AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohno, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sugimura, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ohno, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sugimura, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2001; 177:185-194
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Oxygen-Enhanced MR Ventilation Imaging of the Lung

Preliminary Clinical Experience in 25 Subjects

Yoshiharu Ohno1, Hiroto Hatabu2, Daisuke Takenaka1, Shuji Adachi1, Marc Van Cauteren3 and Kazuro Sugimura1

1 Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan.
2 Department of Radiology, Pulmonary Functional Imaging Research, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 3600 Market St., Ste. 370, Philadelphia, PA 19104-2649.
3 Philips Medical Systems Corporation, Philips Bldg. 2-13-37, Kohnan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8507, Japan.

Received September 27, 2000; accepted after revision January 3, 2001.

 
Address correspondence to Y. Ohno.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to show the feasibility of oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging in a clinical setting with correlation to standard pulmonary function tests, high-resolution CT, and 81mKr ventilation scintigraphy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Seven healthy volunteers, 10 lung cancer patients, and eight lung cancer patients with pulmonary emphysema were studied. A respiratory synchronized inversion-recovery single-shot turbo-spin-echo sequence (TE, 16; inversion time, 720 msec; interecho spacing, 4 msec) was used for data acquisition. The following paradigm of oxygen inhalation was used: 21% oxygen (room air), 100% oxygen, 21% oxygen. MR imaging data including maximum mean relative enhancement ratio and mean slope of relative enhancement were correlated with forced expiratory volume in 1 sec, diffusing lung capacity, high-resolution CT emphysema score, and mean distribution ratio of 81mKr ventilation scintigraphy.

RESULTS. Oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation images were obtained in all subjects. Maximum mean relative enhancement ratio and mean slope of relative enhancement of lung cancer patients were significantly decreased compared with those of the healthy volunteers (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001). The mean slope of relative enhancement in lung cancer patients with pulmonary emphysema was significantly lower than that of lung cancer patients without pulmonary emphysema (p < 0.0001). Maximum mean relative enhancement ratio (r2 = 0.81) was excellently correlated with diffusing lung capacity. Mean slope of relative enhancement (r2 = 0.74) was strongly correlated with forced expiratory volume in 1 sec. Maximum mean relative enhancement had good correlation with the high-resolution CT emphysema score (r2 = 0.38). The maximum mean relative enhancement had a strong correlation with the distribution ratio (r2 = 0.77).

CONCLUSION. Oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging in human subjects showed regional changes in ventilation, thus reflecting regional lung function.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Primary lung cancer, especially in the aged and in heavy smokers, is frequently associated with some degree of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [1, 2]. In lung cancer patients with compromised lung function, surgical resection of lung tumors is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Therefore, it is important to evaluate lung function accurately to determine resectability and to predict postoperative lung function [3, 4].

Currently, the standard lung function tests, including spirometry, plethysmography, and carbon monoxide—diffusing capacity, are performed to determine whole-lung function before and after therapy. The only means for imaging regional lung ventilation is through a nuclear medicine study with krypton-81m, xenon-133, or a radiolabeled aerosol and 99mTc-labeled diethylentriaminepentaacetic acid. The use of nuclear medicine in pulmonary functional imaging for lung cancer patients has been well documented, but the need to inhale a radioactive substance and poor spatial resolution remain major limitations of this method [3,4,5].

The use of oxygen as a paramagnetic contrast agent was first explored by Young et al. [6]. The paramagnetic effect of molecular oxygen promotes longitudinal relaxation of protons nearby, mostly protons in water molecules in the tissue [6,7,8,9,10]. Recently, several investigators have reported that oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging could show regional ventilation [11,12,13,14,15]. Unlike standard lung function tests that determine global pulmonary ventilation, this new MR imaging method may provide information about the regional delivery of oxygen. Although oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging has been described in the physiologic assessment in healthy volunteers and in pathophysiology in animal models of pulmonary embolism and airway obstruction, to our knowledge, there are few reports on the application of this technique in patients with pulmonary diseases [11,12,13,14].

We have successfully applied oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging in patients with lung cancer with or without pulmonary emphysema. These patients with lung cancer underwent extensive preoperative pulmonary function tests, such as spirometry, plethysmography, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, and 81mKr nuclear medicine ventilation scan and imaging studies, including chest radiography and CT. Patients with pulmonary emphysema had various degrees of obstructive pulmonary-function abnormality indicated by forced expiratory volume in 1-sec values (percentage predicted). Lung cancer patients without definite pulmonary emphysema may have subclinical changes of emphysema without apparent forced expiratory volume in 1-sec values (percentage predicted) abnormality. Therefore, our patient population provided a spectrum of obstructive pulmonary-function abnormality. In addition, there have been reports that oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging may reveal delivery of oxygen from air space to pulmonary capillary beds (i.e., diffusion) [12]. We correlated oxygen-enhanced MR imaging data with diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide in these patients and found a surprisingly strong correlation between the degree of oxygen-enhancement and diffusion capacity. The purpose of this article is to describe the preliminary results of the application of oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging in a clinical setting with detailed correlation to standard pulmonary function tests, high-resolution CT, and nuclear medicine ventilation studies.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Subjects
Oxygen-enhanced MR imaging was performed in seven healthy nonsmoking volunteers with normal pulmonary function (four men, three women; age, 25-35 years; mean age, 27 years) and 18 patients with lung cancer (11 men, seven women; age, 45-81 years; mean age, 67.6 years). Eight of these patients (five men, three women; age, 51-81 years; mean age, 69.3 years) had associated pulmonary emphysema.

The institutional review board approved this study, and informed consent was obtained from each subject before entering the study. Although all patients diagnosed with associated pulmonary emphysema had high-resolution CT emphysema scores greater than or equal to 2, half of the patients without pulmonary emphysema had scores of 1. These results reflect the existence of subclinical emphysematous changes in the lung tumors "without pulmonary emphysema" cohort.

The diagnosis of lung cancer was based on cytologic and histologic findings of transbronchial and CT-guided biopsy. Six of 18 patients were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma; nine patients, with adenocarcinoma; two patients, with large cell carcinoma; and one patient, with small cell carcinoma.

The diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema was based on physiologic findings, a history of long-term cigarette smoking ranging from 450 to 2300 on the Brinkman index (cigarette consumption per day x years), pulmonary functional tests, high-resolution chest CT according to American Thoracic Society criteria [16], or nuclear medicine ventilation-perfusion scans. All subjects underwent pulmonary function tests and high-resolution CT. Ten of 18 patients underwent 81mKr scintigraphy.

CT
All examinations were performed with a single-detector helical CT (HiSpeed Advantage scanner; General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) and a spiral single-detector volumetric helical CT (Somatom Plus 4 VB50; Siemens Medical Systems, Forchheim, Germany). The scans were from the area of the lung apex to the diaphragm (collimation, 2-3 mm; interval, 2-3 mm; table speed, 2-6 mm [pitch 1-2]; field of view, 300-350; matrix, 512 x 512; 120 kVp, 150 mA), and they were reconstructed with a high-spatial-frequency algorithm. The scans were viewed at window levels appropriate for pulmonary parenchyma (window width, 1600 H; window center, -600 H) for evaluation of pulmonary emphysema. The severity of emphysema of lung cancer patients was judged by a visual scoring method. First, high-resolution CT scans were scored according to National Emphysema Treatment Trial scores for six regions: upper, middle, and lower lung areas for each lung. The scores in each region of the lung reflect the percentage area with emphysema: 0, normal; 1, less than 25%; 2, 26-50%; 3, 51-75%; 4, greater than 75%. Then, an overall score for emphysema (high-resolution CT emphysema score) was also given for both lungs. In this study, the final overall scores were used for correlation with MR imaging data. Each subject was examined independently by two chest radiologists without the benefit of clinical information or of the results of pulmonary function tests. Final interpretation of each subject was based on a consensus of the two reviewers.

Oxygen-Enhanced MR Imaging Technique
Oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation images were acquired with inhaled oxygen as a contrast agent on T1-weighted imaging. T1-weighted images were obtained with a respiratory synchronized inversion-recovery half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbospin-echo inversion recovery (HASTE) pulse sequence using 1.5-T whole-body scanner (Gyroscan ACS-NT PT6000; Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands). For a 128 x 128 matrix, 68 phase-encoding steps were obtained, including three steps for phase correction. The interecho spacing was 4.0 msec. The effective TE was 16 msec, section thickness was 10 mm, field of view was 450 x 450 mm with an inversion time of 720 msec. MR ventilation images from four coronal sections for each patient were obtained for all studies.

Patients and healthy volunteers inhaled room air first, followed by 100% oxygen (15 L/min), using a nonrebreathing ventilation mask. The following paradigm for oxygen inhalation was used: subjects first breathed 21% oxygen (room air) for 80 sec; then breathed 100% oxygen for 140 sec; and then room air, for 80 sec. During data acquisition, all subjects resumed normal respiration, breathing room air.

Analysis of Oxygen-Enhanced MR Images
After image reconstruction, the data were transferred to a remote workstation (Easy Vision; Philips Medical Systems). To visualize the relative enhancement map of oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging, oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation images were expressed as a percentage change from the oxygen-enhanced and room-air images. Each pixel in the percentage change map was calculated as follows:

The regional distribution of relative enhancement in each pixel was expressed as a color-coded map. Pixels with 0-50% enhancement were shown as color-coded shading from dark blue to red; pixels with more than 50% enhancement were red.

The signal intensity (SI) time course curve was calculated for each coronal section in six spatially defined regions of interest (ROIs) in the lung (three ROIs for each lung analyzed with standalone software [Quantitative Analysis, Philips]). Enhancement curves were automatically plotted, and the data were transferred to a Power Macintosh G3 (Apple Computer, Curpertino, CA).

To compare the slopes between healthy volunteers and patients, points in the SI—time course curve from the baseline to the maximal value of SI during the breathing of 100% oxygen were fitted by a straight line. Then, we created a mean relative enhancement ratio time-course curve, using the 100% oxygen data, and calculated the maximum mean relative enhancement ratio and mean slope value of oxygen concentration by using Excel 98 for Macintosh software (Microsoft, Redmond, WA).

To compare the difference in mean relative enhancement ratio time course curve between the healthy volunteers and patients, we calculated the time of maximum mean relative enhancement (peak time), the maximum mean relative enhancement ratio of lung parenchyma (mean of maximal relative enhancement ratio of lung parenchyma), and the mean slope of mean relative enhancement of lung parenchyma by oxygen concentration.

Maximum relative enhancement ratio was determined with the following formula:

Maximum mean relative enhancement ratio was calculated from the mean of relative enhancement ratio of 24 ROIs.

The mean slope of mean relative enhancement of lung parenchyma by oxygen concentration (mean slope of relative enhancement) was determined with the following equation:

Physiological Index and Outcome Measures
Pulmonary function testing was performed according to American Thoracic Society standards [16] with an automatic spirometer (System 9; Minato Ikagaku, Osaka, Japan). Spirometry values obtained after administration of aerosolized albuterol were used in all patients. Lung volumes were determined with plethysmography, and the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was measured with the single-breathing technique. Arterial blood samples were obtained with patients at rest breathing room air, and partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide were measured with a model G3 blood gas analyzer (Instrumentation Laboratory, Lexington, MA).

All preoperative physiologic testing was performed at least 1 month before surgery (mean, 7 days ± 6).

81mKr Ventilation Scintigraphy Technique
Pulmonary ventilation scintigraphy was performed using krypton-81m (81mKr) with the patient in a sitting position. Images were obtained in the anterior and posterior views with a gamma camera (Shimazu SNC500R; Shimazu, Kyoto, Japan) with a medium-energy collimator. 81mKr gas was inhaled through a mouthpiece with the patient's nose clamped. After several normal tidal breaths, the patient was instructed to exhale as much as possible to the level of residual volume. A deep slow inspiration of 81mKr gas to the total lung capacity level was held for approximately 10 sec, depending on the patient's breathing status.

A 185 MBq (5 mCi) 81mKr generator (rubidium-81) was used for 81mKr gas inhalation. An 18-gauge needle connected to a small tube from the generator was inserted into the mouthpiece, and the elution of 81mKr with oxygen was begun immediately before inhalation at the level of residual volume and was stopped at the end of inhalation at the level of total lung capacity. Total radioactivity in each lung was calculated, and the distribution ratios of radioactivity in the right and left lungs were determined. The right and left lungs were horizontally divided into three equal ROIs by equalizing the number of pixels including lung tumor. The distribution ratios of radioactivity in six ROIs (three in each lung) were calculated and averaged as mean distribution ratios of radioactivity of ventilation scintigraphy (mean distribution ratio).

Data Analysis
For the assessment of mean relative enhancement ratio time-course curves between healthy volunteers and patients with lung disease, maximum mean relative enhancement ratios and mean slopes of relative enhancement were compared with Fisher's protected least significant difference test.

To determine the relationship between parameters of the mean relative enhancement ratio time-course curve and those of the standard lung function test, we correlated the mean slope of relative enhancement with the forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (percentage predicted) and the maximum mean relative enhancement ratio, with the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (percentage predicted).

High-resolution CT emphysema scores and mean distribution ratios of 81mKr ventilation scintigraphy of lung cancer patients were correlated with maximum mean relative enhancement ratios of oxygen-enhanced MR imaging.

Data entry procedures and statistical analyses were performed with the statistical software, Stat-View for Macintosh, version 5 (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA), Microsoft Excel 98 for Macintosh, and a commercially available computer (Power Macintosh G3). A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
All 25 oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging examinations were completed successfully. No adverse effects, including dyspnea, chest pain, headache, dizziness, nausea, or vomiting, were observed. In the seven healthy volunteers, both lungs showed relatively homogeneous enhancement. The maximum mean relative enhancement ratio by oxygen inhalation ranged from 24.3 percentage increase of signal intensity (%SI) to 45.1 %SI (31.8 ± 2.7 %SI; mean ± standard error) (Fig. 1). In 10 patients with lung cancer without underlying pulmonary emphysema, carcinoma and associated areas of atelectasis showed little enhancement. The lung tissue adjacent to the tumor showed decreased enhancement. The remaining areas of both lungs showed relatively homogeneous enhancement. Maximum mean relative enhancement ratio by oxygen inhalation of the lung ranged from 15.2 %SI to 26.6 %SI (18.4 ± 1.3 %SI) (Figs. 2A,2B,2C and 3A,3B,3C). In eight patients with lung cancer and pulmonary emphysema, carcinoma showed little enhancement. The remainder of the lung showed weak and heterogeneous enhancement. Maximum mean relative enhancement ratio by oxygen inhalation of the lung ranged from 8.3 %SI to 19.4 %SI (15.5 ± 3.3 %SI) (Fig. 4A,4B,4C).



View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. 30-year-old healthy male volunteer. Relative enhancement map obtained after oxygen inhalation shows homogeneous (yellow) and high oxygen enhancement (red). Maximum mean relative enhancement ratio was 45.1% SI (percentage increase of signal intensity).

 


View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. 45-year-old man with lung cancer without pulmonary emphysema. Oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation source image by HASTE (TE, 16; interecho spacing, 4 msec; inversion time, 720 msec) shows tumor in left upper lobe.

 


View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. 45-year-old man with lung cancer without pulmonary emphysema. Relative enhancement map obtained after oxygen inhalation shows little enhancement of tumor (arrow). Area of decreased oxygen enhancement (arrowheads) was also observed in lung parenchyma adjacent to mass. Maximum mean relative enhancement ratio by oxygen inhalation was 22.1%SI (percentage increase of signal intensity).

 


View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C. 45-year-old man with lung cancer without pulmonary emphysema. 81mKr ventilation scintigraphy shows defect in left upper lobe and was matched with relative enhancement map (B).

 


View larger version (166K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. 65-year-old man with lung cancer without pulmonary emphysema. Oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation source image by HASTE (TE, 16; interecho spacing, 4 msec; inversion time, 720 msec) shows atelectasis in right middle and lower lung field.

 


View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. 65-year-old man with lung cancer without pulmonary emphysema. Relative enhancement map obtained after oxygen inhalation shows little enhancement of atelectatic lung and tumor. Area of decreased oxygen-enhancement in lateral peripheral portion of anterior segment of right upper lobe was also observed. This may be due to restricted physical motion. Maximum mean relative enhancement ratio by oxygen inhalation was 26.1%SI (percentage increase of signal intensity).

 


View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C. 65-year-old man with lung cancer without pulmonary emphysema. 81mKr ventilation scintigraphy shows defect in right middle and lower lung fields and was matched with relative enhancement map (B).

 


View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. 81-year-old woman with lung cancer and pulmonary emphysema. Oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation source image by HASTE (TE, 16; interecho spacing, 4 msec; inversion time, 720 msec) shows tumor in right upper lobe.

 


View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. 81-year-old woman with lung cancer and pulmonary emphysema. Relative enhancement map obtained after oxygen inhalation shows little enhancement of tumor. Area with decreased oxygen enhancement (arrows) is much larger than accurate tumor itself. Relative enhancement map by oxygen inhalation indicates area of impaired regional ventilation possibly due to invasion of maximal tumor to surrounding tissue, disturbed perfusion by tumor in surrounding lung parenchyma, or scar. Maximum mean relative enhancement ratio by oxygen inhalation was 11.3%SI (percentage increase of signal intensity).

 


View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C. 81-year-old woman with lung cancer and pulmonary emphysema. 81mKr ventilation scintigraphy shows defect in right upper lobe and was matched with relative enhancement map (B).

 

The mean relative enhancement ratio time course curves from both lungs in each group of patients are shown in Figure 5. After switching to 100% oxygen, maximum mean relative enhancement ratios in lung cancer patients (without emphysema, 18.4 ± 1.3 %SI; with emphysema, 15.5 ± 3.3 %SI) were significantly decreased compared with those of healthy volunteers (31.8 ± 2.7 %SI) (p < 0.001). We found no significant difference between lung cancer patients with and without pulmonary emphysema (p = 0.23) (Table 1).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. Graph shows mean relative enhancement time course curve in healthy volunteers ({blacksquare}), in lung cancer patients without pulmonary emphysema ({diamondsuit}), and in lung cancer patients with pulmonary emphysema ([UNK]). Maximum mean relative enhancement ratios in lung cancer patients (without emphysema, 18.4 ± 1.3 %SI [percentage increase of signal intensity]; with emphysema, 15.5 ± 3.3 %SI) are significantly less than those of healthy volunteers (31.8 ± 2.7 %SI) (p < 0.001). Mean slopes of relative enhancement of lung cancer patients (without emphysema, 0.50 ± 0.02 %SI/sec; with emphysema, 0.05 ± 0.02 %SI/sec) are significantly less than those of healthy volunteers (0.69 ± 0.06 %SI/sec) (p < 0.001). Mean slope of relative enhancement of lung cancer patients with pulmonary emphysema is significantly less than that of lung cancer patients without emphysema (p < 0.001).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Comparison of Maximum Mean Relative Enhancement Ratios

 

The mean slopes of relative enhancement of lung cancer patients (without emphysema, 0.50 ± 0.02 %SI/sec (percentage increase of signal intensity per second); with emphysema, 0.28 ± 0.02 %SI/sec) were significantly less than those of healthy volunteers (0.69 ± 0.06 %SI/sec) (p < 0.001). The mean slope of mean relative enhancement of lung cancer patients with pulmonary emphysema was significantly decreased compared with that of lung cancer patients without emphysema (p < 0.001) (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Comparison of Mean Slope of Relative Enhancement Values

 

The mean slope of relative enhancement was strongly correlated to the forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (percentage predicted) (r = 0.86, r2=0.74, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 6). The maximum mean relative enhancement ratio was excellently correlated to the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (percentage predicted) (r = 0.90, r2=0.81, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 7).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6. Graph shows strong correlation between mean slope of relative enhancement and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) (percentage predicted) (y = 0.12x - 0.38, r = 0.86, r2 = 0.74, p < 0.0001). %SI/sec = percentage increase of signal intensity per second.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7. Graph shows excellent correlation between maximum mean relative enhancement ratio and diffusing lung capacity (DLco) (percentage predicted) (y = 0.55x - 15.3, r = 0.90, r2 = 0.81, p < 0.0001). %SI = percentage increase of signal intensity.

 

Maximum mean relative enhancement ratio showed good correlation with high-resolution CT emphysema scores (r = 0.62, r2 = 0.38, p = 0.007) (Fig. 8). Maximum mean relative enhancement ratio showed strong correlation with the mean distribution ratio (r = 0.88, r2 = 0.77, p = 0.004) (Fig. 9).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8. Graph shows good correlation between maximum mean relative enhancement ratio and high-resolution CT (HRCT) emphysema score (y = -1.8x + 19.9, r = 0.62, r2 = 0.38, p = 0.007). %SI = percentage increase of signal intensity.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9. Graph shows strong correlation between maximum mean relative enhancement ratio and mean distribution ratio (y = 1.2x - 1.8, r = 0.88, r2 = 0.77, p = 0.004). %SI = percentage increase of signal intensity.

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Our study showed the feasibility of oxygen-enhanced MR imaging in patients with lung diseases. To our knowledge, ours is the first study in which oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging was applied in a clinical setting [11,12,13,14].

Parameters of oxygen-enhanced MR imaging of healthy volunteers were significantly higher than those of lung cancer patients with or without pulmonary emphysema. Additionally, in lung cancer patients, the mean slope of relative enhancement of lung cancer patients with pulmonary emphysema was significantly lower than that of lung cancer patients without pulmonary emphysema. Molecular oxygen is weakly paramagnetic with a magnetic moment of 2.8 Bohr magnetons. Oxygen modulates the MR imaging signal of blood and fluid through two different mechanisms: the paramagnetic property of deoxyhemoglobin and the paramagnetic property of molecular oxygen itself [6]. Because deoxyhemoglobin is compartmentalized in RBC, tissue water protons do not have access to coordination sites, which is required for spin-lattice interactions causing T1 shortening [6, 8]. Therefore, deoxyhemoglobin with RBC has a T2*-shortening effect with little T1-shortening effect [8, 17]. When oxygen is exchanged between air in the alveoli and blood in the capillary beds, oxygen not only couples to hemoglobin but also dissolves as molecular oxygen in the blood [8, 17]. Dissolved molecular oxygen will shorten the T1 relaxation time of pulmonary venous blood because molecular oxygen is paramagnetic. The areas of the lung affected by pulmonary emphysema were pathologically characterized as having a decrease in pulmonary capillary beds, abnormal permanent enlargement of the air spaces distal to the terminal bronchiole, accompanied by destruction of their walls, and without obvious fibrosis. Therefore, the areas of the lung affected by pulmonary emphysema showed marked decrease in oxygen enhancement due to the decrease in distribution of deoxyhemoglobin and the decrease in the direct diffusion of molecular oxygen to the capillary bed.

Moreover, the areas of the lung affected by lung cancer or atelectasis showed markedly decreased oxygen enhancement. Most oxygen is delivered to tissue by binding to hemoglobin molecules in RBC. The high concentration of oxygen in alveoli increases the oxygen concentration of lung parenchyma severalfold by means of direct diffusion of oxygen molecules [18]. However, there is only a small increase in oxygen delivery to other organs and tissues because the increase in dissolved oxygen in arterial blood serum is relatively small compared with oxygen contained in RBC bonded to hemoglobin molecules. Thus, only a small increase in oxygen concentration in other organs is expected unless the organs have a high arterial flow, such as in the spleen and in the kidneys [19]. Lung-tumor tissue does not receive direct diffusion of oxygen, so an increase in oxygen supply is limited. Therefore, the lack of oxygen enhancement in the tumor is explained.

The atelectatic lung has little ventilation. Therefore, there is little increase in oxygen concentration in atelectatic lung tissue when 100% oxygen is inhaled.

Lung tissue adjacent to the tumor also showed decreased enhancement. Obstruction of large and small airways by lung tumor may impair regional ventilation in areas adjacent to the tumor. The changes in volume in adjacent lung tissue may be decreased and may result in decreased regional ventilation. Moreover, it has been reported that obstruction and destruction of pulmonary vasculature by lung tumor may facilitate regional changes in pulmonary blood volume, ventilation-perfusion distribution, and decreased diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (percentage predicted) [3, 4].

Observation of dynamic oxygen enhancement by MR imaging was also feasible. In patients with associated emphysema, the mean slope of relative enhancement was significantly decreased. The forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (percentage predicted) values correlated strongly with the mean slope of relative enhancement (r2 = 0.74). The delivery of oxygen was markedly delayed and impaired the forced expiratory volume in 1-sec (percentage predicted) decrease because destruction and decreased elasticity of lung parenchyma result in expiratory air-flow obstruction, air trapping, hyperinflation, and impaired respiratory mechanics. The narrowing of small airways may also contribute to the decrease in oxygen delivery.

There was excellent correlation between the maximum mean relative enhancement ratio and the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (percentage predicted) (r2 = 0.81). This result is particularly interesting because diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide reflects diffusion capacity. Alveolocapillary gas transfer is usually regarded as the definition of pulmonary diffusion capacity. The alveolocapillary membrane separating gas from blood in the lung constitutes a diffusive barrier for oxygen uptake in the lung and likewise for carbon dioxide excretion or exchange of any gas. The existence of specific carrier mechanisms for oxygen and carbon monoxide that would facilitate their transfer across the tissue barrier has not been confirmed. Therefore, the diffusion capacity of oxygen is replaced by the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide because of the similar molecular sizes of molecular oxygen and carbon monoxide. The transfer of gas through the membrane is determined according to the law of diffusion. In patients with pulmonary emphysema, the thickness of the barrier remains unchanged unless there is an associated infection, inflammation, fibrosis, or scar from previous infections. Therefore, diffusing capacity in patients with emphysema is proportional to the remaining surface area for gas exchange [18]. On the other hand, the maximum mean relative enhancement ratio should be proportional to the surface area for gas exchange because oxygen enhancement of lung parenchyma is the result of the transfer of oxygen to lung tissue by direct diffusion of molecular oxygen. The fact that there was excellent correlation between maximum mean relative enhancement measured by oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging and diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide supports this hypothesis.

Correlation of oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging and high-resolution CT resulted in good correlation between the maximum mean relative enhancement ratio and high-resolution CT emphysema score (r2 = 0.38). Oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging shows the degree of enhancement by inhaled molecular oxygen, whereas high-resolution CT scores reflect the macroscopically destructed lung. These two phenomena may be different. Moreover, the high-resolution CT emphysema scoring system uses a 5-scale ranking and is only semi-quantitative.

The results of our study revealed that the degree of oxygen-enhancement was reflected by the forced expiratory volume in 1 sec and the diffusing capacity of the lung. 81mKr ventilation scintigraphy was reported to have strong correlation with the forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [20]. Therefore, it is not surprising that oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging data had a strong correlation with the mean distribution ratios of 81mKr ventilation scintigraphy.

Recently developed hyperpolarized noble gas MR imaging with helium-3 and xenon-129 is a superb new method for pulmonary function imaging [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. This technique visualizes gas itself, thus demonstrating airway and air spaces. This method is particularly powerful when used for underlying physiology, such as regional mapping of helium-3 gas diffusion or regional oxygen concentration measurement [26,27,28,29].

The only drawback of hyperpolarized noble gas techniques is the necessity for laser equipment and specialized radiofrequency transmitter—receiver coils.

In contrast, oxygen is safe and widely available. The usual clinical proton MR scanner can be used. Whereas the underlying physiology for oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging is different from that for hyperpolarized noble gas, we understand that functional information derived from hyperpolarized noble gas imaging and oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging is different and possibly complementary.

This study had several limitations. First, the administration of oxygen in patients with pulmonary diseases may alter or modify existing pulmonary pathophysiology. For example, increased oxygenation in the airway may reverse existing hypoxic vasoconstriction [30]. Thus, oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging could show falsely increased oxygen delivery in a previously hypoxic segment or lobe.

Second, other investigators have suggested that prolonged hyperoxia due in 100% oxygen inhalation can cause diffuse alveolar damage and lung fibrosis [31,32,33,34]. However, this effect is unlikely because diffuse alveolar damage is reported to occur after exposure to a high concentration of oxygen, usually for periods from 24 to 120 hours [34]. In our study, exposure to high-concentration oxygen was less than 10 min per study.

Third, the numbers of patients who underwent high-resolution CT (n = 18) and 81mKr ventilation scintigraphy (n = 10) were relatively small. Furthermore, oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging provides tomographic images, and 81mKr ventilation scintigraphy provides only a projection image. Thus, accurate spatial correlation is difficult and impractical. Therefore, further study for comparing ventilation scintigraphy with single-photon emission CT and high-resolution CT of primary pulmonary emphysema without lung cancer is warranted.

In conclusion, oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging was applicable in patients with lung cancer and pulmonary emphysema. Detailed correlation between oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation data and pulmonary function test data, including forced expiratory volume in 1 sec and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, revealed the oxygen-enhancement ratio may reflect the amount of surface area of gas exchange, thus correlating with the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide value. Therefore, oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging may be useful in evaluation of interstitial lung diseases, pulmonary edema, and adult respiratory distress syndrome, in which the increased alveolocapillary barrier for molecular oxygen transport plays a major role in pathophysiology. Oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging provides a new method for clinical functional lung imaging.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Golebiowski A. Pulmonary resection in patients over 70 years of age. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1971;61:265 -270[Medline]
  2. Legge JS, Palmer KNV. Pulmonary function in bronchial carcinoma. Thorax 1973;28:588 -591[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Imaeda T, Kanematu M, Asada S, et al. Prediction of pulmonary function after resection of primary lung cancer: utility of inhalation-perfusion SPECT imaging. Clin Nucl Med 1995;20:792 -799[Medline]
  4. Konietzko N. Nuclear medicine techniques in the management of bronchogenic carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med 1987;13[suppl]:S16 -19
  5. Hayes M, Taplin GV. Lung imaging with radioaerosols for the assessment of airway disease. Semin Nucl Med 1980;10:243 -251[Medline]
  6. Young IR, Clarke GJ, Bailes DR, Pennock JM, Doyle FH, Bydder GM. Enhancement of relaxation rate with paramagnetic contrast agents in NMR imaging. J Comput Tomogr 1981;5:543 -546[Medline]
  7. Pauling L, Coryell C. The magnetic properties and structure of the hemochromogens and related substances. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1936;22:159 -163[Free Full Text]
  8. Brooks RA, Chiro GD. Magnetic resonance imaging of stationary blood: a review. Med Phys 1987;14:905 -913
  9. Thulborn KR, Brady TJ. Iron in magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral hemorrhage. Magn Reson Q 1989;5:23 -38[Medline]
  10. Thulborn KR, Waterton JC, Matthew PW, et al. Oxygenation dependence of the transverse relaxation time of water protons in whole blood at high field. Biochem Biophys Acta 1982;714:265 -270[Medline]
  11. Edelman RR, Hatabu H, Tadamura E, Li W, Prasad PV. Noninvasive assessment of regional ventilation in the human lung using oxygen-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Med 1996;2:1236 -1239[Medline]
  12. Löffler R, Mler CJ, Peller M, et al. Optimization and evaluation of the signal intensity change in multisection oxygen-enhanced MR lung imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:860 -866[Medline]
  13. Chen Q, Jakob PM, Griswold MA, Levin DL, Hatabu H, Edelman RR. Oxygen-enhanced MR ventilation imaging of the lung. MAGMA 1998;7:153 -161
  14. Chen Q, Levin DL, Kim D, et al. Pulmonary disorder: ventilation-perfusion MR imaging with animal models. Radiology 1999;213:871 -879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hatabu H, Chen Q, Levin DL, Tadamura E, Edelman RR. Ventilation-perfusion MR imaging of the lung. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1999;7:379 -392[Medline]
  16. American Thoracic Society. Standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;136:225 -244[Medline]
  17. Thulborn KR, Brady TJ. Iron in magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral hemorrhage. Magn Reson Q 1989;5:23 -38
  18. Schied P, Piiper J. Diffusion. In: Grystal RG, West JB, Weibel ER, Barnes PJ, eds. The lung: scientific foundations, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:1681 -1690
  19. Tadamura E, Hatabu H, Li W, Prasad PV, Edelman RR. Effect of oxygen inhalation on relaxation time in various tissues. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:220 -225[Medline]
  20. Slosman D, Susskind H, Cinotti L, Giessen JW, Brill AB. Regional distribution of ventilation assessed by Kr-81m scintigraphy employing temporal Fourier transform. Am J Physiol Imaging 1986;1:5 -11[Medline]
  21. Albert MS, Cates GD, Driehuys B, et al. Biological magnetic resonance imaging using laser-polarized 129Xe. Nature 1994;370:199 -201[Medline]
  22. Kauczor H, Surkau R, Roberts T. MRI using hyperpolarized noble gases. Eur Radiol 1998;8:820 -827[Medline]
  23. Chen XJ, Chawla MS, Hedlund LW, Moller HE, MacFall JR, Johnson GA. MR microscopy of lung airways with hyperpolarized 3He. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:79 -84[Medline]
  24. Viallon M, Cofer GP, Suddarth SA, et al. Functional MR microsopy of the lung using hyperpolarized 3He. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:787 -792[Medline]
  25. Cremillieux Y, Berthezene Y, Humblot H, et al. A combined 1H perfusion/3He ventilation NMR study in rat lung. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:645 -648[Medline]
  26. Chen XJ, Moller HE, Chawla MS, et al. Spatially resolved measurements of hyperpolarized gas properties in the lung in vivo. 1. Diffusion coefficient. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:721 -728[Medline]
  27. Chen XJ, Moller HE, Chawla MS, et al. Spatially resolved measurements of hyperpolarized gas properties in the lung in vivo. 2. T2*. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:729 -737[Medline]
  28. Wolber J, Cherubini A, Leach MO, Bifone A. Hyperpolarized 129Xe NMR as probe for blood oxygenation. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:491 -496[Medline]
  29. Saam BT, Yablonskiy DA, Kodibagkar VD, et al. MR imaging of diffusion of 3He gas in healthy and diseased lungs. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:174 -179[Medline]
  30. West JB, Wanger PD. Ventilation-perfusion relationships. In: Grystal RG, West JB, Weibel ER, Barnes PJ, eds. The lung: scientific foundations, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997: 1693-1710.
  31. Carpo JD. Morphologic changes in pulmonary oxygen toxicity. Ann Rev Physiol 1986;48:721 -731[Medline]
  32. Johanson WG Jr, Holcomb JR, Coalson JJ. Experimental diffuse alveolar damage in baboons. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982;126:142 -151[Medline]
  33. Los Santos RD, Seidenfeld JJ, Anuzueto A, et al. One hundred percent oxygen lung injury in adult baboons. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;136:657 -661[Medline]
  34. Ichikado K, Suga M, Gushima Y, et al. Hyperoxia-induced diffuse alveolar damage in pigs: correlation between thin-section CT and histopathologic findings. Radiology 2000;216:531 -538[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
Y. Ohno, T. Iwasawa, J. B. Seo, H. Koyama, H. Takahashi, Y.-M. Oh, Y. Nishimura, and K. Sugimura
Oxygen-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Computed Tomography: Multicenter Study for Clinical Stage Classification of Smoking-related Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2008; 177(10): 1095 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Ohno, H. Koyama, M. Nogami, D. Takenaka, S. Matsumoto, M. Obara, and K. Sugimura
Dynamic Oxygen-Enhanced MRI Versus Quantitative CT: Pulmonary Functional Loss Assessment and Clinical Stage Classification of Smoking-Related COPD
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): W93 - W99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Ohno, H. Hatabu, T. Higashino, M. Nogami, D. Takenaka, H. Watanabe, M. Van Cauteren, M. Yoshimura, M. Satouchi, Y. Nishimura, et al.
Oxygen-enhanced MR Imaging: Correlation with Postsurgical Lung Function in Patients with Lung Cancer
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 704 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohno, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sugimura, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ohno, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sugimura, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS