AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaffler, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fotter, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaffler, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fotter, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2000; 175:1041-1045
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Helical CT Angiography with Maximum Intensity Projection in the Assessment of Aortic Coarctation After Surgery

G. J. Schaffler1, E. Sorantin1, R. Groell1, A. Gamillscheg2, E. Maier2, H. Schoellnast1 and R. Fotter1

1 Department of Radiology, University Hospital Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 9, A-8036 Graz, Austria.
2 Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Graz, A-8036 Graz, Austria.

Received January 17, 2000; accepted after revision March 28, 2000.

 
Address correspondence to G. J. Schaffler.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The value of CT angiography and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions was investigated in the postoperative care after surgical repair of aortic coarctation and compared with conventional angiography.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-five patients referred because of suspicion of stenosis in the area of former coarctation were prospectively studied with CT angiography and catheter angiography. We determined the morphometric and morphologic findings such as aortic diameter, stenosis, aneurysm, intimal flaps, circumscribed pouch, or arteriosclerotic plaques with 3D reconstructions, using maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) technique and catheter angiography. The results of both techniques were compared. The ratio of the narrowest diameters of the former coarctation and the descending aorta was correlated with the systolic pullback blood pressure gradient in all patients.

RESULTS. The former coarctation was normal in 11 patients, (44%), group A; narrowed in 12 children (48%), group B; and dilated in two children (8%), group C. An intimal flap and a circumscribed pouch were delineated in four subjects. MIP reconstructions and catheter angiography revealed identical results regarding the classification into groups A, B, C; intimal flaps; and circumscribed pouches. Statistical analysis revealed good correlation between the narrowest aortic diameters measured on MIP reconstructions and catheter angiography, whereas no correlation between the systolic pullback blood pressure gradient and the diameter ratio of the former coarctation and the descending aorta was found.

CONCLUSION. CT angiography and 3D reconstructions using MIP represent a reliable noninvasive technique to replace diagnostic catheter angiography in the postoperative care of patients with coarctation and provide the clinician with valuable information concerning further invasive procedures.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Various surgical techniques to treat coarctation of the aorta have been established during the last 40 years [1]. Perioperative complications are rare; however, late complications such as stenosis, aneurysms, and systolic hypertension necessitate careful long-term supervision [2]. Clinical investigations including measurement of the systolic blood pressure gradient between the upper and lower extremity, chest radiography, and color Doppler echocardiography may not provide accurate information of stenosis or aneurysm of the thoracic aorta [1, 2]. Usually, catheter angiography must be performed for confirmation whenever stenosis or aneurysm is suspected.

Because of the development of helical CT, CT angiography is a promising method for the evaluation of blood vessels [3]. In axial CT slices, the course of complex vascular malformation such as coarctation is not clearly displayed [4, 5]. Becker et al. [5] have shown that three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions were useful in patients with suspected aortic coarctation. In addition, they mentioned that this technique could be useful for noninvasive postoperative followup after surgical repair of coarctation.

To investigate the possible clinical value of 3D reconstructed images of CT angiography, we compared the postoperative results of catheter angiography and maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) reconstructions in former coarctation patients and also correlated radiologic findings with systolic pullback blood pressure gradient obtained by catheter angiography.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The study group consisted of 25 consecutive patients (19 males, six females) who were examined between January 1996 and July 1997. The mean age at repair of coarctation was 16 months (age range, 0.25-130 months), and the mean age at helical CT follow-up was 134 months (age range, 9-288 months, 0.75-24 years). The time between surgical repair and our study averaged 109 months (time range, 5-198 months). From 25 subjects, 14 (56%) underwent coarctation resection with an end-to-end anastomosis, nine (36%) underwent subclavian flap angioplasty, and two (8%) underwent Voßschulte surgery [1, 6, 7]. Associated congenital malformations included cardiovascular failure such as ventricular septal defect (n = 2), bicuspid aortic valve without outflow obstruction (n = 6), transverse arch hypoplasia (n = 5), fibroelastosis with subvalvular outflow obstruction (n = 2), and persistent left superior vena cava (n = 3).

All patients underwent routine clinical follow-up, including complete physical examination, especially pulse recording at all four extremities, calculation of systolic blood pressure gradient between the right arm and the right leg, color Doppler echocardiography, and electrocardiography.

In all 25 patients, stenosis in the former coarctation was suspected either in the case of an increased systolic blood pressure gradient between the right arm and the right leg (n = 7) or, in the case of turbulent blood flow, in the postoperative segment of the thoracic aorta during echocardiography (n = 18). Contrast-enhanced helical CT and catheter angiography were performed in all 25 patients with suspected stenosis.

CT angiography was performed from the level of the diaphragm to 3 cm superior to the origin of the great supraaortic vessels, in the caudocranial direction. All subjects were examined with a Somatom Plus 4 scanner (Siemens Medical System, Erlangen, Germany) using a pitch of 1:5, slice collimation of 3 mm, table feed of 4.5 mm, and reconstruction increment of 2 mm. The voltage and tube current were set at 120 kVp and 107 mA. In children younger than 8 years old, tube current was reduced to 50 mA. Depending on age, an average of 49 mL (range, 10-100 mL, 1.5 mL/kg body weight) of a nonionic contrast agent, either Iomeprol (Jopamiro; Gerot, Vienna, Austria) (n = 7) or iopentol (Imagopaque; Nycomed Imaging AS, Oslo, Norway) (n = 18), was injected into an antecubital or forearm vein with an average flow rate of 1.8 mL/sec (range, 4.0-0.4 mL/sec). The individual scan delay was determined after the administration of a test bolus and ranged from 10 to 20 sec. Helical CT data acquisition was performed in one breath-hold. In children younger than 5 years old, helical CT data acquisition was carried out in deep sedation without intubation (midazolam [Dormicum, Roche, Basel, Switzerland], 0.1-0.2 mg/kg body weight). To generate 3D reconstructed images that display the course of the thoracic aorta, manual segmentation of the aortic arch and the supraaortic vessels was performed on an external workstation (Siemens Medical System) [5]. MIP reconstructions were rendered and displayed at a center level of 250 H and a window width of 1000 H.

In all 25 subjects, we performed catheter angiography under deep sedation (ketamine [Ketalar, Parke, Davis, Morris Plains, NJ], 2-4 mg/kg body weight; midazolam [Dormicum], 0.1-0.2 mg/kg body weight), using an average of 41.8 mL of nonionic contrast agent (range, 7-95 mL; average, 1.2 mL/kg body weight). Images of catheter angiography of the aorta and great vessels were obtained in the left anterior oblique and lateral projections. The average time interval between helical CT and catheter angiography was 12.5 days (range, 1-30 days). Measurement from pullback pressure recordings was obtained for each subject, and the systolic blood pressure gradients between the pre- and poststenotic segments of the former coarctation were calculated. We measured the narrowest diameter of the former coarctation and the diaphragmatic segment of the aorta perpendicular to the z-axis of the thoracic aorta on MIP reconstructions and on the catheter angiograms, using the left anterior oblique and the lateral projection images, respectively. The ratio between the narrowest diameter of the former coarctation and the descending aorta (top of the diaphragma) was calculated [2]. According to Pinzon et al. [2], the postoperative morphology of former coarctation was classified into three groups: normal contour, group A; narrowing, group B (diameter ratio, <0.75); and dilatation, group C (diameter ratio, >1.5). Linear regression was used to correlate the narrowest diameter measured on MIP images with that obtained by catheter angiography. The diameter ratio between former coarctation and descending aorta was correlated by linear regression with the systolic pullback pressure gradient of the catheter angiography. In addition, MIP reconstructions and catheter angiography were reviewed to detect circumscribed pouches, intimal flaps, and intramural calcification [2]. Pouches were classified as a circumscribed bulging of a part of the vessel's circumference, whereas intimal flaps were described as minimal tears of the inner layer of the aortic wall with the potential risk of aortic wall dissection [2]. Intramural calcification in the segment of the former coarctation as a sign of increased arteriosclerotic risk was sought with MIP reconstructions (area with increased density >130 H in the aortic wall) and catheter angiography (calcified area). The sensitivity of each method was compared (McNemar test).

Catheter angiography and MIP images were reviewed in random order by consensus of interpreters blinded to the results from the other technique.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The area of former coarctation showed a normal contour in conventional angiography in 11 (44%) of 25 patients, group A. In 12 children (48%), group B, a circumscribed narrowing of the former coarctation occurred (Fig. 1A,1B). In two children (8%), group C, the entire circumference of the former coarctation showed diffuse dilatation (Fig. 2A,2B). In four subjects (16%), a circumscribed eccentric pouch was delineated at the anterolateral contour of the postoperative segment of the aorta (one in a child with narrowing of the postoperative aorta, one in a child with diffuse dilatation of the descending aorta, and two in children with a normal postoperative aorta) (Fig. 3A,3B,3C). Additionally, an intimal flap in the postoperative segment of the thoracic aorta was delineated in four subjects (16%). MIP reconstructions revealed the same morphologic ratings.



View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. —16-year-old boy after surgical repair of aortic coarctation. Sagittal maximum-intensity-projection reconstruction shows circumscribed narrowing (arrows) of postoperative aorta.

 


View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. —16-year-old boy after surgical repair of aortic coarctation. Sagittal catheter angiogram shows circumscribed narrowing (arrows) of postoperative aorta.

 


View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. —14-year-old boy after surgical repair of aortic coarctation. Sagittal maximum-intensity-projection reconstruction shows diffuse dilatation of postoperative aortic segment (straight arrows) and calcified arteriosclerotic plaque (curved arrow).

 


View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. —14-year-old boy after surgical repair of aortic coarctation. Sagittal catheter angiogram shows diffuse dilatation (arrows) of postoperative segment.

 


View larger version (152K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. —16-year-old boy after surgical repair of aortic coarctation. Sagittal maximum-intensity-projection reconstruction shows circumscribed pouch (arrow) at anterior circumference of postoperative aortic segment.

 


View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. —16-year-old boy after surgical repair of aortic coarctation. Contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan shows anterolateral pouch (curved arrow) that is separated from aortic lumen by thin intimal flap (black arrows). Small intramural calcification is delineated at lateral contour of pouch (straight white arrow).

 


View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C. —16-year-old boy after surgical repair of aortic coarctation. Sagittal catheter angiogram shows circumscribed pouch (arrow) at anterior circumference of postoperative aorta. Distinct calcified plaque of aortic wall is not delineated.

 

In addition, 3D reformatted images revealed intramural calcifications in the postoperative segment of the aorta in 10 (40%) of 25 patients (Figs. 2A,2B,3A,3B,3C,4A,4B). The mean postoperative interval in these subjects was 9.3 years; the shortest postoperative interval was 1.3 years. Mean subject age was 13.8 years; the youngest age was 1.4 years. None of these intramural calcifications were delineated on catheter angiography (McNemar test, p = 0.002). On average, segmentation and image reconstruction of the CT data sets took approximately 15 min on an external workstation. No statistically significant difference was found between both methods for the narrowest diameter in the area of former coarctation (r = 0.98) (Fig. 5) and in the descending aorta (r = 0.99) (Fig. 6). No correlation was found between the systolic pullback blood pressure gradient versus the diameter ratio of the former coarctation and the descending aorta obtained from 3D reformatted images and catheter angiograms, respectively (r = -0.04) (Fig. 7).



View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. —19-year-old man after surgical repair of aortic coarctation. Sagittal maximum-intensity-projection reconstruction shows extensive calcification (arrows) at posterior circumference of postoperative aorta.

 


View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. —19-year-old man after surgical repair of aortic coarctation. Sagittal catheter angiogram shows smooth and sharp contour, and no calcifications are delineated.

 


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. —Scatter diagram shows good correlation (r=0.98) between narrowest diameters of segment of former coarctation measured with angiography and CT.

 


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6. —Scatter diagram shows good correlation (r=0.99) between narrowest diameters of descending aorta measured with angiography and CT.

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7. —Scatter diagram shows that systolic pullback pressure gradient did not correlate (r=-0.04) with diameter ratio of former coarctation and descending aorta.

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Postoperative follow-up investigation of former coarctation has been used to detect stenosis, aneurysms, pouches, and intimal flaps [2]. The value of clinical assessment during follow-up after surgical repair of aortic coarctation is limited because it does not allow detection of the early stages of subtle postoperative complications before acute signs and symptoms indicate a critical situation.

The results of this study, concerning the incidence of postoperative findings (narrowing, dilatation, normal contour of the former coarctation, pouches, and flaps), correlate well with earlier published data [2]. Associated congenital cardiovascular malformations were recognized with the same frequency as those described in our study [2].

Comparing the results of MIP reconstructions and catheter angiography concerning the morphometric and morphologic parameters such as the shape of the aorta (groups A, B, and C), intimal flaps and pouches, and the diameter of the aorta (former coarctation and descending aorta) supports the suggestion by Becker et al. [5] that reconstructed CT angiography data sets of the postoperative aorta will provide clinicians with information that is comparable with diagnostic catheter angiography.

To our knowledge, intramural calcification in the former coarctation has not been described in the radiology literature until now. These calcifications identify the former coarctation as a region with increased arteriosclerotic risk. This identification allows the radiologist to focus on these calcifications as a region of possible increased risk of dissection and might be an advantage of CT angiography over MR angiography in assessment of prognosis for arteriosclerotic disease [8].

As mentioned in earlier published literature [5], associated congenital cardiovascular malformations are considered the reason for negative correlation between the postoperative morphology and the systolic pullback blood pressure gradient. Therefore, with the detection of narrowing in the 3D reconstructed images, for further treatment catheter angiography and a systolic blood pressure gradient calculation should be performed. In these subjects, MIP reconstructions may deliver helpful information for detailed planning of catheter angiography to reduce the amount of contrast media and the number of projections needed.

CT angiography with MIP reconstructions turned out to be equivalent to catheter angiography for the morphologic postoperative assessment of former coarctation. This fast simple noninvasive technique may replace diagnostic catheter angiography for the postoperative follow-up of this condition. CT angiography and MIP reconstructions were superior to catheter angiography for the detection of intramural calcifications, which identify the former coarctation as an area of increased arteriosclerotic risk. Catheter angiography should be restricted to patients with abnormal findings on CT angiography that require endovascular or operative repair.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Kirklin JW. Coarctation of the aorta and interrupted aortic arch. In: Kirklin JW, Barratt-Boyes BG, eds. Cardiac surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1993: 1263-1325
  2. Pinzon JL, Burrows PE, Benson LN, et al. Repair of coarctation of the aorta in children: postoperative morphology. Radiology 1991;180 : 199-203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Stehling MK, Lawrence JA, Weitraub JL, Raptopoulos V. CT angiography: expanded clinical applications. AJR 1994; 163:947 -955[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Chung JW, Park JH, Im JG, Chung MJ, Han MC, Ahn H. Spiral CT angiography of the thoracic aorta. RadioGraphics 1996; 16:811 -824[Abstract]
  5. Becker C, Soppa C, Fink U, et al. Spiral CT angiography and 3D reconstruction in patients with aortic coarctation. Eur Radiol 1997; 7:1473 -1477[Medline]
  6. Kirklin JW, Burchell HB, Pugh DG, Burke EC, Mills SD. Surgical treatment of coarctation of the aorta in a ten week old infant. Circulation 1952;6 : 411-416[Medline]
  7. Voßschulte A. Surgical correction of the aorta by an isthmic plastic operation. Thorax 1961;16 : 338-343
  8. Siegel CL, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, Alpern MB, Courneya DL, Leder RA. Abdominal aortic aneurysm morphology: CT features in patients with ruptured and nonruptured aneurysms. AJR 1994; 163:1123 -1129[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. Sebastia, S. Quiroga, R. Boye, M. Perez-Lafuente, E. Castella, and A. Alvarez-Castells
Aortic Stenosis: Spectrum of Diseases Depicted at Multisection CT
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2003; 23(90001): S79 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
L. B. Haramati, J. S. Glickstein, H. J. Issenberg, N. Haramati, and G. A. Crooke
MR Imaging and CT of Vascular Anomalies and Connections in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease: Significance in Surgical Planning
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2002; 22(2): 337 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. F. Corno, U. Botta, M. Hurni, M. Payot, N. Sekarski, P. Tozzi, and L. K. von Segesser
Surgery for aortic coarctation: a 30 years experience
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 20(6): 1202 - 1206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaffler, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fotter, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaffler, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fotter, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS