AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rozenblit, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Klink, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rozenblit, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Klink, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 174:1759-1764
© American Roentgen Ray Society


CT-Guided Transthoracic Needle Biopsy Using an Ipsilateral Dependent Position

Alla M. Rozenblit1, Joseph Tuvia1, Grigory N. Rozenblit2 and Arlene Klink1

1 Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E. 210th St., Bronx, NY 10467-2490.
2 Department of Radiology, New York Medical College and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595.

Received August 16, 1999; accepted after revision November 15, 1999.

 
Address correspondence to A. M. Rozenblit.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. We postulated that the pneumothorax rate of transthoracic needle biopsy might improve with an ipsilateral dependent position of the affected side. We tried to determine the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of CT-guided biopsy with the patient in this position.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. CT-guided needle biopsy with the patient in an ipsilateral dependent position was performed in 23 patients with 17 lung lesions (15 posterior and two anterior) and six mediastinal lesions. Fine-needle aspiration was used in all patients, and core biopsy was also used in six patients. The technical difficulty of the procedure was classified into three grades compared with a routine transthoracic needle biopsy as follows: grade I, no more difficult; grade II, somewhat more difficult; and grade III, much more difficult.

RESULTS. Adequate samples were obtained in 22 (96%) of 23 patients. A small asymptomatic pneumothorax occurred in two patients (8.7%). Difficulty was rated grades I, II, and III in 18 (78%), two (9%), and three (13%) procedures, respectively. Four of the five grades II and III procedures were biopsies of anterior lesions. Traversing the pleura was avoided in three of six mediastinal masses.

CONCLUSION. Transthoracic needle biopsy of selected lung and mediastinal lesions using a ipsilateral dependent position is feasible, effective, and safe. The role of this technique for reducing the rate of pneumothorax as a result of the biopsy requires further investigation.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Pneumothorax is the most common complication of a transthoracic needle biopsy; it is particularly prevalent with CT-guided procedures [1, 2]. Pneumothorax usually results from an air leak extending from the aerated lung through a puncture in the visceral pleura. With lung biopsy and transpulmonary mediastinal biopsy, the risk of pneumothorax increases with any lung motion during the needle placement [3] and hyperinflation. We postulated that the risk of pneumothorax might decrease if a lung or mediastinal lesion could be biopsied with the affected side dependent, or with the patient in an ipsilateral dependent position. Lung mobility is known to be restricted when the lung is in the dependent position, such as when the patient is in a lateral decubitus position. This position is associated with decreased rib excursion and some hypoinflation of the dependent lung. In addition, the mediastinal shift toward the dependent side may create a window permitting an extrapleural biopsy of mediastinal lesions, thus eliminating the risk of pneumothorax. The goal of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy using an ipsilateral dependent position.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients considered for the study were those who gave a valid consent and who had indications for a transthoracic needle biopsy and no standard contraindications. Excluded from the study were patients with chest lesions accessible in standard positions without pleural transgression, such as some mediastinal lesions and lung lesions with evident chest wall involvement. Also excluded were patients who could not be appropriately positioned for a variety of reasons, and patients with lesions judged inaccessible in an ipsilateral dependent position. The latter group included lesions located near the lateral and anterolateral pleura, with a potential entry site too close to the CT table; middle lobe and lingula lesions were considered inaccessible because of a problematic approach between crowded anterior ribs.

In the first 12 months, only a 90° ipsilateral dependent position was used. This led to the exclusion of patients with lesions in the lateral two thirds of the dependent hemithorax. Of 49 transthoracic needle biopsies performed in this period, only seven (14%) were done in an ipsilateral dependent position. Later in the study, we modified the technique by using a variable obliquity, between 90° and 30°, of the ipsilateral dependent position. This variable obliquity expanded applicability for the method, allowing the biopsy of lesions located farther from the mediastinum while preserving the dependent position of the affected lung. Of 40 consecutive transthoracic needle biopsies performed in the second part of the study, the ipsilateral dependent position was feasible in 16 procedures (40%).

In a 24-month period between 1996 and 1998, CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsies in an ipsilateral dependent position were performed in 23 patients with 17 lung and six mediastinal lesions. The patients were 13 men and 10 women ranging in age from 34 to 82 years (mean, 60 years). Six patients had known primary tumors, and 17 patients had abnormal chest findings without a known diagnosis. Five patients (22%) had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Of 17 lung lesions, two were anterior and 15 posterior. Sixteen lesions were located in the medial half of the hemithorax, and one was in the posterolateral region. Of six mediastinal masses, the anterior mediastinal and aorticopulmonary window locations were found in four and two patients, respectively. For central mediastinal lesions, the predominantly involved side was categorized as the affected side and was selected for biopsy. All mediastinal lesions selected for the study would have required a transgression of the lung if a transthoracic needle biopsy were done with the patient in a supine position.

The lesions ranged in size from 0.8 to 7.0 cm (mean, 2.9 cm); 10 lesions (eight lung and two mediastinal) were smaller than 3 cm (Tables 1 and 2). The distance between the lesion and the pleural surface, or depth, varied from 0 to 5 cm (mean, 1.5 cm) as measured in the ipsilateral dependent position. For the extrapleural puncture of mediastinal lesions, the depth was considered 0 cm. Three lung lesions were pleura-based with a depth of 0 cm without apparent involvement of the chest wall as judged on CT. In four patients with lung lesions, the depth was also measured with the affected lung in a nondependent position to compare with that in the ipsilateral dependent position.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Distribution of Lung Lesions by Size and Depth

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Distribution of Mediastinal Lesions by Size and Depth

 

CT scans were performed on a 9800 Advantage scanner (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). We used 10-mm collimation for lesions larger than 15 mm, and 5-mm collimation for smaller lesions.

Biopsies were performed using a 90° ipsilateral dependent position in seven patients; in the remaining patients, the degree of obliquity from the table was less than 90° but greater than 30°. To stabilize patients in the ipsilateral dependent position, hips and knees were flexed. In addition, a fixation belt and supporting cushions were routinely used. The dependent arm was placed in front of the face. The nondependent arm was positioned along the body for the anterior approach or in front of the chest for the posterior approach. Patient comfort during the procedure was verified by questioning. All procedures were performed by three radiologists experienced with CT-guided biopsy. Technical difficulty of the procedure was assessed by the operators in comparison with a routine transthoracic needle biopsy as follows: grade I, no more difficult; grade II, somewhat more difficult; and grade III, much more difficult.

Biopsy was performed in suspended mid inspiration with the use of a routine sterile technique and local anesthesia. All patients had a fine-needle aspiration with a 20- or 22-gauge Westcott needle (Becton Dickinson, Rutherford, NJ). A single-needle technique was used in 20 patients and coaxial technique in three patients. The material was sent for cytologic analysis and a cell block for all patients and for microbiologic examination in four patients. In addition to a fine-needle aspiration, six patients had a cutting needle biopsy at the same sitting using an 18-gauge TEMNO needle (Bauer Medical, Clearwater, FL) and coaxial technique. A fine-needle aspiration specimen was initially examined by a cytologist present in the CT suite; when a specimen was judged to be sufficient for diagnosis, the procedure was terminated. If up to three fine-needle passes yielded indeterminate material, a cutting needle biopsy was performed. The number of biopsy specimens and needle passes with and without transgressing the pleura were recorded for each procedure (Table 3). For the coaxial technique, introducing a guiding cannula was considered a single pass transgressing the pleura. The final pathologic diagnosis was made 24-48 hr after the procedure.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 Biopsy Techniques Used for Transthoracic Needle Biopsy with Patient in Ipsilateral Dependent Position

 

Patients were monitored during and after the procedure with a pulse oximeter and EKG and blood pressure measurements. Care after the procedure followed the standard protocol for our institution. Patients remained recumbent in the observation area for a variable period. The presence of a pneumothorax was initially determined on CT after the biopsy, followed by expiratory upright chest radiography. The latter was performed at 1 hr in patients without a pneumothorax, and at 2 and 4 hr in patients who had a pneumothorax on CT. Patients with normal findings on chest radiography and asymptomatic patients with a small and nonenlarging pneumothorax were discharged at 1 hr and 4 hr, respectively. Patients with a pneumothorax were instructed to return in 24 hr for chest radiography or earlier should they become symptomatic. The following morning, all outpatients and the referring physicians of the inpatients were contacted by telephone to verify their status.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Specimens were obtained in all patients. The patients reported that they were comfortable in an ipsilateral dependent position. Technical difficulty of the procedure was assessed as grade I in 18 patients (78%), grade II in two patients (9%), and grade III in three patients (13%). Of 15 biopsies that were performed with a posterior approach, grade I was assigned to 14 cases and grade II to one case. Of eight biopsies with an anterior approach, four were classified as grade I, one as grade II, and three as grade III in difficulty.

In all five cases of grades II and III difficulty, access to the lesion was hampered by a reduced lung volume and crowding of the ribs associated with the ipsilateral dependent position. The most problematic part of the procedure in these cases was the advancement of the needle through the chest wall to the pleural surface on the dependent side. Further positioning of the needle into the lesion and retrieval of the specimen did not differ from a routine biopsy. The three patients with grade III difficulty had mediastinal masses requiring an anterior approach. All were women with a large body habitus and prominent breast tissue, presenting an additional technical problem. This problem was remedied by using posterior obliquity in all difficult anterior biopsies.

The maximum number of needle passes was five (mean, 2.4). The number of needle passes transgressing the pleura was zero for three mediastinal lesions; the number ranged from one to four (mean, 1.9) for the remaining lesions (Table 3). The maximum number of obtained specimens was five (mean, 2.4).

Final analysis of the fine-needle specimens allowed a specific diagnosis in 19 (83%) of 23 patients. Eighteen (95%) of 19 malignant lesions were diagnosed on fine-needle aspiration. The lesions were 13 primary lung carcinomas and six metastatic tumors. A nondiagnostic specimen was obtained in one patient who developed an immediate onset of self-limited hemoptysis after a single fine-needle pass. On subsequent surgery this patient was found to have metastatic thyroid cancer. Of four benign lesions, a fine-needle aspiration was diagnostic in only one patient, who had cytomegalovirus pneumonia; in the remaining three patients no specific diagnosis was made. Core biopsy, which was prompted by indeterminate cytologic findings during the initial interpretation, confirmed the final cytologic diagnosis of malignancy in three patients; it showed no evidence of malignancy in the other three patients with a nondiagnostic fine-needle aspiration. Pathologic diagnoses in the latter group included fibrosis in one patient and nonspecific inflammatory tissue in two patients. In these three patients, no additional biopsy was performed. The lesions were presumed benign because follow-up CT showed that one lesion (fibrosis) was stable at 24 months, and two lesions decreased in size at 30 and 14 months. Of four specimens sent for microbiology, only one (cytomegalovirus) was positive. Overall, the biopsy results were accurate in 22 (96%) of 23 patients, including all mediastinal lesions, and in 16 (94%) of 17 lung lesions.

Of four patients who had CT with the affected lung in both dependent and nondependent positions, the lesion depth in the ipsilateral dependent position decreased from 2 to 1 cm in one patient and from 3 to 1 cm in another patient (Fig. 1A,1B), and did not change in two patients, one of whom had a subpleural lesion. In three of six patients with mediastinal lesions, the ipsilateral dependent position allowed an extrapleural needle passage because of the mediastinal shift (Fig. 2A,2B).



View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. —54-year-old woman with squamous cell carcinoma in right lower lobe. CT scan obtained before biopsy with patient prone reveals right lower lobe mass 3 cm deep from pleural surface. Mass extends through major fissure into middle lobe that contains extensive bronchiectasis.

 


View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. —54-year-old woman with squamous cell carcinoma in right lower lobe. CT scan obtained during fine-needle biopsy with patient in 90° ipsilateral dependent position shows that lesion has shifted to more cephalad position because of elevation of diaphragm. Lesion is only 1 cm deep from posterior pleura. Directional needle (arrow) has been placed superficially to pleura. Biopsy needle (arrowhead) is in lesion; entry point (not shown) was made slightly lower.

 


View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. —57-year-old man with poorly differentiated small cell carcinoma. CT scan obtained with patient supine shows anterior mediastinal lymphadenopathy that is separated from chest wall by aerated lung.

 


View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. —57-year-old man with poorly differentiated small cell carcinoma. CT scan obtained during biopsy with patient in ipsilateral dependent position with slight posterior obliquity shows that mediastinum has shifted, allowing extrapleural pathway. Needle was passed along sternum without pleural transgression and medial to internal thoracic vessels (arrow).

 

No complications requiring treatment occurred in this series. A small apical postbiopsy pneumothorax was noted in two patients (8.7%) with metastatic lung lesions measuring 8 and 10 mm. Neither patient had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A single fine-needle pass and posterior approach were used in both cases. The patients remained asymptomatic, showing no evidence of enlargement of the pneumothorax on 2- and 4-hr upright chest radiography. They were discharged after 4 hr of observation. Complete resolution of the pneumothorax in these patients was documented on chest radiography at 24 hr in one and 48 hr in the other patient. Self-limited hemoptysis occurred in one patient who was discharged after 4 hr of observation.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
CT-guided lung and transpulmonary mediastinal biopsies are associated with a high incidence of pneumothorax. Although in most large series the reported rate of pneumothorax varies between 5% and 30% [4,5,6,7], incidences as high as 43% [2], 45% [1], and 60% [8] have been reported. Many factors increase the risk for the development of a pneumothorax [7]. Some are related to patients, others to lesions, needles, biopsy techniques, and care after biopsy. The biopsy technique we suggest aims at the improvement of some patient-related and possibly some lesion-related factors. Among the risks related to patients, a variable degree of inspiration and either respiratory or body motion are common [3] despite careful patient coaching. For a typical transthoracic needle biopsy, the patient is positioned with the lesion in the most nondependent portion of the chest. This position results in a relative hyperinflation and greater respiratory motions near the diaphragm, particularly in the lower lobes, which may contribute to the development of a pneumothorax. Variability in inspiration often leads to numerous needle passes, which also increase the chance for a pneumothorax and sampling error. When the lung is dependent, it is hypoinflated. Lying on the affected side diminishes the ipsilateral rib excursions and respiratory motion. We hypothesize that hypoinflation and reduced motion of the dependent lung may decrease the risk of a pneumothorax (Fig. 3A,3B).



View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. —67-year-old man with adenocarcinoma in left lower lobe. CT scan obtained during fine-needle biopsy at outside institution with patient prone shows small pneumothorax despite subpleural location of lesion. Single 20-gauge needle pass resulted in nondiagnostic specimen.

 


View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. —67-year-old man with adenocarcinoma in left lower lobe. CT scan obtained 10 days later during coaxial core needle biopsy, with patient in approximately 40° ipsilateral dependent position, shows tip of guiding cannula at surface of lesion; guiding cannula may or may not have crossed parietal pleura. Multiple passes yielded diagnostic material without complications. Although oblique rather than 90° ipsilateral dependent position was necessary to approach this posterolateral lesion, dependent lung remained hypoinflated and partially immobilized.

 

In addition, with an overall hypoinflation and reduced volume of the dependent lung with the patient in the ipsilateral dependent position, the distance between a lung lesion and the chest wall is expected to diminish for all but subpleural lesions. Yankelevitz et al. [9] found that the depth of a lung lesion varies considerably on prone and supine CT, with up to 4 cm less in depth for some lesions with the patient in the dependent position. In our series, a decrease in lesion depth in the dependent lung was found in two of the four lung lesions that were imaged in both dependent and nondependent positions. Theoretically, decreased lesion depth achieved by an ipsilateral dependent position may reduce the risk of a pneumothorax. Although in one recent study [10] the direct correlation between the lesion depth and the risk of pneumothorax was not established, other investigators have reported a higher pneumothorax rate with deeper lesions [1, 11].

Regardless of possible theoretic advantages of an ipsilateral dependent position, a lesion in the dependent lung may be difficult to sample because of crowding of the ribs and the proximity of the entry site to the CT table. A procedure that is difficult to perform often becomes impractical. Therefore, we tried to rate efforts associated with ipsilateral dependent position vis-à-vis biopsies in standard positions by subjective comparison of technical difficulties. Increased technical difficulty often translates in the prolongation of the procedure. Unfortunately, we did not time our studies. We believe that cases that we considered difficult certainly prolonged the procedure, possibly by 50% or more. The longer time resulted mainly from the necessity to reposition the patient, typically to less than 90° of obliquity, to achieve the optimal approach to the lesion, with subsequent rescanning and remarking of the entry point. We experienced a learning curve, but we learned to take into account both the lesion location relative to overlying bones and the patient body habitus for optimal positioning, thus keeping the procedure time standard.

Our results show that a biopsy in an ipsilateral dependent position is feasible in many cases. Most lesions in our patients were located in the medial half of the hemithorax. In most cases (78%), transthoracic needle biopsy in an ipsilateral dependent position was thought to be no more technically difficult than a routine chest biopsy. It appears that biopsy of posterior chest lesions can easily be performed in most cases using this position. The specific location of the lesion may require modification of a 90° ipsilateral dependent position to either anterior or posterior oblique to improve access to the lesion. We speculate that this technique may be especially useful for lesions in the inferior, most mobile portion of the lung.

Using an ipsilateral dependent position, biopsy was technically difficult in five patients in whom crowding of the dependent ribs presented a temporary obstacle for the advancement of the needle. Four of the five difficult lesions required an anterior approach. In addition, this approach was hampered by large body habitus with prominent soft tissues of the anterior chest wall, expecially breast tissue in women. Some degree of posterior obliquity was necessary to overcome the problem. Nevertheless, biopsy of anterior lesions was more difficult in an ipsilateral dependent position vis-à-vis a routine supine position in 50% of cases. Lesions located near the lateral and anterolateral chest wall are not accessible for biopsy using an ipsilateral dependent position. Additionally, we did not attempt to biopsy lesions located in the middle lobe and lingula because crowded lower anterior ribs in an ipsilateral dependent position were expected to significantly increase the difficulty of the procedure.

Biopsy of a mediastinal mass or paramediastinal lung lesion via an extrapleural pathway eliminates the risk of pneumothorax. Such a pathway may be formed by the instillation of a saline or a saline-lidocaine mixture [12, 13] along the planned needle pass. An extrapleural window can also be created by the mediastinal shift because of a positional change [14]. Using an ipsilateral dependent position, an extrapleural passage caused by the mediastinal shift became possible in three of the six patients with mediastinal lesions; thus, we avoided traversing the pleura and the risk of a pneumothorax. In three other patients a pleural transgression was not avoided with an ipsilateral dependent position, but the technique was probably helpful because the needle passed through a hypoinflated lung.

In this series, cytologic or histologic diagnosis was established in 96% of cases. Fine-needle aspiration was diagnostic in 95% of malignant lesions but in only 25% of benign lesions. These percentages are in concordance with some other, much larger published series reporting that fine-needle aspiration is reliable for diagnosis of malignancy, whereas histologic samples are more accurate for diagnosis of benign lesions [4, 15]. Thus, in our study, an ipsilateral dependent position for biopsy did not adversely affect the diagnostic yield of the procedure as compared with reported results of biopsies that were performed in standard positions.

A pneumothorax rate of 8.7% in this small series is lower than the rate typically reported for CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy. It is also lower than our own pneumothorax rate of 15-18% encountered with standard techniques for the last 4 years, although a statistically significant difference cannot be proven because of the small sample size. We believe that a lower pneumothorax rate in an ipsilateral dependent position is related to limited motion and hypoinflation of the lung and improved extrapleural window for mediastinal lesions. However, because of a strong association of a pneumothorax with lesion size [10], relatively large lesions in our patients could contribute to a lower pneumothorax rate. We observed minimal pneumothorax after biopsy of the two smallest lesions in the series. We did not encounter any other significant complications. Mild hemoptysis occurred in one patient, limiting the procedure to a single nondiagnostic pass.

We conclude that biopsy of selected lung and mediastinal lesions with the patient in an ipsilateral dependent position is a feasible, effective, and safe procedure. The ipsilateral dependent position is associated with decreased motion and hypoinflation of the dependent lung. It is applicable to patients with lesions accessible in this position, in the absence of exclusion criteria. The technique may be especially useful for sampling central and lower lung lesions using a posterior approach. Additionally, the technique facilitates an extrapleural puncture of mediastinal masses. The ipsilateral dependent position cannot be used for lateral and anterolateral lesions because of the lack of access. The technique has limited application for some anterior lesions because of a difficult intercostal pathway and large body habitus, particularly in women. Although we did not encounter any significant complications, statistical analysis was not possible because of the small number of cases in the series. Further experience is necessary to determine the role of this technique for the prevention of a pneumothorax.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Kazerooni EA, Lim FT, Mikhail A, Martinez FJ. Risk of pneumothorax in CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of the lung. Radiology 1996;198:371 -375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Larscheid RC, Thorpe PE, Scott WJ. Percutaneous transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy: a comprehensive review of its current role in the diagnosis and treatment of lung tumors. Chest 1998;114:704 -709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Yankelevitz DF, Davis SD, Chiarella DA, Henschke CI. Pitfalls in CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of pulmonary nodules. RadioGraphics 1996;16:1073 -1084[Abstract]
  4. Greif J, Marmur S, Schwarz Y, et al. Percutaneous core cutting needle biopsy compared with fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of peripheral lung malignant lesions: results in 156 patients. Cancer 1998;84:144 -147[Medline]
  5. Colquhoun SD, Rosenthal DL, Morton DL. Role of percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy in suspected intrathoracic malignancy. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;51:390 -393[Abstract]
  6. Protopapas Z, Westcott JL. Transthoracic needle biopsy of mediastinal lymph nodes for staging lung and other cancers. Radiology 1996;199:489 -496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Klein JS, Zarka MA. Transthoracic needle biopsy: an overview. J Thorac Imaging 1997;12:232 -249[Medline]
  8. Harter LP, Moss AA, Goldberg HI, Gross BH. CT-guided fine-needle aspirations for diagnosis of benign and malignant disease. AJR 1983;140:363 -367[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI, Davis SD, et al. Variability in lesion depth on prone and supine CT scans of the chest: implications for the accuracy of transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy. J Thorac Imaging 1995;10:117 -120[Medline]
  10. Cox JE, Chiles C, Aquino, SL, Choplin RH. Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy: variables that affect risk of pneumothorax. Radiology 1999;212 : 165-168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Miller KS, Fish GB, Stanley JH, Schabel SI. Prediction of pneumothorax rate in percutaneous needle aspiration of the lung. Chest 1988;93:742 -745[Abstract]
  12. Klose KC. CT-guided large-bore biopsy: extrapleural injection of saline for safe transpleural access to pulmonary lesions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1993;16:259 -261[Medline]
  13. Kandallu K, Grant TH, Stull MA, Chambliss JF Jr. Percutaneous needle biopsy of mediastinal and pulmonary masses with a CT-guided extrapleural approach (abstr). Radiology 1996; 201(P):270
  14. Moore EH. Technical aspects of needle aspiration lung biopsy: a personal perspective. Radiology 1998;208:303 -318[Free Full Text]
  15. Boiselle PM, Shepard J-AO, Mark EJ, et al. Routine addition of an automated biopsy device to fine-needle aspiration of the lung: a prospective assessment. AJR 1997;169:661 -666[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Kinoshita, T. Kato, K. Sugiura, M. Nishimura, T. Kinoshita, M. Hashimoto, T. Kaminoh, and T. Ogawa
CT-Guided Transthoracic Needle Biopsy Using a Puncture Site-Down Positioning Technique
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 926 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. A. Morello Jr, K. C. Wright, and T. M. Lembo
New Suction Guide Needle Designed to Reduce the Incidence of Biopsy-related Pneumothorax: Experimental Evaluation in Canine Model
Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 1045 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
L. B. Haramati and G. Aviram
What Constitutes Effective Management of Pneumothorax After CT-Guided Needle Biopsy of the Lung?
Chest, April 1, 2002; 121(4): 1013 - 1015.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rozenblit, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Klink, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rozenblit, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Klink, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS