AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zack, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zack, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2001; 177:177-178
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Case Report

Primary Breast Lymphoma Originating in a Benign Intramammary Lymph Node

Justin R. Zack1,2, Susan G. Trevisan1 and Monali Gupta1

1 Department of Radiology, North Shore University Hospital, 300 Community Dr., Manhasset, NY 11030.
2 Present address: Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX 78229.

Received October 27, 2000; accepted after revision January 3, 2001.

 
Address correspondence to J. R. Zack.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Primary breast lymphoma is rare and constitutes less than 0.6% of all breast malignancies. Most breast lymphomas are the non-Hodgkin's type, which represent approximately 70-90% [1]. In patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, primary involvement of the breast is seen in 0.4-0.7% of the cases. The development of lymphoma within a previously diagnosed benign intramammary lymph node has, to our knowledge, not been previously reported. The following is a case report of primary breast lymphoma that developed within a previously benign-appearing intramammary lymph node.


Case Report
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
A 76-year-old woman with a medical history of endometrial cancer, a family history significant for breast cancer, and no history of lymphoma presented for a yearly mammogram. A physical examination revealed a palpable abnormality in the left upper outer breast. Mammography showed a well-circumscribed dense mass measuring 1.4 cm in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast, which corresponded to the area of palpable abnormality. The mass was found to originate at the site of a previously identified, mammographically benign lymph node. A previous left craniocaudal mammogram (Fig. 1A), obtained October 4, 1996, showed a well-circumscribed oval mass with a radiolucent center representing an intra-mammary lymph node. A left mediolateral oblique mammogram further defined the benign intramammary lymph node (Fig. 1B). The most recent left craniocaudal mammogram, dated January 14, 1998, revealed a 1.4-cm dense mass (Fig. 1C). The mediolateral oblique image obtained the same day depicted similar findings (Fig. 1D). The lymph node had increased in size and density when compared with the 1996 mammogram (Figs. 1A and 1B).



View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 76-year-old woman with history of endometrial cancer, family history significant for breast cancer, and no history of lymphoma. Left craniocaudal mammogram that was obtained October 4, 1996, shows benign lymph node in lateral aspect of breast (arrow).

 


View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 76-year-old woman with history of endometrial cancer, family history significant for breast cancer, and no history of lymphoma. Mediolateral oblique mammogram that was obtained same day as A further shows benign intramammary lymph node (arrow).

 


View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 76-year-old woman with history of endometrial cancer, family history significant for breast cancer, and no history of lymphoma. Left craniocaudal mammogram that was obtained January 14, 1998, shows mass (arrow) in region of previously recognized benign intramammary lymph node shown in B. BB pellet was placed over area of palpable abnormality.

 


View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. 76-year-old woman with history of endometrial cancer, family history significant for breast cancer, and no history of lymphoma. Mediolateral oblique mammogram that was obtained same day as C shows nodular density (arrow) in region of previously identified benign lymph node shown in B. BB pellet was placed over palpable mass.

 

A sonogram of the left breast was subsequently obtained in the region of the mass and revealed a well-circumscribed hypoechoic lesion with a hyperechoic center and a surrounding irregular hyperechoic rim (Fig. 1E). The lesion measured 1.0 x 0.7 x 1.1 cm. A biopsy was recommended because the lymph node had increased in size and density, become a palpable abnormality, had lost its radiolucent center on mammography, and because sonographic findings were suggestive of tumor infiltrating a lymph node. Pathology revealed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, follicular B-cell type.



View larger version (176K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E. 76-year-old woman with history of endometrial cancer, family history significant for breast cancer, and no history of lymphoma. Sonogram of palpable mass in left breast. Lesion shows central hyperechogenicity surrounded by well-circumscribed hypoechoic region, which is further surrounded by irregular hyperechoic rim (arrow).

 


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Histologically, primary breast lymphoma is predominately of B-cell origin and most commonly large cell type [2]. Numerous authors have found that lymphoma occurs more frequently in the right breast and that the rate of secondary lymphoma metastatic to the breast only slightly exceeds primary breast involvement [2, 3].

Clinically, primary breast lymphoma most commonly presents as a solitary palpable mass. Less common presentations include unilateral or bilateral diffuse breast enlargement. The most frequent radiographic appearance of breast lymphoma is as a well-circumscribed mass without associated calcification. Other radiographic patterns include the following: multiple amorphous or poorly circumscribed noncalcified masses; diffusely increased parenchymal density with or without skin thickening; spiculated masses; or, rarely, miliary densities on mammography [3,4,5,6]. Because the radiographic features of breast lymphoma are nonspecific, the diagnosis of primary breast lymphoma cannot be determined on the basis of mammographic findings alone. Lesions such as primary breast cancer, fibroadenoma, phyllodes tumor, and metastatic disease must be included in the list of differential diagnoses.

Intramammary lymph nodes are often encountered in routine mammography. Benign intramammary lymph nodes are characterized by their well-circumscribed borders, lobulation, and central radiolucency, which represents fatty replacement. Intramammary nodes are considered abnormal if they have become enlarged, lost their well-defined borders, increased in density, or lost their fatty hilum. These features are encountered in both benign and malignant processes. The differential diagnosis of an abnormal intramammary lymph node includes inflammation, infection, and neoplasia. More specific conditions include dermatitis, psoriasis, lymphadenitis, sarcoidosis, lymphoma, HIV, and metastatic disease [7].

Sonographically, breast lymphoma lesions are commonly hypoechoic and may be so significantly hypoechoic that they can be mistaken for simple cysts if careful technique is not used. Biopsy is necessary to establish a diagnosis. Treatment regimens for primary breast lymphoma may include surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy [8]. Mammography can be used to monitor a patient's response to therapy.

Although primary or secondary lymphoma of the breast represents an uncommon diagnosis in the spectrum of breast disease, it should be considered in the list of differential diagnoses when an enlarged intramammary lymph node is encountered.


References
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 

  1. Pullen CM, Cass AJ. Bilateral primary lymphoma of the breast. Aust N Z J Surg 1996;66:845 -847[Medline]
  2. Darnell A, Gallardo X, Sentis M, et al. Primary lymphoma of the breast: MR imaging features—a case report. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:479 -482[Medline]
  3. Paulus D. Lymphoma of the breast. Radiol Clin North Am 1990;28:833 -840[Medline]
  4. Pameijer FA, Beijerinck D. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the breast causing miliary densities on mammography. AJR 1995;164:609 -610[Free Full Text]
  5. Feder J, Paredes E, Hogge J, Wilken J. Unusual breast lesions: radiologic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 1999;19[suppl]:S11 -S26
  6. Slanetz JP, Whitman GJ. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the breast causing multiple vague densities on mammography. AJR 1996;167:537 -538[Medline]
  7. Kopans DB, Meyer JE, Murphy GF. Benign lymph nodes associated with dermatitis presenting as breast masses. Radiology 1980;137:15 -19[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kim SH, Ezekiel MP. Primary lymphoma of the breast. Am J Clin Oncol 1999;22:381 -383[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. Petrow, C. Dromain, J. M. Guinebretiere, and D. Vanel
Normal Intratumoral Lymph Node in a Patient with Lipoma Mimicking Liposarcoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 569 - 570.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zack, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zack, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS