Lesions were located in the following regions: two in L2, four in the L2-L3
disk, three in L3, one in the L3-L4 disk, and two in L4. Lesions included one
instance of vertebral collapse, three of lytic lesion, two of osteoblastic
lesion, and six of narrowing disk space. All patients complained of lumbar
pain. Three patients had known malignancies; three patients had lesions
suggestive of metastasis with no known primary site; three patients had fever
and leukocytosis; and four patients had lesions suggestive of degenerative
disk disease.
Examination before biopsy included complete blood count, erythrocyte
sedimentation rate, activated partial thromboplastin time, and prothrombin
time. Biopsies were performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus
position, eight on the right side and four on the left side.
A lateral scout view was taken and CT images were obtained. Next, we
selected the image in which the lesion was best seen and the anterior visceral
displacement was large enough to allow a lateral approach. The CT table was
moved to locate the selected site and a metal marker was placed on the lateral
abdominal wall. With this image on the CT scan monitor, we located the
puncture site and measured the distance between the skin and the target lesion
using a vertical line perpendicular to the lateral aspect of the vertebra
(Fig. 2A). Once the puncture
site was identified, CT-guided biopsy was performed with the patient under
local anesthesia (Fig. 2B).
Biopsies for osteoblastic lesions were performed using Ackerman needles
(Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) 14-gauge, 17.2 cm long. Biopsies for lytic
lesions were performed using the Ackerman needle and an 18-gauge, 20-cm-long
spinal needle. Sixteen core biopsy samples were sent for pathologic analysis,
eight aspiration biopsy samples for cytologic analysis, and five specimens for
culture and sensitivity analysis.
Results
We report 12 instances of CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of the lumbar spine
successfully performed using the lateral approach. Diagnoses included three
instances of malignancy, two of Staphylococcus infection, one of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, four of degenerative disk
disease, and two of no diagnosis. All patients complained of discomfort and
required analgesics after the procedure; we did not find evidence of bleeding,
neurologic deficit, or internal organ damage.
We performed follow-up examinations for 10 patients (from 6 to 12 months
after their biopsies). Patient outcomes were consistent with the pathologic
diagnosis. We did not find evidence of needle tract contamination by infection
or malignancy. Two patients were lost to follow-up.
Discussion
The literature describes two approaches for lumbar spine biopsy: the
paravertebral approach and the transpedicular approach. The paravertebral
route, initially performed under fluoroscopy
[6,
7,
8] and currently under CT
guidance [1,
2,
3], is a posterior approach. It
is performed with the patient in the prone position. The needle is introduced
a few centimeters lateral to the midline, using an oblique angle to avoid the
nerve roots, kidney, renal pedicle, and large vessels. The tract through which
the needle must be inserted is narrow and the angle of penetration is very
precise.
The CT-guided transpedicular approach
[4,
5] is limited to vertebral
lesions located immediately anterior to the pedicle; lesions of the
intervertebral disks cannot be reached using this route. Complications of this
technique occur when the medial or inferior walls of the pedicle are
punctured, resulting in spinal canal damage or nerve root injury. Also, if the
biopsy needle penetrates too deeply, it can puncture the aorta or inferior
vena cava [4].
Our lateral access route provides a wide field for needle insertion
allowing access to the lateral wall of the vertebral bodies and the
intervertebral disks. The perpendicular direction of the needle is easy to
maintain and the needle is a safe distance away from the nerve roots, kidneys,
renal pedicle, and large vessels. This approach should not be used if the
forward displacement of abdominal contents is too small for a safe
procedure.
There were no postprocedure complications in our study nor were infection
or tumor cells found in the needle tracks.
Our lateral approach is appropriate for lesions located in the vertebral
bodies, disks, and paravertebral areas. It should not be used for lesions of
the pedicles or vertebral arches.
In conclusion, our lateral access route provides a safe approach to lumbar
vertebrae and intervertebral disks. Use of this new route may decrease the
risk of accidental injury to nerves, vessels, or other structures.
References
-
Babu NV, Titus VT, Chittaranjan S, Abraham G, Prem H, Korulas RJ.
Computed tomographically guided biopsy of the spine. Spine
1994;19:2436-2442[Medline]
-
Ghelman B, Lospinuso MF, Levine DB, O'Leary PF, Burke SW.
Percutaneous computed tomography guided biopsy of the thoracic and lumbar
spine. Spine
1991;16:736-739[Medline]
-
Brugieres P, Revel MP, Dumas JL, Heran F, Voisin MC, Gaston A.
CT-guided vertebral biopsy: a report of 89 cases. J Neuroradiol
1991;18:351-359[Medline]
-
Stringham DR, Hadjipavlou A, Dzioba RB, Lander P. Percutaneous
transpedicular biopsy of the spine. Spine
1994;19:1985-1991[Medline]
-
Jelinek JS, Kransdorf MJ, Gray R, Aboulafia AJ, Malawer NM.
Percutaneous transpedicular biopsy of vertebral body lesions. Spine
1996;21:2035-2040[Medline]
-
Walls J, Ottolenghi CE, Schajowicz F. Aspiration biopsy in
diagnosis of lesions of vertebral bodies. JAMA
1948;136:376-382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mamoudy P. Biopsie du corps
vertébral par voie
postérieure
transpédiculaire. Rev Chir Orthop
Reparatrice Appar Mot
1983;69:147-149[Medline]
-
Siffert RS, Arkin AM. Trephine biopsy of bone with special
reference to the lumbar vertebral bodies. J Bone Joint Surg Am
1949;31-A:146-149[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. C. A. Michel, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, N. Boos, and J. Hodler
CT-Guided Core Biopsy of Subchondral Bone and Intervertebral Space in Suspected Spondylodiskitis.
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
April 1, 2006;
186(4):
977 - 980.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Lis, M. H. Bilsky, L. Pisinski, P. Boland, J. H. Healey, B. O'Malley, and G. Krol
Percutaneous CT-Guided Biopsy of Osseous Lesion of the Spine in Patients with Known or Suspected Malignancy
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.,
October 1, 2004;
25(9):
1583 - 1588.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|