AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casford, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casford, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 174:1463-1464
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Radiology Lexicon

Brant Casford

Willford Hall Medical Center San Antonio, TX 78240

Few specialties have developed a descriptive lexicon that can compete with that of radiology. During a recent intensive review of the entire specialty (for the diagnostic written examination), the range of potential descriptors I encountered was astounding. By keeping my list from the review, adding to it from the program's daily lectures, and using a thesaurus, I was able to expand the list to match a single descriptor with each percentage point from 0 to 100. The ranking and ordering of the list is mine and I take full responsibility, although I welcome input from readers.

Table 1 is the complete list of descriptors; they are formatted to fill the blank in the following sentence: "This finding [UNK] represents a given disease process." For example, "Airspace consolidation usually represents pneumonia." In my list, this would mean that airspace consolidation is pneumonia 84% of the time. The list is pared down in Table 2 to a baker's dozen and is further pared in Table 3 to a workable list of four possibilities. Although we may not have it in us to cut to just four, we could probably get accustomed to 13! This may even make us more intelligible to our peers in other specialties who read (do they?) our reports. A disclaimer is, however, in order: There is no intent to assign medicolegal meanings or percentages to these descriptors.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Complete List of Descriptors to Use in the Following Sentence: This Finding[UNK]Represents a Given Disease Process

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Abbreviated List of Descriptors to Use in the Following Sentence: This Finding[UNK]Represents a Given Disease Process

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 Brief List of Descriptors to Use in the Following Sentence: This Finding[UNK]Usually Represents a Given Disease Process

 


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casford, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casford, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS