AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takayasu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ueno, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takayasu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ueno, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2001; 176:681-688
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Targeted Transarterial Oily Chemoembolization for Small Foci of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using a Unified Helical CT and Angiography system

Analysis of Factors Affecting Local Recurrence and Survival rates

Kenichi Takayasu1, Yoshihisa Muramatsu1, Tetsuo Maeda1, Ryoko Iwata1, Hiroyoshi Furukawa1, Yukio Muramatsu1, Noriyuki Moriyama1, Takuji Okusaka2, Shuichi Okada2 and Hideki Ueno2

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
2 Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.

Received August 2, 2000; accepted after revision September 6, 2000.

 
Address correspondence to K. Takayasu.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. We assessed the local recurrence rate after a single targeted transarterial oily chemoembolization for small hepatocellular carcinoma with the unified helical CT and angiography system and analyzed the factors affecting the local recurrence rate and survival rate with Cox proportional hazards model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. For 54 consecutive patients with 71 small hepatocellular carcinomas (<=5 cm) with no more than two associated lesions, targeted oily chemoembolization was performed with an emulsion of doxorubicin hydrochloride mixed with iodized oil or a suspension of zinostatin stimalamer followed by gelatin sponge particles. When local recurrence or a new lesion appeared, follow-up targeted oily chemoembolization was performed.

RESULTS. For 52 of 71 lesions, the catheterization to a subsegmental or more distal feeding artery could be performed. Local recurrence was recognized in 33.2% at 1 year and 37.8% at 2 and 3 years. The significant factors that affected local recurrence were tumor size (p = 0.005) and degree of deposition of iodized oil within the lesion (p = 0.049). The survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 93.3%, 77.1%, and 77.1%, respectively. The significant factors affecting survival rate were tumor thrombus in large vessels (p = 0.0001), appearing after the first chemoembolization, and maximum tumor size (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION. Single targeted transarterial oily chemoembolization with the unified helical CT and angiography system had a low local recurrence rate for small hepatocellular carcinoma, and follow-up embolization resulted in a good survival rate. Tumor size along with degree of intratumoral iodized oil deposition and tumor thrombus along with maximum tumor size were significant factors affecting local recurrence and survival rate, respectively.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most lethal malignancies and is prevalent in areas where the hepatitis B and C viruses are endemic, such as Africa and Southeast Asia [1]. By a periodic follow-up with sonography and {alpha}-fetoprotein measurement for high-risk patients who are positive for hepatitis B virus surface antigen or antihepatitis C virus antibodies, or both, small hepatocellular carcinomas less than 3 cm in diameter can be easily found and have recently been treated by surgery or percutaneous ethanol injection in large numbers of patients.

Although surgery and percutaneous ethanol injection have shown good survival rates, 5-year survival rates after surgery (n = 16,728) and after percutaneous ethanol injection (n = 2,081) were 48.2% and 40.8%, respectively [2]; the number of patients for whom both treatments is indicated is not as large because of advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma or associated liver dysfunction. According to the Japanese liver cancer study group [2], transarterial oily chemoembolization accounted for 48.4% of all treatments, followed by surgery for 28.6%, percutaneous ethanol injection for 24.2%, and radiofrequency for 3.1% (some patients underwent two or more treatments in the same day) in a total of 15,804 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma registered during the 2 years (1994-1995) of the study group [2]. Transarterial oily chemoembolization has been widely used [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma or postoperatively recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma [11], or both, because the treatment is minimally invasive and repeatable. However, the local control rate with transarterial oily chemoembolization was much lower than that of surgery and percutaneous ethanol injection. Viable cancer cells are frequently found within the septum or pseudocapsule and in the surrounding area as histologically confirmed in resected specimens after transarterial oily chemoembolization [12, 13].

For analysis of factors affecting the local control rate and survival, we performed one-session transarterial oily chemoembolization for small hepatocellular carcinoma (<= 5 cm), using a thin catheter seeking the smallest feeding artery and the unified system of helical CT and angiography, both of which were arranged in a line to form a common couch in one suite [14]. To our knowledge, ours is the first study of a series of cases performed this way.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Between April 1996 and June 1999, 544 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent transarterial oily chemoembolization therapy. Among them, 72 consecutive patients who satisfied the following criteria were retrospectively studied: one main lesion (<=5 cm) associated with no more than two lesions (<=3 cm) and treatment with transarterial oily chemoembolization with the unified helical CT and angiography system [14]. The following 18 patients were excluded: 10 patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma underwent surgery, six received percutaneous ethanol injection immediately before transarterial oily chemoembolization, and two failed to have superselective catheterization for targeted transarterial oily chemoembolization. The remaining 54 patients were included in the study.

The study population comprised 35 men and 19 women, with an average age of 65.5 years (age range, 44-82 years). Twenty-one patients (38.9%) had previously undergone surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma: wedge resections for one lesion in 11 patients and for more than two lesions in six, subsegmentectomy in two, and left lateral segmentectomy and right lobectomy in one each. The mean interval between surgery and transarterial oily chemoembolization was 1222 days (range, 218-3303 days).

Fifty-four patients had 71 lesions: 38 had one lesion, 15 had two, and one had three. The mean size of the largest tumor was 2.1 cm (range, 0.5-5.0 cm). TNM classification [15] was stage I for 20 patients, stage II for 20, stage III for 3, and stage IV for 11. Abdominal and thoracic helical CT, sonography, or MR imaging confirmed the absence of metastasis to lymph nodes (N0) and distant organs (M0). Liver function according to the Child classification [16] was grade A in 28 patients, grade B in 21, and grade C in five. Six patients had positive findings for hepatitis B surface antigen; 48, for antihepatitis C virus antibodies; four, for both: and four had negative findings for both. The average level of {alpha}-fetoprotein was 862 ng/mL (range, 4-13,509 ng/mL). Nineteen patients showed {alpha}-fetoprotein levels greater than 200 ng/mL.

The diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma was made clinically in these patients with sonography, CT, MR imaging, hepatic angiography, combination of CT and angiography, and with measurements of {alpha}-fetoprotein. Unenhanced tumor such as an early hepatocellular carcinoma or adenomatous hyperplasia was excluded. The histopathology of noncancerous hepatic parenchyma in the resected specimens was chronic hepatitis in six patients and cirrhosis in 15.

Method of Targeted Oily Chemoembolization with the Unified System of Helical CT and Angiography
"Targeted transarterial oily chemoembolization" is defined as a superselective catheterization in the subsegmental or more distal artery followed by oily chemoembolization, in which the entire process is assisted and the achievement is confirmed by findings of the unified helical CT and angiography system.

The unified system of helical CT and angiography (Interventional-CT; Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) [14] consists of helical CT (X-vision; Toshiba) and angiography units in which digital subtraction angiography equipment with a C-arm (Angiorex, CAS-8000V; Toshiba) is arranged in a linear configuration to form a common couch, facilitating quick transportation of the patient from one unit to the other for CT during arterial portography and CT arteriography without risking dislodgment of the catheter.

Before transarterial oily chemoembolization, the following baseline study was carried out in all patients with the unified CT and angiography system for precise information about the number and exact location of lesions in the entire liver: CT during arterial portography [17] (Fig. 1A) followed by the common or proper hepatic arteriography and CT arteriography [18] of the proper hepatic or the right or left hepatic artery when it derives independently. Hepatic arteriography in the right anterior oblique position was performed, if necessary. On the basis of the baseline study findings, the feeding artery was determined. Subsequently, a 2.7-French 100-cm-long microcatheter (Rapid transit TM; Cordis, Miami, FL) with a double angle—shaped 0.016-inch 150-cm-long guidewire covered by hydrophilic polymer (Radifocus; Terumo, Japan) was advanced through a 5-French catheter into the peripheral portion of the feeding artery as close to the lesion as possible (Fig. 1B), and follow-up CT arteriography was performed to confirm the possible feeding artery supplying the targeted lesion and the expected extent of embolization of the noncancerous portion (Fig. 1C). If the predicted noncancerous hepatic portion to be embolized was large enough to deteriorate hepatic functional reserve, the catheter tip was advanced in the more peripheral part of the feeding artery (Fig. 1D). Follow-up CT angiography was performed (Fig. 1E), followed by transarterial oily chemoembolization with an emulsion of 30 mg of doxorubicin hydrochloride (Adriamycin; Adria, Dublin, OH) dissolved in 3 mL of iopamidol (Iopamiron, 300mg I/mL; Schering, Tokyo) mixed with 5 mL of iodized oil (Lipiodol Ultra-Fluid; Guerbet, Paris, France), or followed by a suspension of 4 mg of zinostatin stimalamer (a lipophilic anticancer agent containing 4 mL of iodized oil) (Smancs; Yamanouchi, Tokyo, Japan) [19] and then by gelatin sponge particles (Gelfoam; Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI). The end point of transarterial oily chemoembolization was cessation of arterial blood flow. If deposition of iodized oil in the lesion was inadequate, another feeding artery was sought (Fig. 1F), and CT arteriography was performed again to confirm the feeder supplying the lesion with an undeposited portion (Fig. 1G). Transarterial oily chemoembolization was carried out again. Finally, complete deposition of the iodized oil in the lesion was confirmed by unenhanced CT to complete treatment (Fig. 1H)



View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 81-year-old woman with hepatocellular carcinoma between segments II and III. CT scan during arterial portography reveals perfusion defect (arrow). Note that in right lobe previously treated lesion contains deposition of iodized oil.

 


View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 81-year-old woman with hepatocellular carcinoma between segments II and III. Left hepatic angiogram shows faint tumor staining (short arrows) supplied from two feeder arteries, one (long arrow) from left lateral superior branch and the other (arrowhead) from inferior branch. Latter artery was not suspected as feeder at this angiographic study.

 


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 81-year-old woman with hepatocellular carcinoma between segments II and III. CT arteriogram of B shows targeted lesion (arrow) and noncancerous hepatic portion to be embolized.

 


View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. 81-year-old woman with hepatocellular carcinoma between segments II and III. Angiogram shows microcatheter being advanced to more distal branch artery that is shown as long arrow in B.

 


View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E. 81-year-old woman with hepatocellular carcinoma between segments II and III. CT arteriogram of D shows lesion and noncancerous area to be embolized as smaller than that seen in C. Ventral portion of lesion is incompletely enhanced, suggesting another feeding artery.

 


View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1F. 81-year-old woman with hepatocellular carcinoma between segments II and III. Superselective angiogram shows another feeding artery derived from origin of left lateral inferior branch. Note tumor stain (arrows).

 


View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1G. 81-year-old woman with hepatocellular carcinoma between segments II and III. CT arteriogram of F shows ventral defect of tumor, which is now enhanced. Oily chemoembolization was performed.

 


View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1H. 81-year-old woman with hepatocellular carcinoma between segments II and III. Unenhanced CT scan shows good retention of iodized oil in entire tumor and in surrounding hepatic parenchyma. CT arteriography of right hepatic artery is simultaneously performed to evaluate effect of previous oily chemoembolization.

 

For CT during arterial portography and CT arteriography, 370 mg I/mL of ioversol (Optiray; Yamanouchi) diluted to 92 mg I/mL by saline solution (1:3) was used. CT during arterial portography was performed with the catheter tip placed in the superior mesenteric artery, 90 mL of contrast medium was injected after administration of 10 µg of prostaglandin E1 at a rate of 3 mL/sec, and CT was begun 20 sec after the start of the injection. For CT arteriography in the hepatic arteries, the following adequate dose of contrast medium that never regurgitates was injected: 60 mL for CT arteriography through the proper or common hepatic artery at a speed of 2 mL/sec, 30 mL for the segmental artery at a speed of 1 mL/sec, and 6-10 mL for subsegmental or more peripheral arteries at a speed of 0.3-0.5 mL/sec. CT was started 8-10 sec later. The following parameters were used: slice thickness, 5-7 mm; pitch, 1:1.

On the second or third day after transarterial oily chemoembolization, blood was collected for measuring albumin, total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase. Follow-up CT with measurement of {alpha}-fetoprotein was performed 1 month after transarterial oily chemoembolization and every 3 months thereafter. If the enhanced area was located within or abutting the embolized lesion, it was diagnosed as a local recurrence; a lesion newly appearing at a different site from the initially treated lesion was defined as a recurrence at a different site. For treating recurrent foci at a local and different area, follow-up targeted transarterial oily chemoembolization with the unified machine or percutaneous ethanol injection was performed. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

The follow-up period between transarterial oily chemoembolization and the outcome of the patient was 556 days on the average (range, 163-1280 days).

Analysis of Factors Affecting Local Recurrence and Survival After One Session of Oily Chemoembolization
To analyze factors affecting local recurrence after one session of transarterial oily chemoembolization for 71 hepatocellular carcinoma lesions, the following factors were evaluated (Table 1): tumor diameter measured on CT, minimum distance between the margin of tumor and the liver surface, grade of liver function according to Child classification (A, B, C), degree of deposition of iodized oil in the lesion classified by unenhanced CT performed immediately after transarterial oily chemoembolization (excellent, 100% deposition of iodized oil in the lesion; good, 51-99%; poor, <=50%) and in the noncancerous hepatic portion around the lesion (excellent, deposited completely around the lesion [Fig. 1H]; good, deposition between excellent and poor; poor, <=50% deposition), location of lesion (right, left, or caudate lobe), location of hepatic artery embolized (right hepatic, right anterior, posterior or left hepatic artery versus more peripheral artery), anticancer agent used (doxorubicin hydrochloride, zinostatin stimalamer), and use of gelatin sponge particles.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Factors Affecting Local Recurrence After Transarterial Oily Chemoembolization

 

Statistical Analyses
All analyses were performed by SAS statistical software. Univariate analyses such as survival and recurrence-free rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method [20] and evaluated by the log-rank test. A landmark analysis [21, 22] was used to evaluate significant survival risk of events observed during a follow-up period, such as local recurrence, recurrence at a different site, tumor thrombus in large vessels, and temporal alteration of liver function based on Child classification. A landmark of 12 months was determined on the basis of 90% and 70% of the patients eventually developing local recurrence and tumor thrombus, respectively, 12 months after the first transarterial oily chemoembolization, and of 70% of the patients living at that time. For multivariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards model [23] was used with PHREG (Proportional Hazard REGression) procedure of SAS. The events observed during the follow-up were included in the multivariate Cox regression model by defining them as time-dependent covariates. Methods of stepwise selection and best subset selection in the PHREG procedure were used to identify important prognostic factors (p < 0.05 [two-tailed test] was statistically significant).


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Local Recurrence After Single-Session Targeted Transarterial Oily Chemoembolization
The microcatheter could be advanced to the following sites of the hepatic artery: distal hepatic artery beyond the subsegmental artery (Figs. 1D and 1F) in 27 lesions, subsegmental arteries in 25, segmental artery in 14 (right anterior hepatic in five, posterior hepatic in five, and left hepatic in four), and right hepatic artery in five. An average dose of ioversol (370 mg I/mL) used in one patient for the baseline study, including angiography and transarterial oily chemoembolization, was 160 mL (range, 130-180 mL). The mean dose of doxorubicin and zinostatin stimalamer was 20.1 mg (range, 7.5-40.0 mg) and 3.3 mg (range, 2.0-4.0 mg), respectively. The average amount of gelatin sponge used was 0.18 pieces (range, 0-0.8 pieces). In six lesions, gelatin sponge was not intentionally used. It took approximately 2 hr (range, 1.5-3 hr) to complete all studies.

Twenty-three lesions (32.4%) in 20 patients (37.0%) showed local recurrence after the first transarterial oily chemoembolization. One-year, 2-year and 3-year local recurrence rates were 33.2%, 37.8%, and 37.8%, respectively (Fig. 2). The univariate analysis of factors showed only tumor size to be statistically significant. The multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model for affecting local recurrence showed tumor size and the degree of deposition of the iodized oil within the lesion (excellent versus good and poor) to be significant (Table 2). With respect to the relationship between the tumor size and the local recurrence rate, there was a statistically significant difference among three groups with different tumor sizes (Fig. 3). The larger the tumor size, the higher the local recurrence rate and the earlier the local recurrence appeared. Other factors such as grade of Child classification, degree of iodized oil deposition in the surrounding noncancerous portion, location of the lesion, site of the embolized hepatic artery, anticancer agent used, and gelatin sponge used were not statistically significant.



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. Overall local recurrence rate for 71 small hepatocellular carcinomas (<=5 cm) with one session of oily chemoembolization with unified helical CT angiography system. Local recurrence rate is 33.2% at 1 year and 37.8% at 2 and 3 years. TOCE = transarterial oily chemoembolization.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Factors Affecting Local Recurrence and Survival with Cox Proportional Hazards Model

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. Local recurrence rates in relation to tumor size. Two-year local recurrence rate was 15%, 40%, and 61% for small (<= 1 cm), medium (1-2.5 cm) and large (2.5-5 cm) groups, respectively. TOCE = transarterial oily chemoembolization.

 

The outcome of the 23 local recurrent foci was as follows: 15 lesions treated by repeated targeted transarterial oily chemoembolization and three lesions, by percutaneous ethanol injection; one lesion, associated with tumor thrombus in the portal vein and bone metastases, by systemic chemotherapy; and in four lesions, therapy not chosen until the end of the observation period.

Survival Rate for 54 Patients After Transarterial Oily Chemoembolization
The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates were 93.3%, 77.1%, and 77.1%, respectively (Fig. 4). Eight patients died of intra- and extra- hepatic extension of cancer, and one died of hepatic failure after rupture of the esophageal varix. During the follow-up period, recurrent metachronous foci in different sites of the liver were recognized in 33 patients. The 1- and 2- year rates of recurrence at different areas were 39.3% and 91.0%, respectively. In addition, the recurrence pattern recognized on CT was a solitary lesion with an average diameter of 1.6 cm (range, 0.5-6.0 cm) in 22 patients, multiple lesions developing in one lobe and both hepatic lobes in five each, and tumor thrombus of the portal vein in one. For treatment, follow-up targeted transarterial oily chemoembolization was performed in 22 patients an average of 1.4 times (range, 1-4 times), percutaneous ethanol injection was performed in two patients, and no therapy was performed in nine patients. Five patients had tumor thrombus in a major vein (four portal and one hepatic), and four did not undergo any therapy in the observation period.



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. Graph shows survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years after treatment in 54 patients with 71 hepatocellular carcinomas. Note that 1- and 3- year survival rates were 93.3% and 77.1%, respectively. TOCE = transarterial oily chemoembolization.

 

The following four factors during the observation period after transarterial oily chemoembolization were significant by the univariate analysis: maximum tumor size, local recurrence, tumor thrombus, and logarithmic value of {alpha}-fetoprotein. The multivariate analysis showed that the tumor thrombus in the portal or hepatic vein and the largest tumor size were significant factors affecting the survival of the patient (Table 2). No statistical significance was recognized in other factors such as Child classification, hepatitis B surface antigen, antihepatitis C virus, past history of hepatectomy, alteration of Child classification between pre- and posttransarterial oily chemoembolization, number of lesions, stage of hepatocellular carcinoma, metachronous recurrence at a different site, the site of embolized artery, and anticancer agent used.

Complications of Targeted Transarterial Oily Chemoembolization
All 54 patients were discharged with a mean hospital stay of 6.3 days (range, 5-10 days). No patient died as a result of transarterial oily chemoembolization. High temperature more than 38°C lasting less than 3 days after transarterial oily chemoembolization was observed in 39 patients (72.2%); abdominal pain requiring a sedative and nausea or vomiting was observed in nine patients (16.7%) each; and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase more than 500 U/L was observed in two patients (3.7%). These complications could be controlled by palliative therapy.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
For ideal oily chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma, the following are goals for interventional radiologists: a super-selective catheterization into the feeding artery without fail followed by injection of the emulsion of iodized oil and anticancer agent deposited only in the targeted lesion with no washout of iodized oil, achieved in only one session, while the noncancerous hepatic portion remains completely free from unnecessary embolization. To achieve these goals, we developed the unified system that combines helical CT and angiography and have applied this system to transarterial oily chemoembolization therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Conventional transarterial oily chemoembolization has been developed with the introduction of the unique carrier of anticancer agent, iodized oil, and a microcatheter that makes segmental [6] or subsegmental [8] transarterial oily chemoembolization possible. It is now widely performed as a palliative treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. However, without assistance of sectional imaging such as CT at transarterial oily chemoembolization, superselective catheterization into the real feeding artery to obtain complete necrosis of the hepatocellular carcinoma lesion was not always successful. Therefore, inadvertent misembolization occurred. The targeted lesion was not embolized, and instead, the noncancerous hepatic portion that should be preserved was misembolized resulting in severe hepatic damage (Fig. 5A,5B). This kind of misembolization was not found immediately after transarterial oily chemoembolization but usually 1 month later by follow-up CT.



View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A. 57-year-old man undergoing misembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma by conventional subsegmental oily chemoembolization. Radiograph after oily chemoembolization of anterior superior branch discloses good accumulation of iodized oil in targeted lesion (arrows) and accompanying portal veins.

 


View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B. 57-year-old man undergoing misembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma by conventional subsegmental oily chemoembolization. Dynamic CT scan, obtained 1 week after A, shows dense deposition of iodized oil not in targeted lesion but in noncancerous hepatic portion just posterior to well-opacified hepatocellular carcinoma (arrow) with faint iodized oil deposition. Ascites has appeared anew on liver surface.

 

With the advent of the unified system for helical CT and angiography, the previously mentioned difficulty of the conventional transarterial oily chemoembolization has been overcome, and several advantages have been added. Using selective arteriography of the feeding artery followed by CT arteriography and repeating these studies after advancing the microcatheter to a more distal artery (Fig. 1A,1B,1C,1D,1E,1F,1G,1H), we found it possible to achieve targeted transarterial oily chemoembolization, strengthening the effect of chemoembolization on the targeted lesion and reducing the damage to the surrounding noncancerous portion. Because of this method, relatively larger amounts of anticancer agent and embolization material can be injected per tumor. The amount of anticancer agent and iodized oil used in the conventional transarterial oily chemoembolization was presumed to be reduced to two thirds. The amount of gelatin sponge has been drastically reduced. Much more iodized oil can be injected with nearly all tumor vessels embolized, and consequently, the caliber of vessels for gelatin sponge is rendered much smaller. As a result, the incidence of abdominal pain after chemoembolization has remarkably decreased, and some patients could be discharged without pain and fever 6 days after transarterial oily chemoembolization. Reported severe inadvertent complications such as hepatic biloma, abscess, septicemia, chemical cholangitis, gastrointestinal bleeding, and hepatic infarction [24] were not encountered.

Another merit of this unified machine is the capability of confirming on CT and at the completion of treatment whether the targeted lesion is completely treated by transarterial oily chemoembolization. By performing unenhanced CT immediately after transarterial oily chemoembolization, distinction can be made between primarily incomplete deposition of iodized oil and secondarily incomplete deposition as a result of washout of iodized oil from the initially completely deposited lesion. This distinction is important to verify the mechanism of local recurrence and to assess the characteristics of anticancer agents used for embolization therapy in the future, namely, whether it has an affinity for tumor vessels.

In our study, the local recurrence rate with single-session targeted transarterial oily chemoembolization with the unified CT and angiography system was 33.2%, 37.8%, and 37.8% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively (Fig. 2). The results of one session of subsegmental transarterial oily chemoembolization for small hepatocellular carcinomas (<= 4 cm) reported by Matsui et al. [8] (18% at 1 year, 30% at 2 years, and 33% at 3 years) were superior to ours even though they did not use this kind of unified system. The reason for the difference may be mainly the size of tumor that we (<= 5 cm) and they (<= 4 cm) treated because the larger the tumor size, the higher the local recurrence rate (Fig. 3). In our study, all local recurrences were recognized in 1.5 years after transarterial oily chemoembolization (Fig. 2). This recurrence rate suggests that follow-up is needed for at least 2 years.

Cox proportional hazards model suggests tumor size and the degree of deposition of iodized oil within the lesion as significant factors affecting the local recurrence. In relation to the tumor size, large hepatocellular carcinomas (2.5-5 cm) showed a higher local recurrence rate and earlier appearance than smaller ones (Fig. 3). The reason for higher local recurrence with a large lesion may be increased numbers of feeding arteries that result in inhomogeneous deposition of iodized oil and extension of cancer cells beyond the fibrous capsule and into the portal vein. The degree of deposition of iodized oil and tumor necrosis are well correlated [25, 26].

Iodized oil is also deposited in the noncancerous portion, and it is partially accounted for by retention of iodized oil in the portal vein, which receives flow from the hepatic artery via the peribiliary plexus [27]. This retention is perhaps related to reduction of the local recurrence. The marginal portion of the lesion receives both arterial and portal blood flows, and the portal blood flow increases reciprocally after ligation of the artery [28]. However, no statistical significance for the degree of deposition of iodized oil in the surrounding noncancerous parenchyma was recognized in our study. For conventional transarterial oily chemoembolization, gelatin sponge particles are thought to be indispensable for strengthening the anticancer effect as verified by pharmacokinetics [29] and histopathologic study [12]. In targeted transarterial oily chemoembolization, there was no statistically significant difference in recurrence rate between the groups with and without gelatin sponge. Gelatin sponge might not be as important as previously believed because superselectively injected iodized oil probably occupies almost the entire vascular bed in the lesion, producing a strong effect similar to stopping the blood flow with gelatin sponge.

In our study, the following survival rates were obtained with transarterial oily chemoembolization: 93.3% at 1 year and 77.1% at 2 and 3 years (Fig. 4). Comparing the 3-year survival rate with conventional transarterial chemoembolization [30] or transarterial oily chemoembolization [31], segmental transarterial oily chemoembolization [6], and subsegmental transarterial oily chemoembolization [8] (Table 3), we found that our results were comparable with those of Matsui et al. [8], even though transarterial oily chemoembolization with the unified CT and angiography system is theoretically superior to subsegmental transarterial oily chemoembolization alone. The significant factors affecting the survival were tumor thrombus in the portal vein and maximal tumor size. According to the Japanese liver cancer study group [32] that analyzed prognostic factors in 5800 patients who underwent resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, tumor size and portal involvement were found to be the significant prognostic factors.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 Survival Rates for Patients with Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Different Kinds of Transarterial Chemoembolization

 

Recently, prospective and randomized trials of chemoembolization with [10] and without [33] iodized oil comparing it with supportive therapy were conducted outside Japan. Their results showed no significant difference in survival rate between the two groups and suggested no benefit of transarterial chemoembolization or transarterial oily chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Their studies consisted of scheduled periodic embolization from the proper [33] or right or left hepatic artery [10] without evaluation of transarterial oily chemoembolization on CT; embolization of liver parenchyma certainly deteriorates the liver function with a shortening of survival time. Ernst et al. [34] reported that the group that received repeated transarterial chemoembolization based on the tumor response showed a significantly better survival rate than the group that received scheduled follow-up transarterial chemoembolization. We believe that the repeated transarterial oily chemoembolization should be performed when local recurrence or a new lesion or both are found on follow-up CT [35]. The targeted transarterial oily chemoembolization with combined CT-angiography system seems best for control of small lesions because it maximizes therapeutic effect for hepatocellular carcinoma and minimizes damage to the noncancerous hepatic portion.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank Kunio Okuda, Professor Emeritus of Internal Medicine, Chiba School of Medicine, for his critical review.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Munoz N, Bosch X. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma. In: Okuda K, Ishak KG, eds. Neoplasms of the liver. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, 1987:3 -19
  2. The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Survey and follow-up study of primary liver cancer in Japan: report 13 [in Japanese]. Acta Hepatol Jpn 1999;40:288 -300
  3. Nakamura H, Hashimoto T, Oi H, et al. Transcatheter oily chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 1989;170:783 -786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Takayasu K, Suzuki M, Uesaka K, et al. Hepatic artery embolization for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma: prognosis and risk factors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1989;23[suppl]:S123 -S125
  5. Kanematsu T, Furuta T, Takenaka K, et al. A 5-year experience of lipiodolization: selective regional chemotherapy for 200 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 1989;10:98 -102[Medline]
  6. Uchida H, Ohishi H, Matsuo N, et al. Transcatheter hepatic segmental arterial embolization using lipiodol mixed with an anticancer drug and Gel-foam particles for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1990;13:140 -145[Medline]
  7. Vetter D, Wenger JJ, Bergier JM, Doffoel M, Bockel R. Transcatheter oily chemoembolization in the management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: results of a Western comparative study in 60 patients. Hepatology 1991;13:427 -433[Medline]
  8. Matsui O, Kadoya M, Yoshikawa J, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with subsegmental transcatheter arterial embolization. Radiology 1993;188:79 -83[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Bronowicki JP, Vetter D, Dumas F, et al. Transcatheter oily chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a 4-year study of 127 French patients. Cancer 1994;74:16 -24[Medline]
  10. Groupe D'etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hepatocellulaire. A comparison of lipiodol chemoembolization and conservative treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Me687687d 1995;332:1256 -1261[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Takayasu K, Wakao F, Moriyama N, et al. Postresection recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma treated by arterial embolization: analysis of prognostic factors. Hepatology 1992;16:906 -911[Medline]
  12. Takayasu K, Shima Y, Muramatsu Y, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with intraarterial iodized oil with and without chemotherapeutic agents. Radiology 1987;163:345 -351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kuroda C, Sakurai M, Monden M, et al. Limitation of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using iodized oil for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a study in resected cases. Cancer 1991;67:81 -86[Medline]
  14. Takayasu K, Muramatsu Y, Asai S, Muramatsu Y, Kobayashi T. CT fluoroscopy-assisted needle puncture and ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary study. AJR 1999;173:1219 -1224[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Sobin LH, Wittekind C, eds. International Union Against Cancer: TNM classification of malignant tumors, 5th ed. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1997:74 -77
  16. Child CG, Turcotte JG. Surgery and portal hypertension. In: Child CG, ed. The liver and portal hypertension. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1964:1 -85
  17. Matsui O, Kadoya M, Suzuki M, et al. Work-in-progress: dynamic sequential computed tomography during arterial portography in the detection of hepatic neoplasms. Radiology 1983;146:721 -727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Freeny PC, Marks WM. Computed tomographic arteriography of the liver. Radiology 1983;148:193 -197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Konno T, Maeda H, Iwai K, et al. Effect of arterial administration of high-molecular weight anti-cancer agent SMANCS with lipid lymphographic agent on hepatoma: a preliminary report. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1983;19:1053 -1065[Medline]
  20. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation for incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457 -481
  21. Anderson JR, Cain KC, Gelber RD. Analysis of survival by tumor response. J Clin Oncol 1983;1:710 -719[Abstract]
  22. Anderson JR, Cain KC, Gelber RD, et al. Analysis and interpretation of the comparison of survival by treatment outcome variables in cancer clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rep 1985;69:1139 -1146[Medline]
  23. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc 1972;34:187 -220
  24. Chung JW, Park JH, Han JK, et al. Hepatic tumors: predisposing factors for complications of transcatheter oil chemoembolization. Radiology 1996;198:33 -40[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Maki S, Konno T, Maeda H. Image enhancement in computed tomography for sensitive diagnosis of liver cancer and semiquantitation of tumour selective drug targeting with oily contrast medium. Cancer 1985;56:751 -757[Medline]
  26. Choi BI, Kim HC, Han JK, et al. Therapeutic effect of transcatheter oily chemoembolization therapy for encapsulated nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: CT and pathologic findings. Radiology 1992;182:709 -713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kan Z. Dynamic study of iodized oil in the liver and blood supply to hepatic tumors: an experimental investigation in several animal species. Acta Radiol Suppl 1996;408:1 -25[Medline]
  28. Ackerman NB, Lien WM, Kondi ES, Silverman NA. The blood supply of experimental liver metastases. I. The distribution of hepatic artery and portal vein blood to "small" and "large" tumors. Surgery 1969;66:1067 -1072[Medline]
  29. Raoul JL, Heresbach D, Bretagne JF, et al. Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinomas: a study of the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin. Cancer 1992;70:585 -590[Medline]
  30. Yamada R, Kishi K, Sonomura T, Tsuda M, Nomura S, Satoh M. Transcatheter arterial embolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovas Intervent Radiol 1990;13:135 -139
  31. Nakao N, Kamino K, Miura K, et al. Transcatheter arterial embolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: a long-term follow-up. Radiat Med 1992;10:13 -18[Medline]
  32. The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Predictive factors for long-term prognosis after partial hepatectomy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan. Cancer 1994;74:2772 -2780[Medline]
  33. Pelletier G, Roche A, Ink O, et al. A randomized trial of hepatic arterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 1990;11:181 -184[Medline]
  34. Ernst O, Sergent G, Mizurahi D, Delemazure O, Paris J-C, L'Hermine C. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: comparison of planned periodic chemoembolization and chemoembolization based on tumor response. AJR 1999;172:59 -64[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Ikeda K, Kumada H, Saitoh S, Arase Y, Chayama K. Effect of repeated transcatheter arterial embolization on the survival time in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: an analysis by the Cox proportional hazards model. Cancer 1991;68:2150 -2154[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
K. Shimada, Y. Sakamoto, M. Esaki, T. Kosuge, C. Morizane, M. Ikeda, H. Ueno, T. Okusaka, Y. Arai, and K. Takayasu
Analysis of Prognostic Factors Affecting Survival After Initial Recurrence and Treatment Efficacy for Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Potentially Curative Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2007; 14(8): 2337 - 2347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
H Takao, I Doi, and T Watanabe
Superselective transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation of an unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma using three-dimensional rotational angiography
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2007; 80(953): e85 - e87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
K. Takayasu, T. Maeda, and R. Iwata
Sensitivity of Superselective Arteriography for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Compared with Proximal Arteriography and Computed Tomography During Superselective Arteriography
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2002; 32(6): 191 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takayasu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ueno, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takayasu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ueno, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS