AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Unterweger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kubik-Huch, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Unterweger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kubik-Huch, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2001; 176:959-963
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Ultrafast MR Imaging of the Pelvic Floor

M. Unterweger1, B. Marincek1, N. Gottstein-Aalame1, J. F. Debatin1,2, B. Seifert3, N. Ochsenbein-Imhof4, D. Perucchini4 and R. A. Kubik-Huch1

1 Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Rämistr. 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
2 Present address: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, D-451222 Essen, Germany.
3 Department of Biostatistics, University of Zurich, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
4 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.

Received August 18, 2000; accepted after revision October 2, 2000.

 
Address correspondence to R. A. Kubik-Huch.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to compare pelvic floor anatomy and laxity at rest and on straining (Valsalva's maneuver) using dynamic ultrafast MR imaging in women who were continent versus those with stress incontinence differing in obstetric history.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty continent women were divided into three equal groups (nulliparous, previous cesarean delivery, previous vaginal delivery) and compared with 10 women with stress-incontinence with a history of at least one vaginal delivery. MR imaging of the pelvic floor at rest and on maximal strain was performed, using axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo images followed by sagittal ultrafast T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo sequences. Mean population age (age range, 22-45 years; mean ± SD, 36 ± 5.4 years), was similar in the four groups, as was parity in the three parous groups.

RESULTS. Mean distances between the bladder floor and pubococcygeal line at rest did not differ between the four groups. On straining, bladder floor descent was 1.1 ± 0.9, 1.0 ± 1.1, and 1.9 ± 0.9 cm in continent nulliparous, cesarean delivery, and vaginal delivery women, respectively, versus 3.2 ± 1.0 cm in incontinent women (p = 0.0005). Cervical descent was greater in incontinent versus nulliparous women (p = 0.0019). Bladder floor descent was greater in the continent vaginal delivery group than in continent cesarean delivery control patients (p = 0.04). In patients with stress incontinence, symptoms did not correlate with amplitude of descent. The right levator muscle was thinner overall than the left, regardless of frequency direction (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION. Ultrafast MR imaging using the T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo sequence allows dynamic evaluation of the pelvic compartments at maximal strain with no need for contrast medium. Pelvic floor laxity and supporting fascia abnormalities were most common in patients with stress incontinence followed by continent women with a history of vaginal delivery. The results are therefore compatible with the hypothesis of vaginal delivery as a contributory factor to stress incontinence in older parous women.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Stress urinary incontinence is a significant problem in older women. Its predominance in parous women prompted the etiologic hypothesis of trauma to pelvic-floor support structures in childbirth [1]. Interest in methods of assessment has recently increased. The advantages of MR imaging are high soft-tissue contrast for visualizing the pelvic floor morphology and nonexposure of the patient to ionizing radiation. In addition, the development of stronger, faster gradients and ultrafast T2-weighted pulse sequences with acquisition times under 1 sec permits dynamic evaluation of the pelvic compartments at maximal strain [1, 2].

The purpose of our dynamic MR imaging study, using an ultrafast T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo technique, was to test the etiologic hypothesis of trauma by comparing pelvic floor laxity in continent nulliparous women and continent parous women subgrouped by mode of delivery (cesarean delivery and vaginal) with women with stress incontinence as a positive control group.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients
The population comprised 40 women (age range, 22-45 years; mean age ± SD, 36 ± 5.4 years), each of whom provided their informed written consent after a full explanation of the examination procedure. The women were recruited into four groups (n = 10) of similar age: continent nulliparous women (mean age ± SD, 38 ± 4.8 years), continent women who underwent cesarean delivery (mean age, 33 ± 5.2 years), continent women who delivered vaginally (mean age ± SD, 37 ± 6.2 years), and women with stress incontinence who had at least one vaginal delivery (mean age ± SD, 36 ± 4.5 years). Patients with stress incontinence were referred from the department of gynecology. All women were asked not to empty their bladders for 2 hr before MR imaging. Patients completed a questionnaire on weight, height, previous gynecologic history, mode of delivery (including in cases of vaginal delivery, episiotomy [yes or no] and postpartum pelvic floor training [yes or no]), weight of newborns, and symptoms of stress incontinence self-rated on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 (0 = none, 10 = intolerable). Valsalva's maneuver was explained to all patients, who then practiced under supervision several times outside the scanner before MR imaging.

Imaging Technique
All MR imaging studies were performed on a 1.5-T system (CTi; General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) in the supine position using a pelvic phased array surface coil. After an initial coronal localizer sequence, axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging (TR/TE, 5000/105; field of view, 18 cm; slice thickness, 5 mm; gap, 0 mm; number of excitations, 4; matrix, 256 x 256; echo train length, 12; kHz, 21; acquisition time, 6 min) was performed to assess the anatomy and any abnormality of the pelvic floor (i.e., levator ani, vaginal attachments, and uterus). A right-to-left frequency direction was chosen in all patients. In five patients, the same sequence was repeated with identical parameters except that an anteroposterior frequency direction was used.

This sequence was followed by dynamic MR imaging to assess pelvic descent. Sagittal ultrafast T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo sequences (TR, indefinite; TE, 93 msec; field of view, 26 cm; slice thickness, 5 mm; gap, 0 mm; number of excitations, 0.5; matrix, 256 x 192; echo train length, 12; kHz, 21; acquisition time, <1 sec/slice) were performed (three adjacent slices in the pelvic midline) at rest and intriplicate during Valsalva's maneuver at maximal pelvic floor strain. The MR image showing maximal maneuver effect was used for analysis.

Image Analysis
Consensual image analysis by the same two radiologists who were unaware of the clinical history was based on multiple pelvic measures using the MR console. Axial images were evaluated at the level of pubic symphysis (at approximately the proximal urethra) for vaginal morphology (normal H-shape, asymmetric, or flat). Vaginal angles were measured as shown in Figure 1 at the level of pubic symphysis, and differences between the right and left sides were calculated. Levator thickness (i.e., transverse diameter) was measured bilaterally.



View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo image of 31-year-old nulliparous woman shows lines drawn on workstation for left and right vaginal-angle measurements. Note H-shaped vagina and symmetric levator muscle.

 

On sagittal dynamic MR images, the pubococcygeal line drawn between the inferior aspect of the symphysis and the distal joint of the coccyx was used as the reference line. Bladder volume was calculated using the formula for an ellipse: length x width x height x 0.5. The vertical distance from the pubococcygeal line to the most inferior portion of the bladder floor and cervix was measured at rest and at maximal strain. Laxity was defined as an absolute value greater than 2.5 cm below the pubococcygeal line at maximal strain [1]. The mobility of the bladder floor and cervix (i.e., the difference between rest and maximal strain) was calculated for each patient. MR imaging parameters were then analyzed as a function of symptoms and mode of delivery.

Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between groups were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by post hoc comparison using the Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni adjustment. Nominal variables were analyzed using the chisquare test. Relations between symptom amplitude and pelvic floor descent were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. A significance level of p less than 0.05 was used in all tests.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Diagnostic-quality MR images were obtained in all 40 patients. The four groups did not differ in age (p = 0.117) or bladder volume (p = 0.09). Body weight was slightly lower in the cesarean delivery group (weight range, 46-60 kg; mean ± SD, 51.2 ± 3.9 kg) than in the vaginal delivery group (weight range, 51-70 kg; mean ± SD, 60.6 ± 6.0 kg) and the stress-incontinent group (weight range, 52-80 kg; mean ± SD, 63.1 ± 9.1 kg) (p = 0.003). Parity did not differ in the three parous groups (mean ± SD, 1.1 ± 0.9 births) (p = 0.24).

Qualitative analysis showed lesions of vaginal suspension structures in five patients with stress incontinence (Fig. 2) and none in nulliparous women. Quantitative analysis, however, was unable to show a significant intergroup difference in vaginal angle (right, p = 0.52; left, p = 0.22) or vaginal shape in terms of the absolute right-minus-left difference in vaginal angle (p = 0.19).



View larger version (156K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. Axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR image of 36-year-old woman with stress urinary incontinence shows flattened vagina (arrow) at level of pubic symphysis. Levator ani could not be followed to pubic symphysis on right side.

 

Levator thickness did not differ between groups (p = 0.11), but, overall, the left side was thicker than the right (p = 0.001), regardless of frequency direction (Fig. 3A,3B). Additional findings on the T2-weighted axial fast spin-echo MR images included fluid in the pouch of Douglas (n = 17), functional ovarian cysts (n = 14) indicative of the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle, retroverted uterus (n = 1), and nabothian cysts (n = 3).



View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A 32-year-old nulliparous woman. Axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR images at pubic symphysis, frequency direction right to left (A) and anteroposterior (B), show thinner levator muscle on right (arrow) than on left, independent of frequency direction.

 


View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B 32-year-old nulliparous woman. Axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR images at pubic symphysis, frequency direction right to left (A) and anteroposterior (B), show thinner levator muscle on right (arrow) than on left, independent of frequency direction.

 

At rest, on the sagittal MR images, the mean distance between the bladder floor and pubococcygeal line did not differ between the groups: 2.8 ± 0.7 cm in nulliparous women, 2.7 ± 0.6 cm in the cesarean delivery group, 2.7 ± 0.6 cm in the vaginal delivery group, and 2.4 ± 0.6 cm in the incontinent group (Fig. 4) (p = 0.46). On straining, however, bladder descent was less marked in the continent groups: 1.1 ± 0.9 cm (nulliparous women; Fig. 5), 1.0 ± 1.1 cm (cesarean delivery), and 1.9 ± 0.9 cm (vaginal delivery; Fig. 6) than in women with stress incontinence (3.2 ± 1.0 cm [Fig. 7]) (p = 0.0005).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. Box plots of distances between bladder floor and pubococcygeal line at rest and on straining for the four different groups (N, nulliparous; V, vaginal delivery; S, cesarean delivery; P, stress incontinence). Box lines represent 25%, 50%, and 75%; whiskers represent 10% and 90%; and circles indicate maximal and minimal bladder volumes.

 


View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. Dynamic sagittal T2-weighted MR images in 32-year-old nulliparous woman at rest (left image) and on maximal straining (right image), show no significant pelvic floor descent. Pubococcygeal line (1) and distances to bladder floor (2) and cervix (3) are also shown.

 


View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6. Dynamic sagittal T2-weighted MR images in 37-year-old woman with history of vaginal delivery at rest (left image) and on maximal straining (right image) show some bladder floor descent on straining. Uterus is retroverted.

 


View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7. Dynamic sagittal T2-weighted MR images in 38-year-old woman with stress incontinence show significant pelvic floor descent at rest (left image) and on maximal straining (right image).

 

Similarly, at rest the mean distance between the cervix and pubococcygeal line did not differ between the groups: 3.2 ± 1.3 cm (nulliparous women), 3.4 ± 0.8 cm (cesarean delivery), 3.4 ± 1.5 cm (vaginal delivery), and 3.4 ± 0.9 cm (stress incontinence) (p = 0.76). On straining, however, cervical descent was greater in the stress-incontinent group than in the nulliparous group: 2.2 ± 0.5 cm versus 0.8 ± 0.9 cm, respectively, (p = 0.0019). Values in the cesarean delivery and vaginal delivery groups were 1.4 ± 1.2 cm and 2.2 ± 0.8 cm, respectively.

Pelvic floor laxity in the vaginal delivery group (Fig. 6) did not significantly differ from that in nulliparous women (p = 0.11) but was greater than that in the cesarean delivery group (p = 0.04).

Results are summarized in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Results of Four Patient Groups

 

Assessment of the posterior compartment (i.e., exact delineation of the anorectal junction) was somewhat limited by the absence of rectal contrast medium in patients in whom the rectum was collapsed. Qualitative assessment showed descent (> 2.5 cm below the pubococcygeal line) in five patients with stress incontinence (Fig. 7) versus none in the nulliparous group.

The patients with stress incontinence who had undergone pelvic floor training (n = 6) showed less cervical descent than their untrained within-group controls (p = 0.02); however, no such correlation was observed with either cervical or bladder floor descent in the continent vaginal delivery group, nor between episiotomy (n = 3) and bladder floor descent (p = 0.73)

The women with stress incontinence rated their symptoms as 4.7 ± 3.6 (range, 1-10). Symptom ratings did not correlate with the amplitude of descent of either bladder floor (p = 0.35) or cervix (p = 0.99). Symptoms were not correlated with pelvic floor training.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Overall, pelvic floor laxity was greater in the stress incontinence group than in the negative controls, as shown on dynamic ultrafast MR imaging by increased bladder floor and cervical descent on straining. However, it did not correlate with symptom amplitude (p = 0.99). Pelvic floor laxity was also more common in the continent vaginal delivery group than in age-matched cesarean delivery controls (p = 0.04), a result that requires confirmation in a larger study population.

These findings are of interest because obstetric trauma is believed to be a main cause of incontinence in older women. Although the trauma was initially thought to be neurologic [3], structural pelvic floor damage is now thought to be a major contributor, fueling current debate about the risks and benefits of elective cesarean delivery. Some women may prefer an elective cesarean to avoid the disabling complications of incontinence [4].

In our study population, independent of parity and mode of delivery, the wall of the funnel-shaped levator muscle was thinner on the right side than on the left (p = 0.001). Right—left difference has previously been described, but was attributed to the presence of either trauma or chemical-shift artifacts [5, 6]. Although the latter may have contributed to the difference to some extent, the fact that it persisted after changing the frequency direction proved that it was anatomically based. It is important to realize that asymmetry can also be a physiologic finding in nulliparous women and, thus, is not necessarily a result of birth trauma and episiotomy.

Various radiologic techniques have been developed to meet the need for accurate visualization and quantitative assessment in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders [7,8,9]. Transvaginal and transrectal sonography are well suited for the static and dynamic examination of the anterior compartment [8] but are dependent on operator skill. Vaginography explores the middle compartment and reveals vaginal fistulas [9]. Bead-chain cystourethrography, colpocystorectography, and defecography have become key techniques for investigating all compartments, but their drawbacks include high exposure to ionizing radiation and absence of information on surrounding soft tissue [10]. The advantages of MR imaging are nonexposure to ionizing radiation and high soft-tissue contrast for assessing pelvic floor morphology [11].

Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor was first reported by Yang et al. [1] in 1991 using T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences. Because of the relatively long acquisition times, dynamic imaging was only feasible in cooperative patients. The development of stronger, faster gradients and ultrafast T2-weighted pulse sequences with acquisition times under 1 sec now permits dynamic evaluation of the pelvic compartments at maximal strain. By enhancing tissue differentiation, the heavily T2-weighted images also obviate the administration of contrast medium [12,13,14]. A possible objection to our methodology is that the images were acquired in a physiologically inappropriate supine position. Open-configuration MR imaging systems permit imaging in the sitting position, simulating the conditions most often associated with urinary leakage by combining the effect of gravity with the increased intraabdominal pressure caused by the Valsalva's maneuver and the damaged pelvic floor. However, the dynamic ultrafast single-shot fast spin-echo sequence is not currently available with the open-magnet scanner. Furthermore, in a study on the influence of gravity on a 0.5-T open-configuration magnet system, Fielding et al. [2] showed that, in both the supine and upright positions, all pelvic floor structures remained stable except for the posterior urethrovesical angle. Gufler et al. [12] corroborated these findings by showing that examination in the supine position yields correct diagnoses at maximal pelvic strain.

Another potential objection is that we did not quantify straining. In an attempt at standardization, all patients practiced the Valsalva's maneuver several times under supervision before undergoing MR imaging. Furthermore, only the image showing maximal depressant effect was used for subsequent analysis. We decided against using a device to measure intraabdominal pressure, in case the device itself (i.e., the rectal balloon) influenced the straining effect. A further limitation was that we did not fill the rectum with contrast medium. Unlike Gufler et al. [12], we thus found it difficult to correctly assess the posterior compartments in selected patients.

In conclusion, dynamic ultrafast MR imaging using the single-shot fast spin-echo sequence allows dynamic evaluation of the pelvic compartments at maximal strain. Heavily T2-weighted images give excellent tissue differentiation with no need for contrast medium. In our study, pelvic floor laxity and supporting fascia abnormalities were most common in patients with stress incontinence, all of whom had a history of at least one vaginal delivery, followed by continent women with a history of vaginal delivery. The results are therefore compatible with the hypothesis of vaginal delivery as a contributory factor to stress incontinence in older parous women.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank Anni Meier and Karl Treiber for technical assistance, and Josef Wisser and Renate Huch for critical review of our study design.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Yang A, Mostwin JL, Rosenheim NB, Zerhouni EA. Pelvic floor descent in women: dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display. Radiology 1991;179:25 -33[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Fielding JR, Griffiths DJ, Versi E, et al. MR imaging of pelvic floor continence mechanisms in the supine and sitting positions. AJR 1998;171:1607 -1610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Smith AR, Hosker GL, Warrell DW. The role of pudendal nerve damage in the aetiology of genuine stress incontinence in women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96:29 -32[Medline]
  4. Steer P. Caesarean delivery: an evolving procedure. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:1052 -1055[Medline]
  5. Tunn R, DeLancey JO, Howard D, et al. MR imaging of levator ani muscle recovery following vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1999;10:300 -307
  6. Tunn R, Paris S, Fischer W, Hamm B, Kuchinke J. Static magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor muscle morphology in women with stress urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn 1998;17:579 -589[Medline]
  7. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, Kohz C, Reiser M. Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic-floor descent. Eur Radiol 1997;7:1309 -1317[Medline]
  8. Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Schuessler B, Haller U. Perineal ultrasound for evaluating the bladder neck in urinary stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:220 -224[Medline]
  9. Giordano P, Drew PJ, Taylor D, Duthie G, Lee PW, Monson JR. Vaginography: investigation of choice for clinically suspected vaginal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:568 -572[Medline]
  10. Seifert H, Blass G, Leetz HK. Zur Bestimmung der Ovarialdosis bei der Defäkographie an einem digitalen C-Bogen. Rofo Fortschr Rontgen 1994;161:70 -74
  11. Comiter CV, Vasavada SP, Barbaric ZL, Gousse AE, Raz S. Grading pelvic prolapse and pelvic floor relaxation using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Urology 1999;54:454 -457[Medline]
  12. Gufler H, Laubenberger J, DeGregorio G, Dohnicht S, Langer M. Pelvic floor descent: dynamic MR imaging using a half-Fourier RARE sequence. J Magn Res Imaging 1999;9:378 -383[Medline]
  13. Vanbeckevoort D, Van Hoe L, Oyen R, Ponette E, De Ridder D, Deprest J. Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:373 -377[Medline]
  14. Goh V, Halligan S, Kaplan G, Healy J, Bartam C. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor in asymptomatic subjects. AJR 2000;174:661 -666[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. C. Colaiacomo, G. Masselli, E. Polettini, S. Lanciotti, E. Casciani, L. Bertini, and G. Gualdi
Dynamic MR Imaging of the Pelvic Floor: a Pictorial Review1
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2009; 29(3): e35 - e35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. C. Colaiacomo, G. Masselli, E. Polettini, S. Lanciotti, E. Casciani, L. Bertini, and G. Gualdi
Dynamic MR Imaging of the Pelvic Floor: a Pictorial Review
RadioGraphics, March 6, 2009; (2009) e35.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. M. Hecht, V. S. Lee, T. P. Tanpitukpongse, J. S. Babb, B. Taouli, S. Wong, N. Rosenblum, J. A. Kanofsky, and G. L. Bennett
MRI of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Dynamic True Fast Imaging with Steady-State Precession Versus HASTE
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 352 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. K. Kim, Y. J. Kim, M. S. Choo, and K.-S. Cho
The Urethra and Its Supporting Structures in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence: MR Imaging Using an Endovaginal Coil
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 1037 - 1044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. R. Fielding
Practical MR Imaging of Female Pelvic Floor Weakness
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2002; 22(2): 295 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Unterweger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kubik-Huch, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Unterweger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kubik-Huch, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS