AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by An, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by An, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 175:1673-1675
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Case Report

Intrahepatic Metastasis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Through Reversed Hepatic Venous Flow

Su Kyung An1, Jin Wook Chung1, Tae Kyoung Kim1, Hyun Beom Kim2, Joon Koo Han1, Byung Ihn Choi1 and Jae Hyung Park1

1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, SNUMRC, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongno-Gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea.
2 Department of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, 896 Pyungchon-dong, Anyang-city, Kyungki-do, 431-070, Korea.

Received February 24, 2000; accepted after revision May 15, 2000.

 
Address correspondence to J. W. Chung.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Hepatocellular carcinoma frequently manifests as multiple lesions in the liver. The multiplicity of the lesions has been explained by a multicentric origin of hepatocellular carcinoma [1] and intrahepatic spread through the portal vein [2]. We present a case of hepatocellular carcinoma with an unusual pathway of intrahepatic metastasis: retrograde seeding through the hepatic vein.


Case Report
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
A 59-year-old man visited our hospital with a chief complaint of dark yellowish urine. Physical examination revealed atrophic skin and telangiectasia on the face and neck. Laboratory tests disclosed the following abnormalities: serum aspartate aminotransferase level of 510 U/L, serum alanine aminotransferase level of 1228 U/L, and positive serologic test for hepatitis-B surface antigen. The serum level of {alpha}-fetoprotein was 37 ng/mL. Contrast-enhanced helical CT revealed a 6-cm mass in the anterior superior segment of the right lobe of the liver without evidence of venous invasion. Percutaneous needle biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. The patient was referred to our department for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.

On celiac arteriography, a hypervascular mass was present in the right lobe of the liver that is supplied by the anterior superior segmental branch of the right hepatic artery (Fig. 1A). A mixture of an iodized oil (Lipiodol; Andre Guerbet, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France) and doxorubicin hydrochloride (ADM; Dong-a Pharmacy, Seoul, Korea) was infused through the feeding artery followed by embolization with absorbable gelatin sponge particles (Gelfoam; Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI). After three sessions of chemoembolization through the same feeding artery for 5 months, no radiologic evidence of tumor vascularity was visible on hepatic arteriography (Fig. 1B) or contrast-enhanced helical CT. The serum level of {alpha}-fetoprotein also decreased below 5 ng/mL. On follow-up hepatic arteriography performed 9 months after the last treatment, marginal tumor recurrence was detected (Fig. 1C)Go. At that time, the portal and hepatic veins were widely patent, and no evidence of arteriovenous shunt was seen on CT or angiography. The patient was treated with three additional sessions of chemoembolization through the right hepatic artery and four sessions of percutaneous ethanol injection therapy. The serum level of {alpha}-fetoprotein continuously remained below 5 ng/mL.



View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. Hepatocellular carcinoma in 59-year-old man. Celiac arteriogram shows hypervascular mass (arrows) in right lobe of liver.

 


View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. Hepatocellular carcinoma in 59-year-old man. Celiac arteriogram obtained after three sessions of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization shows localized accumulation of iodized oil (arrows) in tumor. Note no evidence of residual tumor vascularity.

 


View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. Hepatocellular carcinoma in 59-year-old man. Follow-up celiac arteriogram obtained 9 months after last treatment shows marginal tumor recurrence (arrows), but there was no evidence of hepatic vein invasion and arteriovenous shunt.

 


View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. Hepatocellular carcinoma in 59-year-old man. Celiac arteriogram obtained 10 months after further chemoembolization and percutaneous ethanol injection therapy for recurrent tumor (29 months after initial treatment) shows additional accumulation of iodized oil in recurrent tumor and no residual tumor vascularity (arrows).

 

Four years after the initial treatment, contrast-enhanced helical CT showed an enhancing mass along the middle hepatic vein (Fig. 1E). Hepatic arteriography revealed tumor thrombi with a typical appearance in a branch of the middle hepatic vein (Fig. 1F), and these thrombi extended into the main trunk of the middle hepatic vein. There was retrograde opacification of the peripheral branches of the middle hepatic vein and the corresponding liver parenchyma due to arteriohepatic venous shunt associated with tumor thrombi (Fig. 1F). No evidence of portal venous invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma could be seen on angiography or CT. Chemoembolization was performed at the right anterior segmental branch and the left medial segmental branch of the hepatic artery. On follow-up hepatic arteriography and CT performed 7 months later, multiple small nodular tumors developed in the area exactly matching the territory of the middle hepatic vein opacified through the arteriohepatic venous shunt (Figs. 1G and 1H). In spite of repeated chemoembolization, the patient died of variceal bleeding 5 months after the last imaging study.



View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E. Hepatocellular carcinoma in 59-year-old man. Contrast-enhanced helical CT scan obtained 4 years after initial treatment, which included seven sessions of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and four sessions of percutaneous ethanol injection therapy, shows enhancing mass along middle hepatic vein (arrows).

 


View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1F. Hepatocellular carcinoma in 59-year-old man. Early phase of celiac arteriogram obtained 1 month after E shows tumor thrombi in middle hepatic vein with "thread and streaks" appearance (solid arrows). Note retrograde opacification of peripheral branches of middle hepatic vein and corresponding liver parenchyma through arteriohepatic venous shunt (open arrows).

 


View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1G. Hepatocellular carcinoma in 59-year-old man. Follow-up hepatic arteriogram (G) and CT scan (H) obtained 7 months after F show multiple small nodular tumors in area matching territory of middle hepatic vein opacified by arteriohepatic venous shunt.

 


View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1H. Hepatocellular carcinoma in 59-year-old man. Follow-up hepatic arteriogram (G) and CT scan (H) obtained 7 months after F show multiple small nodular tumors in area matching territory of middle hepatic vein opacified by arteriohepatic venous shunt.

 


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Hepatocellular carcinomas manifested as multiple nodules in the liver have been regarded as multicentric in origin or intrahepatic metastases through the portal vein. Mitsunobu et al. [3] provided strong supporting evidence of intrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma through the portal vein in a study of 231 liver specimens of resected hepatocellular carcinomas. Strong statistical correlation was seen between the presence of intrahepatic metastasis and the frequency of vascular invasion. Direct injection of radiopaque material into 23 resected tumors and percutaneous injection in eight unresectable lesions revealed that the portal vein might act as an efferent vessel of tumor. Moreover, macroscopic tumor thrombi were found in the portal vein in 16.4% of the patients.

The frequency of hepatic vein invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma is much lower than that of portal vein invasion. A retrospective study by Mathieu et al. [4] of 134 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma revealed hepatic venous involvement in 5.9% of the patients. Okuda et al. [5] reported angiographic visualization of tumor growth in the hepatic vein in nine (6.3%) of 141 patients. Whereas portal venous thrombi are stacked in the peripheral branches of the portal vein, small tumor thrombi in the hepatic vein might be washed into the systemic circulation by continuous hepatofugal flow at its early stage, increasing the chance of extrahepatic metastasis [6]. Therefore, if the vein is patent, it is unlikely that intrahepatic metastases through the hepatic vein can occur. However, if the tumor thrombus in the hepatic vein occludes hepatic venous outflow, the flow direction of the occluded hepatic vein may reverse, and intrahepatic metastases of the tumor through the hepatic vein may occur.

In the present case, tumor thrombi in the middle hepatic vein occluded its main trunk, and the associated arteriohepatic venous shunt resulted in reversal of the flow direction of the occluded hepatic vein. This fact was clearly shown by hepatic arteriography (Fig. 1F). On 7-month follow-up hepatic arteriography, tumor implantation in the territory of reversed hepatic venous flow was proved angiographically (Fig. 1G). Because there was no evidence of portal vein invasion of the tumor and the area of tumor recurrence was well matched with the area with reversed flow direction of the hepatic vein, we believe that recurred tumors were metastasized through the hepatic vein.

In conclusion, hepatic vein invasion and resultant hemodynamic alterations should be considered as one of the causes of intrahepatic metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma.


References
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 

  1. Sakamoto M, Hirohashi S, Shimosato Y. Early stages of multistep hepatocarcinogenesis: adenomatous hyperplasia and early hepatocellular carcinoma. Hum Pathol 1991;22:172 -178[Medline]
  2. Kishi K, Shikata T, Hirohashi S, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S, Makuuchi M. Hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinical and pathologic analysis of 57 hepatectomy cases. Cancer 1983;51:542 -548[Medline]
  3. Mitsunobu M, Toyosaka A, Oriyama T, Okamoto E, Nakao N. Intrahepatic metastases in hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of the portal vein as an efferent vessel. Clin Exp Metastasis 1996;14:520 -529[Medline]
  4. Mathieu D, Guinet C, Bouklia-Hassane A, Vasile N. Hepatic vein involvement in hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastrointest Radiol 1988;13:55 -60[Medline]
  5. Okuda K, Jinnouchi S, Nagasaki Y, Kuwahara S, Kaneko T. Angiographic demonstration of growth of hepatocellular carcinoma in the hepatic vein and inferior vena cava. Radiology 1977;124:33 -36[Abstract]
  6. Nakashima T, Kojiro M. Hepatocellular carcinoma: an atlas of its pathology. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, 1987: 87-139

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by An, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by An, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS