AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, H. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2001; 176:1589-1595
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Pictorial Essay

MR Imaging Findings After Stereotactic Radiosurgery Using the Gamma Knife

David P. Friedman1, Robert E. Morales1 and H. Warren Goldman2,3

1 Department of Radiology, Jefferson Medical College and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S. 10th St., Ste. 1072, Main Bldg., Philadelphia, PA 19107.
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosensory Institute—Wills Eye Hospital, Jefferson Medical College and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
3 Present address: Department of Neurosurgery, MCP-Hahnemann University, 245 N. 15th St., Philadelphia, PA 19102.

Received September 29, 2000; accepted after revision November 8, 2000.

 
Address correspondence to D. P. Friedman.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Stereotactic Functional...
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for...
References
 
The gamma knife is a radiosurgical tool developed to perform closed-skull destruction of a stereotactically defined target. In modern units, 201 cobalt-60 sources are distributed over the surface of a sphere, and the geometric focus of the emitted gamma rays is at the sphere's center. Using a variety of helmets, collimators, and plugs, the gamma rays are further focused to a specific target. While wearing the helmet, the patient's head is positioned within the unit so that the center of the intracranial target and the center of the spherical array of sources coincide. The treatment dose is determined by the duration of exposure to the radioactive sources.

A variety of intracranial diseases are treated using the gamma knife; these include movement disorders, trigeminal neuralgia, neoplasms, and arteriovenous malformations. MR imaging is invaluable in studying the results of therapy, because the pathologic data is limited in this minimally invasive technique. Examinations can be performed to verify lesion placement, determine the effects of the radiation dose on the targeted tissue, and detect treatment-related complications.


Stereotactic Functional Radiosurgery
Top
Introduction
Stereotactic Functional...
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for...
References
 
The use of the gamma knife in stereotactic functional neurosurgery differs from the treatment of intracranial neoplasms and arteriovenous malformations, because the radiosurgical lesion is produced in macroscopically normal tissue. As a result, the effects of radiation may be more predictable.

Movement Disorders
For the radiosurgical treatment of tremor (e.g., benign essential tremor, Parkinson's disease), the target is the ventralis intermedius thalamic nucleus, which is a subnucleus of the ventral lateral nucleus. The ventral lateral nucleus receives projections from the contralateral cerebellum via the brachium conjunctivum. The ventralis intermedius nucleus is only 3-4 mm in anteroposterior thickness. These thalamic nuclei cannot be definitively identified on the basis of MR imaging characteristics. Hence, localization of these structures with stereotactic techniques is critical for optimal placement of the radiosurgical lesion. Stereotactic coordinates are calculated relative to a line connecting the anterior and posterior commissures. The target is 7-8 mm anterior to the posterior commissure along the intercommissural line, and 11-13 mm lateral and 2 mm superior to the intercommissural line. During a radiosurgical thalamotomy, a single dose of 120-140 Gy is administered to the target during a 45-60 min interval. In our experience, therapeutic effect usually begins approximately 4 weeks after treatment. At 3 months posttreatment, the radiosurgical lesion most commonly appears as a ring-enhancing focus 5 mm or less in diameter surrounded by vasogenic edema extending less than 7 mm in radius beyond the target (Figs. 1 and 2). Patients with ring-enhancing lesions 7 mm or more in diameter at 3 months after treatment may have already developed, or should be considered at risk for developing, more extensive radiation necrosis and edema [1] (Fig. 3A,3B). The development of symptomatic radiation necrosis appears to be an idiosyncratic event. In our experience, it has occurred in approximately 20% of patients and it is usually treated successfully with corticosteroids.



View larger version (170K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Appearance of uncomplicated radiosurgical thalamotomy in 80-year-old man with essential tremor who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 140 Gy to left thalamus. Axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR image (4000/95, TR/TE) obtained 3 months after thalamotomy shows small focus of hyperintensity (edema, arrow) in expected location of left ventralis intermedius thalamic nucleus.

 


View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. Appearance of uncomplicated radiosurgical thalamotomy in 71-year-old woman with Parkinson's disease who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 120 Gy to right thalamus. Enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image (500/16) obtained 3 months after thalamotomy shows 5-mm focus of ring enhancement (arrow) in expected location of right ventralis intermedius thalamic nucleus.

 


View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. Appearance of complicated radiosurgical thalamotomy in 78-year-old man with essential tremor who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 140 Gy to left thalamus. Enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image (500/16, TR/TE) obtained 3 months after thalamotomy shows 10-mm focus of ring enhancement (arrow) in expected location of left ventralis intermedius thalamic nucleus.

 


View larger version (167K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. Appearance of complicated radiosurgical thalamotomy in 78-year-old man with essential tremor who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 140 Gy to left thalamus. Axial T2-weighted MR image (2400/80) shows radiosurgical lesion in left thalamus (arrow) surrounded by more extensive hyperintensity (edema, asterisks). Patient developed right hemiparesis that partially resolved after corticosteroidal treatment.

 

Trigeminal Neuralgia
For the radiosurgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, the target can be either the proximal root entry zone of the trigeminal nerve (Fig. 4A,4B,4C) or the distal (retrogasserian) portion (Fig. 5). In theory, the portion of the nerve closer to the brainstem is myelinated by oligodendrocytes and therefore should be more sensitive to irradiation than the retrogasserian portion of the nerve, which is myelinated by Schwann's cells [2]. The proximal root entry zone is irradiated such that no more than 20% of the 50% isodose curve includes the brainstem. However, recent data suggest that the retrogasserian portion of the trigeminal nerve is also an adequate target. Because the 20% isodose curve is at the brainstem surface when this target is used, higher doses (90 Gy, as compared with 70-80 Gy for the proximal root entry zone) can be given to the nerve, resulting in less exposure to the brainstem [3]. Onset of therapeutic effect begins from 3 weeks to 3 months after treatment. In our experience, no changes were identified in the trigeminal nerve or brainstem at 3-6 months posttreatment except in two patients with multiple sclerosis (a known cause of trigeminal neuralgia) (Figs. 4A,4B,4C and 5).



View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. Radiosurgical treatment of root entry zone of trigeminal nerve in 56-year-old woman with left trigeminal neuralgia resulting from multiple sclerosis. Axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR image (10002/142, TR/TE) shows hyperintensity (edema) in left pons (straight arrow). Left trigeminal nerve (curved arrow) is incompletely seen on image.

 


View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. Radiosurgical treatment of root entry zone of trigeminal nerve in 56-year-old woman with left trigeminal neuralgia resulting from multiple sclerosis. Enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image (616/13) shows abnormal enhancement in root entry zone of left trigeminal nerve (straight arrow) and adjacent pons (curved arrow).

 


View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C. Radiosurgical treatment of root entry zone of trigeminal nerve in 56-year-old woman with left trigeminal neuralgia resulting from multiple sclerosis. Enhanced coronal T1-weighted MR image (550/13) shows abnormal enhancement in left trigeminal nerve (thin straight arrow) and adjacent pons (thick straight arrow). Treated nerve is enlarged as compared with right trigeminal nerve (curved arrow). Asterisk denotes hyperintense fatty marrow in skull base.

 


View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. 56-year-old woman with left trigeminal neuralgia caused by multiple sclerosis who underwent radiosurgical treatment of retrogasserian portion of trigeminal nerve. Enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image (400/15, TR/TE) shows abnormal enhancement in retrogasserian portion of left trigeminal nerve (straight arrow). Enhancement indicates radiation-induced breakdown of blood—nerve barrier. Chronic plaques are identified in right pons (curved arrow). Asterisk denotes cerebrospinal fluid in Meckel's cavity.

 


Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Neoplasms and Arteriovenous Malformation
Top
Introduction
Stereotactic Functional...
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for...
References
 
Neoplasms
The effects of exposing neoplastic tissue to a high dose of focal radiation are likely to include apoptosis, cell necrosis, and vascular obliteration. Depending on the type of tumor and the clinical circumstances, radiation treatment may be either fractionated or administered as a single dose. The sequential changes identified on MR imaging appear to fall into a few major categories: temporary exacerbation of the lesion, central loss of contrast enhancement, growth arrest, and regression or obliteration [4].

On initial follow-up imaging of a treated neoplasm, the lesion may show an increase in size, volume of enhancement, and surrounding T2 hyperintense signal (Fig. 6A,6B,6C,6D,6E). These changes should not necessarily be interpreted as signs of tumor progression. The increased T2 signal likely represents breakdown of the blood—brain barrier and vasogenic edema, although experiments in primates have shown that some of this increased signal represents reactive astrocytosis [4]. These changes tend to develop 3-12 months after treatment and subside within 5-7 months after onset; they may uncommonly result in permanent deficits. Treated neoplasms may also show loss of central enhancement [5, 6] (Figs. 7A,7B and 8A,8B,8C), which likely reflects apoptosis, cell necrosis, or vascular obliteration. This appearance occurs earlier in malignant neoplasms (8-12 weeks) than in benign neoplasms (5-18 months) and is associated with tumor regression within the next 12 months in more than 70% of patients [4, 6].



View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A. Evolution of radiosurgical changes after treatment for benign neoplasm in 52-year-old woman who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 15 Gy to presumed falcine meningioma. Axial T2-weighted MR image (2400/90, TR/TE) obtained before treatment shows hypointense, dural-based mass arising from left posterior parietal falx (arrow); no surrounding edema is seen.

 


View larger version (173K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B. Evolution of radiosurgical changes after treatment for benign neoplasm in 52-year-old woman who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 15 Gy to presumed falcine meningioma. Enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image (400/14) also obtained before treatment shows uniform enhancement of mass (arrow).

 


View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6C. Evolution of radiosurgical changes after treatment for being neoplasm in 52-year-old woman who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 15 Gy to presumed falcine meningioma. Axial T2-weighted MR image (2400/90) obtained 9 months after treatment shows new hyperintensity in mass (arrow) and vasogenic edema in adjacent periatrial and subcortical white matter (asterisks).

 


View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6D. Evolution of radiosurgical changes after treatment for benign neoplasm in 52-year-old woman who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 15 Gy to presumed falcine meningioma. Enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image (500/16) also obtained 9 months after treatment shows increase in volume of enhancing neoplasm (asterisk) and surrounding hypointense edema (arrows).

 


View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6E. Evolution of radiosurgical changes after treatment for benign neoplasm in 52-year-old woman who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 15 Gy to presumed falcine meningioma. Enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image (500/16) obtained 13 months after treatment shows substantial reduction in volume of neoplasm (arrow). Lesion has not yet returned to pretreatment size. Corresponding T2-weighted MR image (not shown) revealed almost complete resolution of surrounding edema.

 


View larger version (170K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7A. Decreased central contrast enhancement after radiosurgical treatment of benign neoplasm in 68-year-old man who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 14 Gy to presumed right vestibular schwannoma. Enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image (500/14, TR/TE) obtained before treatment shows enhancing right cerebellopontine angle mass (arrow) extending into right internal auditory canal (asterisk).

 


View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7B. Decreased central contrast enhancement after radiosurgical treatment of benign neoplasm in 68-year-old man who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 14 Gy to presumed right vestibular schwannoma. Enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image (400/14) obtained 7 months after treatment shows markedly decreased central enhancement of mass (arrow).

 


View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8A. Evolution of radiosurgical changes after treatment of primary malignant neoplasm in 46-year-old man who underwent single radiosurgical boost dose of 16 Gy to surgically proven glioblastoma multiforme. Enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image (500/14, TR/TE) obtained before administration of boost radiation shows enhancing mass in left posterior temporal lobe (arrow).

 


View larger version (180K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8B. Evolution of radiosurgical changes after treatment of primary malignant neoplasm in 46-year-old man who underwent single radiosurgical boost dose of 16 Gy to surgically proven glioblastoma multiforme. Enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image (500/8) obtained 1 month after treatment shows increase in volume of neoplasm and markedly decreased central enhancement (arrow); this decrease in enhancement typically occurs much more rapidly in malignant neoplasms than in benign neoplasms (compare with Fig. 7B).

 


View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8C. Evolution of radiosurgical changes after treatment of primary malignant neoplasm in 46-year-old man who underwent single radiosurgical boost dose of 16 Gy to surgically proven glioblastoma multiforme. Enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image (400/8) obtained 4 months after treatment shows decrease in volume of neoplasm (straight arrow). New focus of enhancing tumor (curved arrow) is seen anteromedial to treated component.

 

Successful treatment with the gamma knife may result in growth arrest, regression, or obliteration of the neoplastic lesion. Growth arrest has been reported in approximately 90% of benign neoplasms at the skull base and 85% of solitary metastases [4]. Tumor regression is uncommonly seen earlier than 3 months posttreatment and may take years to fully evolve. For example, the median time for regression of vestibular schwannomas is approximately 1 year, with a range of 3-33 months [5, 7] (Fig. 9A,9B). Tumor regression occurs more rapidly in malignant neoplasms (Fig. 10A,10B). Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts aid in tumor retraction.



View larger version (175K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9A. Late radiosurgical changes after treatment of benign neoplasm in 75-year-old woman who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 12 Gy to surgically proven right vestibular schwannoma. Enhanced coronal T1-weighted MR image (400/8, TR/TE) obtained before treatment shows enhancing, partially cystic mass in right cerebellopontine angle extending into right internal auditory canal (large arrow). Diffuse pachymeningeal enhancement (small arrows) is related to previous surgery.

 


View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9B. Late radiosurgical changes after treatment of benign neoplasm in 75-year-old woman who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 12 Gy to surgically proven right vestibular schwannoma. Enhanced coronal T1-weighted MR image (400/14) obtained 24 months after treatment shows substantial decrease in volume of neoplasm and retraction of cystic component (arrow).

 


View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10A. Early radiosurgical changes after treatment of secondary malignant neoplasm in 72-year-old woman with lung carcinoma who underwent single radiosurgical boost dose of 18 Gy to presumed cerebral metastasis. Enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image (500/16, TR/TE) obtained before administration of boost radiation shows heterogenously enhancing mass in left posterior frontal lobe (arrow).

 


View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10B. Early radiosurgical changes after treatment of secondary malignant neoplasm in 72-year-old woman with lung carcinoma who underwent single radiosurgical boost dose of 18 Gy to presumed cerebral metastasis. Enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image (500/16) obtained 4 months after treatment shows reduction in volume of mass.

 

Arteriovenous Malformations
Stereotactic radiosurgery is an effective treatment strategy for small arteriovenous malformations, and it can be the preferred treatment for high-risk lesions located in the basal ganglia, thalamus, and brainstem. After successful radiosurgery, injury to the endothelium and intervening brain tissue causes the transnidal blood flow to gradually decrease until the arteriovenous malformation is completely obliterated. MR imaging and MR angiography are accurate methods to follow up regression of the nidus, as well as to show the appearance of complications such as venous hypertension and radiation-induced vasogenic edema, demyelination, or gliosis [8] (Figs. 11A,11B,11C,11D and 12A,12B,12C,12D). Most patients have a transient period before the arteriovenous malformation is obliterated, during which the transnidal blood flow is so slow that neither MR imaging nor MR angiography can accurately reveal patency of the malformation. Therefore, conventional cerebral angiography is usually required to exclude the presence of a small residual nidus.



View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11A. Evolution of radiosurgical changes after treatment of arteriovenous malformation in 40-year-old woman who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 20 Gy to arteriovenous malformation. Axial T2-weighted MR image (2120/80, TR/TE) obtained before radiosurgery shows nidus (arrow) and deep draining veins (asterisks) of arteriovenous malformation located in region of thalamus and posterior third ventricle.

 


View larger version (179K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11B. Evolution of radiosurgical changes after treatment of arteriovenous malformation in 40-year-old woman who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 20 Gy to arteriovenous malformation. Sagittal T1-weighted MR image (355/12) also obtained before treatment shows nidus (straight arrows) and deep draining veins (curved arrow).

 


View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11C. Evolution of radiosurgical changes after treatment of arteriovenous malformation in 40-year-old woman who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 20 Gy to arteriovenous malformation. Sagittal T1-weighted MR image (355/12) obtained 7 months after treatment shows decrease in size of nidus (small straight arrows) and deep draining veins (curved arrow). Nidus also shows increased intravascular signal, indicating slow flow, thrombosis, or both. Defect in corpus callosum (large straight arrow) is related to ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

 


View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11D. Evolution of radiosurgical changes after treatment of arteriovenous malformation in 40-year-old woman who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 20 Gy to arteriovenous malformation. Axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR image (9000/15), also obtained 7 months after treatment, shows new hyperintensity in left thalamus and left temporooccipital lobe (asterisks) that is probably related to radiation-induced edema or venous hypertension. Flow voids of arteriovenous malformations are decreased in size.

 


View larger version (168K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12A. Evolution of radiosurgical changes after treatment of arteriovenous malformation in 53-year-old woman who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 22 Gy to previously embolized arteriovenous malformation. Enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image (380/12, TR/TE) obtained before radiosurgery shows enhancing right medial frontal arteriovenous malformation (curved arrow); punctate hypointense foci represent flows voids (straight arrows).

 


View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12B. Evolution of radiosurgical changes after treatment of arteriovenous malformation in 53-year-old woman who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 22 Gy to previously embolized arteriovenous malformation. Frontal subtraction right internal carotid artery angiogram obtained before radiosurgery shows nidus of arteriovenous malformation (curved arrow) and draining vein (straight arrow).

 


View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12C. Evolution of radiosurgical changes after treatment of arteriovenous malformation in 53-year-old woman who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 22 Gy to previously embolized arteriovenous malformation. Enhanced axial T1-weighted MR image (400/12) obtained 12 months after radiosurgery shows decrease in volume of enhancement (arrow); flow voids are not seen. Enhancement is probably related to radiation-induced breakdown of blood-brain barrier.

 


View larger version (176K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12D. Evolution of radiosurgical changes after treatment of arteriovenous malformation in 53-year-old woman who underwent single radiosurgical dose of 22 Gy to previously embolized arteriovenous malformation. Frontal subtraction magnified right internal carotid artery angiogram obtained 13 months after radiosurgery shows no evidence of residual arteriovenous malformation (arrows).

 


References
Top
Introduction
Stereotactic Functional...
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for...
References
 

  1. Friedman DP, Goldman HW, Flanders AE, Gollomp SM, Curran WJ. Stereotactic radiosurgical pallidotomy and thalamotomy with the gamma knife: MR imaging findings with clinical correlation—preliminary experience. Radiology 1999;212:143 -150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kondziolka D, Perez B, Flickinger JC, Habeck M, Lunsford LD. Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia. Arch Neurol 1998;55:565 -566
  3. Regis J, Bartolomei F, Metellus P, et al. Radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia and epilepsy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1999;10:359 -377[Medline]
  4. Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Maitz A, Flickinger JC. Black holes, white dwarfs, and supernovas: imaging after radiosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1998;70[suppl 1]:2 -10
  5. Linskey ME, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC. Stereotactic radiosurgery for acoustic nerve sheath tumors. In: Lunsford LD, ed. Stereotactic radiosurgery update. New York: Elsevier, 1992: 321-324
  6. Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD. Radiosurgery of meningiomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1992;3:219 -230[Medline]
  7. Linskey ME, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC. Tumor control after stereotactic radiosurgery in neurofibromatosis patients with bilateral acoustic tumors. Neurosurgery 1992;37:829 -839
  8. Pollock BE, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Patel AK, Bissonette DJ, Lunsford LD. Magnetic resonance imaging: an accurate method to evaluate arteriovenous malformations after stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 1996;85:1044 -1049[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, H. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS