AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.-y.
Right arrow Articles by Yoo, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.-y.
Right arrow Articles by Yoo, H. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 174:1571-1574
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Case Report

Atypical Inside-Out Pattern of Hepatic Hemangiomas

Si-yeon Kim1, Jae-Joon Chung, Myeong-Jin Kim, Sumi Park, Jong Tae Lee and Hyung Sik Yoo

1 All authors: Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, #134 Schinchon-dong, Seodaemun-ku, Seoul 120-752, South Korea.

Received July 14, 1999; accepted after revision October 12, 1999.

 
Address correspondence to J.-j. Chung.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
The imaging characteristics of hepatic hemangioma have been well established, requiring few imaging procedures for the diagnosis of this common benign hepatic tumor. However, some atypical imaging findings of hepatic hemangioma have also been reported [1, 2]; for example, incomplete central enhancement of hemangioma or isoattenuation of the lesion compared with the surrounding normal hepatic parenchyma on delayed images of dynamic studies. We report two patients with centrifugal enhancement patterns on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging.


Case Report
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Case 1
A 45-year-old woman was admitted for evaluation of hepatic masses that were incidentally discovered during routine screening. Her liver function tests had normal findings and her test for hepatitis B antibody was positive. Abdominal sonography revealed two masses in segments II and VIII of the liver [3], measuring 3 cm and 2.5 cm in diameter, respectively (Figs. 1A and 1B). Both masses were well delineated and appeared hypoechoic with posterior acoustic enhancement; one mass had a central echogenic area and the other had a more focal central hyperechogenicity. Vascular flow signals were not detected on color Doppler sonography in or around the masses.



View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. —45-year-old woman with two cavernous hepatic hemangiomas. Sonographic images reveal 2.5-cm (arrow, A) and 3-cm (arrow, B) hypoechoic masses in segments VIII and II of liver. Note central echogenic area.

 


View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. —45-year-old woman with two cavernous hepatic hemangiomas. Sonographic images reveal 2.5-cm (arrow, A) and 3-cm (arrow, B) hypoechoic masses in segments VIII and II of liver. Note central echogenic area.

 

On dynamic CT, no significant enhancement was noted in the lesions during the early arterial phase, but gradual opacification from the center to the periphery (centrifugal direction) occurred during the portal and delayed venous phases. The edges of the lesions appeared unenhanced on 5-min delayed images.

The masses had low signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images and high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images (Fig. 1C). Gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR images (Figs. 1D,1E,1F,1G) revealed gradual centrifugal enhancement (except for the tumoral edges), similar to dynamic CT findings. Selective hepatic angiography revealed no definite evidence of tumor vascularity or staining or filling defect on either arterial or capillary phases.



View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. —45-year-old woman with two cavernous hepatic hemangiomas. T2-weighted MR image shows two masses with high-signal-intensity enhancement.

 


View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. —45-year-old woman with two cavernous hepatic hemangiomas. Unenhanced T1-weighted MR image shows low signal intensity of each mass.

 


View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E. —45-year-old woman with two cavernous hepatic hemangiomas. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images reveal centrifugal enhancement in each mass.

 


View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1F. —45-year-old woman with two cavernous hepatic hemangiomas. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images reveal centrifugal enhancement in each mass.

 


View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1G. —45-year-old woman with two cavernous hepatic hemangiomas. 10-min delayed image shows no enhancement in peripheral portion of each mass.

 

99mTc-labeled RBC radionuclide images revealed no increased or decreased radioactivity in the liver on early dynamic images but revealed pooling of radiotracer in segments II and VIII on delayed images. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) showed increased uptake lesions at corresponding areas of the liver. Therefore, the two hepatic masses were radiologically confirmed as hemangiomas with atypical imaging findings.

Case 2
A 32-year-old man was admitted for evaluation of a hepatic mass that was discovered on abdominal sonography during a routine examination. A two-phase abdominal CT scan was obtained. The scan revealed a 2.5-cm lobulated mass in the boundary area between segments V and VIII [3]. The mass had low density with central enhancing foci on arterial phase images and centrifugal enhancement with a peripheral unenhanced portion on 5-min delayed images (Figs. 2A and 2B). The lesion had low signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images and high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images (Figs. 2C and 2D). Dynamic MR images were obtained after gadopentetate dimeglumine injection; on these images, the lesion had a centrifugal enhancement pattern (Figs. 2E,2F,2G,2H). The peripheral rim portion remained unenhanced on images with up to a 5-min delay.



View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. —32-year-old man with hepatic mass at boundary area between segments V and VIII of liver. Arterial phase dynamic CT scan shows central enhancing portion of low density mass.

 


View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. —32-year-old man with hepatic mass at boundary area between segments V and VIII of liver. On delayed image, mass shows more centrifugal enhancement with some peripheral unenhancing portions.

 


View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C. —32-year-old man with hepatic mass at boundary area between segments V and VIII of liver. Mass has high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR image (C) and low signal intensity on T1-weighted MR image (D).

 


View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D. —32-year-old man with hepatic mass at boundary area between segments V and VIII of liver. Mass has high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR image (C) and low signal intensity on T1-weighted MR image (D).

 


View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2E. —32-year-old man with hepatic mass at boundary area between segments V and VIII of liver. Dynamic MR images reveal centrifugal enhancement pattern of mass, which has peripheral unenhancing portion on 5-min delayed image (H).

 


View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2F. —32-year-old man with hepatic mass at boundary area between segments V and VIII of liver. Dynamic MR images reveal centrifugal enhancement pattern of mass, which has peripheral unenhancing portion on 5-min delayed image (H).

 


View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2G. —32-year-old man with hepatic mass at boundary area between segments V and VIII of liver. Dynamic MR images reveal centrifugal enhancement pattern of mass, which has peripheral unenhancing portion on 5-min delayed image (H).

 


View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2H. —32-year-old man with hepatic mass at boundary area between segments V and VIII of liver. Dynamic MR images reveal centrifugal enhancement pattern of mass, which has peripheral unenhancing portion on 5-min delayed image (H).

 


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
The dynamic distribution of contrast material in the extracellular space (vascular and interstitial space) has been well documented [4]. After 1 min, 50% of contrast material moves from the vascular space to the interstitial space, and after 5 min, 80% moves. Equilibrium between the two spaces is attained in 2-5 min. After that, the contrast material returns to the vascular space [4]. Peripheral enhancement within 2 min of bolus injection is caused by the accumulation of contrast material in the vascular lakes [5]. The delayed enhancement of hemangiomas and some malignant neoplasms have different mechanisms. The delayed enhancement of hemangiomas is probably caused by the longer retention of contrast material in large intravascular spaces, resulting from slow flow, puddling, and partial thrombosis [6]. Cholangiocarcinoma and some metastatic liver tumors contain abundant fibrous tissues. Contrast material is retained by the fibrous stroma because of the large interstitial spaces in the fibrous tissues and the slow back-diffusion of contrast media in the vascular space [7, 8]. Hemangiomas with rapid enhancement on arterial phase images have large vascular spaces with thin intervening septa. Hemangiomas with delayed contrast enhancement have smaller vascular channels with a large portion of fibrous interstitial spaces [9].

The specificity of scintigraphy and 99mTc-labeled RBC radionuclide scanning with SPECT is nearly 100% in the diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma.

Although we did not obtain confirmatory pathologic specimens, our patients' atypical imaging findings probably resulted from the variable structural features of hepatic hemangiomas. Fibrosis of hepatic hemangiomas occurs commonly inside the bodies of tumors, beginning in the center and extending peripherally in variable degrees [5]. In our patients, the histologic findings of hemangiomas revealed a central area composed of numerous vascular spaces, which showed central echogenicity on sonography and early and prolonged enhancement on dynamic bolus CT. The peripheral portions of the lesions had a predominantly fibrous component and showed hypoechogenicity on sonography and delayed enhancement on dynamic CT.

Typical radiographic characteristics of hepatic hemangiomas are well established and extremely specific; however, intratumoral structural variation may cause unusual imaging features. More reports about the radiographic-histologic correlation of hepatic hemangiomas are needed to draw further conclusions.


References
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 

  1. Mikulis D, Costello P, Clouse M. Hepatic hemangioma: atypical appearance. AJR 1985;145:77 -78[Free Full Text]
  2. Takayasu K, Moriyama N, Shima Y, et al. Atypical radiographic findings in hepatic cavernous hemangioma: correlation with histologic features. AJR 1986;146:1149 -1153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Couinaud C. Le foie: études anatomiques et chirurgicales. Paris: Masson, 1957
  4. Kormano M, Dean P. Extravascular contrast material: the major component of contrast enhancement. Radiology 1976;121:379 -382[Abstract]
  5. Barnett P, Zerhouni E, White R, Siegelman S. Computed tomography in the diagnosis of cavernous hemangioma of the liver. AJR 1980;134:439 -447[Abstract]
  6. Ashida C, Fishman E, Zerhouni E, Herlang F, Siegelmann S. Computed tomography of hepatic cavernous hemangioma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:455 -460[Medline]
  7. Itai Y, Ohtomo K, Kokubo T, et al. CT of hepatic masses: significance of prolonged and delayed enhancement. AJR 1986;146:729 -733[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Choi B, Lee J, Han M, Kim S, Yi J, Kim C. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparative study with sonography and CT. Radiology 1989;172:689 -692[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Yu J, Kim M, Kim K, et al. Hepatic cavernous hemangioma: sonographic patterns and speed of contrast enhancement on multiphase dynamic MR imaging. AJR 1998;171:1021 -1025[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.-y.
Right arrow Articles by Yoo, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.-y.
Right arrow Articles by Yoo, H. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS