|
|
||||||||
Original Report |
1
Department of Radiologic Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rm.
M-111, 14th St. N.W. and Alaska Ave., Washington, DC 20306-6000.
2
Present address: Asheville Radiology Associates, P. O. Box 2959, Asheville, NC
28802.
3
Present address: Department of Radiology, USA MEDDAC, Fort Carson, CO
80913.
Received September 23, 1999;
accepted after revision December 8, 1999.
The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the
authors and are not to be construed as official or as representing the views
of the Department of the Army or the Department of the Defense.
Abstract
|
|
|---|
CONCLUSION. The most frequent appearance of abdominal or pelvic Castleman disease is of a single, well-defined enhancing mass. Smaller tumors (<5 cm) display homogeneous contrast enhancement; larger tumors (>5 cm) show heterogeneous enhancement and attenuation when correlated with central necrosis and degeneration. Calcification was seen in 31% of the cases. Castleman disease may be considered in the differential diagnosis of a discrete enhancing mass in the abdomen or pelvis.
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The hyaline-vascular type was found in 11 patients (69%), the plasma cell type in three patients (19%), and a mixed form in two cases (13%). Of the 11 patients with the hyaline-vascular type, eight (73%) were symptomatic. The most common symptom was abdominal pain (n = 5); additional signs and symptoms included weight loss (n = 3), fatigue (n = 2), anemia (n = 2), and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (n = 1). All three patients with the plasma cell type were symptomatic. Symptoms included fatigue (n = 2), failure to thrive (n = 2), fever (n = 1), anemia (n = 1), polyclonal hypergamma-globulinemia (n = 1), elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (n = 1), and splenomegaly (n = 1). Both patients with the mixed form of the disease were symptomatic, both presenting with abdominal pain and one presenting with anemia. The lesion was an incidental finding in two patients. One patient presented with a palpable abdominal mass. Clinical history was unavailable for one patient.
Fifteen patients (94%) were found to have a single mass on CT: nine in the retroperitoneum or pelvis, three in the porta hepatis, and three in the mesentery. One patient presented with generalized lymphadenopathy in the chest, with diffuse abdominal lymph nodes measuring approximately 1 cm. Of the nine cases of focal retroperitoneal or pelvic Castleman disease, seven were located on the left side and two on the right side. Lesions ranged in size from 1 to 18 cm in maximum diameter (average size, 4.5 cm). All tumors had well-defined margins. Tumors less than 5 cm in diameter (n = 8) generally showed homogeneous enhancement (enhancement defined as increased attenuation relative to the psoas muscle) (Fig. 1A,1B,1C), whereas tumors greater than 5 cm in diameter (n = 8) generally showed heterogeneous enhancement (Fig. 2). Calcification was seen in five (31%) of 16 patients; punctate calcification was seen in four patients and an "arborizing" or radial pattern of calcification was seen in one patient (Fig. 3). Although calcification tended to be seen in larger lesions (average size, 15 cm), calcification was also seen in one lesion measuring 3.5 cm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|
Two major histologic forms of Castleman disease, the hyaline-vascular and plasma cell types, and, uncommonly, a transitional or mixed form may be seen. The hyaline-vascular type of Castleman disease is found in 90% of affected patients, and 70% of cases are diagnosed in patients younger than 30 years old [3]. Patients with the hyaline-vascular type are usually asymptomatic; only 3% of patients present with systemic complaints [3]. Histologically, the hyaline-vascular type shows hypervascularhyaline germinal centers. The follicle center cells are concentrically layered and flattened, with extensive capillary proliferation between follicles and complete effacement of lymphoid sinuses [6].
Compared with patients with the hyalinevascular type of Castleman disease, 50% of patients with the plasma cell type are symptomatic at presentation [3]. Systemic signs and symptoms may include fever, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, anemia, hypergammaglobulinemia, and splenomegaly [2,3]. Pediatric patients may present with growth disturbance or failure to thrive. The plasma cell type histologically shows sheets of mature plasma cells with normal- to large-size follicular centers [6]. Effacement of lymphoid sinuses is rare.
Castleman disease in the abdomen and pelvis is most commonly described in the radiology literature as a focal enhancing mass of varying locations, including the retroperitoneum, mesentery, porta hepatis, and pancreas [7,8,9]. In comparison, Castleman disease in the mediastinum is described as having a variety of appearances depending on histology. The hyaline-vascular type is described as having three patterns on CT: a solitary, noninvasive mass; a dominant infiltrative mass with associated lymphadenopathy; or matted lymphadenopathy without a dominant mass [10]. In contrast, the plasma cell type of Castleman disease manifests as diffuse mediastinal lymphadenopathy. All lesions show enhancement, regardless of histopathology.
In our series, 15 of 16 patients had a single, well-circumscribed enhancing mass. No difference was seen between the CT appearance of the hyaline-vascular or plasma cell types. Smaller lesions (<5 cm in diameter) tended to display homogeneous contrast enhancement whereas larger tumors (>5 cm) displayed heterogeneous enhancement, with low-attenuation areas consistent with necrosis. Because of its imaging appearance, Castleman disease may mimic a visceral neoplasm [8,9,10]. Although these lesions are usually well defined, a single case report describes Castleman disease as an enhancing retroperitoneal mass that appears to infiltrate the surrounding fat [11].
Castleman disease in the abdomen and pelvis displays a variety of calcification patterns, including punctate, coarse, peripheral, and "arborizing" [7,8,12]. In our series, five tumors (31%) showed calcification, one with an arborizing pattern and the remaining lesions with punctate calcification.
The differential diagnosis of an enhancing retroperitoneal mass may include lymphoma, metastasis, infection (abscess, tuberculosis), sarcoma, schwannoma, paraganglioma, and hemangiopericytoma. Based on its CT appearance, the most commonly stated presurgical radiologic differential diagnosis for Castleman disease in our series was lymphoma or sarcoma. In fact, two patients had presurgical diagnoses of lymphoma based on percutaneous biopsy; in one patient, a histologic diagnosis of lymphoma was made on frozen section. On CT, lymphoma is typically a mass of low attenuation, without significant enhancement or calcification. Retroperitoneal sarcomas may show enhancement and calcification, depending on histologic type. In contrast, tuberculosis is typically seen on CT as a mass or multiple masses with necrotic, low-attenuation centers and peripheral enhancement.
Limitations of our study include a small sample size and a selection bias. In addition, because the cases were submitted to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology from many different institutions, a variety of CT imaging techniques was included.
In our series, Castleman disease in the abdomen and pelvis most commonly manifested as a discrete, enhancing mass. Masses less than 5 cm in diameter showed homogeneous contrast enhancement, and larger masses (>5 cm in diameter) showed heterogeneous enhancement. A variety of calcification patterns may be seen. Castleman disease may be considered in the differential diagnosis of an enhancing mass in the abdomen and pelvis.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.-F. Ko, M.-J. Hsieh, S.-H. Ng, J.-W. Lin, Y.-L. Wan, T.-Y. Lee, W.-J. Chen, and M.-C. Chen Imaging Spectrum of Castleman's Disease Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2004; 182(3): 769 - 775. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S D Chang and R F Thoeni Castleman's disease presenting as an adnexal mass: ultrasound, CT and MRI features Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2004; 77(914): 161 - 163. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nishie, K. Yoshimitsu, H. Irie, H. Aibe, T. Tajima, K. Shinozaki, T. Nakayama, D. Kakihara, S. Naito, M. Ono, et al. Radiologic Features of Castleman's Disease Occupying the Renal Sinus Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2003; 181(4): 1037 - 1040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |