AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiechl-Kohlendorfer, U.
Right arrow Articles by Gaßner, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kiechl-Kohlendorfer, U.
Right arrow Articles by Gaßner, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2001; 177:1041-1044
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

Diagnosing Neonatal Female Genital Anomalies Using Saline-Enhanced Sonography

Ursula Kiechl-Kohlendorfer1, Theresa Elisabeth Geley, Karin Maria Unsinn and Ingmar Gaßner

1 All authors: Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

Received March 19, 2001; accepted after revision May 8, 2001.

 
Address correspondence to I. Gaßner.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to show the usefulness of sonography in diagnosing genital anomalies early in female neonates who have unilateral renal malformations. Our patients were three female neonates with renal anomalies that had been detected in utero. We performed sonography of the inner genitalia of each girl after filling the vagina with saline solution. In two patients with multicystic dysplastic kidney disorder, the examination revealed uterus didelphys with obstruction of one of the vaginas. Sonographic examination of the third patient showed Gartner's duct cyst with renal agenesis.

CONCLUSION. The neonatal period provides a unique opportunity to use sonography to detect uterine anomalies because maternal and placental hormone stimulation increases the size of the uterus. Simultaneous intravaginal saline instillation during imaging further improves the radiologist's ability to diagnose genital malformations precisely. This procedure is a simple, sensitive, and inexpensive examination method that is useful in imaging female neonates with renal dysplasia or agenesis detected in utero or in the neonatal period. Its particular value is to further characterize a cystic mass posterior to the bladder that is seen at transabdominal sonography.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The first detailed description of concomitant congenital malformations of the reproductive and urinary tracts in females was provided by Woolf and Allen [1]. Because of the high coincidence of genital and renal anomalies, careful investigation of the genital system in patients with renal anomalies (or vice versa) is warranted [2]. Unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK) disorder, renal agenesis, or cystic dysplastic kidney disorder may be associated with genital anomalies, most commonly fusion defects of the müllerian ducts (such as uterus septus, uterus duplex, uterus didelphys, and unicornuate uterus) and remainders of the wolffian ducts (Gartner's duct cyst). A number of females with renal anomalies and concomitant genital malformations have been described in the literature [1,2,3,4,5,6], but in only a few reports was the diagnosis established in the neonatal period [7, 8].

We describe three female neonates with concomitant wolffian and müllerian duct developmental anomalies. The conditions of all three patients were revealed in the neonatal period through the use of genital sonography.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Between February 1994 and December 1999, three female neonates who were 1-3 days old underwent renal and pelvic sonography at the radiologic unit of the Department of Pediatrics, Innsbruck University Hospital. In all three patients, renal anomalies had been detected in utero. Pelvic sonography was performed with special attention to potential concomitant genital anomalies. To improve visualization of the vagina and adjacent structures, normal 0.9% saline solution was instilled in the vagina through an 8-French feeding tube that had been inserted into the vaginal orifice under sterile conditions and gently advanced. The vagina had then been filled with the saline solution. Continous infusion of the fluid compensated for the leakage through the vaginal orifice. The patients then were examined using Ultramark 8 HDI or HDI 5000 scanners (Advanced Technology Laboratories, Bothell, WA) equipped with a 7- to 4-MHz curved array or a 5- to 12-MHz linear transducer.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Abdominal sonography in two of the neonatal girls showed that multiple noncommunicating cysts were located at the L4-L5 level (consistent with MCDK disorder) and that the contralateral kidney was normal in position, size, and echogenicity. Transabdominal sonography revealed a duplicated uterus and a paramedian cystic structure at the level of the vagina (Figs. 1A and 1B). After filling the vagina with the saline solution and then obtaining sonograms, we identified one patent vagina and the previously mentioned cyst as an obstructed vagina ipsilateral to the MCDK (Fig. 1C). In one of the patients, a moderately dilated ureter originated from the MCDK and extended to the level of the vagina. Genitography performed under fluoroscopic guidance showed only the inner contour of the contrast-material-filled vagina; neither uterine nor vaginal anomalies were discernible in either patient. No reflux was evident on voiding cystourethrography. On the basis of the sonographic workup, the diagnosis of a uterus didelphys and obstruction of one vagina ipsilateral to a MCDK was established in both patients (Fig. 1D).



View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 1-day-old female neonate with right multicystic dysplastic kidney and uterus didelphys with ipsilateral vaginal obstruction. Transverse sonogram of pelvis shows right (R) and left (L) uteri behind bladder.

 


View larger version (173K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 1-day-old female neonate with right multicystic dysplastic kidney and uterus didelphys with ipsilateral vaginal obstruction. Transverse sonogram at lower level than A shows cyst (C) representing obstructed vagina.

 


View larger version (189K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 1-day-old female neonate with right multicystic dysplastic kidney and uterus didelphys with ipsilateral vaginal obstruction. Longitudinal sonogram obtained after instilling saline solution in vagina shows filled patent left vagina (V) and right uterus (U), as well as cervical os (arrowhead) protruding into obstructed right vagina (arrows).

 


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. 1-day-old female neonate with right multicystic dysplastic kidney and uterus didelphys with ipsilateral vaginal obstruction. Diagram shows noncommunicating cysts of right multicystic dysplastic kidney (white arrowhead) located at lower position than it would normally be found. Contralateral kidney is normal in shape and size and located at normal abdominal level. Duplicate uterus is associated with ipsilateral obstructed vagina (black arrowhead).

 

In the third patient, the left kidney could not be detected, and the right kidney was normal. Transabdominal sonography revealed a normal uterus and a cystic structure at the level of the vagina (Fig. 2A). At the instillation of saline solution into the vagina, the cyst was revealed to be in continuity with a tubular structure that extended superiorly to the fundus of the uterus (Fig. 2B). The cyst impinged on the left wall of the vagina (Fig. 2C). Using genitography with contrast media, we were able to visualize the impression of the cyst on the vaginal wall; there was no communication between vagina and cyst. A voiding cystourethrogram did not show ureteral reflux. This patient had ipsilateral renal agenesis, and she was thought to have a single ectopic ureter that communicated with a Gartner's duct cyst (Fig. 2D).



View larger version (186K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. 3-day-old female neonate with Gartner's duct cyst and ipsilateral renal agenesis. Transverse sonogram of pelvis shows paramedian left-sided fluid-filled cyst (C) at level of vagina and cervix.

 


View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. 3-day-old female neonate with Gartner's duct cyst and ipsilateral renal agenesis. Axial sonogram after filling of vagina (V) shows cyst (C) adjacent to left wall of vagina.

 


View larger version (195K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C. 3-day-old female neonate with Gartner's duct cyst and ipsilateral renal agenesis. Longitudinal sonogram shows cyst (C) in continuity with dilated and tortuous ureter (arrows) extending cephalad from it.

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D. 3-day-old female neonate with Gartner's duct cyst and ipsilateral renal agenesis. Diagram shows Gartner's duct cyst (white arrowhead) in close relation to left vaginal wall and cervix. A single rudimentary left ureter (black arrowhead) communicates with cyst. Both uterus and right kidney are normal in shape, size, and location. No left kidney is found.

 

No surgical intervention was necessary in any of the three patients, and all have been followed up for 1-6 years. No history of abdominal pain or voiding problems has been reported. Findings of physical examinations and routine blood analyses, including parameters of renal function, were unremarkable, as were the results of the standard urine analyses and cultures. In both patients with uterus didelphys, sonographic follow-ups after the neonatal period failed to reveal the duplicated uterus accurately. Cystic structures in the kidney became smaller in one patient.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The close interrelation of the urinary and reproductive system during embryologic development may explain the coexistence of urinary and reproductive tract anomalies [1, 3,4,5]. The internal genital organs and the lower urinary system originate from two paired urogenital structures that develop in both sexes: the mesonephric (wolffian) ducts and the paramesonephric (müllerian) ducts. In females, the upper four fifths of the vagina, the uterus, and the fallopian tubes develop from the müllerian ducts. The distal segments of the müllerian ducts move toward the midline and fuse into a single tube, the uterovaginal canal. The ureteral bud develops from the wolffian duct and evolves into the ureter, renal pelvis, and intrarenal collecting system and acts as an inducer of differentiation of the renal blastema in the adult kidney.

A ureteral bud that originates from a mesonephric duct that is in a more cranial position than is normally found causes the development of ureteral ectopia and renal dysplasia. In females, an ectopic ureter may terminate proximal to, at, or distal to the urethral sphincter in the urethra, vestibule, vagina, perineum, uterus, fallopian tube, Gartner's duct cyst, or rectum. MCDK may be associated with lateral ectopy of the ureter, resulting in misalignment of the ureteral bud as it grows cephalad to the metanephric blastema or in obstruction anywhere in the urinary tract during early gestation [9]. An example of the latter mechanism is the dilated ureter in one of our patients, which could be traced from the MCDK to the obstructed ipsilateral vagina. MCDK detected in utero or in the neonatal period may involute; the cysts may disappear later and mimic renal agenesis [10].

In two of our patients, the MCDK was associated with a uterus didelphys with obstruction of the ipsilateral vagina (Fig. 1A,1B,1C,1D). This genital malformation is due to incomplete fusion of the müllerian ducts and unilateral occlusion of the duplicated müllerian system [5]. In the third patient, unilateral renal agenesis was associated with a Gartner's duct cyst (Fig. 2A,2B,2C,2D). This cyst, a remnant of the wolffian duct, may occur anywhere in the ovary, broad ligament, uterine walls, or vagina [6]. A Gartner's duct cyst can communicate with the uterus or vagina; in our patient, no communication could be visualized.

Because of the frequent association of concomitant wolffian and müllerian duct developmental anomalies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8], female neonates with renal malformations need to be screened for genital anomalies. Under the influence of maternal and placental hormones, the size of the uterus increases late in gestation and displays a definable endometrial stripe. Thus, the uterus can readily be examined in the neonatal period using transabdominal sonography to provide an early and accurate diagnosis. Fluid instillation into the vagina further improves diagnostic value of sonography by providing considerably better visualization of the vagina and adjacent structures and allowing cystic structures to be more precisely classified (Figs. 1C, 2B, and 2C). This method is comparatively simple and noninvasive [11]. After the neonatal period, the uterus regresses in size and has a tubular shape; the endometrium is not apparent, making it almost impossible to evaluate uterine anomalies.

Alternative or additional diagnostic tools currently available for determining genital malformations in infants are genitography with contrast media and MR imaging. Genitography has the disadvantage of exposing the patient to ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast material. Moreover, visualization is limited to the inner contour of the genital tract. Frequently, the uterus is not completely filled with contrast material [7], and so the proximal impression of the cervix or cervices or the lateral impression caused by an obstructed hemivagina may evade diagnosis. In our patients, traditional genitography was clearly inferior to sonography in revealing and allowing classification of genital anomalies. The disadvantages of MR imaging are that it is expensive and generally requires anesthesia in pediatric patients. As in sonography, the diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging may be improved by instilling a 0.9 normal saline solution in the vagina.

In conclusion, early and accurate diagnosis of genital malformations hastens the provision of appropriate treatment or eliminates unnecessary surgical exploration at puberty when patients with unilateral vaginal obstruction become symptomatic with acute abdominal pain and dysmenorrhea [1, 2, 7, 12]. Pelvic sonography is a noninvasive and cost-effective imaging technique suitable for use in evaluating genital anomalies in neonatal patients with renal malformations. Instillation of a saline solution further improves diagnostic accuracy.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Woolf RB, Allen WM. Concomitant malformations: the frequent, simultaneous occurrence of congenital malformations of the reproductive and urinary tracts. Obstet Gynecol 1953;2:236 -265[Medline]
  2. Yoder IC, Pfister RC. Unilateral hematocolpos and ipsilateral renal agenesis: report of two cases and review of the literature. AJR 1976;127:303 -308[Abstract]
  3. Gruenwald P. The relation of the growing müllerian duct to wolffian duct and its importance for the genesis of malformations. Anat Rec 1941;81:1 -19
  4. Gilsanz V, Cleveland RH. Duplication of the müllerian ducts and genitourinary malformations. I. The value of excretory urography. Radiology 1982;144:793 -796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gilsanz V, Cleveland RH, Reid BS. Duplication of the müllerian ducts and genitourinary malformations. II. Analysis of malformations. Radiology 1982;144:797 -801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Currarino G. Single vaginal ectopic ureter and Gartner's duct cyst with ipsilateral renal hypoplasia and dysplasia (or agenesis). J Urol 1982;128:988 -993[Medline]
  7. Nussbaum Blask AR, Sanders RC, Gaerhart JP. Obstructed uterovaginal anomalies: demonstration with sonography. I. Neonates and infants. Radiology 1991;179:79 -83[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Hahn-Pedersen J, Kvist N, Nielsen OH. Hydrometrocolpos: current views on pathogenesis and management. J Urol 1984;132:537 -540[Medline]
  9. Stephens FD. The pathogenesis of renal dysplasia. In: Stephens FD, ed. Congenital malformations of the urinary tract. New York: Praeger, 1983:441 -456
  10. Mesrobian HG, Rushton HG, Bulas D. Unilateral renal agenesis may result from in utero regression of multicystic renal dysplasia. J Urol 1993;150(2 Pt 2):793 -794[Medline]
  11. Randolph JR, Ying YK, Maier DB, Schmidt CL, Riddick DH. Comparison of real-time ultra-sonography, hysterosalpingography, and laparoscopy/hysteroscopy in the evaluation of uterine abnormalities and tubal patency. Fertil Steril 1986;46:828 -832[Medline]
  12. Tolete-Velcek F, Hansbrough F, Kugaczewski J, et al. Uterovaginal malformations: a trap for the unsuspecting surgeon. J Pediatr Surg 1989:24:736 -740[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
E. B. Johnston-MacAnanny, A. S. Lev-Toaff, and F. Batzer
Diagnosis and Treatment of a Communicating Uterus Didelphys With an Atretic Hemivagina: Utility of 3-Dimensional and Intraoperative Sonography
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2008; 27(6): 975 - 978.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiechl-Kohlendorfer, U.
Right arrow Articles by Gaßner, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kiechl-Kohlendorfer, U.
Right arrow Articles by Gaßner, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS