AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okazaki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Matsunaga, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okazaki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Matsunaga, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2000; 175:1677-1681
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Discrimination of Alcoholic from Virus-Induced Cirrhosis on MR Imaging

Hajime Okazaki1, Katsuyoshi Ito, Takeshi Fujita, Shinji Koike, Katsuyuki Takano and Naofumi Matsunaga

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minamikogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.

Received March 10, 2000; accepted after revision May 26, 2000.

 
Address correspondence to H. Okazaki.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether MR features help to differentiate virus-induced cirrhosis from alcoholic cirrhosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The MR examinations of 53 patients with cirrhosis (38 men and 15 women; age range, 28-73 years) caused by hepatitis B (n = 16), hepatitis C (n = 18), or alcohol abuse (n = 19) were retrospectively reviewed independently by two radiologists. The following MR features were assessed by each radiologist independently: volume indexes of the spleen and of each liver segment (based on 3-axis measurements), the nodularity of the surface, and the presence of regenerative nodules, ascites, iron or fat deposition, varices or collateral veins, the right posterior hepatic notch, and an expanded gallbladder fossa.

RESULTS. The mean values of the volume index of the caudate lobe were significantly greater (p < 0.0001) in the group with alcoholic cirrhosis than those in the group with viral cirrhosis. The frequency of visualization of the right posterior hepatic notch in the patients with alcoholic cirrhosis was significantly greater (p < 0.05) than that in the patients with viral cirrhosis. The size of regenerative nodules of the liver in the patients with cirrhosis caused by hepatitis B was significantly greater (p < 0.02) than that in the patients with alcoholic cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION. Enlargement of the caudate lobe and the presence of the right posterior hepatic notch on MR imaging are more frequent findings of alcoholic cirrhosis than of virus-induced cirrhosis.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The causes of liver cirrhosis are well known and include viral infection, such as hepatitis B or C; alcohol abuse; primary sclerosing cholangitis; and other metabolic diseases, including Wilson's disease, primary biliary cirrhosis, and hemo-chromatosis. Alcoholic cirrhosis is common in the United States, whereas virus-induced cirrhosis is associated with a high morbidity in Asia [1]. Sonography, CT, and MR imaging have been useful diagnostic modalities for liver disease. Previous studies have reported that some imaging features, such as hepatic and extrahepatic findings (e.g., morphologic changes of the liver and splenomegaly), were highly suggestive of cirrhosis [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. In most reports, however, the study population included patients with cirrhosis due to various causes such as viral hepatitis, alcohol abuse, or primary biliary cirrhosis. Recently, Dodd et al. [13] reported that morphologic changes of the liver in patients with end-stage cirrhosis resulting from primary sclerosing cholangitis were different from those in patients with cirrhosis resulting from other causes. In clinical practice, we have identified some hepatic morphologic changes that occur more frequently in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis than in patients with virus-induced cirrhosis. However, to our knowledge, no previous reports have described the differences in the MR imaging findings between patients with virus-induced cirrhosis and those with alcoholic cirrhosis. The purpose of this study was to determine whether MR features are helpful in differentiating viral cirrhosis from alcoholic cirrhosis.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patient Population
Our study population consisted of 53 patients with cirrhosis (38 men amd 15 women; age range, 28-73 years; mean age, 57 years) caused by hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or alcohol abuse who underwent MR imaging at our institution between December 1997 and July 1998. These patients had been referred for MR imaging for the screening of liver lesions or for further examination of suspected hepatic lesions seen with other imaging modalities. The causes of cirrhosis were as follows: viral infection (hepatitis B [n = 16] or C [n = 18]), which was diagnosed by viral antigen test and antibody titration, and alcohol abuse (n = 19). All the patients were subjected to the same tests for viral antigens. The patients who had both a history of alcohol abuse and positive findings for viral antigens or antibodies were not included in this study. The diagnosis of cirrhosis was established by percutaneous liver biopsy (n = 5) and by clinical evaluation including liver function tests (n = 48). Patients were not included in this study if they had hepatocellular carcinoma lesions larger than 2 cm in diameter or if they had undergone hepatic resection or therapeutic interventional procedures, such as transcatheter arterial chemoembolization or alcohol injection, because these procedures may affect the morphology of the liver.

MR Imaging Technique
All examinations were performed on a 1.5-T MR imaging unit (Magnetom Vision; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using a phased array torso coil. All patients underwent axial T1-weighted and T2-weighted MR imaging, T1-weighted imaging included the following two sequences: in-phase gradient-echo imaging (TR range/TE, 180-210/4.4 or 9.0; flip angle, 90°) and opposed-phase gradient-echo imaging (180-210/2.2 or 7.0; flip angle, 90°). T2-weighted images were obtained by breath-hold fast spin-echo sequences (TR range/effective TE, 2500-3000/70 or 93). Dynamic in-phase gradient-echo images were obtained before and after an antecubital IV bolus injection of 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Schering, Berlin, Germany) followed by a 20-mL flush of sterile normal saline in all patients. Contrast-enhanced imaging was initiated immediately after completion of the saline injection and was repeated two or three times within 3 min of each other to obtain multiphase images (arterial, portal, and delayed phases). Finally, delayed-phase contrast-enhanced gradient-echo images were acquired, with or without fat suppression, 4-10 min after injection of contrast material. The imaging matrix was 256 x 128, 256 x 160, or 256 x 192 pixels for gradient-echo images and 256 x 192 pixels for breath-hold fast spin-echo images, usually with a rectangular field of view (to reduce the number of phase-encoding acquisitions). The section thickness was 8-10 mm with an intersection gap of 2 mm or smaller.

Imaging Interpretation
Two radiologists experienced in hepatic MR imaging reviewed all examinations retrospectively and scored the findings independently without knowledge of patient status. The following measurements were obtained and categoric findings were documented: three-axis measurements [11, 16] of the spleen and of each segment of the liver, the presence of a nodular surface, the presence of ascites, the visualization of regenerative nodules, the presence of hepatic iron or fat deposition, the presence of varices or collateral vessels, the presence of the right posterior hepatic notch (Fig. 1), and the presence of an expanded gallbladder fossa [17].



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. 50-year-old man with alcoholic cirrhosis. Opposed-phase MR image (TR/TE, 180/2.2; flip angle, 90°) shows presence of right posterior hepatic notch (arrow).

 

For the measurement of the liver, hepatic segments were classified as right anterior, right posterior, medial left, lateral left, or caudate. The measurements of the long and short axes of the spleen and each liver segment were obtained from axial images. Cephalocaudal measurements were obtained by calculating length from axial images with the finding. These measurements were used to calculate the volume indexes. Volume indexes were calculated as a simple product of these three diameters for each liver segment and for the spleen. These indexes do not provide an accurate measurement of volumes but give a number that is related to the size of each segment. All transverse measurements of the liver segments were made approximately at or less than 1 cm below the bifurcation of the main portal vein.

Measurements of the spleen were obtained at the level of the splenic hilum. The liver was assessed visually: the nodularity of the surface, the presence of ascites, and iron or fat deposition were scored on a severity scale (none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3). Fat deposition was assessed by comparing opposed-phase images with in-phase images. Regenerative nodules were evaluated on T2-weighted images, contrast-enhanced dynamic images, or both. Regenerative nodules were defined as hypointense lesions with hyperintense septa on T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced dynamic images. Visualization of regenerative nodules was scored on the basis of three grades (none = 0, subtle = 1, definite = 2). If regenerative nodules were identified in the liver, the size of regenerative nodules was scored (<8 mm = 0, >=8 mm = 1). Additionally, the presence of iron or fat deposition in regenerative nodules and the visibility of internodular band were scored (no = 0, yes = 1). Varices and collateral vessels were evaluated on contrast-enhanced dynamic images. The presence of varices or collateral vessels was recorded (none = 0, present = 1) for the following five locations: gastroesophageal, paraesophageal, splenorenal, and paraumbilical sites and other locations. The total number of sites, varying from none to five, at which varices or collateral vessels were visible was then scored. The presence of the right posterior hepatic notch and of an expanded gallbladder fossa was also recorded (none = 0, present = 1). When the opinions of two observers were inconsistent in the evaluation of the categoric findings, a third observer served as the tiebreaker, and a majority opinion was then used as the final decision. Regarding the MR measurements, averaged values of the two observers were used for data analysis.

Statistical Analysis
Results were expressed as means plus or minus the standard error. The unpaired Student's t test was used to analyze multiple MR measurements and findings between the group with viral cirrhosis and the group with alcoholic cirrhosis. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Results of the comparison of MR measurements and categoric findings between the viral cirrhosis and alcoholic cirrhosis groups are shown in Table 1. The mean values of the volume index of the caudate lobe were significantly greater (p < 0.0001) in the alcoholic cirrhosis group than in the viral cirrhosis group (Figs. 2 and 3). The differences in the mean values of the volume indexes of the other segments and of the spleen were not statistically significant. The frequency of visualization of the right posterior hepatic notch in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis was significantly greater (p < 0.05) than that in patients with viral cirrhosis (Fig. 1). In this study, no significant difference existed between the two groups with regard to nodularity of the liver surface; iron or fat hepatic deposition; presence of ascites, varices, and collateral vessels; or visibility of an expanded gallbladder fossa. Regarding the frequency of visualization of regenerative nodules, these nodules were visualized in 17 (89.5%) of the 19 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and in 27 (79.4%) of the 34 patients with viral cirrhosis. These differences were not statistically significant. However, the size of regenerative nodules of the liver in the patients with cirrhosis caused by hepatitis B was significantly greater (p < 0.02) than that in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (Figs. 4 and 5). The differences in the size of the regenerative nodules in the patients with hepatitis C—induced cirrhosis and that in the patients with alcoholic cirrhosis was not statistically significant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 MR Measurements and Categoric Findings in Groups with Alcoholic Cirrhosis and Viral-Induced Cirrhosis

 


View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. 61-year-old man with alcoholic cirrhosis. T1-weighted MR image (TR/TE, 150/6.0; flip angle, 90°) shows marked enlargement of caudate lobe (arrows) and presence of right posterior hepatic notch.

 


View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. 52-year-old man with hepatitis B-induced cirrhosis. Opposed-phase MR image (TR/TE, 210/7.0; flip angle, 90°) shows enlargement of lateral segment of left hepatic lobe. Enlargement of caudate lobe (arrows) is mild. Note moderate nodularity of liver surface and subtle visibility of regenerative nodules.

 


View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. 28-year-old woman with hepatitis B-induced cirrhosis. Contrast-enhanced MR image (TR/TE, 155/4.1; flip angle, 90°) shows macronodular regenerative nodules (arrows).

 


View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. 66-year-old man with hepatitis C-induced cirrhosis. Contrast-enhanced MR image (TR/TE, 150/6.0; flip angle, 90°) shows micronodular regenerative nodules (arrows).

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Several investigators have reported that quantitative analysis of the regional changes in hepatic morphology on cross-sectional imaging was useful for the diagnosis of cirrhosis [2, 3, 9,10,11]. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic potential of multiple MR measurements and categoric findings in the differentiation between viral cirrhosis and alcoholic cirrhosis. Our results showed that the mean values of the volume index of the caudate lobe were significantly greater in the group with alcoholic cirrhosis than in the group with viral cirrhosis and indicate that a large caudate lobe is highly suggestive of cirrhosis caused by alcohol abuse. The development of hepatocellular carcinoma is closely associated with cirrhosis. Ikeda et al. [18] reported that total alcohol intake was significantly associated with liver carcinogenesis and was found to be an independent risk factor in all 795 patients. However, the rate of development of hepatocellular carcinoma was significantly lower in the group with alcoholic cirrhosis than in the groups with cirrhosis caused by hepatitis B or C. Kato et al. [19] reported that the cumulative risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in the non—hepatitis B and C group including alcoholic cirrhosis was significantly lower than that in hepatitis B or C viral group (p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively). Therefore, the differentiation between virus-induced cirrhosis and alcoholic cirrhosis is also important in estimating prognosis.

In this study, the frequency of visualization of the right posterior hepatic notch in the patients with alcoholic cirrhosis was significantly greater than that in the patients with viral cirrhosis. The right posterior hepatic notch may be a consequence of hypertrophy of the caudate lobe and atrophy of the right hepatic lobe, because the caudate lobe of the patients with alcoholic cirrhosis tended to be larger than that of the patients with viral infection. This finding is simple to evaluate in clinical practice, compared with quantitative measurements, and may reflect considerable enlargement of the caudate lobe in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. The diffuse morphologic changes present in cirrhotic livers can distort the liver contour and parenchymal architecture. Ohtomo et al. [8, 15] reported that wedge-shaped fibrosis was seen most frequently in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (19% [18/97]) in contrast to patients with cirrhosis caused by viral infection (6% [6/100]). The reason for this difference is unclear; however, alcohol is known to produce distinct histologic fibrosis in the liver. Long-standing inflammation with obstruction of the biliary system may cause regional fibrosis and compensatory hypertrophy of other liver segments and may account for the different distribution seen in alcohol-related cirrhosis.

The configuration of the margin of the liver corresponds to the size of the underlying regenerative nodules [20,21,22]. A margin that is smooth or deformed by multiple small nodules is typical of micronodular cirrhosis; a coarse nodularity of the margin is the result of macronodular cirrhosis. In this study, no significant difference existed between the two groups regarding nodularity of the liver surface. However, the regenerative nodules of the liver in the patients with hepatitis B—induced cirrhosis were significantly larger than those in the patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Several investigators have proved using laparoscopy that the regenerative nodules in cirrhosis caused by hepatitis B tended to be larger than those in cirrhosis resulting from other causes. Our results suggest that the size and appearance of regenerative nodules can be noninvasively assessed with MR imaging. Ito et al. [20] reported that the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma may be associated causally with iron deposition in large regenerative nodules in patients with cirrhosis. Therefore, MR imaging may be a useful modality for assessing regenerative nodules as a possible risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma.

This study has several limitations. The first limitation concerns the small size of our study population. A larger series might have revealed additional MR features for differentiation between viral and alcoholic cirrhosis. Second, our study was limited to patients who were from a particular practice and who had cirrhosis caused entirely by viral hepatitis or alcohol abuse. Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and those with Budd-Chiari syndrome in which the caudate lobe tends to enlarge were excluded from our study population. Dodd et al. [13] reported that the caudate lobe was the most frequent region of hypertrophy in patients with end-stage cirrhosis caused by primary sclerosing cholangitis. In addition, patients with viral and possible alcoholic cirrhosis or with a cryptic cause for their liver disease were not included in this study. It is unclear how the addition of patients with cirrhosis resulting from these other causes would have affected our results. Further studies may be necessary. The third limitation of this study is the lack of pathologic confirmation of cirrhosis in most patients because liver biopsy was obviated on the basis of a clinical diagnosis of cirrhosis. Pathologic examination can evaluate the severity of fibrosis and the activity of hepatitis in cirrhotic livers. However, in clinical practice, it is important to evaluate not only hepatic conditions but also extrahepatic conditions such as varices. Finally, MR measurements and findings in this study can also be assessed by means of helical CT, although MR imaging may offer a more extensive and comprehensive evaluation of cirrhosis, including findings such as minimal ascites, fat and iron deposition, and detection of regenerative nodules and dysplastic nodules.

In conclusion, enlargement of the caudate lobe and the presence of the right posterior hepatic notch on MR imaging are more frequent findings in alcoholic cirrhosis than that in viral cirrhosis. Conversely, regenerative nodules tend to be larger in patients with hepatitis B—induced cirrhosis than in those with alcoholic cirrhosis.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Murakami T, Kim T, Nakamura H. Hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:346 -358[Medline]
  2. Lafortune M, Matricardi L, Denys A, et al. Segment 4 (the quadrate lobe): a barometer of cirrhotic liver disease at US. Radiology 1998;206:157 -160[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Giorgio A, Amoroso P, Lettieri G, et al. Cirrhosis: value of caudate to right lobe ratio in diagnosis with US. Radiology 1986;161:443 -445[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Goyal AK, Pokharna DS, Sharma SK. Ultrasonic diagnosis of cirrhosis: reference to quantitative measurements of hepatic dimensions. Gastrointest Radiol 1990;15:32 -34[Medline]
  5. DiLelio A, Cestari C, Lomazzi A, Beretta L. Cirrhosis: diagnosis with sonographic study of the liver surface. Radiology 1989;172:389 -392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ferral H, Male R, Cardiel M, Munoz L, Ferrari FQ. Cirrhosis: diagnosis by liver surface analysis with high-frequency ultrasound. Gastrointest Radiol 1992;17:74 -78[Medline]
  7. Fisher MR, Gore RM. Computed tomography in the evaluation of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. J Clin Gastroenterol 1985;7:173 -181[Medline]
  8. Ohtomo K, Baron RL, Dodd GD, et al. Confluent hepatic fibrosis in advanced cirrhosis: appearance at CT. Radiology 1993;188:31 -35[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Harbin WP, Robert NJ, Ferrucci JT. Diagnosis of cirrhosis based on regional changes in hepatic morphology. Radiology 1980;135:273 -283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Torres WE, Whitmire LF, Gedgaudas-McClees K, Bernardino ME. Computed tomography of hepatic morphologic changes in cirrhosis of the liver. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986;11:47 -50
  11. Ito K, Mitchell DG, Hann H-WL, Outwater EK, Kim Y. Compensated cirrhosis due to viral hepatitis: using MR imaging to predict clinical progression. AJR 1997;169:801 -805[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ito K, Mitchell DG, Hann H-WL, et al. Viral-induced cirrhosis: grading of severity using MR imaging. AJR 1999;173:591 -596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Dodd GD, Baron RL, Oliver JH, Federle MP. Hepatic morphology in end-stage primary sclerosing cholangitis: computed tomographic findings in 36 patients. Radiology 1999;211:357 -362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Dodd GD III, Baron RL, Oliver JH III, Federle MP. Spectrum of imaging findings of the liver in end-stage cirrhosis. 1. Gross morphology and diffuse abnormalities. AJR 1999;173:1031 -1036[Free Full Text]
  15. Ohtomo K, Baron RL, Dodd GD, et al. Confluent hepatic fibrosis in advanced cirrhosis: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1993;189:871 -874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ito K, Mitchell DG, Hann H-WL, et al. Progressive viral-induced cirrhosis: serial MR imaging findings and clinical correlation. Radiology 1998;207:729 -735[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ito K, Mitchell DG, Gabata T, Hussain SM. Expanded gallbladder fossa: simple MR imaging sign of cirrhosis. Radiology 1999;211:723 -736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ikeda K, Saitoh S, Koida I, et al. A multivariate analysis of risk factor for hepatocellular carcinogenesis: a prospective observation of 795 patients with viral and alcoholic cirrhosis. Hepatology 1993;18:47 -53[Medline]
  19. Kato Y, Nakata K, Omagari K, et al. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis in Japan. Cancer 1994;74:2234 -2238[Medline]
  20. Ito K, Mitchell DG, Gabata T, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: association with increased iron deposition in the cirrhotic liver at MR imaging. Radiology 1999;212:235 -240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ohtomo K, Itai Y, Ohtomo Y, Shiga J, Iio M. Regenerating nodules of liver cirrhosis: MR imaging with pathologic correlation. AJR 1990;154:505 -507[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kita K, Kita M, Sato M, Ooshima A, Yamada R. MR imaging of liver cirrhosis: role of fibrous septa in visualization of regenerating nodules. Acta Radiol 1996;37:198 -203[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. C. Tan
The Right Posterior Hepatic Notch Sign
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 317 - 318.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. S. d. A. Bezerra, G. D'Ippolito, R. P. Caldana, D. D. Leopoldino, G. R. Batista, D. R. Borges, G. de Jesus Lopes Filho, and M. Ahmed
Differentiating Cirrhosis and Chronic Hepatosplenic Schistosomiasis Using MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): W201 - W207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. Vilgrain, B. Condat, C. Bureau, A. Hakime, A. Plessier, D. Cazals-Hatem, and D. C. Valla
Atrophy-Hypertrophy Complex in Patients with Cavernous Transformation of the Portal Vein: CT Evaluation
Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 149 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. R. Bader, K. L. Beavers, and R. C. Semelka
MR Imaging Features of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Patterns of Cirrhosis in Relationship to Clinical Severity of Disease
Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 675 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Awaya, D. G. Mitchell, T. Kamishima, G. Holland, K. Ito, and T. Matsumoto
Cirrhosis: Modified Caudate-Right Lobe Ratio
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 769 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okazaki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Matsunaga, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okazaki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Matsunaga, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS