|
|
||||||||
1
Department of Radiology, Universität
Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 2, D-97080
Würzburg, Germany.
2
Department of Internal Medicine, Universität
Würzburg, D-97080
Würzburg, Germany.
Received May 3, 1999;
accepted after revision September 9, 1999.
Supported by a grant from the
Interdisziplinäres Zentrum
für Klinische Forschung,
Universität
Würzburg, part F2.
Abstract
|
|
|---|
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twelve patients with wall motion abnormalities and related coronary artery disease revealed by conventional coronary angiography underwent MR imaging at 1.5-T before and 3 months after revascularization therapy. Short-axis images were acquired using a cine gradient-echo sequence. Each slice was divided into eight segments. Overall, 73 segments with impaired contractility were imaged during the first-pass and 14 ± 2 min after injection of 0.05-mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine at a flow of 3 ml/sec using a T1-weighted turbo fast low-angle shot sequence. Improved systolic wall thickening 3 months after revascularization served as the criterion of viability.
RESULTS. At study entry, 26 dysfunctional segments showed delayed hyperenhancement compared with the adjacent functional segments within the same slice, and 47 did not reveal hyperenhancement. After revascularization, 25 (96%) of the 26 hyperenhanced segments did not recover function, whereas 39 (83%) of the 47 segments without hyperenhancement showed mechanical improvement. Segment-related sensitivity and specificity for the correlation of lack of delayed hyperenhancement with myocardial viability were 39 (98%) of 40 and 25 (76%) of 33, respectively. Hypoenhancement during first-pass did not serve as a reliable criterion of viability.
CONCLUSION. Evidence of delayed hyperenhancement of dysfunctional myocardium may be used to predict lack of mechanical improvement or nonviability, whereas the lack of hyperenhancement can be correlated with improvement of regional contractility or viability after revascularization.
|
|
|---|
The aim of our study was to correlate the presence or absence of first-pass hypoenhancement and delayed hyperenhancement of dysfunctional myocardial regions with myocardial viability after injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine. The functional recovery of these regions 3 months after revascularization therapy served as the criterion of viability.
|
|
|---|
All MR imaging examinations were performed with a 1.5-T scanner (Magnetom VISION; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with 25 mT/m maximum gradient strength and a phased array body coil. Patients were examined in the supine position. Short-axis cine MR images were acquired during a breath-hold using an ECG-triggered two-dimensional cine fast low-angle shot sequence with a slice thickness of 8 mm without gap (TR/TE, 80/4.8; flip-angle, 30°; rectangular field of view, 320 x 320; matrix 256 x 256). The number of cardiac phases imaged depended on the heart rate. After determination of up to five slices with wall motion abnormalities, these slices were imaged during first-pass and 15 min after injection of 0.05 mmol/kg of gadopentetate dimeglumine into an antecubital vein. A multislice T1-weighted turbo fast low-angle shot sequence was used (TR/TE, 2.4/1.2; TI, 10 msec; flip-angle, 8°; matrix 60 x 128; field of view, 350 x 350; acquisitions, 40). For the first-pass examination, at least five images were acquired before the contrast agent reached the heart to assess steady-state of the magnetization.
For data analysis, each slice was divided into eight segments. By consensus interpreting by two experienced observers, regional wall motion was judged as normal, hypokinetic, or akinetic. Any improvement of systolic wall thickening after revascularization of the affected segments served as the criterion of viability. An infarcted region was defined as homogeneous if all the segments in this region were either viable or nonviable at follow-up and heterogenous if the infarcted regions consisted of a mixture of viable and nonviable segments. To compensate for changes in localization within the heart between study entry and follow-up, identification of the short heart axis was always performed using double-angulated scout images positioned perpendicular to the septum, and the examination was always started at the same level at the base of the heart. Additionally, image planes were matched using internal landmarks such as papillary muscles, right ventricular shape, and the absolute distance from the base.
For each of these dysfunctional segments, the presence or absence of hypoenhancement during the first-pass of the contrast agent or delayed hyperenhancement was stated both qualitively and by signal-intensity measurements. These measurements were performed with manually drawn regions of interest and the signal intensity was expressed as the percentage of increase over the baseline intensity. The signal intensities of the dysfunctional segments were compared with the signal intensities of the adjacent nondysfunctional segments within the same slice. During first-pass, the image with the clearest depiction of hypoenhancement was chosen for evaluation, whereas, in the of absence of hypoenhancement, the image with the highest myocardial signal intensity was evaluated. All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, and Wilcoxon's rank sum test was used to identify differences between dysfunctional and adjacent normal segments with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
After revascularization, four segments with former normal enhancement during first-pass showed hypoenhancement, whereas eight segments with former hypoenhancement changed to normal signal intensity. Delayed contrast-enhancement patterns of all segments did not differ from results at study entry (delayed enhancement, 66% ± 24% increase over the baseline of the dysfunctional segments versus 22% ± 21% increase over baseline of the adjacent segments, p < 0.001; normal enhancement, 37% ± 17% versus 33% ± 15%, p = 0.11). Concerning global viability of the infarcted regions at follow-up, seven patients had homogeneous viability or nonviability, but five patients had heterogeneous infarcted regions of up to 50% viable and nonviable segments. Overall, 40 segments with former wall motion abnormalities showed improved systolic contractility and were diagnosed as viable, and 33 segments did not improve and were judged nonviable (Figs. 1E,1F). No discrepancies occurred between the two observers concerning the judgment of regional wall motion abnormalities before and after revascularization. Results of groups I-IV are shown in Table 1.
|
|
|
Analysis of only the delayed contrast-enhancement patterns revealed that 25 of the 26 hyperenhanced segments remained dysfunctional, whereas 39 of the 47 segments without hyperenhancement showed mechanical improvement. Concerning the prediction of viability, 39 of the 40 viable segments were not enhanced, and 25 of the 33 nonviable segments showed delayed hyperenhancement. Despite the small number of patients, sensitivity and specificity for the correlation of the absence of delayed hyperenhancement with myocardial viability were 98% and 76%, and positive and negative predictive values were 83% and 96%, respectively.
|
|
|---|
Accurate quantification of the reperfused infarction size by contrast enhancement is possible with experimental studies after injection of gadolinium tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid or gadodiamide [15, 16]. With clinical studies, de Roos et al. [3, 4] also showed significantly increased enhancement of infarcted areas. They included patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction after coronary angiography and thrombolytic treatment. A delayed hyperenhancement was found 15-20 min and 25-30 min after injection with no significant difference between both imaging times. In this acute situation, a distinction between reperfused and nonreperfused infarction based on delayed enhancement was not possible. Nevertheless, patients with reperfused myocardial infarction showed significantly smaller infarct sizes than patients without reperfusion [5].
For the detection of myocardial viability, Fedele et al. [8] examined 19 patients more than 3 months after previous myocardial infarction with dysfunctional areas related to the left anterior descending coronary artery. Spin-echo sequences were used to measure signal intensity 4, 8, 12, and 30 min after injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine. The sequences showed high signal intensity in necrotic tissue compared with normal or hibernating myocardium judged by 123I phenylpentadecanoic acid scintigraphy. This hyperenhancement was seen only 12 and 30 min after injection. Comparing thallium scintigraphy and late enhancement, Lima et al. [9] found a close correlation between hyperenhancing segments and fixed scintigraphic defects 10 min after contrast injection. In a recent study, 24 patients with stable coronary artery disease and regional wall motion abnormalities were examined at least 6 months after myocardial infarction [10]. Delayed hyperenhancement 3-15 min after contrast administration was correlated with a diagnosis of viability by a 201Tl scan and dobutamine echocardiography. A significantly greater enhancement was seen each time after contrast injection with the nonviable regions, even in patients without a history of myocardial infarction.
Unlike the results of other reports and our study, Rogers et al. [11] found that 5 ± 2 days after reperfused first acute myocardial infarction only regions with a normal first-pass signal followed by hyperenhanced signal on delayed images (HYPER) showed systolic-wall-motion improvement 7 weeks later. Regions with hypoenhancement at first-pass (HYPO) did not improve, and regions with additional delayed hyperenhancement (COMB) only tended to improve. Referring to this nomenclature, we found only one of 73 segments in the HYPER group revealed nonviability compared with 13 of 28 regions described by Rogers et al. representing viable myocardium. In our study, 24 of the 25 segments in the COMB group were nonviable, whereas 10 regions in the study by Rogers et al. showed a borderline improvement and were considered to contain a mixture of viable and necrotic myocardium. In the HYPO group, five of the nine segments were viable in our study and none of the five regions were viable in the study by Rogers et al. However, with our data, nearly all functionally improved segments were predicted by the absence of delayed hyperenhancement. Concerning hypoenhancement at first-pass, we also found that 28 of the 38 segments did not improve. Nevertheless, 24 of these 28 segments also showed delayed hyperenhancement, and nine out of 10 segments that did improve had no hyperenhancement. This might be explained by the different mechanisms for first-pass hypoenhancement concerning either microvascular or macrovascular damage, which we have previously mentioned. Our data indicate that delayed contrast-enhancement patterns are a more reliable criterion of viability.
Whether these contradictory results concerning the prediction of myocardial viability are explained by varying examination times after myocardial infarction or by other differences concerning patient selection needs to be further investigated. With our patients, a delayed enhancement of the nonviable segments was seen on the first examination and on follow-up 3 months later. Therefore, we postulate, in agreement with the results by Fedele et al. [8] and Ramani et al. [10], that delayed hyperenhancement is not only a sign of nonviability related to recent myocardial infarction, but also indicates chronic coronary artery disease.
In summary, our preliminary data suggest that evidence of delayed hyperenhancement of dysfunctional myocardium may predict lack of mechanical improvement or nonviability, whereas the absence of hyperenhancement is correlated with improvement of regional contractility or viability after revascularization. This interpretation of delayed hyperenhancement in reperfused myocardium differs from previously published results and, thus, needs to be further studied.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Nieman, M. D. Shapiro, M. Ferencik, C. H. Nomura, S. Abbara, U. Hoffmann, H. K. Gold, I.-K. Jang, T. J. Brady, and R. C. Cury Reperfused Myocardial Infarction: Contrast-enhanced 64-Section CT in Comparison to MR Imaging Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 49 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Fenchel, A Franow, P Martirosian, M Engels, U Kramer, N I Stauder, U Helber, H Vogler, C D Claussen, and S Miller 1 M Gd-chelate (gadobutrol) for multislice first-pass magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 884 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Lim, M. B. Srichai, and V. S. Lee Non-Ischemic Causes of Delayed Myocardial Hyperenhancement on MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1675 - 1681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ishida, H. Sakuma, N. Kato, N. Ishida, K. Kitagawa, T. Shimono, I. Yada, and K. Takeda Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease before Elective Repair of Aortic Aneurysm Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 458 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Laissy, F. Hyafil, L. J. Feldman, J.-M. Juliard, E. Schouman-Claeys, P. G. Steg, and M. Faraggi Differentiating Acute Myocardial Infarction from Myocarditis: Diagnostic Value of Early- and Delayed-Perfusion Cardiac MR Imaging Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 75 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fenchel, U. Helber, U. Kramer, N. I. Stauder, A. Franow, C. D. Claussen, and S. Miller Detection of Regional Myocardial Perfusion Deficit Using Rest and Stress Perfusion MRI: A Feasibility Study Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2005; 185(3): 627 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gupta, V. S. Lee, Y.-C. Chung, J. S. Babb, and O. P. Simonetti Myocardial Infarction: Optimization of Inversion Times at Delayed Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 921 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Gibbons, U. S. Valeti, P. A. Araoz, and A. S. Jaffe The quantification of infarct size J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 19, 2004; 44(8): 1533 - 1542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Wellnhofer, A. Olariu, C. Klein, M. Grafe, A. Wahl, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel Magnetic Resonance Low-Dose Dobutamine Test Is Superior to Scar Quantification for the Prediction of Functional Recovery Circulation, May 11, 2004; 109(18): 2172 - 2174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Shan, G. Constantine, M. Sivananthan, and S. D. Flamm Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Myocardial Viability Circulation, March 23, 2004; 109(11): 1328 - 1334. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Van Hoe and M. Vanderheyden Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Value of Different MRI Techniques for Prediction of Functional Recovery After Revascularization Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 95 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Chiu, N. M. C. So, W. W. M. Lam, K. Y. Chan, and J. E. Sanderson Combined First-Pass Perfusion and Viability Study at MR Imaging in Patients with Non-ST Segment-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Feasibility Study Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 717 - 722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Krombach, M. F. Wendland, C. B. Higgins, and M. Saeed MR Imaging of Spatial Extent of Microvascular Injury in Reperfused Ischemically Injured Rat Myocardium: Value of Blood Pool Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Particles of Iron Oxide Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 479 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Beer, T. Seyfarth, J.o. Sandstede, W. Landschutz, C. Lipke, H. Kostler, M. von Kienlin, K. Harre, D. Hahn, and S. Neubauer Absolute concentrations of high-energy phosphate metabolites in normal, hypertrophied, and failing human myocardium measured noninvasively with 31P-SLOOP magnetic resonance spectroscopy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 2, 2002; 40(7): 1267 - 1274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Gerber, J. Garot, D. A. Bluemke, K. C. Wu, and J. A.C. Lima Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Improvement of Regional Myocardial Function in Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction Circulation, August 27, 2002; 106(9): 1083 - 1089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Perin, G. V. Silva, R. Sarmento-Leite, A. L.S. Sousa, M. Howell, R. Muthupillai, B. Lambert, W. K. Vaughn, and S. D. Flamm Assessing Myocardial Viability and Infarct Transmurality With Left Ventricular Electromechanical Mapping in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Validation by Delayed-Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging Circulation, August 20, 2002; 106(8): 957 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. W. Sandstede, T. Pabst, M. Beer, C. Lipke, K. Baurle, F. Butter, K. Harre, W. Kenn, W. Voelker, S. Neubauer, et al. Assessment of Myocardial Infarction in Humans with 23Na MR Imaging: Comparison with Cine MR Imaging and Delayed Contrast Enhancement Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 222 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Gerber, C. E. Rochitte, D. A. Bluemke, J. A. Melin, P. Crosille, L. C. Becker, and J. A.C. Lima Relation Between Gd-DTPA Contrast Enhancement and Regional Inotropic Response in the Periphery and Center of Myocardial Infarction Circulation, August 28, 2001; 104(9): 998 - 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Sechtem Imaging myocardial area at risk and final infarct size Eur. Heart J. Suppl., June 1, 2001; 3(suppl_C): C36 - C46. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Saeed New Concepts in Characterization of Ischemically Injured Myocardium by MRI Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2001; 226(5): 367 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Duerinckx Myocardial Viability Using MR Imaging: Is It Ready for Clinical Use? Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2000; 174(6): 1741 - 1743. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |