|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||
The following table or figure may be downloaded to PowerPoint for personal use in teaching and presentations. This feature is available to all subscribers to the journal. You MUST read and follow the guidelines at Request to Reproduce AJR Content if you are distributing or using AJR content beyond academic use (limited distribution, non-revenue producing, or educational purposes). (Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Fig. 3B. 56-year-old man with arterial hypertension (175 over 95 mm Hg) and
suspected renal artery stenosis. This case shows disagreement regarding
grading of stenosis with contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital
subtraction angiography. Three-dimensional anteroposterior fast low-angle shot
MR angiogram (3.8/1.49 [TR/TE], 25° flip angle, 10-sec acquisition time,
1.5-mm partition thickness) of first measurement after power injection of
contrast material followed by saline solution reveals significant stenosis
(arrow) of left renal artery (mean value of all four observers was
73%; range, 60-90%). Degree of stenosis was confirmed on additional views (not
shown). Note significant stenosis in right renal artery (mean value of all
four observers was 68%; range, 63-77%). Contrast-enhanced MR angiography
overestimated both stenoses significantly.
![]()
Return to article
Hotlight (NEW!) ![]()
![]()
What's Hotlight?
HOME
HELP
FEEDBACK
SUBSCRIPTIONS
ARCHIVE
SEARCH
TABLE OF CONTENTS