|
|
||||||||
Technical Innovation |
1
Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Kantonsspital
Basel/University Hospitals, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
2
Department of Neurology, Kantonsspital Basel/University Hospitals, 4031 Basel,
Switzerland.
3
Department of Radiology, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Kantonsspital
Basel/University Hospitals, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
4
Department of Psychiatry, Kantonsspital Basel/University Hospitals, 4031
Basel, Switzerland.
5
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Medical Physics, University of
Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Received August 9, 1999;
accepted after revision September 29, 1999.
Supported by Swiss National Science Foundation grant 3200-52194.97. E.
Seifritz holds a University of Basel habilitation stipend.
Introduction
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
MR Imaging
MR imaging was performed on a 1.5-T MR clinical imaging system (Magnetom
Vision; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). A standard circularly polarized head coil
was used for all imaging procedures.
MR Projection Angiography
Images were acquired with a radiofrequency-spoiled steady-state
gradient-echo sequence [3]
(TR/TE, 4.5/1.8; flip angle, 40°; matrix size, 196 x 256; field of
view, 188 x 250 mm) without slice selection in the coronal plane and, in
the 44-year-old woman, also in the sagittal plane. The sequence was run
continuously and 60 images were acquired, with a temporal resolution of 900
msec per image. The start of the sequence was simultaneous with the injection
of the contrast bolus (0.1 mmol/kg of body weight gadodiamide; 0.5 mmol/ml
[Omniscan; Nycomed Imaging, Oslo, Norway]). The bolus was injected at a flow
rate of 3 ml/sec with a power injector (Spectris MR Injector System; Medrad,
Pittsburgh, PA), immediately followed by a 20-ml saline solution flush through
the right antecubital vein. Because of artifacts induced by signal
fluctuations during the approach to the steady-state amplitude, the first
image of the time-resolved series was discarded. The next five images obtained
before the bolus arrival were averaged and formed a background mask. All
further images were calculated by complex subtraction of the mask from the
subsequent images. Complex subtraction emphasizes the difference in phase
between stationary tissue and contrast-enhanced blood and avoids signal
cancellation as in magnitude subtraction
[1]. Only the processed images
are presented to the viewer.
Spin-Echo Imaging
The standard MR examination of the brain included unenhanced T2-weighted
turbo spin-echo images (3800/90) and unenhanced and enhanced T1-weighted
spin-echo images (600/14).
Time-of-Flight MR Angiography
For visualization of the arteries, axial three-dimensional time-of-flight
MR angiography was used with venous presaturation (39/6.5; ramped flip angle,
10-30°; nominal flip angle, 20°) in the 44-year-old woman. Venous
structures were depicted by a coronal sequential two-dimensional
time-of-flight MR angiographic sequence with arterial presaturation below the
jugular bulb (30/9; flip angle, 40°) in the 30-year-old woman and in the
44-year-old woman.
Digital Subtraction Angiography
Diagnostic intraarterial DSA (matrix size, 1024 x 1024; image
intensifier, 40 cm) (Multistar T.O.P.; Siemens) was performed after
catheterization of the common, external, and internal carotid arteries and of
the vertebral arteries with a 4-French catheter via a femoral artery approach.
In selected patients, superselective catheterization of the external branches
of the carotid artery was performed.
Evaluation
All examinations were discussed and reviewed by two neuroradiologists. The
MR studies were performed and evaluated in all patients before the DSA. The
examinations were assessed for the presence and location of a dural
arteriovenous fistula, the status of the involved dural sinus, arterial
feeders, and venous drainage. DSA was the standard of reference.
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
MR projection angiography was the only MR imaging technique to reveal the presence of a dural arteriovenous fistula. Findings on spin-echo images and venous two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography indicated the transverse sinus thrombosis in the 30-year-old woman. In the 44-year-old woman possible postthrombotic changes of the left transverse sinus but no signs suggestive of a vascular malformation were seen. Arterial three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography, performed in the 44-year-old woman, showed a prominent left occipital artery but no flow-related enhancement in the left transverse sinus; a diagnosis of the dural arteriovenous fistula was therefore not possible (Fig. 2A,2B).
|
|
|---|
This lack of clarity is most likely attributable to the limited spatial resolution of MR projection angiography compared with that of DSA and to superimpositions of different vessels caused by the IV contrast-agent application that leads to a simultaneous enhancement of all supraaortic vessels. Because an acquisition in a second plane (sagittal) requires a second contrast bolus, the number of projection directions is limited with MR projection angiography.
Although spin-echo images and time-of-flight angiograms might show findings suggestive of a dural arteriovenous fistula [5, 6], the impact of dynamic MR projection angiography for detection of dural arteriovenous fistulas is evident; this technique was the only MR imaging method to reveal the presence of the fistula in all our patients. The technique is easy to perform because no postprocessing method or timing of the contrast bolus is necessary. With the short measurement time of 1 min, motion artifacts are not encountered. Further studies are necessary, particularly to evaluate the diagnostic power of MR projection angiography in detecting fistulas with drainage into the cortical veins.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. A. Taschner, J. Gieseke, V. Le Thuc, H. Rachdi, N. Reyns, J.-Y. Gauvrit, and X. Leclerc Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformation: Time-resolved Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography with Combination of Parallel Imaging, Keyhole Acquisition, and k-Space Sampling Techniques at 1.5 T Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 871 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wu, N. Kim, F.R. Korosec, A. Turk, H.A. Rowley, O. Wieben, C.A. Mistretta, and P.A. Turski 3D Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced Cerebrovascular MR Angiography with Subsecond Frame Update Times Using Radial k-Space Trajectories and Highly Constrained Projection Reconstruction AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2007; 28(10): 2001 - 2004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-Y. Gauvrit, M. Law, J. Xu, R. Carson, P. Sunenshine, and Q. Chen Time-Resolved MR Angiography: Optimal Parallel Imaging Method AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2007; 28(5): 835 - 838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Meckel, M. Maier, D. S. M. Ruiz, H. Yilmaz, K. Scheffler, E.-W. Radue, and S.G. Wetzel MR Angiography of Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Diagnosis and Follow-Up after Treatment Using a Time-Resolved 3D Contrast-Enhanced Technique AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2007; 28(5): 877 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Horie, M. Morikawa, N. Kitigawa, K. Tsutsumi, M. Kaminogo, and I. Nagata 2D Thick-Section MR Digital Subtraction Angiography for the Assessment of Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2006; 27(2): 264 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tsuchiya, K. Honya, A. Fujikawa, H. Tateishi, and Y. Shiokawa Postoperative Assessment of Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass by Time-Resolved 3D Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Using Parallel Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2005; 26(9): 2243 - 2247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-Y. Gauvrit, X. Leclerc, C. Oppenheim, T. Munier, D. Trystram, H. Rachdi, F. Nataf, J.-P. Pruvo, and J.-F. Meder Three-Dimensional Dynamic MR Digital Subtraction Angiography Using Sensitivity Encoding for the Evaluation of Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: A Preliminary Study AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2005; 26(6): 1525 - 1531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Meckel, K.-O. Lovblad, G. Abdo, D. S. M. Ruiz, J. Delavelle, E.-W. Radue, D. A. Ruefenacht, and S. G. Wetzel Arterialization of Cerebral Veins on Dynamic MDCT Angiography: A Possible Sign of a Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1313 - 1316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ziyeh, R. Strecker, A. Berlis, J. Weber, J. Klisch, and I. Mader Dynamic 3D MR Angiography of Intra- and Extracranial Vascular Malformations at 3T: A Technical Note AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2005; 26(3): 630 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. K. Chooi, N. Woodhouse, S. C. Coley, and P. D. Griffiths Pediatric Head and Neck Lesions: Assessment of Vascularity by MR Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2004; 25(7): 1251 - 1255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Schreiber, R. R. Diehl, W. Weber, H. Henkes, H. C. Nahser, R. Lehmann, F. Doepp, and J. M. Valdueza Doppler Sonographic Evaluation of Shunts in Patients with Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2004; 25(5): 775 - 780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Noguchi, E. R. Melhem, T. Kanazawa, M. Kubo, N. Kuwayama, and H. Seto Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Evaluation with Combined 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and MR Digital Subtraction Angiography Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 183 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Klisch and M. Schumacher Dural Arteriovenous Fistulae: Noninvasive Diagnosis with Dynamic MR Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2002; 23(9): 1614 - 1614. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Coley, C. A.J. Romanowski, T. J. Hodgson, and P. D. Griffiths Reply AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2002; 23(9): 1614 - 1615. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sonnet, C. H. Buitrago-Tellez, K. Scheffler, R. Strecker, G. Bongartz, and J. Bremerich Dynamic Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced Two-Dimensional MR Projection Angiography of the Pulmonary Circulation: Standard Technique and Clinical Applications Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2002; 179(1): 159 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |