AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hernanz-Schulman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cywes, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hernanz-Schulman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cywes, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2001; 177:843-848
© American Roentgen Ray Society


In Vivo Visualization of Pyloric Mucosal Hypertrophy in Infants with Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis

Is There an Etiologic Role?

Marta Hernanz-Schulman1, Lisa H. Lowe1, Joyce Johnson2, Wallace W. Neblett3, D. Brent Polk4, Ramiro Perez, Jr.1, Luis E. Scheker1, Sharon M. Stein1, Richard M. Heller1 and Robert Cywes3

1 Department of Pediatric Radiology, Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Vanderbilt University Medical Center-D-1120, Medical Center North, 21st Ave. S., Nashville, TN 37232-2675.
2 Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Nashville, TN 37232-2675.
3 Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Nashville, TN 37232-2675.
4 Department of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Nashville, TN 37232-2675.

Received December 29, 2000; accepted after revision April 19, 2001.

 
Address correspondence to M. Hernanz-Schulman.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) is a common condition which presents in infants at 2-12 weeks of postnatal life, and whose cause remains obscure. Multiple associated abnormalities have been recognized within the external hypertrophied pyloric muscle layer, but the internal component of the pyloric mucosa has received scant attention in the literature to date. Our purpose in this study was to show that pyloric mucosal redundancy is a constant finding in infants with IHPS, to discuss its possible cause, and to explore the hypothesis of a relationship between pyloric mucosal redundancy and the development of IHPS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We identified 102 consecutive infants with surgically confirmed IHPS and determined the thickness of the pyloric mucosa compared with the thickness of the surrounding hypertrophied muscle. Fifty-one infants who did not have pyloric stenosis served as controls.

RESULTS. Mean mucosal thickness in patients with IHPS approximated mean muscle thickness, with a ratio of 0.89. In infants with IHPS, the pyloric mucosa constitutes approximately one third of the cross-sectional diameter of the pyloric mass and fills and obstructs the pyloric canal.

CONCLUSION. Mucosal redundancy is a constant associated finding in IHPS. Although the origin of the redundancy and a cause-and-effect relationship are difficult to establish, our findings support the hypothesis that hypergastrinemia may be implicated in the pathogenesis of IHPS, and suggest that mucosal thickening could be implicated as one of the initiating factors in its development.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) was described in 1646 by Hildanus but remained largely unknown until its clinical description by Hirschsprung in 1888 [1,2,3]. It occurs in approximately two to four infants per 1000 [2, 4] and develops during the first 2-12 weeks of postnatal life [5]. Despite the intervening span of more than a century since IHPS was described and the frequency with which it occurs, the inciting event that results in gastric outlet obstruction and hypertrophy of the muscle fibers within the first 2-12 weeks of oral feeding remains obscure. Various investigators have studied histologic muscle specimens for the presence of nerve cells and fibers [1], nerve terminals in the smooth muscle of the pylorus [6], and neuronal nitric oxide synthase activity [7], and have reported significant reduction in these parameters in patients with IHPS compared with controls. However, to our knowledge, no studies have proven whether these changes are causative or associated phenomena [8]. Some researchers have implicated hypergastrinemia and decreased gastric pH in the pathogenesis of IHPS [9,10,11].

On routine sonographic examinations, we have recognized marked thickening of the pyloric mucosa, which fills the pyloric mucosa, which fills the pyloric lumen and protrudes into the gastric antrum in patients with pyloric stenosis [12, 13]. Our purpose in this study was to show that pyloric mucosal thickening is a constant finding in patients with IHPS and to explore its relationship to the pyloric lumen and pyloric muscle mass. We postulated that mucosal thickening may represent an abnormal or hypertrophied mucosa and in turn could be a related and perhaps an inciting event in the development of obstruction and muscular hypertrophy in IHPS.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
We identified 102 consecutive infants (19 girls and 83 boys) from the institutional database for our study. All were diagnosed with IHPS by sonography between September 1997 and June 1999; they met our diagnostic criteria, and their images were available for review. All examinations were performed by or in the presence of pediatric radiologists. Positive findings were confirmed surgically. Our methodology and diagnostic criteria, based on a muscle thickness greater than or equal to 3mm, have been previously described [14]. The presence and degree of mucosal hypertrophy were not used in prospective diagnoses. The sonograms were reviewed, and measurements of the mucosal thickness and pyloric diameter were performed with calipers using the on-screen scale. These measurements were correlated with measurements of the muscle thickness performed prospectively with electronic calipers and confirmed in retrospective review.

Because none of the patients in the study group had a biopsy, a specimen from a patient with typical findings, obtained several years earlier [12], was evaluated to show the pathologic correlate to the sonographic findings. This patient had a biopsy for reasons not directly related to her condition, which was otherwise typical in its clinical manifestations, sonographic and surgical findings, and postoperative course.

The sonographic examinations of 83 infants who did not have pyloric stenosis were also reviewed. The mucosal thickness was measured in all those infants in whom it could be distinguished from gastric contents. The resultant control population consisted of 51 infants.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The positive sonographic diagnosis of IHPS was confirmed surgically in all 102 patients. Their median age was 5 weeks (mean age, 6 ± 3 weeks; range, 2-19 weeks). The mean mucosal thickness was 4.1 ± 0.9 mm. The mucosal thickness approximated that of the muscle in all patients, with a mean mucosal thickness to muscle thickness ratio of 0.89 (Table 1). The ratios of mucosal thickness and muscle thickness to pyloric diameter indicated that the mucosal thickness and each muscle thickness constituted approximately one third the diameter of the pyloric "tumor" in most patients (Fig. 1). However, the thickness of the mucosa was variable; it equaled that of the muscle layer in 23% of patients and exceeded the muscle thickness in 16%. There was a nearly normal distribution of all parameters: mucosal thickness, muscle thickness, and the related pyloric diameter.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Pyloric Measurements in 102 Infants with Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of transverse diameter of hypertrophied pylorus. Pyloric diameter is defined as diameter of entire mass; it represents additive components of muscle thickness on each side and mucosal thickness in center.

 

In all patients, the mucosa could be traced in continuity from the normal portion of the gastric antrum into the pyloric canal. In the pyloric canal, the mucosal and submucosal layers appeared as irregularly alternating hyperechoic and hypoechoic layers, indicating an infolded mucosa protruding into the antral lumen on longitudinal images. On transverse images, the mucosa filled the pyloric canal; its cross-sectional measurement represented the lumen of the pyloric channel (Fig. 2A,2B).



View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. Sonographic images of typical hypertrophied pylorus in male infant with hypotrophic pyloric stenosis. Longitudinal sonogram shows two-layered, thickened mucosa (solid arrows) surrounded by muscular components (open arrows). Mucosa protrudes into, and is outlined by, fluid within gastric antrum (A).

 


View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. Sonographic images of typical hypertrophied pylorus in male infant with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Transverse sonogram shows redundant, infolded mucosa (solid arrows) between muscular components (open arrows).

 

The biopsy specimen of the patient presenting several years earlier showed mucosal hypertrophy, edema, and eosinophilic infiltration (Fig. 3A,3B). IHPS was confirmed surgically [12].



View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. Histopathologic specimens in infant with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Photomicrograph shows mucosal hyperplasia, characterized by elongated, branched, and mildly distorted pits (solid arrow) and abundant lamina propria that is somewhat edematous (open arrow). (H and E, x25)

 


View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. Histopathologic specimens in infant with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Photomicrograph shows hyperplastic mucosa with crypt distortion and pit epithelial cell hypertrophy with abundant supranuclear cytoplasm (arrow). (H and E, x62.5)

 

One patient merits specific mention. This infant was a 4-month-old girl whose sonographic examination showed that the mucosa was thickened to 8 mm, with a muscle thickness of 4.5 mm (Fig. 4A). Fluoroscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract, performed because of the unusual sonographic findings, revealed a prominent filling defect within the pyloric channel (Fig. 4B). At pyloromyotomy, the surgeon could detect no difference in the surgical findings: "typical" pyloric stenosis was reported in the operative note, and the girl's postoperative recovery was uneventful.



View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. 4-month-old female infant with surgically confirmed infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Longitudinal sonographic image shows markedly hypertrophied mucosa (solid arrows) measuring 8 mm in thickness. Muscle thickness was 4.5 mm (open arrows). A = antrum.

 


View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. 4-month-old female infant with surgically confirmed infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Radiograph from upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy shows increased peristaltic activity of the contrastfilled stomach, and double-track sign (arrows), denoting contrast material coursing around redundant, hypertrophied mucosa. A = antrum.

 

Among the control patients, the mean mucosal thickness (two layers) was 2.3 ± 0.5 mm. The difference between the control and pyloric stenosis group was significant (p <0.001).


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Our data show and quantify pyloric mucosal redundancy that occurs in infants with pyloric stenosis, which was uniformly present in all 102 patients in our study. Although variability was seen in the diameter of the mucosa, this diameter is similar to that of the muscle thickness in the consecutive patient population studied. On the average, approximately one third of the total pyloric diameter consists of pyloric mucosa, with the remaining two thirds consisting of the hypertrophied muscle on either side (Fig. 1). Mucosal redundancy, therefore, should be recognized as an integral component of IHPS, and not be mistaken as a polyp or other abnormality. Our findings raise the question of whether the mucosa filling and obstructing the pyloric lumen is normal and merely crowded by the achalasic pyloric muscle, or whether it is truly abnormally thickened and hypertrophic.

Imaging
Until the advent of sonography, the gastrointestinal barium meal test had been the mainstay of diagnosis for many years in patients in whom the pyloric muscle was not readily palpable. The upper gastrointestinal barium contrast examination reveals the condition indirectly, by its effect on the pyloric lumen. The ingested contrast material courses through the pyloric channel, thus outlining the lumen of the canal. In many cases, the contrast material is seen to course through more than one channel of infolded mucosa, which is termed the double track sign, originally described as a differentiating criterion between pylorospasm and IHPS [15] (Fig. 4B). This finding is recognized to represent contrast material coursing through the interstices of the pyloric canal. What is not widely acknowledged is that the distance between the two lines must represent a minimum width of the pyloric channel and that the intervening area represents a filling defect within the canal. If this criterion, as expounded by Haran et al. [15], serves as a method of differentiating between pylorospasm and IHPS, it suggests that in IHPS the mucosa is not merely compressed but truly thickened and hypertrophied. Pyloric mucosal prolapse into the gastric antrum is not typically identified at upper gastrointestinal barium contrast examination because it is usually small and obscured by the contrast material within the distended stomach.

Sonography permits identification of the entire pylorus, including the lumen. The submucosa is hypoechoic and readily distinguished from the hyperechoic mucosa (Fig. 2A,2B). Low echogenicity and variable prominence of the submucosal layer may be associated with submucosal edema, which is known to occur in IHPS [2]. Researchers in the earlier period of sonographic examination of the hypertrophied pylorus, limited by equipment constraints and a small base of experience, mistook the edematous submucosa within the canal for fluid traversing the pyloric channel [16]. However, as early as 1984, pathologic interpretation of these sonolucent intrapyloric bands was theorized to represent hypertrophy of the muscularis mucosae [17].

In patients with IHPS, sonographic correlation with the findings at upper gastrointestinal examination confirms that the lumen of the pyloric canal on cross-section measures approximately 4 mm on the average, a diameter that is similar to or larger than that of the normal open pyloric ring, and that this lumen, unlike the normal pyloric ring, is obstructed by the folds of hypertrophied intraluminal mucosa and edematous submucosa. The fact that the obstructed pyloric channel can often be traversed by a stiff enteric tube [7] illustrates the adequate size of the canal and the pliability of the obstructing mucosal folds.

Endoscopic and Surgical Correlation
Recent experience with endoscopy has permitted further evaluation of the lumen of the pyloric canal in IHPS and provided a visual antral correlate to the sonographic images. The criteria for diagnosis of IHPS in an endoscopic series include a cauliflowerlike narrowing [18] of the gastric entrance to the pyloric canal (Fig. 5), identical to that which we have reported and shown at biopsy to represent hypertrophied and edematous antropyloric mucosa [12]. After the muscle is surgically divided, the mucosa "bulges" through the myotomy incision [19]. These surgical and endoscopic findings, although indicating the constancy of mucosal redundancy, do not directly address the question of mucosal redundancy versus true hypertrophy.



View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. Endoscopic image of infant illustrated in Figure 3A,3B shows pyloric mucosa (M) protruding into gastric antrum (A). (Reprinted with permission from [12])

 

Pathologic Correlation
Early pathology reports described an obstructive role played by redundancy of the mucosa, stressed by Heubner and Fredet in 1906 and 1908 [20]. However, most recent pathologic data and direct observations of the pyloric anatomy are limited to external observations during pyloromyotomy and to muscle biopsies obtained during surgery. Thus, information regarding the pyloric lumen in IHPS is limited; it is assumed that the thickened pyloric muscle narrows the pyloric lumen, resulting in the anatomical obstruction that leads to vomiting in these infants.

However, pediatric pathology texts have described constant pyloric submucosal edema of variable degree and exaggeration of the longitudinal rugae of the pyloric mucosa as contributing significantly to the obstruction [2]. The Ramstedt operation, described in 1912 [20], "proved that transverse closure of the pyloromyotomy incision was unnecessary and probably harmful since it contributed to further obstruction through folding of the redundant mucosa." A mild-to-moderate inflammatory cell infiltration is also described as being a constant finding in the submucosal and muscularis layers of the antropyloric channel [2]. On the other hand, biopsies at the greater curvature of the body of the stomach in these patients show no difference from controls [21].

Because of the success of the Ramstedt operation, few cases in the recent literature describe pathologic correlation of the mucosal abnormalities. One reported case described a prominent filling defect within the lumen of the obstructed pyloric canal on upper gastrointestinal meal test [22]. The article documented and illustrated a large filling defect that was seen protruding into the gastric antrum of that infant. A full-thickness excision and histologic examination of the lesion revealed the hypertrophied and edematous mucosa to be nearly twice the thickness of the muscle (Fig. 6). The exaggerated mucosal thickness described in this patient resembles that in our patient, illustrated in Figure 4A,4B; both patients did well after an otherwise routine pyloromyotomy. Other patients with histologic findings similar to those of our typical patient, illustrated in Figure 3A,3B, with branching glands and submucosal edema, have also been reported and classified as exhibiting idiopathic focal foveolar hyperplasia in association with pyloric stenosis. Those patients also did well after routine pyloromyotomy [23]. Thus, pathologic information suggests that the crowded mucosa, with submucosal edema, inflammatory cellular infiltration, and branching glandular structure is abnormal.



View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6. Photograph of full-thickness biopsy specimen of pyloric muscle (MUS) in previously reported infant with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Marked enlargement of mucosa (muc) resembles that in our patient, illustrated in Figure 4A,4B. (Reprinted with permission from [22])

 

Other Associated Findings
Considerable attention has been focused over the past decade on the muscular layers of the hypertrophied pylorus. The muscular layer has been found to be deficient in the quantity of nerve terminals [6], markers for nerve-supporting cells [24], peptide-containing nerve fibers [1, 25], nitric oxide synthase activity [7], mRNA for nitric oxide synthase production [26], and interstitial cells of Cajal [27, 28]. It also contains increased expression of insulinlike growth factor ImRNA [29] when compared with control specimens. These studies localize the abnormalities largely to the muscular layer, particularly the circular layer, with fewer or no changes described in the myenteric plexus. It is postulated that this abnormal innervation of the muscular layer leads to failure of relaxation of the pyloric muscle, increased synthesis of growth factors, and subsequent hypertrophy, hyperplasia [30], and obstruction.

Prostaglandin E2 generation in the gastric mucosa and its concentration in the gastric secretions of patients with pyloric stenosis have been reported to be significantly greater than in normal controls [31]. Prostaglandin E1 and E2 induce proliferation of the gastric mucosa [32] and are related to muscle contraction in the human gastrointestinal tract [33]. Prostaglandin therapy has been found to result in significant antropyloric mucosal hypertrophy, leading to a reported case of muscular hypertrophy and symptomatic pyloric stenosis requiring surgery [34]. The degree of mucosal hypertrophy illustrated in that patient is very similar to that in all of the consecutive patients in our study.

We have shown the additional associated finding of mucosal thickening filling and obstructing the lumen of the pyloric canal in patients with pyloric stenosis. However, the question of whether this mucosa is merely compressed normal gastric rugae, or whether it is abnormal, needs to be addressed. We believe that some degree of crowding of the mucosa is inevitable, although the obstructed lumen of the hypertrophied pyloric canal is similar to or wider than that of the nonobstructed pyloric ring, suggesting either that the mucosa is indeed thicker than normal or that it is the normally wider, prepyloric antral portion of the stomach that undergoes the changes found in infants with IHPS. However, the filling defect noted on upper gastrointestinal barium contrast examination, distinct from that of pylorospasm, lends credence to the hypothesis that the mucosa is thicker in patients with IHPS. The variable and sometimes greatly exaggerated diameter of the mucosa again points to an inherent change in this component of the lesion. Finally, review of histologic findings, both in older pathologic literature and in the more sparse recent literature, indicates that changes of submucosal edema, inflammatory cellular infiltrate, and gland hypertrophy are present; these are confirmed in our patient who otherwise had a typical course of treatment and findings of IHPS (Fig. 3A,3B).

Cause or Effect?
We have shown the presence of mucosal thickening in the pylorus of patients with pyloric stenosis, whereas other investigators have identified multiple abnormalities within the hypertrophied muscle layers that in turn have been implicated in the causality of the lesion. It is difficult to determine whether associated findings are the initiation or the result of an abnormality [8]. It is known that infants who subsequently develop IHPS are born with a normally functioning pyloric sphincteric mechanism before oral feeding commences, because neither a functional obstruction nor an anatomic abnormality is present at birth [5]. Therefore, it is more difficult to postulate that the associated muscle abnormalities are preexistent, or to disregard a stimulus initiated at or soon after birth.

One is thus tempted to ask the obvious question: What is it about the initiation of oral feedings after birth that results in hypertrophy of the pyloric mucosa and muscular layers and in the multiplicity of abnormalities in the sphincteric relaxation mechanism? It seems reasonable to hypothesize that acid secretion induced by the ingested material in contact with the gastric mucosa may in turn be related to the initiation of the antropyloric changes present in infants who develop IHPS.

Maternal administration of pentagastrin in dogs has been implicated in an abnormality in pups that resembles IHPS in humans [9]. Hypergastrinemia in humans has been associated with immaturity of the gut during the first 3 months of life [35]. Furthermore, lactation has resulted in increase in mucosal mass and villus crypt formation in infant animals [36]. Many of these known clinical features of IHPS could be explained by a theory postulating increased antropyloric-acid secretory activity in these infants [11]. It is possible that a genetic propensity towards hyperacidity, augmented by gut immaturity in the first 3 months of life and potentiated by the initiation of oral feedings, may lead to mucosal hypertrophy and the beginning of gastric outlet obstruction. Obstruction, in turn, may lead to a further increase in acidity, increased synthesis of prostaglandins, and antropyloric hypermotility, with subsequent muscular hypertrophy and further obstruction, constituting a vicious circle interrupted by relief of obstruction via pyloromyotomy.

In summary, we have shown that significant mucosal redundancy obstructs the lumen of the pyloric channel in IHPS and that its presence should not lead to an unrelated diagnosis such as gastric polyp. To assess the potential implications of this finding, we have reviewed the existing literature investigating various abnormalities implicated in the pathogenesis of IHPS within the context of our findings. Although redundancy and hypertrophy are not synonymous, data suggest that in IHPS the mucosa is not only crowded within the canal, but may, in fact, be primarily abnormal. It is difficult to tease out a precipitating event from a multiplicity of associated abnormalities, but the uniform presence of pyloric mucosal thickening cannot be ignored and begs further study. The absence of pyloric obstruction and the normal anatomy of the pylorus at birth suggest that the mucosal changes, initiated by oral feedings and mediated by gastric hypersecretion, could be implicated among the initiating events in the development of IHPS in predisposed infants.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Wattchow D, Cass DT, Furness JB, et al. Abnormalities of peptide-containing nerve fibers in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Gastroenterology 1987;92:443 -448[Medline]
  2. Kissane J. Stomach and duodenum. In: Pathology of infancy and childhood. St. Louis: Mosby, 1975: 175-178
  3. Abel RM. The ontogeny of the peptide innervation of the human pylorus, with special reference to understanding the aetiology and pathogenesis of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr Surg 1996;31:490 -497[Medline]
  4. Applegate MS, Druschel CM. The epidemiology of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in New York State, 1983 to 1990. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995;149:1123 -1129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rollins MD, Shields MD, Quinn RJ, Woolridge MA. Pyloric stenosis: congenital or acquired? Arch Dis Child 1989;64:138 -139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Okazaki T, Yamataka A, Fujiwara T, Nishiye H, Fujimoto T, Miyano T. Abnormal distribution of nerve terminals in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Ped Surg 1994;29:655 -658[Medline]
  7. Vanderwinden JM, Mailleux P, Schiffmann SN, Vanderhaeghen JJ, De Laet MH. Nitric oxide synthase activity in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. N Engl J Med 1992;327:511 -515[Abstract]
  8. Michel T. Nitric oxide synthesis in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. (letter; comments) N Engl J Med 1992;327:1690 -1691[Medline]
  9. Dodge JA, Karim AA. Induction of pyloric hypertrophy by pentagastrin: an animal model for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Gut 1976;17:280 -284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Fisher R, Lipshutz W, Cohen S. The hormonal regulation of pyloric sphincter function. J Clin Invest 1973;52:1289 -1296
  11. Rogers IM. The enigma of pyloric stenosis: some thoughts on the aetiology. Acta Paediatr 1997;86:6 -9[Medline]
  12. Hernanz-Schulman M, Dinauer P, Ambrosino MM, Polk DB, Neblett WW 3rd. The antral nipple sign of pyloric mucosal prolapse: endoscopic correlation of a new sonographic observation in patients with pyloric stenosis. J Ultrasound Med 1995;14:283 -287[Abstract]
  13. Hernanz-Schulman M, Neblett WW 3rd, Polk DB, Johnson JE. Hypertrophied pyloric mucosa in patients with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. (letter; comments) Pediatr Radiol 1998;28:901[Medline]
  14. Hernanz-Schulman M, Sells LL, Ambrosino MM, Heller RM, Stein SM, Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in the infant without a palpable olive: accuracy of sonographic diagnosis. Radiology 1994;193:771 -776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Haran P, Darling D, Sciammas F. The value of the double rack sign as a differentiating factor between pylorospasm and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in infants. Radiology 1966;86:723 -725[Medline]
  16. Cohen, HL, Schechter S, Mestel AL, Eaton DH, Haller JO. Ultrasonic "double track" sign in hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Ultrasound Med 1987;6:139 -143[Abstract]
  17. Grignon A, Filiatrault D, Patriquin H, Boisvert J, Perrault G. Echographie de la stenose du pylore. J Can Assoc Radiol 1984; 35:271 -275[Medline]
  18. De Backer A, Bove T, Vandenplas Y, Peeters S, Deconinick P. Contribution of endoscopy to early diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1994;18:78 -81[Medline]
  19. Benson C D. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. In: Welch K, Randolph JG, Ravitch MM, O'Neill JA, Rowe MI, eds. Pediatric surgery. Chicago: Yearbook Medical, 1986:811 -815
  20. Mack H. A history of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis and its treatment. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 1942;XII:465 -689
  21. Batcup G, Spitz L. A histopathological study of gastric mucosal biopsies in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Clin Pathol 1979;32:625 -628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Markowitz RI, Wolfson BJ, Huff DS, Capitanio MA. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: congenital or acquired? J Clin Gastroenterol 1982;4:39 -44[Medline]
  23. Holland AJ, Freeman JK, Le Quesne GW, Khong TY. Idiopathic focal foveolar hyperplasia in infants. Pediatr Surg Int 1997;12:497 -500[Medline]
  24. Kobayashi H, O'Brian D, Puri P. Selective reduction in intramuscular nerve supporting cells in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:651 -654[Medline]
  25. Malmfors G, Sundler F. Peptidergic innervation in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr Surg 1986;21:303 -306[Medline]
  26. Kusafuka T, Puri P. Altered messenger RNA expression of the neuronal nitric oxide synthase gene in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Pediatr Surg Int 1997;12:576 -579[Medline]
  27. Vanderwinden JM, Liu H, De Laet MH, Vanderhaeghen JJ. Study of the interstitial cells of Cajal in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Gastroenterology 1996;111:279 -288 [erratum, Gastroenterology 1996;111:1403][Medline]
  28. Langer JC, Berezin I, Daniel EE. Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: ultrastructural abnormalities of enteric nerves and the interstitial cells of Cajal. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:1535 -1543[Medline]
  29. Ohshiro K, Puri P. Increased insulin-like growth factor-ImRNA expression in pyloric muscle in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Pediatr Surg Int 1998;13:253 -255[Medline]
  30. Oue T, Puri P. Smooth muscle cell hypertrophy versus hyperplasia in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Pediatr Res 1999;45:853 -857[Medline]
  31. Shinohara K, Shimizu T, Igarashi J, Yamashiro Y, Miyano T. Correlation of prostaglandin E2 production and gastric acid secretion in infants with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:1483 -1485[Medline]
  32. Peled N, Dagan O, Babyn P, et al. Gastric-outlet obstruction induced by prostaglandin therapy in neonates. N Engl J Med 1992;327:505 -510[Abstract]
  33. Ohshiro K, Puri P. Pahogenesis of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: recent progress. Pediatr Surg Int 1998;13:243 -252[Medline]
  34. Callahan MJ, McCauley RG, Patel H, Hijazi ZM. The development of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in a patient with prostaglandin-induced foveolar hyperplasia. Pediatr Radiol 1999;29:748 -751[Medline]
  35. Moazam F, Kirby WJ, Rodgers BM, McGuigan JE. Physiology of serum gastrin production in neonates and infants. Ann Surg 1984;199:389 -392[Medline]
  36. Lichtenberger LM, Trier JS. Changes in gastrin levels, food intake, and duodenal mucosal growth during lactation. Am J Physiol 1979;237:E98 -E105

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Hernanz-Schulman, Y. Zhu, S. M. Stein, R. M. Heller, and L. A. Bethel
Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis in Infants: US Evaluation of Vascularity of the Pyloric Canal
Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 389 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Hernanz-Schulman
Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis
Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 319 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hernanz-Schulman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cywes, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hernanz-Schulman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cywes, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS