AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weishaupt, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hodler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weishaupt, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hodler, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 174:1635-1637
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Technical Innovation

Dynamic MR Imaging of the Hip in Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease

Comparison with Arthrography

Dominik Weishaupt1, G. Ulrich Exner1,2, Paul R. Hilfiker1 and Juerg Hodler1,3

1 Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Rämistr. 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
2 Present Address: Department of Radiology, Orthopedic Surgery, Section of Pediatric and Tumor Orthopedics, Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Forchstr. 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
3 Present Address: Department of Radiology, Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.

Received August 18, 1999; accepted after revision November 1, 1999.

 
Address correspondence to J. Holder.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Arthrography of the hip is important in tailoring treatment in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease [1,2,3,4]. Hip arthrography in children with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease is used for dynamic imaging to determine congruency and containment of the femoral head by the acetabulum and to rule out "hinge" abduction [1, 3, 5]. Hinge abduction means failure of the femoral head to move medially in abduction, with blocking of the severe flattened femoral head on the lateral acetabular margin [3]. Because the primary goal in treatment of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease is to improve containment and joint congruity [6], information obtained from hip arthrography may help in selecting candidates for periacetabular and intertrochanteric osteotomy [1, 4, 5]. Detection of hinge abduction is of paramount importance. Hinging must be relieved to assure normal femoral development, which requires contact between the femoral head and the normally formed acetabulum. This relief can frequently be accomplished by appropriate surgery [3]. Furthermore, arthrography allows assessment of joint congruity when immobilization during the process of epiphyseal healing is used as treatment [4].

MR imaging is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of early or radiographically occult Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease. It shows the extent of epiphyseal involvement [7]. However, dynamic examination of the hip with MR imaging is hampered by the closed architecture of conventional MR systems. With the increasing availability of open-configuration MR systems, dynamic imaging of joints in various positions has become feasible.

The purpose of this study was to compare arthrography with dynamic MR imaging of the hip using a superconducting open-configuration system to evaluate Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Ten hips of nine children (seven boys, two girls; age range, 7-9 years; mean age, 7.8 years) who were referred for evaluation and treatment of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease were included in the study. According to the Catterall classification [5], two hips were in group II (50% involvement of femoral head with sparing of the lateral border), five hips were in group III (75% involvement of femoral head with lateral head significantly involved and collapsed), and three hips were in group IV (total femoral head involvement). In accordance with the guidelines of our hospital's institutional review board, written informed consent was obtained from all patients' parents. All 10 hips were examined with arthrography and dynamic MR imaging. Arthrograms and MR images were obtained with the hips in neutral position and in maximally abducted and maximally adducted positions. Abduction and adduction were performed without internal or external rotation. However, examinations in flexion were performed if extension osteotomy was considered as a surgical option. These images were not used for further evaluation, however.

MR imaging was performed with a 0.5-T super-conducting open-configuration MR system (Signa SP; General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). No sedation was used. Each patient was placed in the supine position with a flexible radiofrequency coil strapped around the pelvis. The geometry of the magnet permits unrestricted motion of the hip to the position required for this examination. To maintain the relevant positions, the pelvis and the examined leg were fixed with clear adhesive tape. To optimize compliance, an accompanying adult, sitting or staying in the gap between the two magnet rings, was allowed to attend MR imaging.

To evaluate an appropriate MR protocol, we used two different MR sequences. Six hips in five children were imaged using a T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence with the following parameters: TR/TE, 5000/133; section thickness, 5 mm; interslice gap, 0.5 mm; acquisitions, two; and echo train length, eight. Imaging time of this sequence was 5 min 20 sec. A spoiled three-dimensional gradient-recalled echo sequence was chosen for four hips in four children. Imaging parameters for this sequence were the following: 50/5; flip angle, 35°; section thickness, 2.5 mm; and acquisitions, two. Imaging time for this sequence was 10 min 20 sec. Field of view for both sequences was 25 cm, and image matrix was 256 x 192. MR imaging was performed in the coronal plane for all hip positions.

Hip arthrography was performed under general anesthesia in the operating room. Radiographs taken in the same positions as the MR images were obtained. MR imaging and hip arthrography were both performed within 1 week of each other.

Arthrographic and MR images were reviewed separately by two observers in consensus. Images of all joint positions were available on either arthrographic or MR data sets. Overall image quality for diagnostic purposes on both MR images and arthrography was ranked as poor, acceptable, or good. Criteria evaluated on both arthrography and MR images included sphericity of the femoral head [8], irregularity of the cartilaginous articular surfaces [1], presence of a hinge abduction [3], and identification of best position and fit of the femoral head by the acetabulum (containment) [1]. Containment is considered present when the femoral head is located completely in the acetabular socket. Good containment reduces the pressure on the lateral segment of the epiphyseal femoral cartilage and maintains sphericity of the femoral head during development [6].


Results
Top
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Dynamic MR imaging was well tolerated by all nine children. MR examination was completed in a single session without sedation for each patient. Although resolution of images obtained in open-configuration MR imaging is usually inferior to images obtained on a conventional MR scanner, all MR images were of diagnostic quality. Using the T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence, image quality of all 18 MR image data sets (six hips with three different positions) was rated as good. Using the gradient-recalled echo sequence, observers rated 11 of 15 MR image data sets as good. The remaining four of 15 data sets in two different patients were rated as acceptable because of motion artifacts. All ten hips were non-spheric with flattening of the superior aspect of the cartilaginous aspect of the femoral head on both arthrograms and MR images (Fig. 1A,1B,1C,1D). In all children, pooling of the joint fluid could be observed in the empty space that formed between the flattened segment of the articular surface of the epiphysis and the acetabulum. MR imaging was as efficient as arthrography in showing irregularities of the capital articular surface that was almost always located at the point of the weight-bearing area. In severe flattening and protrusion of the femoral head, abduction leads to hinging of the head on the lateral acetabular margin (Fig. 2A,2B). MR imaging showed hinge abduction where it was visible on arthrography in all eight hips of eight children. Complete agreement about the position of best containment was found between arthrography and MR findings.



View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. —7-year-old boy with Legg-Calvé-Perthes Catterall [6] group III disease. Arthrogram (A) and dynamic T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR image (TR/TE, 5000/133) (B) taken in neutral position show overgrowth of femoral head and aspheric flattened subluxated femoral head. Note pooling of contrast material and joint fluid (arrow), respectively, indicating incongruency of articular surfaces.

 


View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. —7-year-old boy with Legg-Calvé-Perthes Catterall [6] group III disease. Arthrogram (A) and dynamic T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR image (TR/TE, 5000/133) (B) taken in neutral position show overgrowth of femoral head and aspheric flattened subluxated femoral head. Note pooling of contrast material and joint fluid (arrow), respectively, indicating incongruency of articular surfaces.

 


View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. —7-year-old boy with Legg-Calvé-Perthes Catterall [6] group III disease. Arthrogram (C) and corresponding MR image (D) obtained in adducted position show containment evidence by fact that femoral head is centered within acetabulum.

 


View larger version (162K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. —7-year-old boy with Legg-Calvé-Perthes Catterall [6] group III disease. Arthrogram (C) and corresponding MR image (D) obtained in adducted position show containment evidenced by fact that femoral head is centered within acetabulum.

 


View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. —9-year-old boy with Legg-Calvé-Perthes Catterall [5] group IV disease and hinge abduction. Arthrogram (A) and gradient-recalled echo MR image (TR/TE, 50/5; flip angle, 30°) (B) were obtained in abduction. Note medial pooling of contrast and joint fluid (arrows), respectively. Subluxated superolateral part of femoral head blocks at acetabular edge (open arrows).

 


View larger version (170K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. —9-year-old boy with Legg-Calvé-Perthes Catterall [5] group IV disease and hinge abduction. Arthrogram (A) and gradient-recalled echo MR image (TR/TE, 50/5; flip angle, 30°) (B) were obtained in abduction. Note medial pooling of contrast and joint fluid (arrows), respectively. Subluxated superolateral part of femoral head blocks at acetabular edge (open arrows).

 


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Dynamic MR imaging of the hip in children with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease using an open-configuration imager allows accurate assessment of the containment and congruity in various positions without exposing the patient to the side effects of irradiation and intraarticular injections. The excellent definition of the cartilaginous acetabulum and femoral head allows assessment of irregularity of the articular cartilage, which is important prognostically [3].

In our series, all dynamic MR imaging was been performed without prior sedation or need for general anesthesia. Although lack of need for sedation was not a criterion for selection, no examination had to be cancelled because of noncompliance.

Both sequences used in this investigation (T2-weighted fast spin-echo and gradient-recalled echo sequence) are adequate. However, because of the shorter imaging time and fewer motion artifacts, the fast spin-echo sequence may be preferable.

Dynamic MR imaging of the hip appears to be a feasible noninvasive alternative to arthrography in patients with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease in planning surgery or evaluating the optimal position of the femoral head for immobilization. Our preliminary study of 10 hips in nine patients showed promising results. However, the statistical power of our study was limited, and further studies to assess interobserver reliability are required.


References
Top
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Gershuni DH, Axer A, Hendel D. Arthrographic findings in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease and transient synovitis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60-A:457 -464[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Gallagher JM, Weiner DS, Cook AJ. When is arthrography indicated in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease? J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65-A:900 -905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Quain S, Catterall A. Hinge abduction of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986;68-B:61 -64
  4. Weinstein SL. Legg-Calvé-Perthes syndrome. In: Morrissy RT, Weinstein SL, eds. Pediatric orthopedics, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996: 951-991
  5. Catterall A. The natural history of Perthes disease. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1971;53-B:37 -53
  6. Herring JA. The treatment of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76-A:448 -458[Free Full Text]
  7. Bos CF, Bloem JL, Bloem RM. Sequential magnetic resonance imaging in Perthes disease. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73-B:219 -224
  8. Axer A, Schiller MG. The pathogenesis of the early deformity of the capital femoral epiphysis in Legg-Calvé-Perthes syndrome. Clin Orthop 1972;84:106 -115[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weishaupt, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hodler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weishaupt, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hodler, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS