AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melhem, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Itoh, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melhem, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Itoh, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2001; 176:537-539
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

Effect of T1 Relaxation Time on Lesion Contrast Enhancement in FLAIR MR Imaging

A Study Using Computer-Generated Brain Maps

Elias R. Melhem1 and Ryuta Itoh1

1 Both authors: Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287-2182.

Received June 8, 2000; accepted after revision July 14, 2000.

 
Address correspondence to E. R. Melhem.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Using computer-generated brain maps, we aimed to define T1 relaxation time thresholds above which a T2 hyperintense (compared with surrounding white matter) lesion became hypointense on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR imaging. Thresholds were identified for FLAIR MR imaging sequences with different echo times (TEs).

CONCLUSION. Thresholds for T1 relaxation times increased as TE increased during FLAIR MR imaging sequences. Such thresholds defined the transition from hyperintense to hypointense lesions.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR imaging has assumed an important role in routine brain imaging because of its ability to enhance the visibility of several abnormal lesions compared with T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging sequences [1,2,3]. Studies have shown the effect of pulse parameters (TR, TE, inversion time [TI], and echo-train length) of the FLAIR MR imaging sequence on the visibility of brain lesions [4, 5]. Despite pulse parameter optimization, certain T2-hyperintense brain lesions (i.e., hyperintense compared with white matter on T2-weighted MR images) remain inconspicuous on FLAIR MR images. Furthermore, other T2-hyperintense brain lesions are hypointense on FLAIR MR images [6]. These apparent inconsistencies between FLAIR and T2-weighted MR imaging are mostly the result of complex interactions between the relaxation times (T1 and T2) of the lesion and the pulse parameters (TR, TE, and TI) of the FLAIR MR imaging sequence [7].

We studied interactions between the T1 relaxation time of the lesion and the TE of the FLAIR MR imaging sequence. Using computer-generated brain maps, we aim to define T1 relaxation time thresholds above which a T2 hyperintense lesion becomes hypointense on FLAIR MR images. Thresholds are identified for FLAIR MR imaging sequences with different TEs.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Acquisition of MR Images
MR studies were performed on a 1.5-T MR system (ACS-NT; Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) with maximum gradient capability of 23 mT/m-1 and slew rate of 103 mT/m-1 per msec-1 using a quadrature head coil operating in the receive mode.

A mixed multiecho spin-echo and inversion recovery MR sequence was used to image the brain of a 40-year-old male volunteer at the level of the lateral ventricles. The mixed sequence simultaneously provided two image data sets: eight spin-echo (TR/averages, 1500/1) images with different TEs (20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, and 160 msec); and eight inversion recovery images (TR/TI/averages, 2000/400/1) with different TEs (20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, and 160 msec). The image slice thickness was 5 mm, the in-plane resolution was 0.86 x 0.86 mm2 (field of view, 220 mm; matrix, 256 x 256), and the acquisition time was 9 min 30 sec.

Generation of Brain Maps
The generation of brain maps involved two steps: First, pixel-by-pixel T1-relaxation, T2-relaxation, and proton density brain maps at the level of the lateral ventricles were generated online, using ratios and least-squares algorithm (software release 6.2, Philips Medical Systems) applied to the image data sets from the mixed MR sequence [8]. Second, calculated maps simulating T2-weighted and FLAIR MR imaging sequences were generated off-line (SUN Enterprise 5500; Sun Microsystems, Mountain View, CA) using proton density, T1-relaxation, and T2-relaxation pixel values from the corresponding maps.

The following numeric calculations and image displays were performed using Interactive Data Language software (Research Systems, Boulder, CO).

Each pixel value S(x,y) of the calculated map was calculated using the following equation:

T1(x,y), T2(x,y), and {rho}(x,y) were derived from corresponding coordinate pixel values of the T1-relaxation, T2-relaxation, and proton density maps, respectively.

TR, TE, and TI for the simulated sequences were selected based on the parameters used in clinical brain imaging.

For T2-weighted MR imaging sequences, TR, TE, and TI were 3000, 90, and 0 msec, respectively. For FLAIR MR imaging sequences, TR was 11,000 msec, TE was variable, and TI was 2600 msec.

For the FLAIR MR imaging sequence six different maps were generated using TEs of 20, 40, 60, 100, 140, and 180 msec.

Creation of Simulated Lesions
Using an in-house program written in Interactive Data Language, we placed 12 simulated lesions in the T2-weighted and all the FLAIR maps except the one with a TE of 180 msec (Fig. 1). Seventeen simulated lesions were placed in the FLAIR map with a TE of 180 msec.



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Computer-generated T2-weighted (left image) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) maps (center image, 40 msec; right image 140 msec) show 12 simulated lesions placed in white matter of cerebral hemisphere parallel to lateral ventricle. T1 relaxation time of lesions varied from 800 msec (posteriormost lesion) to 3000 msec (anteriormost lesion) by increments of 200 msec. All simulated lesions were hyperintense to white matter on T2-weighted maps. On FLAIR maps, simulated lesions changed from hyperintense to hypointense with increasing T1 relaxation time. Lesions with identical T1 relaxation times were hypointense on short-TE FLAIR and hyperintense on long-TE FLAIR (arrowheads). Also, lesions that were hyperintense on T2-weighted sequences were invisible on FLAIR sequences (circles).

 

The simulated lesions were round and approximately 6 mm (7 pixels) in diameter. They were placed in the white matter of the cerebral hemisphere parallel to the lateral ventricle.

The T2 relaxation time and proton density (relative to adjacent white matter) for every pixel within the lesions were fixed at 300 msec and 1.07, respectively. The long T2 relaxation time of the simulated lesions (compared with white matter) was chosen to reflect common brain abnormalities such as demyelination and gliosis [4, 9]. For the T2-weighted map and all the FLAIR maps except the one with a TE of 180 msec, the T1 relaxation time of the lesions was varied from 800 msec (posteriormost lesion) to 3000 msec (anterior-most lesion) by increments of 200 msec. For the FLAIR map with a TE of 180 msec, the T1 relaxation time of the lesions was varied from 800 to 4000 msec by increments of 200 msec.

The writing and refinement of the program used for the generation of the different maps and simulated lesions took a moderately experienced programmer approximately 1 month. Once the program was operational, it took approximately 30 sec to generate each map and simulated lesion.

T2-weighted and six different FLAIR maps were reviewed by an experienced observer. The T1 relaxation time (isointense T1) at which the simulated lesion became isointense to surrounding white matter (transition from hyperintense to hypointense) was documented for each of the FLAIR maps. A plot of isointense T1 versus TE was generated (Fig. 2).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. Graph shows isointense T1 (T1 relaxation time at which simulated lesion with T2 relaxation time of 300 msec became isointense to surrounding white matter) versus TE on corresponding fluid-attenuated inversion recovery map. White area = hypointense, gray area = hyperintense.

 


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The computer-generated T2-weighted and FLAIR maps were of adequate quality.

All simulated lesions were hyperintense to white matter on the T2-weighted maps. There was, however, a decrease in contrast between the simulated lesions and white matter with increasing T1 relaxation time (Fig. 1).

On all the FLAIR maps, the simulated lesions transformed from hyperintense to hypointense compared with white matter, once the T1 relaxation time increased beyond a certain threshold (Fig. 1). The T1 relaxation time threshold increased with the TE of the FLAIR MR imaging sequence (Fig. 2).

As a result of this upward shift in the T1 relaxation time threshold, lesions with the same T1 and T2 relaxation times could appear hypointense on short-TE FLAIR and hyperintense on long-TE FLAIR MR imaging (Fig. 1). Also, if a lesion had a T1 relaxation time that matched that defined by a particular FLAIR MR imaging sequence, the lesion was isointense to white matter (invisible) on the FLAIR MR imaging sequence despite being hyperintense on T2-weighted MR imaging sequences (Fig. 1).


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The computer-generated brain maps show the dependency of lesion contrast on the T1 relaxation time of the lesion and the TE of the FLAIR MR imaging sequence.

On the T2-weighted maps, all lesions are hyperintense to white matter. The observed gradual decrease in lesion contrast with increasing T1 relaxation time is caused by saturation of longitudinal magnetization imposed by the selected TR (3000 msec) (T1 effect). Longer TRs (on the order of three to four times the selected T1 relaxation time of the simulated lesion) will eliminate the effect of saturation and render lesion contrast predominantly determined by the selected T2 relaxation time (T2 effect).

In FLAIR MR imaging, as in all inversion-recovery sequences, T1 relaxation time influences image contrast by affecting the degree of longitudinal magnetization recovery during the T1 and TR-TI intervals. As the T1 relaxation time of a lesion increases, the degree of longitudinal magnetization recovery decreases and the signal intensity from the lesion decreases. At short TEs, the T1 effect is emphasized and the lesion appears hypointense to surrounding white matter. At long TEs, on the other hand, the T2 effect is emphasized and the lesion appears hyperintense [7].

In our FLAIR MR imaging simulations, near-complete recovery of longitudinal magnetization during the TR-TI interval is achieved by choosing a long TR (11,000 msec) and disregarding the influence of the commonly implemented fast spin-echo readout [10]. Thus, the degree of recovery during the TI interval (2600 msec) in combination with the T2 effect determines lesion contrast.

We have shown using computer-simulated brain maps that several combinations of intrinsic lesion parameter (T1 relaxation times) and FLAIR MR imaging pulse parameter (TE) exist in which T2-hyperintense lesions are isointense to white matter on FLAIR MR imaging. This may partly explain reported differences in the performance of FLAIR compared with T2-weighted MR imaging sequences [11, 12] and underscores the importance of implementing multiecho FLAIR MR imaging in routine practice.

Another potentially important role for multi-echo FLAIR MR imaging is in the evaluation of multiple sclerosis lesions. The respective volumes of hypointense multiple sclerosis lesions, as shown by T1-weighted and long-TE FLAIR MR imaging, correlate strongly and moderately, respectively, with clinical disability [6]. The difference in the strength of the correlation is attributed to the inability of long-TE FLAIR MR imaging to show mildly damaged lesions, (i.e., multiple sclerosis lesions with mild prolongation of T1 relaxation times) [6]. The multiecho FLAIR MR imaging sequence may improve the visibility of mildly damaged lesions as hypointense lesions on short-TE FLAIR MR imaging, help differentiate mildly from severely damaged lesions, and strengthen the correlation between the volume of hypointense lesions and clinical disability. Initial experience with cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy, a rare disease affecting the white matter, shows the ability of short-TE FLAIR MR imaging to separate between mildly (peripheral) and severely damaged (central) zones (Fig. 3).



View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. 8-year-old boy with cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy. Axial T1-weighted MR image (TR/TE, 516/14) (left image) at level of lateral ventricles shows low signal intensity (prolonged T1 relaxation time) involving splenium of corpus callosum and deep white matter of both frontal and parietooccipital lobes. Axial T2-weighted MR image (3000/100) (center image) shows corresponding high signal intensity (prolonged T2 relaxation time) in involved regions. Axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR image (TR/TI/TE, 6000/2000/53) (right image) shows low signal intensity in center (asterisks) and high signal intensity in periphery (arrowheads) of white matter lesion in both parietooccipital lobes. The low signal intensity in center of lesion is presumably a result of more severely damaged white matter and greater prolongation of T1 relaxation time.

 

One limitation of this model is that the T1, T2, and proton density pixel values used to generate the FLAIR and T2-weighted MR images were obtained from a single patient. The restricted nature of the database may influence the definition of the T1 relaxation time thresholds.

Lastly, in this work, we present a computer-based tool that allows us to generate brain maps of any pulse sequence and that provides the freedom to choose the location, size, shape, and intrinsic characteristics of simulated lesions. We believe that this tool will be useful for testing the effect of pulse sequence optimization on the visibility of brain lesions.

In conclusion, T1 relaxation time thresholds increase with TE of the FLAIR MR imaging sequence and define the transition from hyperintense to hypointense lesions.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Rydberg JN, Hammond CA, Grimm RC, et al. Initial clinical experience in MR imaging of the brain with a fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery pulse sequence. Radiology 1994;193:173 -180[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Alexander JA, Sheppard S, Davis PC, Salverda P. Adult cerebrovascular disease: role of modified rapid fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery sequences. AJNR 1996;17:1507 -1513[Abstract]
  3. Hashemi RH, Bradley WG, Chen DY, et al. Suspected multiple sclerosis: MR imaging with a thin section fast FLAIR pulse sequence. Radiology 1995;196:505 -510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Rydberg JN, Riederer SJ, Rydberg CH, Jack CR. Contrast optimization of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:868 -877[Medline]
  5. Barboriak DP, Provenzale JM, MacFall JR. White matter lesion contrast in fast spin-echo fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery imaging: effect of varying effective echo time and echo train length. AJR 1999;173:1091 -1096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Rovaris M, Comi G, Rocca MA, et al. Relevance of hypointense lesions on fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR images as a marker of disease in cases of multiple sclerosis. AJNR 1999;20:813 -820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ashikaga R, Araki Y, Ono Y, et al. Appearance of normal brain maturation on fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) MR images. AJNR 1999;20:427 -431[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. In den Kleef JJE, Cuppen JJM. RLSQ: T1, T2 and rho calculations—combining ratios and least squares. Magn Reson Med 1987;5:513 -524[Medline]
  9. Barbosa S, Blumhardt LD, Roberts N, Lock T, Edwards RH. Magnetic resonance relaxation time mapping in multiple sclerosis: normal appearing white matter and the "invisible" lesion load. Magn Reson Imaging 1994;12:33 -42[Medline]
  10. Lee JN, Riederer SJ. A modified saturation-recovery approximation for multiple spin-echo pulse sequences. Magn Reson Med 1986;3:132 -134[Medline]
  11. Stevenson VL, Gawne-Cain ML, Barker GJ, Thompson AJ, Miller DH. Imaging of the spinal cord and brain in multiple sclerosis: a comparative study between fast FLAIR and fast spin echo. J Neurol 1997;244:119 -124[Medline]
  12. Gawne-Cain ML, O'Riordan JI, Thompson AJ, Moseley IF, Miller DH. Multiple sclerosis lesion detection in the brain: a comparison of fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and conventional T2-weighted dual spin echo. Neurology 1997;49:364 -370[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melhem, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Itoh, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melhem, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Itoh, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS