AJR 2000; 174:539-540
© American Roentgen Ray Society
Sonographically Guided Clip Placement Facilitates Localization of Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Lisa F. Baron1,2,
Paul L. Baron2,3,
Susan J. Ackerman1,
David D. Durden1 and
Thomas Lee Pope, Jr.1
1
Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 169 Ashley
Ave., P. O. Box 250322, Charleston, SC 29425.
2
Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
29425.
3
Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
29425.
Received March 1, 1999;
accepted after revision July 20, 1999.
Address correspondence to L. F. Baron.
Introduction
Historically, the gold standard for treating large palpable breast cancer
has been mastectomy, chemotherapy, and occasionally radiation therapy.
However, data from Europe have shown that patients with palpable tumors can
benefit from preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy, thus enabling most to
undergo lumpectomy rather than mastectomy
[1,
2]. Recently, some patients
with palpable breast cancer are initially being offered neoadjuvant
chemotherapy before surgery to debulk the primary breast tumor. After
treatment, the primary tumor bed is surgically excised to verify tumor
response and to obtain clean margins before radiation therapy. However, a
problem faced by the surgeon in this setting is that the tumor frequently
responds so dramatically to preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy that it is
no longer palpable or visible on a mammogram. If the lesion is not visible on
the mammogram, it can be difficult to localize the tumor bed before definitive
breast conservation surgery. As a result, the surgeon can benefit from having
a needle localization wire placed to identify the prior tumor bed to ensure
the tumor's removal.
To address this issue, we devised a simple technique of placing a small
clip in the tumor and using sonography to localize and permanently document
the tumor site before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Stability of clip position
after core needle biopsy and accuracy as a guide for wire localization have
been established with stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies
[3,
4,
5]. When the tumor has a
complete response to the systemic treatment, the tumor bed can be easily
identified on a mammogram by using the clip to guide needle localization
before a standard needle localization-directed excision of the clip site.
Materials and Methods
Patients presenting with palpable breast cancer are referred for placement
of a clip either before receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or at the time of
the original breast biopsy. Patients are selected for this procedure when the
initial diagnosis of breast cancer is made with mammography, sonography, and
subsequent histologic confirmation. Tumor grade, hormone receptor status, and
other markers are established from the core biopsy. Clinical staging,
including palpable tumor size and lymph node status, is recorded. Further
evaluation may include diagnostic radiologic imaging and blood studies.
Eligible patients are then enrolled in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocol
approved by the hospital internal review committee.
Before beginning neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the patient is referred to the
mammography center for placement of the clip. Informed written consent is
obtained from the patient. The surgical tray is assembled in a sterile fashion
with the following items: gloves, sterile drape, scalpel, bandage
(Steri-Strip; 3M, St. Paul, MN), 11-gauge bone needle with an inner stylet
(Ackerman; Cook, Bloomington, IN), surgical clip (MicroMark; Biopsys Medical,
Irvine, CA,), and sterile gel (K-Y; Johnson & Johnson, Arlington, TX).
Before MicroMark clip deployment, the applicator is placed on the sterile
field and held gently against the tray. The plastic introducer housing the
clip is manually extended as far forward as possible. The plastic introducer
sleeve has an extended portion that does not overlap the clip and wire system.
This extended portion is carefully cut away with the scalpel to ensure that
the applicator wire and the clip are not cut. The stylet is removed from the
cannula. The applicator clip and wire assembly are fed through the inner
cannula until the clip extends 2 mm beyond the tip of the cannula. The plastic
introducer sleeve is marked where it meets the entrance hub of the cannula.
The clip applicator is gently removed from the inner cannula and placed back
on the sterile tray. The stylet is reinserted into the inner cannula.
The patient is positioned and the breast is prepared and draped. The
sonographic probe is fitted with the sterile probe cover. Sonographic guidance
with a 10-MHz transducer (Eccocee SSA-34A; Toshiba America Medical Systems,
Tustin, CA) locates the tumor and determines the center. If possible, the
dermatotomy is made directly over the center of the tumor because during
definitive tumor surgery, the surgeon may include the needle tract in the
lumpectomy specimen.
The 11-gauge needle and the inner stylet are inserted into the middle of
the tumor. The inner stylet is removed and the MicroMark clip applicator unit
is inserted through the needle. The clip is deployed when sonography shows
that the tip of the clip extends 2 mm past the tip of the outer cannula. The
needle and the applicator unit are pulled out and manual pressure is applied
to the site. The skin is cleaned with hydrogen peroxide and pressure is
maintained until all bleeding ceases. A bandage is placed over the
incision.?,?,?,?

View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1A. 38-year-old woman with 1.5-cm palpable mass at inferior aspect of
right breast found during breast feeding. Diagnostic mammogram shows vague
density corresponding to palpable lesion. Note BB marker denoting palpable
mass. Sonography (not shown) documented tumor.
|
|

View larger version (194K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1B. 38-year-old woman with 1.5-cm palpable mass at inferior aspect of
right breast found during breast feeding. Sonogram obtained after clip
deployment shows hyperechoic focus corresponding to clip.
|
|

View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1D. 38-year-old woman with 1.5-cm palpable mass at inferior aspect of
right breast found during breast feeding. Mammogram obtained after neoadjuvant
chemotherapy shows no evidence of tumor.
|
|

View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1E. 38-year-old woman with 1.5-cm palpable mass at inferior aspect of
right breast found during breast feeding. Specimen radiograph obtained after
lumpectomy shows wire and surgical clip (MicroMark; Biopsys Medical, Irvine,
CA). Pathology (not shown) found no residual cancer. SUP = superior, MED =
medial.
|
|
When the patient is ready, two-view film-screen mammography is performed
with craniocaudal and mediolateral projections. A mediolateral oblique
mammogram is obtained when the lesion is not visualized on the mediolateral
image because the needle localization is performed in the mediolateral
projection, rather than the mediolateral oblique projection. Clip placement is
now documented for subsequent definitive surgical treatment after neoadjuvant
chemotherapy (Fig. 1C).
Discussion
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery is allowing women to undergo breast
conservation surgery rather than mastectomy for the treatment of palpable
breast cancer [1]. Locating the
tumor for subsequent definitive breast cancer treatment can be problematic
when a dramatic or complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy occurs. We
describe an easy method of using sonography to guide a clip into the tumor
before chemotherapy and permanently document the tumor site. After
chemotherapy, the clip can be used as a marker to guide localization of the
tumor site at the time of definitive breast conservation surgery. This
technique may prove useful to other clinicians whose patients undergo
neoadjuvant chemotherapy before definitive breast conservation therapy.
References
-
Colleoni M, Nole F, Minchella I, et al. Pre-operative chemotherapy
and radiotherapy in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer
1998;34:641-645
-
Danforth DN Jr, Zujewski J, O'Shaughnessy J, et al. Selection of
local therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA, B
breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol
1998;5:150-158[Medline]
-
Burbank F, Forcier N. Tissue marking clip for stereotactic breast
biopsy: initial placement accuracy, long-term stability and usefulness as a
guide for wire localization. Radiology
1997;205:407-415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, et al. Clip placement after
stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology
1997;205:417-422[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fajardo LL, Bird RE, Herman CR, DeAngelis GA. Placement of
endovascular embolization microcoils to localize the site of breast lesions
removed at stereotactic core biopsy. Radiology
1998;206:275-278[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. L. Mercado, A. A. Guth, H. K. Toth, L. Moy, D. Axelrod, and J. Cangiarella
Sonographically Guided Marker Placement for Confirmation of Removal of Mammographically Occult Lesions After Localization
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
October 1, 2008;
191(4):
1216 - 1219.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Yeh, P. Slanetz, D. B. Kopans, E. Rafferty, D. Georgian-Smith, L. Moy, E. Halpern, R. Moore, I. Kuter, and A. Taghian
Prospective Comparison of Mammography, Sonography, and MRI in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Palpable Breast Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
March 1, 2005;
184(3):
868 - 877.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. W. Phillips, H. Gabriel, C. E. Comstock, and L. A. Venta
Sonographically Guided Metallic Clip Placement After Core Needle Biopsy of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
November 1, 2000;
175(5):
1353 - 1355.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|