AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stazzone, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahboubi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stazzone, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahboubi, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 175:835-839
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Ultrafast MR Imaging of the Normal Posterior Fossa in Fetuses

Madelyn M. Stazzone1, Anne M. Hubbard, Larissa T. Bilaniuk, M. Patricia Harty, James S. Meyer, Robert A. Zimmerman and Soroosh Mahboubi

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th and Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19154.

Received August 23, 1999; accepted after revision February 22, 2000.

 
Address correspondence to A. M. Hubbard.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine if a standard imaging protocol using ultrafast MR sequences could adequately reveal normal posterior fossa anatomy in fetuses and, if so, to document a template on MR imaging for normal posterior fossa development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective review found 66 MR imaging studies of 63 fetuses, 16-39 weeks' gestation age (mean, 25 weeks' gestation), who were referred between June 1996 and May 1999 for evaluation of non-central nervous system anomalies revealed on prenatal sonography. All fetuses had normal brains and spines on prenatal sonography. The standard MR imaging protocol included axial, sagittal, and coronal half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE); sagittal and coronal two-dimensional fast low-angle shot (FLASH); and axial turbo T1-weighted FLASH images through the fetal brain. Structures that we analyzed were the fourth ventricle, the cisterna magna, the vermis, the cerebellar hemispheres, and the brainstem. Using the HASTE sequences, we documented gestational age-specific signal intensity changes in the cerebellar hemispheres and the brainstem.

RESULTS. The posterior fossa anatomy was sufficiently well defined to exclude abnormalities of the fourth ventricle and cerebellar vermis in all cases. Because of high T2-weighting, good contrast enhancement, and good signal-to-noise ratios, HASTE images provided the best anatomic definition of the posterior fossa.

CONCLUSION. Normal posterior fossa anatomy can be adequately shown on ultrafast MR images, which can be helpful when prenatal sonography is equivocal.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Familiarity with normal fetal brain anatomy and development as shown on MR images is essential for proper interpretation of prenatal MR images of the brain. From previous studies we have learned that the MR imaging templates of normal cerebral development can lag behind their gestational age—specific histologic templates [1, 2]. Therefore, conclusions about normal and abnormal fetal MR imaging development should be based on MR imaging studies. The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to determine if a standard fetal MR imaging protocol using ultrafast sequences, obtained to document overall anatomy, could adequately define posterior fossa anatomy; and second, to document normal posterior fossa development on MR imaging.

Prenatal sonography in the second trimester is the technique of choice for the screening of brain anomalies in utero. Sonography provides real-time imaging that is safe, readily available, noninvasive, and cost-effective [3, 4]. However, prenatal sonography has its limitations, particularly in the examination of the posterior fossa, which is often difficult given the compact anatomy. To evaluate the posterior fossa sonographically, a transthalamic axial view of the head angled posteriorly toward the cerebellum is obtained. From this one view, the cerebellum, cerebellar vermis, cisterna magna, and nuchal soft tissues are evaluated [5]. However, the degree of posterior angulation has not been standardized because of lack of a single anatomic landmark. Therefore, depending on the degree of angulation, inferior vermian defects and other subtle posterior fossa anomalies can go undetected. Conversely, the cisterna magna can appear falsely enlarged if the angle of inclination of the transducer is increased [6, 7]. In addition, evaluation of the posterior fossa in fetuses older than 33 weeks' gestation can be difficult because of interference of beam penetration with the ossified cranium or because the head is engaged in the maternal pelvis [3]. Fetal sonography can also be limited by other factors such as maternal obesity, gasfilled maternal structures, oligohydramnios, and fetal motion [4, 8, 9].

Fetal MR imaging is helpful in the evaluation of brain anomalies detected on sonography and in cases in which sonography was equivocal or inadequate [1, 3, 8, 10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Earlier MR imaging studies in the mid 1980s to early 1990s were limited by fetal motion, so maternal sedation with diazepam or fetal paralysis with pancuronium or vecuronium bromide was used to obtain quality images, introducing risks to the mother and fetus [1, 3, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18]. Because of the development of ultrafast MR imaging in the 1990s, quality multiplanar images can now be obtained in milliseconds, essentially eliminating the problem of motion artifacts and obviating premedication.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
A retrospective review was made of 66 fetal MR imaging studies performed on 63 patients between June 1996 and May 1999. The fetuses were examined in their second and third trimesters for suspected non-central nervous system anomalies detected on prenatal sonography. The anomalies in question were congenital diaphragmatic hernia (n = 28), congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation (n = 13), bronchopulmonary sequestration (n = 3), omphalocele (n = 2), abdominal mass (n = 4), choledochal cyst (n = 1), renal anomaly (n = 3), posterior urethral valves (n = 3), suprarenal mass (n = 2), ovarian mass (n = 1), sacrococcygeal teratoma (n = 2), and amniotic leak (n = 1). To be included in the study, all patients had to have shown normal fetal brain and spinal anatomy on level II sonography performed just before the MR imaging. The fetuses were 16-39 weeks' gestational age (mean, 25 weeks' gestation). All were singleton gestations with distribution of gestational ages as follows: 16-19 weeks' gestation (n = 8), 20-23 weeks' gestation (n = 23), 24-27 weeks' gestation (n = 17), 28-31 weeks' gestation (n = 10), 32-35 weeks' gestation (n = 5), and 36-39 weeks' gestation (n = 3). Follow-up studies were obtained on three patients: a patient with congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation whose initial and follow-up studies were performed at 19 and 21 weeks' gestation, respectively; a patient with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia whose initial scan was performed at 28 weeks' gestation and follow-up scan at 33 weeks' gestation; and a patient with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia whose initial and follow-up scans were performed at 26 and 39 weeks' gestation, respectively.

Informed consent was obtained for all patients. MR imaging was performed on a 1.5-T Vision Magnetom System (Siemens Medical Systems, Iselin, NJ) with a body phased array coil. Our standard protocol included half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE), two-dimensional fast low-angle shot (2D FLASH,) and turbo T1-weighted FLASH images. HASTE images (TR/TE, 4.4/64 msec; flip angle, 120°; matrix, 128 x 256; slice thickness, 6 mm with no gap) were obtained through the fetus in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. Two-dimensional FLASH images (174/4.1 msec; flip angle, 80°; matrix, 128 x 256; slice thickness, 5 mm with a 0.2-mm gap) were obtained in the sagittal and coronal planes. Turbo T1 FLASH images (11.0/5.3; flip angle, 15°; matrix, 128 x 256; slice thickness, 5 mm with a 0.2-mm gap) were obtained from the fetal brain through the pelvis in the axial plane. Whenever possible, patients were asked to hold their breath on all sequences with a scan time equal to or less than 22 sec.

All images were reviewed by three radiologists: two senior attending radiologists and the first-year pediatric radiology fellow. To determine which sequence revealed posterior fossa anatomy best, each of the three sequences was evaluated in terms of contrast and resolution. The anatomic structures analyzed were the cerebellar hemispheres, the vermis, the cisterna magna, the fourth ventricle, and the brainstem. Any signal intensity changes of these structures seen with fetal maturation were documented.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The HASTE sequence was superior to the 2D FLASH and turbo T1 FLASH sequences in defining the anatomy of the developing fetal brain because it provided the best contrast. In addition, each HASTE image was obtained in less than 400 msec, virtually eliminating most fetal motion artifacts. This resulted in sharper, much less noisy images than the 2D FLASH and turbo T1 FLASH images. Less noise yielded a better effective resolution. The 2D FLASH and turbo T1 FLASH images had lower signal intensity, and there was very little difference in signal intensity of various parts of the posterior fossa. Because the HASTE sequence provided the best anatomic definition, it was the sequence we used to describe the normal template of posterior fossa development.

The standard sequences we used displayed enough posterior fossa anatomy to exclude morphologic anomalies in all cases (Figs. 1 and 2). We found that 5- and 6-mm-thick slices were adequate for excluding anomalies of the vermis and cisterna magna. The thickness of the slices was the thinnest possible for the sequences used. The HASTE sequence was sufficient in 64 cases. In two cases, however, the 2D FLASH sequence was used to confirm the anatomy because the appropriate planes were not performed on the HASTE sequences. In addition, characteristic signal intensity changes on HASTE sequences were detected in the cerebellum and brainstem (Table 1). Between 16 and 19 weeks' gestation, the cerebellar hemispheres and most of the brainstem showed homogenous, intermediate signal intensity. A lobulated area of low signal intensity was seen in the dorsal aspect of the midbrain as early as 16 weeks' gestation and certainly by 20 weeks' gestation in all cases. This area corresponded anatomically to the tectum (Fig. 3). By 20-23 weeks' gestation, lower signal intensity that corresponded anatomically to the cerebellar cortex was seen in the periphery of the cerebellar hemispheres. At the same gestational age, a lower signal-intensity vertical band was seen in the posterior aspect of the pons and the medulla (Fig. 3); the band reached the midbrain by 32 weeks' gestation (Fig. 4A,4B). This band corresponded to the region of the medial longitudinal fasciculus. No other changes in signal intensity were noted in the brainstem after 32 weeks' gestation.



View larger version (152K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. —Sagittal half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo image of brain of fetus at 18 weeks' gestation clearly shows inferior vermis (arrow).

 


View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. —Semiaxial half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo image in fetus at 25 weeks' gestation shows normal cerebellar hemispheres, normal cisterna magna (solid arrow), normal fourth ventricle (arrowhead), and normal vermis (open arrow).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Signal Intensity Changes in Fetal Cerebellum and Brainstem Revealed on MR Imaging

 


View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. —Sagittal half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo image of fetus at 21 weeks' gestation shows peripheral low signal intensity in cerebellar hemisphere (thick arrow). Note low signal intensity in region of tectum (thin arrow) and in posterior aspect of pons and medulla.

 


View larger version (167K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. —A fetus at 32 weeks' gestation. Sagittal half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) image shows well-developed cerebellar hemisphere with notable folia. Arrow indicates midbrain.

 


View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. —A fetus at 32 weeks' gestation. Semiaxial HASTE image shows that posterior band of low signal intensity along brainstem has now reached mid brain (arrow).

 

By 23-26 weeks' gestation, minimal undulation of the periphery of the cerebellar hemispheres was seen, and by 32 weeks' gestation prominent folia were identified (Fig. 4A,4B) that increased in number as the fetus approached term. The folial pattern was best depicted on the axial images as a layered pattern of alternating intermediately low- and high-signal-intensity bands (Fig. 5). By 27 weeks' gestation, the cerebellar tonsils were seen. In addition, by 26-27 weeks' gestation, three distinct cerebellar layers were identified that were best detected on the coronal views. The outermost thin layer of low signal intensity corresponded anatomically to the cerebellar cortex, and the thicker middle layer of high signal intensity corresponded to the cerebellar white matter. The deepest layer was a thin layer of low signal intensity that outlined the fourth ventricle on either side and corresponded to the dentate nucleus (Fig. 6). The middle cerebellar peduncles were first appreciated at 24 weeks' gestation as bilateral bands of low signal intensity extending from the pons to the cerebellar hemispheres on the axial images (Fig. 7).



View larger version (156K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. —Axial half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo image in fetus at 21 weeks' gestation shows early folial pattern with alternating layers of intermediate to low- (short arrow) and high-signal-intensity bands (long arrow).

 


View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6. —Coronal half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo image in fetus at 21 weeks' gestation shows three cerebellar layers: peripheral layer of low signal intensity corresponding to cerebellar cortex (curved arrow), thicker middle layer of high signal intensity corresponding to cerebellar white matter, and deep layer of low signal intensity outlining fourth ventricle that corresponds to dentate nucleus (straight arrow). Note cerebellar tonsils (open arrow).

 


View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7. —Axial half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo image of brain of fetus at 25 weeks' gestation clearly shows middle cerebellar peduncles as bilateral bands of low signal intensity extending from pons to cerebellar hemispheres (arrows).

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Our standard protocol successfully showed normal posterior fossa anatomy in all fetuses in our study, with visualization of the brainstem, fourth ventricle, cerebellar hemispheres, vermis, and cisterna magna. Although the fetuses ranged in age from 16 to 39 weeks, most of our patients were scanned in the late second trimester for several reasons. First, the maternal serum test referred to as the "triple screen," which detects a possible anomaly in a fetus, is usually performed between 15 and 18 weeks' gestation. Second, most screening sonography for fetal anomalies is performed at 18-20 weeks, when the fetus is best visualized. Third, most patients were referred to our institution for further counseling and possible fetal intervention.

Multiple case reports and studies have proven the usefulness of MR imaging in defining fetal anatomy and pathology [3, 4, 8,9,10, 12,13,14, 16, 17, 19, 20]. MR imaging provides superior resolution and soft-tissue characterization compared with sonography. It is more efficient in the evaluation of the subarachnoid spaces, ventricular walls, and intraparenchymal architecture [1, 3, 9, 11, 19]. In addition, because images can be obtained in the sagittal and coronal planes, MR imaging is superior to sonography in the examination of the posterior fossa for anomalies such as Dandy-Walker malformation and Arnold-Chiari malformations. However, most fetal MR imaging studies to date have concentrated on supratentorial brain anatomy, with particular attention to neuronal migration patterns. Minimal focus has been placed on normal anatomy and development of the posterior fossa on MR imaging [1, 3, 8, 11, 13, 16, 17, 21].

As stated earlier, from previous studies we learned that MR imaging templates of fetal cerebral development can lag behind their gestational age—specific histologic correlates [1, 2]. A recent study by Chong et al. [2] analyzed normal cerebellar development on MR imaging on 26 fetal specimens ranging from 9 to 24 weeks' gestation. Comparison was made to age-specific histologic specimens. They found a lag of up to 5 weeks between the appearance of some structures histologically and their visualization on MR imaging. They attributed this discrepancy to the limits of resolution of MR imaging, particularly in the first and early second trimesters, when structures are small [2]. Therefore, it would be erroneous to interpret MR imaging findings of the posterior fossa on the basis of the expected histologic findings for a given gestational age. An in vivo MR imaging template of normal fetal posterior fossa anatomy and development is essential for proper interpretation of prenatal MR imaging of the brain.

Most previous MR imaging studies of the development of the supratentorial brain in fetuses have documented normal anatomy using T1-weighted sequences [1, 11, 21]. However, several reports have shown the HASTE sequence to be excellent for examining the developing fetal brain [9, 10, 14, 15]. Our study agrees with these previous reports. The HASTE sequence is an ultrafast, heavily T2-weighted sequence with good signal-to-noise ratio. Because each image is acquired sequentially in less than 1 sec, motion artifacts are fewer than on the 2D FLASH and turbo T1 FLASH sequences [9, 10]. Moreover, if motion occurs during the acquisition, only the images acquired during motion are affected [20], which results in better effective resolution. This is not the case with the two other sequences, in which all images would be affected by fetal motion occurring at some point during the acquisition. The fetal brain has a lower protein content and higher water content than the normal adult brain, with an extracellular space equaling 40% of the total brain versus 20% in the adult. This higher water content results in long T2 relaxation characteristics in the fetal brain. Therefore, subtle differences in signal intensity in the brain parenchyma are best shown using a heavily T2-weighted sequence like HASTE to highlight T2 differences [1, 19]. This technique results in better contrast. The 2D FLASH and turbo T1 FLASH sequences were T1-weighted and therefore were not optimal for defining fine detail in the fetal brain.

Changes of signal intensity in the brainstem and cerebellum were not evident on MR imaging until 20-23 weeks' gestation, which correlates with recent findings of Levine et al. [20], who analyzed normal fetal anatomy using a similar ultrafast sequence and found that the resolution of MR imaging was limited in live fetuses of fewer than 20 weeks' gestation, probably because of the small size of the structures being analyzed. We agree with Girard et al. [1] that signal intensity changes (high on T1-weighted and low on T2-weighted images) in the cerebellar cortex, dentate nucleus, and tectum are the result of relatively high cellularity in these areas composed of gray matter, which contains less water than the adjacent white matter. This assumption is based on histologic correlates that show hypercellularity in these areas [22]. In addition, we also agree with Girard et al. that the signal intensity change of the posterior aspects of the pons and medulla (high on T1-weighted and low on T2-weighted images) corresponds to the myelination of the medial longitudinal fasciculus, which is also first seen histologically at 20 weeks' gestation.

The 1997 in vitro study of posterior fossa development by Chong et al. [2] first showed changes in cerebellar signal intensity at a similar time (19 weeks' gestation). However, those researchers first noted signal intensity changes in the posterior brainstem at 17 weeks' gestation, which is before the myelination of the medial longitudinal fasciculus has occurred. They postulated that these signal intensity changes in the dorsal brainstem are not the result of myelination, but instead result from differences in water content between densely packed gray matter in the pontine tegmentum (dorsal pons) and the nonmyelinated tracts with scattered nuclei seen in the basis pontis. A factor to be taken into consideration is that they used only T1-weighted imaging. In addition, they studied formalin-fixed specimens. The in vivo study by Girard et al. [1] also used T1-weighted images and first detected signal intensity changes in the brainstem at 23 weeks' gestation. Therefore, the HASTE images were comparable to, if not more sensitive than, the T1-weighted sequences in terms of detecting subtle signal intensity differences in vivo.

Unlike previous MR imaging studies of fetal development of the supratentorial brain that showed a five-layered pattern of neuronal migration correlating to the expected histologic pattern, in our study neuronal migration in the cerebellar hemispheres was not evident on MR imaging [1, 11, 21]. This was also the case in the recent in vitro study by Chong et al. [2]. However, in our study, a three-layered pattern was noted in the cerebellar hemispheres by 26-27 weeks' gestation, which corresponds to the development of the cerebellar cortex, cerebellar white matter, and dentate nucleus (Fig. 6). This pattern is based on coronal fetal histologic sections that show these three basic layers composing the cerebellar hemispheres. Two of these layers, the cerebellar cortex and the dentate nucleus, are hypercellular and therefore correspond to their low signal intensity on the HASTE sequences [23]. This three-layered pattern was also seen in the recent in vitro study by Chong et al. [2], although it was seen earlier, at 19 weeks' gestation. The same recent study by Chong et al. identified folia in the vermis at 16 weeks' gestation. Histologically, folia are first identified at 12-13 weeks' gestation [24, 25]. Our study first identified folia at 23-26 weeks' gestation, yielding a longer lag time between the appearance of folia histologically and their appearance on MR imaging. The discrepancy between the two studies may lie in the fact that Chong et al. used formalin-fixed specimens, which yielded better resolution. Our study included only eight fetuses between 16 and 19 weeks' gestation. However, we believe that we were not able to identify folia before 23 weeks' gestation because of the limitation of resolution of MR imaging in the early second trimester [2].

In conclusion, although MR imaging will not replace sonography in the evaluation of the fetal brain, it plays a crucial role as an adjuvant study, especially in the evaluation of the posterior fossa. As the fetus matures, predictable changes in signal intensity can be seen that correspond to anatomic and histologic differentiation. Using the HASTE sequence, we found what we believe to be the first template of normal fetal posterior fossa development revealed on MR imaging.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Girard N, Raybaud C, Ponce M. In vivo MR study of brain maturation in normal fetuses. AJNR 1995;16:407 -413[Abstract]
  2. Chong B, Babcook C, Pang D, Ellis W. A magnetic resonance template for normal cerebellar development in the human fetus. Neurosurgery 1997;41:924 -929[Medline]
  3. Yuh W, Nguyen H, Fisher D, et al. MR of fetal central nervous system abnormalities. AJNR 1994;15:459 -464[Abstract]
  4. Weinreb J, Lowe T, Santos-Ramos R, Cunningham F, Parkey R. Magnetic resonance imaging in obstetric diagnosis. Radiology 1985;154:157 -161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Timor-Tritsch I, Monteagudo A, Haratz-Rubinstein N. Biometry of the fetal brain. In: Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cohen H, eds. Ultrasonography of the prenatal and neonatal brain. Stamford, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1996:89 -146
  6. Laing F, Frates M, Brown D, Benson C, DiSalvo D, Doubilet P. Sonography of the fetal posterior fossa: false appearance of mega-cisterna magna and Dandy-Walker variant. Radiology 1994;192:247 -251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kurtz A, Middleton W. Fetal central nervous system: head and spine. In: Kurtz A, Middleton W. Ultrasound: the requisties. St. Louis: Mosby, 1996:207 -236
  8. Sonigo P, Rypens F, Carteret M, Delezoide A, Burnelle F. MR imaging of fetal cerebral anomalies. Pediatr Radiol 1998;28:212 -222[Medline]
  9. Levine D, Hatabu H, Gaa J, Atkinson MW, Edelman RR. Fetal anatomy revealed with fast MR sequences. AJR 1996;167:905 -908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Yamashita Y, Namimoto T, Abe Y, et al. MR imaging of the fetus by a HASTE sequence. AJR 1997;168:513 -519[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Chong B, Babcook C, Salamat M, Nemzek W, Kroeker D, Ellis W. A magnetic resonance template for normal neuronal migration in the fetus. Neurosurgery 1996;39:110 -116[Medline]
  12. Rotmensch S, Grannum P, Nores J, Hall C, Keller M, McCarthy S. In utero diagnosis and management of fetal subdural hematoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;164:1246 -1248[Medline]
  13. D'Ercole C, Girard N, Boubli L, Potier A, Chagnon C, Raybaud C. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal cerebral abnormalities by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993;50:177 -184[Medline]
  14. Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Seki T, Mizutani Y, Hachiya J. Short communication: MR imaging of fetal brain abnormalities using a HASTE sequence. Br J Radiol 1996;69:668 -670[Abstract]
  15. Levine D, Barnes P, Madsen J, Li W, Edelman R. Fetal central nervous system anomalies: MR imaging augments sonographic diagnosis. Radiology 1997;204:635 -642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Girard N, Raybaud C, Dercole C, et al. In vivo MRI of the fetal brain. Neuroradiology 1993;35:431 -436[Medline]
  17. Garel C, Brisse H, Sebag G, Elmaleh M, Oury J, Hassan M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetus. Pediatr Radiol 1998;28:201 -211[Medline]
  18. Weinreb J, Lowe T, Cohen J, Kutler M. Human fetal anatomy: MR imaging. Radiology 1985;157 : 715-720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. McCarthy S, Filly R, Stark D, Hricak H, Brant-Zawadzki M, Callen P. Obstetrical magnetic resonance imaging: fetal anatomy. Radiology 1985;154:427 -432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Levine D, Barnes P, Sher S, et al. Fetal fast MR imaging: reproducibility, technical quality, and conspicuity of anatomy. Radiology 1998;206:549 -554[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Girard N, Raybaud C. In vivo MRI of fetal brain cellular migration. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:265 -267[Medline]
  22. Fees-Higgins A, Larroche JC. Development of the human fetal brain: an anatomical atlas. Paris: Masson, 1987: 13-189
  23. Valdes-Dapena M. Central nervous system. In: Valdes-Dapena M, ed. Histology of the fetus and newborn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1979:533 -620
  24. Hansen P, Ballesteros M, Soila K. Garcia L, Howard J. MR imaging of the developing human brain. I. Prenatal development. RadioGraphics 1993;13:21 -36[Abstract]
  25. Sidman R, Rakic P. Development of the nervous system. In: Haymaker W, Adams R, eds. Histology and histopathology of the nervous system. Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1982:3 -145

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Limperopoulos, R. L. Robertson Jr., O. S. Khwaja, C. D. Robson, J. A. Estroff, C. Barnewolt, D. Levine, D. Morash, L. Nemes, L. Zaccagnini, et al.
How Accurately Does Current Fetal Imaging Identify Posterior Fossa Anomalies?
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1637 - 1643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
O.A. Glenn and A.J. Barkovich
Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis, part 1.
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2006; 27(8): 1604 - 1611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. C. Chen, E. M. Simon, J. C. Haselgrove, L. T. Bilaniuk, L. N. Sutton, M. P. Johnson, D. M. Shera, and R. A. Zimmerman
Fetal Posterior Fossa Volume: Assessment with MR Imaging
Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 997 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. F. Reichel, R. M. Ramus, J. T. Caire, L. S. Hynan, K. P. Magee, and D. M. Twickler
Fetal Central Nervous System Biometry on MR Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 1155 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stazzone, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahboubi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stazzone, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahboubi, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS