AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Maitem, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Maitem, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2001; 177:317-318
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Technical Innovation

A Rapid Low-Cost Uncrossed Sheath Method for Clearing Thrombosed Hemodialysis Grafts

Edward B. Strauss1, Bradley N. Delman2 and Avelino Maitem1

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Norwalk Hospital, Maple St., Norwalk, CT 06856.
2 Department of Radiology, Box 1234, Mount Sinai Medical Center, One Gustave L. Levy PI., New York, NY 10029.

Received January 5, 2001; accepted after revision February 12, 2001.

 
Address correspondence to E. B. Strauss.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Discussion
References
 
Many percutaneous techniques for treating thrombosed hemodialysis grafts have been described in the literature [1,2,3,4]. All require crossed sheaths (puncture of the arterial side of the graft directed toward the venous anastomosis and vice versa), which are potentially disadvantageous but necessary, to permit clearance of the space between the punctures. Crossed sheaths place the operator, particularly the operator's hands, very close to the radiation field and are less convenient for subsequent hemodialysis than uncrossed sheaths. Our method avoids the necessity for crossed sheaths by using a balloon inflated occlusively within the arterial side of the graft so that injection of heparinized saline solution expels all thrombus from the graft, including the space between the sheaths. We refer to this method as balloon luminal occlusion with forced injection of saline solution and heparin (BLOWFISH).


Materials and Methods
Top
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Discussion
References
 
We developed several variations of the BLOWFISH method and used this method for 197 graft declottings between February 1997 and October 2000. All patients but one had arm loop grafts arising from the brachial artery, the proximal parts of the radial artery, or the ulnar and intraosseous trunk. One patient had a leg loop graft, and no patients had straight grafts. We initially performed procedures with and without thrombolytics, on the basis of the operator's preference, with comparable technical success. However, we now favor the routine use of thrombolytics, presently tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) because procedure times are shorter. We have had two failures, both in the same patient and the only one in our series with a leg graft; both failures were caused by our inability to gain access to the graft because of a seroma. No clinical events suggestive of pulmonary embolus have occurred, but we have not evaluated for occult embolic disease. We describe the basic method we use most often with tPA.

First, the arterial side of the graft is accessed with the puncture directed toward the arterial anastomosis. A short 5.5-French vascular sheath with a large-diameter side arm (Check-Flo Performer Introducer; Cook, Bloomington, IN), suitable for later hemodialysis, is introduced. A straight 0.035-inch guidewire is advanced into the native brachial artery over which a 5-French Fogarty catheter (Walrus; Arrow, Woburn, MA) is passed. The balloon is inflated in the brachial artery (Fig. 1A) and drawn back to the sheath, clearing the arterial anastomosis and the proximal part of the graft. This procedure is conventional but, with other methods, would be performed last.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. Drawings illustrate schematic of uncrossed sheath method for clearing thrombosed hemodialysis grafts. Fogarty balloon is used to clear arterial anastomosis and proximal part of graft.

 

Second, the Fogarty balloon is deflated fully, advanced to a position within the graft roughly half-way between the arterial anastomosis and the sheath, and inflated to completely occlude the graft. The balloon will visibly flatten against the walls of the graft indicating adequate inflation. The balloon is left inflated until the procedure is completed. Anything injected through the arterial sheath is now forced into the thrombosed graft and beyond into the native vein (Fig. 1B).



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. Drawings illustrate schematic of uncrossed sheath method for clearing thrombosed hemodialysis grafts. Fogarty balloon inflates occlusively within arterial side of graft; tissue plasminogen activator and heparin are injected through arterial sheath and are forced into thrombosed graft.

 

At this point, 5-10 mL of 2 mg of tPA and 3000 U of heparin is injected slowly through the arterial sheath. Even a small amount of tPA injected in this manner substantially liquefies the thrombus in minutes, and the time required for the next few steps is more than adequate to ensure substantial thrombolysis.

Third, the venous side of the graft is accessed with the puncture directed toward the venous anastomosis, and a second sheath is introduced. Contrast material injected through the sheath cannot reflux into the graft and, as a result, will usually permit diagnostic venography even without introduction of a catheter. If venous stenosis is present, angioplasty can be performed at this time (Fig. 1C). After dilatation, the angioplasty balloon is removed, but a guidewire remains in place until technical success is achieved.



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. Drawings illustrate schematic of uncrossed sheath method for clearing thrombosed hemodialysis grafts. Contrast material is injected through venous sheath to treat venous stenosis with angioplasty.

 

Fourth, 30 mL of heparinized saline solution (10 U/mL heparin) is injected through the arterial sheath (Fig. 1D), displacing all the liquefied thrombus from the graft and native veins. Excessive pressure is not required; it is the volume of fluid injected into the sheath that seems to matter.



View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. Drawings illustrate schematic of uncrossed sheath method for clearing thrombosed hemodialysis grafts. Heparinized saline solution is injected through arterial sheath to clear liquefied thrombus from graft and native vein.

 

When the Fogarty balloon is deflated, blood flow is usually restored. Sometimes, thrombus reforms in the proximal part of the graft but is easily cleared by one more pass with the Fogarty balloon from the native artery to the graft. Residual thrombus within the graft is seldom seen, but if present, it can be cleared by repeating the injection of heparinized saline solution against the occlusively inflated balloon.

Fifth, a diagnostic study is performed by injecting contrast material into the native brachial artery (usually by advancing the deflated Fogarty catheter) to evaluate for arterial stenosis, residual thrombus, and failure of venous angioplasty. Further intervention can be performed if needed. Finally, the sheaths are flushed and left in place for hemodialysis.

The BLOWFISH method is low in cost because no mechanical thrombolytic device is required, and in fact, no equipment beyond the basics is required for the other techniques used. A single, inexpensive, prepackaged (by most hospital pharmacies) unit dose of 2 mg of tPA is optional.

Procedures tend to be rapid, averaging less than 25 min, with no additional time needed to achieve hemostasis.


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Discussion
References
 
We believe, as others have assumed, that the long-term patency of hemodialysis grafts is not predicted by the method of graft clearance, but rather by the identification and effective treatment of stenoses [1, 2, 4]. If so, avoiding the use of expensive mechanical thrombolytic devices makes sense. Also, the native artery is protected from reflux of the thrombus during graft clearance, a complication that is relatively common with standard methods [5]. Most importantly, the uncrossed sheaths make the procedure easier and more convenient for the interventionist, the hemodialysis nurses, and the patient.

One potential shortcoming exists with this method: if stenosis occurs within the graft itself and between the two sheaths, angioplasty would not be possible without a separate crossed puncture. However, stenoses within grafts are distinctly uncommon (we encountered none), and when present, they do not respond well to angioplasty. If a lesion were detected, another puncture could be performed, or treatment could be attempted at a later time.

The significance of pulmonary emboli is controversial, and the lengths to which one should go to avoid them, debatable [6, 7]. If the BLOWFISH method were used without pharmacologic thrombolysis, thrombus from within the graft would certainly embolize to the lungs, as it would from simple mechanical clearance with crossed sheaths and a balloon. However, if the balloon occlusion and the saline solution injection is performed with the venous sheath open, either before venous angioplasty or after venous angioplasty and with the angioplasty balloon re-inflated within the vein, a surprising amount of thrombus is expelled from the venous sheath. Most recently, we began to perform this method even when tPA was used and found it effective in removing essentially all of the liquefied thrombus from the graft. It should be noted that other pharmacologic methods do not expose the arterial plug to the action of the thrombolytic, although the necessity and value of this are questionable. When our method is used, the arterial plug is pulled into the graft and exposed to the action of tPA, but we do not know the extent to which the plug actually dissolves.

We have tried several methods for clearing thrombosed hemodialysis grafts, but we now use the BLOWFISH method exclusively because of its speed, low cost, and convenience.


References
Top
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Discussion
References
 

  1. Valji K, Bookstein JJ, Roberts AC, Oglevie SB, Pittman C, O'Neill MP. Pulse-spray pharmacomechanical thrombolysis of thrombosed hemodialysis access grafts: long-term experience and comparison of original and current techniques. AJR 1995;164:1495 -1500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Middlebrook MR, Amygdalos MA, Soulen MC, et al. Thrombosed hemodialysis grafts: percutaneous mechanical balloon declotting versus thrombolysis. Radiology 1995;196:73 -77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Cynamon J, Lakritz PS, Wahi SI, Bakel CW, Sprayregen S. Hemodialysis graft declotting: description of the "lyse and wait" technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997;8:825 -829[Medline]
  4. Trerotola SO, Vesley TM, Lund GB, Soulen MC, Ehrman KO, Cardella JF. Treatment of thrombosed hemodialysis access grafts: Arrow-Trerotola percutaneous thrombolytic device versus pulse-spray thrombolysis. Radiology 1998;206:403 -414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Trerotola SO, Johnson MS, Shah H, Namyslowski J. Backbleeding technique for treatment of arterial emboli resulting from dialysis graft thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998;9:141 -143[Medline]
  6. Dolmatch BL, Gray RJ, Horton KM. Will iatrogenic pulmonary embolization be our pulmonary embarrassment? Radiology 1994;191:615 -617[Free Full Text]
  7. Swan TL, Smyth SH, Ruffenach SJ, Berman SS, Pond GD. Pulmonary embolism following hemodialysis access thrombolysis/thrombectomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1995;6:683 -686[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Maitem, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Maitem, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS