AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruehm, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Debatin, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruehm, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Debatin, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 174:1127-1135
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Pelvic and Lower Extremity Arterial Imaging

Diagnostic Performance of Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography

Stefan G. Ruehm1,2, Thomas F. Hany1, Thomas Pfammatter1, Ernst Schneider3, Mark Ladd1,2 and Jörg F. Debatin1,2

1 Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
2 Present address: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
3 Institute of Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.

Received March 26, 1999; accepted after revision September 23, 1999.

 
Address correspondence to J. F. Debatin.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The diagnostic performance of a three-dimensional MR angiography—based strategy was assessed with regard to its ability to characterize the arterial vasculature from the aortic bifurcation to the lower extremity runoff vessels. A single-injection, two-station protocol in combination with a lower-extremity vascular coil was used.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Both conventional digital subtraction angiography and three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography with a dedicated peripheral vascular coil were performed in 61 patients with suspected peripheral vascular disease. In a prospective analysis, one reviewer evaluated the digital subtraction angiographic images and a second reviewer evaluated the MR angiographic images; both were unaware of the results of the other imaging technique. Each vascular segment (29 segments per patient) was evaluated for the presence of occlusive vessel disease. The following grading system was applied: 0, normal; 1, vessel irregularity with a luminal reduction of less than 10%; 2, mild stenosis (lumen reduction, 10-49%); 3, severe stenosis (lumen reduction, 50-99%); and 4, occlusion (lumen reduction, 100%). In 11 patients surgical graft patency was assessed.

RESULTS. MR angiography provided an image quality comparable with that of digital subtraction angiography. Overall sensitivity and specificity for MR angiography were 92% and 96.6%, respectively, for the detection of hemodynamically significant disease and 92.3% and 99.4%, respectively, for the detection of occlusions.

CONCLUSION. Two-station contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with a dedicated lower-extremity vascular coil proved effective enough to consider it as a noninvasive alternative to digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of the pelvic and lower extremity arterial vasculature.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Catheter-based digital subtraction angiography (DSA) remains the gold standard in the evaluation of peripheral vascular disease [1]. DSA is, however, invasive, expensive, and not without risk. Depending on the site of vascular access, the diameter of the catheter, and experience of the angiographer, minor and major complication rates ranging from 0.17% to 7% have been reported [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The impact of angiographic complications must be viewed in light of an aging population with an increasing number of patients affected by atherosclerotic occlusive disease who present for endoluminal treatment. A noninvasive alternative for accurate depiction of pelvic and runoff arteries is therefore desirable.

In recent years, we have seen the development and rapid clinical implementation of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography for the assessment of virtually all vascular territories [9,10,11,12,13,14]. This technique is based on the availability of high-performance gradient systems, capable of reducing data collection times sufficiently to acquire a three-dimensional image set during the intravascular phase of an IV-administered extracellular contrast agent. Subsequent parenchymal enhancement and contrast dose limitations initially curtailed use of the technique to the display of the vascular territory contained within a single 40- to 48-cm field of view. Concomitant assessment of the pelvic and runoff arteries, however, requires extended coverage of the arterial system from the aortic bifurcation to the distal runoff vessels.

The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of a three-dimensional MR angiographic strategy, one that combined use of a dedicated vascular coil with performance of a single-injection, two-station protocol, with regard to the assessment of the arterial vasculature from the aortic bifurcation to the distal trifurcation vessels in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Conventional DSA served as the standard of reference.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients
From January 1998 through July 1998, 61 patients, 41 men and 20 women, with an average age of 64 years (range, 41-83 years) were enrolled in our study. Inclusion of patients was based on fulfillment of the following criteria: a referral for conventional DSA for the assessment of either peripheral vascular disease (n = 50) or graft patency (n = 11); the ability and willingness to provide informed consent in accordance with regulations set forth by the institutional review board; a lack of contraindications to MR imaging such as pacemaker, claustrophobia, metallic foreign bodies, and pregnancy; and the availability of an MR system for the additional MR examination within 72 hr of the DSA examination.

MR Imaging
All MR imaging was performed on a 1.5-T system (Signa EchoSpeed; General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) equipped with a high-performance gradient system. Patients were wrapped in a multichannel quadrature-phased array peripheral vascular coil (Peripheral Vascular Array; Medical Advances, Milwaukee, WI) and were imaged in a supine position. The coil consists of four circular arrays and is used for signal reception. The flexible design of the coil allows bilateral vascular imaging in close proximity to the anatomy of interest resulting in high spatial and contrast resolution. Each element covers a territory of 24 cm (total coverage, 96 cm) and can be activated separately or in combination with one other element. The coil was placed to encompass the pelvic and runoff vasculature from the aortic bifurcation to the distal trifurcation vessels (Fig. 1). The first two coil elements covered the pelvis and thighs, and the second set covered the popliteal and trifurcation vessels.



View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. —Photograph shows volunteer wrapped in multichannel quadrature-phased array peripheral vascular coil (Medical Advances, Milwaukee, WI). Coil consists of four circular arrays. Flexible design of coil allows bilateral vascular imaging in close proximity to anatomy of interest. Each element covers territory of 24 cm (total coverage, 96 cm) and can be activated separately or in combination with one other element. Patients are placed in coil so that first two coil elements cover pelvis and thighs while second set covers popliteal artery and trifurcation vessels.

 

The imaging strategy was based on the acquisition of two three-dimensional data sets, each time using two adjacent coil elements extending more than 48 cm. To determine the anteroposterior offset of the two three-dimensional acquisition volumes, 12 10-mm axial two-dimensional time-of-flight images were acquired at 10-cm intervals through the pelvis, thighs, and lower limbs. Based on these images, the two three-dimensional acquisitions, each consisting of 48 contiguous sections, were prescribed. Section thickness was individually adapted to ensure coverage of the entire vascular territory and ranged between 2.4 and 2.8 mm. The applied three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence used the following parameters: TR/TE, 5.2/1.5; inversion time, 28 msec; and flip angle, 30°. A 48 x 36 x 12 cm field of view combined with a 256 x 192 x 48 matrix size rendered an in-plane spatial resolution of 1.8 x 1.8 x 2.4 mm. An interpolation scheme was applied (zero interpolation) with adding of extra zeroes to the K-space data in all three planes before the Fourier transformation. Thus, the pixel size was halved resulting in an improvement of the apparent resolution to 0.9 x 0.9 x 1.2 mm. With this technique, partial volume effects can be reduced by making the pixel size smaller. Each image set was collected over 30 sec: the first covered the pelvis and thighs, and the second covered the popliteal and trifurcation vessels.

Before collecting the three-dimensional data sets, the scan delay for the first three-dimensional acquisition after beginning administration of contrast material into the antecubital vein was determined. For this purpose, axial multiphase gradient-echo images were collected at the level of the lower thigh after administration of a 2-ml contrast test bolus. The contrast agent (gadopentetate dimeglumine [Magnevist]; Schering, Berlin, Germany) was administered at a rate of 0.6 ml/sec by an automated injector (MR Spectris; Medrad, Pittsburgh, PA) through a 20-gauge needle placed in the antecubital fossa and was followed by a 15-ml normal saline flush. A signal-intensity curve was determined for a region of interest placed within the superficial femoral artery on both sides. Half time to maximum signal intensity was determined in the delayed leg and was used as the scan delay (Fig. 2).



View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. —62-year-old man with 10-year history of diabetes. Axial multiphase gradient-echo image at level of lower thigh after administration of 2-ml contrast test bolus shows regions of interest (A and B) that are placed over superficial femoral artery bilaterally to obtain signal-intensity curve for both sides. Half time to maximum signal intensity is determined in both legs. Delayed value is used as scan delay. Display is immediately available on operating console.

 

Both three-dimensional data sets were collected over 70 sec: 30 sec for each of the two three-dimensional acquisitions separated by a 10-sec imaging break. During the 10-sec break, the MR table was manually repositioned to the center of the lower imaging volume (Fig. 3A,3B,3C), which was offset by only 45 cm to ensure some overlap between the two data sets. Craniocaudal coverage thus extended over 90 cm. Gadopentetate dimeglumine was administered over 70 sec followed by a saline flush of 20 ml using the automated injector. Based on patient size, the flow rate was adapted to the volume that corresponded to a dose of 0.3 mmol/kg, ranging between 0.5 and 0.7 ml/sec.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. —71-year-old man with episodes of right calf claudication. Lateral MR angiogram with maximum intensity projection shows acquisition volumes of superior and inferior three-dimensional data set in craniocaudal extension. Note required anteroposterior offset.

 


View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. —71-year-old man with episodes of right calf claudication. Frontal view of MR angiographic data set shows vascular graft extending from superficial femoral to popliteal artery. Note mild stenosis (arrow) in distal segment.

 


View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C. —71-year-old man with episodes of right calf claudication. Corresponding digital subtraction angiogram of femoropopliteal runoff reveals femoropopliteal graft.

 

MR angiographic data sets were postprocessed on an Advantage Windows workstation (General Electric Medical Systems). Maximum intensity projections were rendered containing the proximal (distal aorta and pelvic and upper thigh arteries) and distal (popliteal and trifurcation arteries) vascular territories. Rotated maximum-intensity-projection displays ranging from -60° to +60° were documented on film. In addition, images of each territory were merged in the multiple display mode to provide an overview of the entire runoff.

Conventional DSA
DSA of the pelvic and lower extremity vessels was performed on two standard angiography units (Digitron 3, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany; or Integris V3000 [version 13], Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). All 61 patients underwent catheter angiography extending from the distal aorta to the lower trifurcation vessels with a transfemorally inserted 5-French pigtail catheter (angiographic catheter; AngioDynamics, Queensbury, NY). The catheter tip was positioned just above the aortic bifurcation for DSA of the pelvic arteries, followed by multiple acquisitions encompassing the thigh and lower limbs. At each station, 20 ml of iodinated contrast material (ioxaglate [320 mg/ml]) was administered. As required, the examination was supplemented by acquisition of one or more oblique views of the pelvic arteries using 15 ml of contrast material.

Image Analysis
DSA and MR angiographic images were interpreted prospectively. DSA images were interpreted by a board-certified radiologist specializing in vascular interventions who was unaware of the MR angiographic data, and MR angiographic images were reviewed by a board-certified radiologist with special training in MR angiography who was unaware of the DSA results. Analysis of both examinations was based on all images. DSA images and the maximum-intensity-projection displays were documented on film using similar magnification factors and could be analyzed on a monitor for further interpretation. Three-dimensional MR angiographic data sets were available on a workstation permitting review of the source images as well as interactive reformation at the time of interpretation. DSA was used as the standard of reference.

For analysis, the arterial system was divided into the following segments: 1, distal infrarenal aorta; 2, common iliac artery; 3, internal iliac artery; 4, external iliac artery; 5, common femoral artery; 6 and 7, superficial femoral artery divided into proximal and distal halves; 8, popliteal artery; 9, tibiofibular trunc; 10 and 11, anterior tibial artery divided into proximal and distal segments; 12 and 13, peroneal artery, divided into proximal and distal segments; and 14 and 15, posterior tibial artery divided into proximal and distal segments.

Segments not contained within the imaging volume were considered nondiagnostic. All other segments were evaluated for the presence of stenotic or aneurysmal disease. Occlusive disease was graded on a 4-point scale on the basis of the most severe reduction of the arterial diameter compared with the most normal-appearing segment proximal or distal to the area of arterial compromise: 0, normal vessel; 1, irregularity of the vessel wall caused by atherosclerotic plaque formation with less than 10% luminal reduction; 2, stenosis with less than 50% luminal narrowing; 3, stenosis with 50% luminal narrowing or more; and 4, occlusion.

Sensitivities and specificities were calculated for all segments together and for each vessel separately. When two or more pathologic changes were present in one vessel segment, the most severe change was used for subsequent grading and analysis. Kappa values were calculated to measure concordance between the results of DSA and MR angiography.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
DSA depicted 1769 segments in 61 patients with an abnormality present in 980 segments. In 448 segments, a vessel irregularity with luminal reduction of less than 10% was revealed. Mild stenosis was present in 169 segments, and severe stenosis was seen in 156 segments (Figs. 4A,4B,4C,5A,5B,6A,6B). Two hundred seven segments were interpreted as occluded (Table 1).



View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. —63-year-old man with bilateral leg claudication. Cut film angiogram of pelvic region showing severe stenoses of right proximal common iliac artery, left distal common femoral artery (arrowhead), and proximal superficial femoral artery (arrow). In anteroposterior projection, area of femoral bifurcation is difficult to assess.

 


View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. —63-year-old man with bilateral leg claudication. Three-dimensional MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection image in anteroposterior projection shows good correlation with conventional angiography. Long arrow indicates left distal common femoral artery; short arrow indicates proximal superficial femoral artery.

 


View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C. —63-year-old man with bilateral leg claudication. MR angiogram with 30° rotated maximum intensity projection of superior data set provides better view of severe stenoses of left distal common femoral (arrowhead) and proximal superficial femoral artery (arrow).

 


View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A. —81-year-old man with left leg claudication. Conventional angiogram reveals occlusion of left superficial femoral artery (arrow) in adductor canal. Occlusion is well collateralized by vessels originating from deep femoral artery.

 


View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B. —81-year-old man with left leg claudication. Three-dimensional MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection image shows occlusion (arrow). Collateral vessels are also well visualized.

 


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A. —79-year-old man with claudication of right calf during exercise. Conventional angiogram shows following findings: irregularity of distal aorta, severe stenosis of right distal superficial femoral artery (arrow), mild stenosis of left superficial femoral artery (arrowhead), proximal occlusion of all trifurcation vessels on right side, proximal occlusion of proximal anterior and posterior tibial artery on left side, and severe atherosclerotic changes of left peroneal artery.

 


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B. —79-year-old man with claudication of right calf during exercise. Three-dimensional MR projection angiogram reveals good correlation with findings of conventional angiography. Occlusion of runoff vessels was correctly diagnosed.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Assessment of Degree of Stenosis with Digital Subtraction Angiography (1769 Vessel Segments) and Three-Dimensional MR Angiography (1711 Vessel Segments)

 

MR angiographic images failed to adequately depict 58 segments (3%). In five patients the superior acquisition volume was centered too low, resulting in the failure to depict the distal aorta (n = 5) and common iliac artery (n = 6). Technical problems impaired assessment of MR angiographic images in two other patients. A failure to reconstruct the distal data set for an unknown reason rendered 18 segments nondiagnostic. In the second patient, detection of the test bolus was erroneously based on signal changes within a small collateral vessel that had filled in a retrograde fashion. The scan delay was miscalculated and the bolus passage was missed resulting in the inability to evaluate the entire examination (29 segments). Subsequent analysis was thus based on 1711 segments. MR angiographic images showed 723 segments as normal, 399 segments as irregular with less than 10% luminal narrowing, 224 segments as mildly stenosed, and 168 segments as severely stenosed. One hundred ninety-seven segments were considered occluded (Table 1).

Table 2 summarizes the MR angiographic results relative to the conventional angiographic findings. Severe stenosis exceeding 50% luminal narrowing was identified on both DSA and MR angiography in 126 segments. Thirty-nine segments were overgraded as severely stenosed using MR angiography, whereas using DSA these segments were characterized as normal (n = 5), irregular (n = 8), or mildly stenosed (n = 26) (Figs. 7A,7B,7C and 8A,8B,8C,8D). Using MR angiography, underestimation of severe stenoses as either normal (n = 1), irregular (n = 2), or mild (n = 12) occurred in 15 segments (Fig. 9A,9B). Using both techniques, 186 segments were characterized as occluded. Based on MR angiographic images, reviewers overgraded eight segments as occluded that were characterized as severely stenosed using DSA. Using MR angiography, 17 segments of distal runoff vessels that had been interpreted as occluded on DSA were found to be patent, containing no abnormality (n = 1), irregularity (n = 8), or mild (n = 5) or severe (n = 3) stenosis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Sensitivities and Specificities of MR Angiography for Detection of Stenosis in 1711 Vascular Segments

 


View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7A. —71-year-old woman with pain in left lower calf during exercise. This case is example of overestimation of stenosis using MR angiography. This discrepancy may be caused by projection-related limitations of conventional angiography. Other findings such as mild stenosis in mid third of left superficial femoral artery, severe stenosis of distal superficial femoral artery, and occlusion of popliteal artery on left side were correctly diagnosed on MR angiography. Trifurcation of runoff vessels as normal variant on right side and filling of proximal segments of anterior and peroneal artery after occlusion by collateral vessels on left side are displayed by both three-dimensional MR angiography and conventional angiography. Three-dimensional MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection images in anteroposterior projection (A) and rotated view (B) show lesion of external iliac artery (arrow) immediately distal to origin of internal iliac artery. Lesion was interpreted as severe.

 


View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7B. —71-year-old woman with pain in left lower calf during exercise. This case is example of overestimation of stenosis using MR angiography. This discrepancy may be caused by projection-related limitations of conventional angiography. Other findings such as mild stenosis in mid third of left superficial femoral artery, severe stenosis of distal superficial femoral artery, and occlusion of popliteal artery on left side were correctly diagnosed on MR angiography. Trifurcation of runoff vessels as normal variant on right side and filling of proximal segments of anterior and peroneal artery after occlusion by collateral vessels on left side are displayed by both three-dimensional MR angiography and conventional angiography. Three-dimensional MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection images in anteroposterior projection (A) and rotated view (B) show lesion of external iliac artery (arrow) immediately distal to origin of internal iliac artery. Lesion was interpreted as severe.

 


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7C. —71-year-old woman with pain in left lower calf during exercise. This case is example of overestimation of stenosis using MR angiography. This discrepancy may be caused by projection-related limitations of conventional angiography. Other findings such as mild stenosis in mid third of left superficial femoral artery, severe stenosis of distal superficial femoral artery, and occlusion of popliteal artery on left side were correctly diagnosed on MR angiography. Trifurcation of runoff vessels as normal variant on right side and filling of proximal segments of anterior and peroneal artery after occlusion by collateral vessels on left side are displayed by both three-dimensional MR angiography and conventional angiography. Corresponding conventional digital subtraction angiogram shows same lesion as A and B. Lesion was graded as irregular in presence of plaque (arrow).

 


View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8A. —65-year-old woman with bilateral knee pain during exercise. This case is example of overestimation of stenosis using MR angiography. Three-dimensional MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection images in anteroposterior (A) and rotated (B) views. Severe stenosis was diagnosed at origin of left peroneal artery (arrowhead) and mild stenosis at origin of right peroneal artery (arrow). Rotated view is of inferior volume.

 


View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8B. —65-year-old woman with bilateral knee pain during exercise. This case is example of overestimation of stenosis using MR angiography. Three-dimensional MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection images in anteroposterior (A) and rotated (B) views. Severe stenosis was diagnosed at origin of left peroneal artery (arrowhead) and mild stenosis at origin of right peroneal artery (arrow). Rotated view is of inferior volume.

 


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8C. —65-year-old woman with bilateral knee pain during exercise. This case is example of overestimation of stenosis using MR angiography. Conventional angiograms of right trifurcation arteries (C) and left trifurcation arteries (D) were interpreted as normal.

 


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8D. —65-year-old woman with bilateral knee pain during exercise. This case is example of overestimation of stenosis using MR angiography. Conventional angiograms of right trifurcation arteries (C) and left trifurcation arteries (D) were interpreted as normal.

 


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9A. —51-year-old male smoker. This case is example of underestimation of stenosis using MR angiography and points to semantic difficulties associated with classification of vascular morphology and can be regarded as example of interobserver variability rather than failure of MR angiography to accurately estimate vascular disease. Anteroposterior projection of three-dimensional MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection image shows multiple irregularities of right superficial femoral artery. Lesion in distal third of superficial femoral artery (arrow) was characterized as mild.

 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9B. —51-year-old male smoker. This case is example of underestimation of stenosis using MR angiography and points to semantic difficulties associated with classification of vascular morphology and can be regarded as example of interobserver variability rather than failure of MR angiography to accurately estimate vascular disease. Conventional angiogram shows same lesion (arrow) as that in A. Lesion was characterized as severe.

 

Combining severe stenoses and occlusions, the overall sensitivity and specificity for detection of occlusive disease was 92.2% and 98%, respectively; sensitivity and specificity values were 92.3% and 99.4%, respectively, when only occluded segments were considered. For a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.83 to 0.87, the kappa value calculated to measure concordance between DSA and MR angiography was 0.85 for the detection of mild stenoses, severe stenoses, and occlusions.

Aneurysmal changes were identified as such on both DSA and MR angiography in nine segments. Ten femoropopliteal grafts and one vascular graft extending from the common femoral artery to proximal anterior tibial artery were found to be patent on both DSA and MR angiographic images. Artifacts caused by metallic clips were readily identified on the individual source images of the MR angiographic data sets because of characteristic signal dropout in the region of the clip (Fig. 10A,10B).



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10A. —55-year-old man who underwent imaging for assessment of vascular graft. Conventional angiogram (A) and MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection image (B). Aneurysmal changes of vascular graft can be reliably assessed on three-dimensional MR angiography. Metallic clip in midhalf of graft shows typical artifact (arrow).

 


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10B. —55-year-old man who underwent imaging for assessment of vascular graft. Conventional angiogram (A) and MR angiographic maximum-intensity-projection image (B). Aneurysmal changes of vascular graft can be reliably assessed on three-dimensional MR angiography. Metallic clip in midhalf of graft shows typical artifact (arrow).

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The presented three-dimensional MR angiographic strategy performed well in the assessment of peripheral vascular disease. Based on our results, the technique may be considered a suitable noninvasive alternative to DSA for evaluating the pelvic and lower extremity vasculature.

The lower extremity arterial system has been targeted by a variety of MR angiographic strategies. Based on the acquisition of thin axial slices, two-dimensional time-of-flight techniques were found to be highly sensitive to slow flow [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22], providing results superior to even conventional arteriography for identification of distal runoff vessels [23]. The limited clinical impact of the technique mainly reflects the lengthy acquisition time, often extending beyond 30 min for a single extremity [9, 24], and magnet time, taking up to 90 min, needed to assess the vasculature from the aorta to the lower limb arteries [25]. Because contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography does not rely on time-of-flight effects it permits imaging along the major-vessel axis [26], thereby vastly shortening imaging times to a total magnet time of less than 25 min for the display of the vasculature from the distal aorta to the trifurcation vessels. Although contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography has been shown to perform well in the evaluation of the pelvic arteries [10, 14, 27], the apparent inability to cover the entire arterial tree from the aortic bifurcation to the lower extremity runoff vessels has long been considered a limitation.

Based on the observation that the capillary passage of extracellular contrast material sufficiently reduces the concentration of venous contrast material for select display of the lower extremity arterial system, Ho et al. [28] and Meaney et al. [25] recently advocated a slow-infusion, multistation technique. Paramagnetic contrast material was infused over several minutes while three-dimensional data were collected at successive stations. The two-station imaging strategy we used in this study is based on the same principle. The use of a dedicated surface coil with very short TRs provides an excellent contrast-to-noise ratio, obviating image subtraction. A short data collection period extending over a mere 70 sec permits injection of contrast material at high rates, resulting in good delineation of even small trifurcation vessels.

The two-station, single-bolus—injection protocol proved highly robust, with few technique-related problems. Although the failure to reconstruct one distal image set remains unexplained, the analysis of a miscalculated timing regimen points to a possible pitfall. In a patient with extensive arterioocclusive disease, the detection of the test bolus was inadvertently performed in a collateral vessel, which apparently had filled in a retrograde fashion. The bolus passage was missed, leaving insufficient signal in the arterial system to render diagnostic images. Retrospectively, the detection of the test bolus should have been repeated at a different level. This case points to the dependence of image quality on proper timing of the IV contrast bolus. For optimal results, the arterial concentration of contrast material should plateau while image data are collected [29]. To define the travel time from the peripheral injection site to the runoff vessels, a test bolus should be used [30]. To ensure the presence of contrast material in all relevant vessels, timing should be based on measurements of the delayed leg.

The presented strategy provided diagnostic image quality in all patients. Some venous enhancement in the distal volume was found in patients with high-grade chronic disease affecting proximal vessel segments. This observation suggests that the presence of extensive collaterals results in a faster passage of contrast material into the venous system. In all patients, venous overlap was easily compensated for by viewing the data set in the interactive multiplanar reformation mode.

Good image quality is reflected by the comparative analysis with DSA. Severe stenoses were correctly identified on MR angiography with an overall sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 96.6%, respectively. Overestimation of stenoses occurred more frequently (n = 39) (Figs. 7A,7B,7C and 8A,8B,8C,8D) than underestimation (n = 15) (Fig. 9A,9B). Correlation between MR angiography and DSA was lower in cases of mild disease (Table 2), but even in these cases sensitivity and specificity values ranged between 70% and 90%. The technique also proved adequate for assessment of the morphology of surgically reconstructed arterial segments. Thus, graft patency was correctly confirmed in 11 patients. Signal voids caused by metallic clips, which may simulate the presence of a severe stenoses, need to be considered (Fig. 10A,10B).

For lack of a more accurate technique, we used DSA as a reference standard. Limitations of this projectional technique for the detection and characterization of nonconcentric stenoses are well recognized. Seventeen runoff vessel segments, interpreted as occluded on DSA but found patent on three-dimensional MR angiography, underscore these concerns. Similar observations have been made in other vascular territories such as the renal arteries [31]. Another potential cause for differences between MR angiography— and DSA-based interpretations relates to the presence of interobserver variability (Fig. 9A,9B). Thus, the kappa value between the MR angiography and DSA interpretations (95% confidence interval, {kappa} = 0.85 ± 0.02) is similar to that reported for observers viewing the same conventional DSA image sets [32].

The presented strategy does have several drawbacks. First and most important, craniocaudal coverage remains limited. The overlap between the two acquisitions reduces coverage to 90 cm. This precludes inclusion of the renal arteries in the imaging volume in adult patients. In tall patients, inclusion of the distal aorta proved difficult, resulting in incomplete coverage of the vascular tree in five of the 61 patients. These five patients had an average height of 186 cm, ranging from 183 to 191 cm. Because magnet hardware limits the field of view to 48 cm, this issue can only be resolved by adding a third acquisition, similar to the technique proposed by Meaney et al. [25]. Coverage would then extend more than 130 cm—sufficient for the additional display of the renal arteries. Finally, the current strategy would benefit from automation of table motion. Software solutions have already been implemented in some scanners.

This study should be considered another step toward clinical implementation of MR angiography for assessment of the peripheral arterial vasculature. The presented two-step, single-injection strategy is robust and accurate in the evaluation of peripheral vascular disease. Eminent hard- and software improvements including the design of longer coils and automation of table motion promise to add to the diagnostic performance of this technique in the foreseeable future.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Borrello JA. MR angiography versus conventional x-ray angiography in the lower extremities: everyone wins (editorial). Radiology 1993;187: 615 -617[Free Full Text]
  2. Shehadi WH, Toniolo G. Adverse reactions to contrast media: a report from the Committee on Safety of Contrast Media of the International Society of Radiology. Radiology 1980;137: 299 -302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Hessel SJ, Adams DF, Abrams HL. Complications of angiography. Radiology 1981;138: 273 -281[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Shehadi WH. Contrast media adverse reactions: occurrence, recurrence, and distribution patterns. Radiology 1982;143: 11 -17[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA, Boland JP, et al. Complications of arteriography in a recent series of 707 cases: factors affecting outcome. Ann Vasc Surg 1993;7: 122 -129[Medline]
  6. Lilly MP, Reichman W, Sarazen AA Jr, Carney WI Jr. Anatomic and clinical factors associated with complications of transfemoral arteriography. Ann Vasc Surg 1990;4: 264 -269[Medline]
  7. Grollman JH Jr, Marcus R. Transbrachial arteriography: techniques and complications. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1988;11: 32 -35[Medline]
  8. Waugh JR, Sacharias N. Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 1992;182: 243 -246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Snidow JJ, Aisen AM, Harris VJ, et al. Iliac artery MR angiography: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced and two-dimensional time-of-flight techniques. Radiology 1995;196: 371 -378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Douek PC, Revel D, Chazel S, Falise B, Villard J, Amiel M. Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhanced, whole-volume subtraction technique. AJR 1995;165: 431 -437[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994;191: 155 -164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995;197: 785 -792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Leung DA, McKinnon GC, Davis CP, Pfammatter T, Krestin GP, Debatin JF. Breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1996;200: 569 -571[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries with breath-hold contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography: comparison with conventional angiography. Radiology 1997;204: 357 -362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Owen RS, Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Holland GA, Cope C. Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease: selection of imaging parameters and clinical evaluation with MR angiography. Radiology 1993;187: 627 -635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Yucel EK, Kaufmann JA, Geller SC, Waltman AC. Atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremity: prospective evaluation with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1993;187: 637 -641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Carpenter JP, Owen RS, Baum RA, Perloff LJ, Cope C. Magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral runoff vessels. J Vasc Surg 1992;16: 807 -815[Medline]
  18. Schiebler ML, Listerud J, Holland G, Owen R, Baum R, Kressel HY. Magnetic resonance angiography of the pelvis and lower extremities. Invest Radiol 1992;27: 90 -96
  19. Snidow JJ, Harris VJ, Trerotola SO, et al. Interpretations and treatment decisions based upon MR angiography compared to those based upon conventional arteriography in symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1995;6: 595 -603[Medline]
  20. McCauley TR, Monib A, Dickey KW, et al. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: accuracy and reliability of time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1994;192: 351 -357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Quinn SF, Demlow TA, Hallin RW, Eidemiller LR, Szumowski J. Femoral MR angiography versus conventional angiography: preliminary results. Radiology 1991;178: 695 -700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Davis CP, Schopke WD, Seifert B, Schneider E, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. MR angiography of patients with peripheral arterial disease before and after transluminal angioplasty. AJR 1997;168: 1027 -1034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Owen RS, Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Perloff LJ, Cope C. Magnetic resonance imaging of angiographically occult runoff vessels in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. N Engl J Med 1992;326: 1577 -1581[Abstract]
  24. Yucel EK, Silver MS, Carter AP. MR angiography of normal pelvic arteries: comparison of signal intensity and contrast-to-noise ratio for three different inflow techniques. AJR 1994;136: 197 -201
  25. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Radjenovic A, Kassner AP, Kouwenhoven M. Bolus chase gadolinium-enhanced MRA of the aorta and lower limb vessels with a "stepping table": comparison with catheter angiography. Radiology 1999;211: 59 -67[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufmann JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3: 877 -881[Medline]
  27. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36: 345 -351[Medline]
  28. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206: 683 -692[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Twieg DB. The k-trajectory formulation of the NMR imaging process with applications in analysis and synthesis of imaging methods. Med Phys 1983;10: 610 -621[Medline]
  30. Hany TF, McKinnon GC, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. Optimization of contrast timing for breath-hold 3D MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7: 552 -557
  31. Wasser MN, Westenberg J, van der Hulst VP, et al. Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997;202: 333 -338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Leung DA, Hoffmann U, Pfammatter T, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography versus duplex sonography for diagnosing renovascular disease. Hypertension 1999;33: 726 -731[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. R. Hadizadeh, J. Gieseke, S. H. Lohmaier, K. Wilhelm, J. Boschewitz, F. Verrel, H. H. Schild, and W. A. Willinek
Peripheral MR Angiography with Blood Pool Contrast Agent: Prospective Intraindividual Comparative Study of High-Spatial-Resolution Steady-State MR Angiography versus Standard-Resolution First-Pass MR Angiography and DSA
Radiology, September 3, 2008; (2008) 2492072033.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Nael, S. G. Ruehm, H. J. Michaely, R. Saleh, M. Lee, G. Laub, and J. P. Finn
Multistation Whole-Body High-Spatial-Resolution MR Angiography Using a 32-Channel MR System
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 529 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. M. Kelly, P. Cronin, H. K. Hussain, F. J. Londy, D. B. Chepeha, and R. C. Carlos
Preoperative MR Angiography in Free Fibula Flap Transfer for Head and Neck Cancer: Clinical Application and Influence on Surgical Decision Making
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 268 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Andreisek, T. Pfammatter, K. Goepfert, D. Nanz, P. Hervo, R. Koppensteiner, and D. Weishaupt
Peripheral Arteries in Diabetic Patients: Standard Bolus-Chase and Time-resolved MR Angiography
Radiology, December 19, 2006; (2006) 2422051111.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. S. Pereles, J. D. Collins, J. C. Carr, C. Francois, M. D. Morasch, R. M. McCarthy, E. A. Krupinski, G. M. Butler, and J. P. Finn
Accuracy of Stepping-Table Lower Extremity MR Angiography with Dual-Level Bolus Timing and Separate Calf Acquisition: Hybrid Peripheral MR Angiography
Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 283 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Tongdee, V. R. Narra, G. McNeal, C. F. Hildebolt, F. El-Merhi, G. Foster, and J. J. Brown
Hybrid peripheral 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography of calf and foot vasculature.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1746 - 1753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. J. Schaefer, F. P. Boudghene, H. J. Brambs, M. Bret-Zurita, J. L. Caniego, R. A. Coulden, H. B. Gehl, R. Hammerstingl, A. Huber, R. J. Mendez, et al.
Abdominal and Iliac Arterial Stenoses: Comparative Double-blinded Randomized Study of Diagnostic Accuracy of 3D MR Angiography with Gadodiamide or Gadopentetate Dimeglumine
Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 827 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Fenchel, A. M. Scheule, N. I. Stauder, U. Kramer, K. Tomaschko, T. Nagele, C. Bretschneider, H.-P. Schlemmer, C. D. Claussen, and S. Miller
Atherosclerotic Disease: Whole-Body Cardiovascular Imaging with MR System with 32 Receiver Channels and Total-Body Surface Coil Technology--Initial Clinical Results
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 280 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. K. Willmann, B. Baumert, T. Schertler, S. Wildermuth, T. Pfammatter, F. R. Verdun, B. Seifert, B. Marincek, and T. Bohm
Aortoiliac and Lower Extremity Arteries Assessed with 16-De