AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fulbright, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wexler, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fulbright, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wexler, B. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2001; 177:1205-1210
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Functional MR Imaging of Regional Brain Activation Associated with the Affective Experience of Pain

Robert K. Fulbright1, Clemens J. Troche1, Pawel Skudlarski1, John C. Gore1,2 and Bruce E. Wexler3

1 Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, Box 208042, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06520-8042.
2 Department of Applied Physics, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.
3 Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520.

Received December 14, 2000; accepted after revision May 17, 2001.

 
Address correspondence to R. K. Fulbright.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. Current models propose that the experience of pain includes both sensory and affective components. Our purpose was to use functional MR imaging to determine areas of the brain engaged by the affective dimension of pain.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twelve healthy adults underwent functional MR imaging using a gradient-echo echoplanar technique while a cold pressor test, consisting of cold and pain tasks, was applied first to one foot and then to the other. The cold task involved the application of cold water (14-20°C) that was not at a painful level. For the pain task, the water temperature was then lowered to a painful temperature (8-14°C) and subsequently to the pain threshold (3-8°C). Images acquired at room temperature before the cold and pain tasks served as a baseline task. Composite maps of brain activation were generated by comparing the baseline task with the cold task and the cold task with the pain task. The significance of signal changes was estimated by randomization of individual activation maps.

RESULTS. Cold-related activation (p < 0.01) was found in the postcentral gyrus bilaterally, laterally, and inferiorly to the primary motor-sensory area of the foot and at a site near the second somatosensory site. Activation also occurred in the frontal lobe (the bilateral middle frontal gyri and the right inferior frontal gyrus), the left anterior insula, the left thalamus, and the superior aspect of the anterior cingulate gyrus (seen at one slice location). Pain-related activation (p < 0.01) included the anterior cingulate gyrus (seen at four slice locations); the superior frontal gyrus, especially on the right; and the right cuneus.

CONCLUSION. Compared with the basic sensory processing of pain, the affective dimension of pain activates a cortical network that includes the right superior frontal gyrus, the right cuneus, and a large area of the anterior cingulate gyrus.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The experience of pain is believed to include a sensory dimension involved with processing the initial stimulus and an affective dimension that engages cognitive and emotional processes [1,2,3,4]. The cerebral activity measured in pain experiments might be attributed less to the neurophysiologic domain of the pain sensation and more to the brain processes of feeling and thinking as antecedents, concomitants, and consequences of the pain response [3]. The results of pain experiments can differ because the nociceptive stimulus can vary by modality, intensity, duration, and location, and also because subjects can have different emotional, cognitive, and motivational states [5]. It is not surprising, then, that a number of brain regions have been shown to respond to painful stimulation, including the cingulate gyrus (especially the anterior portion), the thalamus, and, less consistently, the primary and secondary sensory cortex, the insula, and various areas of the frontal lobe [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. The emotional and cognitive aspects of the pain experience might be particularly associated with activation of the frontal and anterior limbic lobes [4, 18, 19, 21, 22].

The purpose of our study was to use functional MR imaging (fMR imaging) to identify regions of activation associated with the subjective experiences of pain. Pain was produced by a variant of the tonic cold pressor test [23]. In the cold pressor test, the volunteer's foot was immersed in water of constantly decreasing temperatures to produce a progression of subjective experiences that included aspects of sensory stimulation (cold water), pain tolerance, and pain threshold. A tonic stimulus, as used in the cold pressor test, produces a robust, long-lasting second pain experience that has a stronger affective component than the first pain experience [24].

The cold pressor test was applied to both feet at different times to focus on brain activation associated with the subjective sense or affective dimension of pain rather than with the sensory processing aspects of the stimulus. As the cold progresses from sensory sensation of coolness to pain, a self-rating of pain helps to engage the affective dimension of pain. Cognitive operations of self-monitoring are required. Efforts to maximize pain tolerance can lead to cognitive coping mechanisms such as thoughts of self-distraction or thoughts about compliance with the researchers to help ensure a successful experiment.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The institutional review board at our facility approved this study. Twelve healthy, right-handed subjects (nine women and three men) between the ages of 22 and 55 years participated in the study. Each subject was pain-free and taking no medication. Before entering the magnet, we provided each subject with a description of the task, a consent form to read, and a brief orientation to MR imaging. All subjects gave written informed consent. Approximately 30 min before imaging, the cold pressor test was applied to the subjects. Their feet were placed in water up to the ankle to estimate individual temperature standards of cold and pain. Temperatures ranged from 14° to 20°C for cold perception, 8° to 14°C for pain, and 3° to 8°C for unbearable pain.

During fMR imaging, the cold pressor test was applied four times—two 4-min runs for each foot in an alternating sequence starting with the right foot. The study was designed not to look at each foot separately during the cold and pain tasks but to include an equal number of trials of right- and left-foot stimulation and then to determine the cortical response. The chosen foot for the cold pressor test was placed in the bottom of an empty basin before each run. The basin was positioned on the MR imaging table so that the subjects could keep their feet flat in the basin and their legs relaxed. A cushion under the subject's knees helped to stabilize the position of the leg and foot. The foot that was not being stimulated was wrapped in towels. Functional images were collected for 30 sec while the foot was in a dry basin at room temperature (baseline task). Cold water, at a temperature based on the subject's perception tested beforehand, was then poured into the basin up to the level of two overflow outlets so that the whole foot, including the ankle, was immersed, and a constant water filling was achieved (cold task). This cold phase lasted approximately 45 sec. Ice water at a temperature of 1-2°C was then added to lower the temperature until the subjects indicated unbearable pain (pain task). During the pain task, the subjects were instructed to indicate their feelings of pain with the left hand based on a four-step scale: one finger, first clear feeling of pain (mild pain); two fingers, moderate pain; three fingers, severe pain; and four fingers, unbearable pain (maximal pain tolerance level). When the subjects indicated their maximal pain tolerance level, the foot was immediately taken out of the basin and functional imaging was stopped. The cold task required approximately 3 min 5 sec to complete. A pulse oximeter on the tip of the right index finger measured heart rate throughout the procedure.

Imaging
fMR imaging was performed on a 1.5-T imager (Signa; General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) equipped with resonant gradients (Advanced NMR, Wilmington, MA). Subjects lay supine in the magnet with their heads immobilized by a neck support, foam wedges, and a restraining band drawn around the forehead. Scout images in the sagittal plane were acquired with parameters of TR/TE, 600/13; field of view, 24 cm; imaging matrix, 256 x 192; and contiguous sections, 5 mm. Eight anatomic images were acquired in an axial—oblique plane parallel to the anterior and posterior commissures, with parameters of 500/13; field of view, 40 x 40 cm; imaging matrix, 256 x 192; and thick sections, 8 mm with a 1-mm gap. One hundred twenty activation images were collected at each of the same eight locations using a single-shot, echoplanar gradient-echo sequence with parameters of 2000/45; flip angle, 45°; field of view, 40 x 20 cm; imaging matrix, 128 x 64; and thick sections, 8 mm with a 1-mm gap. Activation images were acquired while the subjects performed the cold pressor task just described.

Data Analysis
Before the statistical analysis, motion estimation and motion correction were performed [25]. Of the 48 imaging runs (four runs in 12 patients), two runs (one run from two patients) were discarded because of translation greater than 1 mm or rotation greater than 1.5°. The images from the remaining 46 runs did not exceed the motion criteria mentioned previously and were motion-corrected for three translation directions and for three possible rotations. The motion-corrected images were spatially filtered using a gaussian filter with a full-width at half-maximum value of 6.5 mm. For each run in each subject, images of the baseline period were compared with the images of the cold task, and images from the cold task were compared with those from the pain task. Using t statistics corrected for linear drift [26], a t value for each voxel was obtained from each run and then averaged across runs to provide a t value for each voxel for the cold and pain tasks, respectively. These t test comparisons created two activation maps for each subject, one for the cold task compared with the baseline task and another for the pain task compared with the cold task. The activation maps and the anatomic images from individual subjects were transformed by inplane transformation and slice interpolation into a normalized three-dimensional grid defined by Talairach and Tournoux [27].

The activation maps from individual subjects were used as a derived measure of a task-related activity and were combined to obtain a composite activation map. A randomization procedure was used to estimate p values. The sign of the activation measure (the t value) for each voxel was reversed in randomly generated subsets of subjects. The mean value of the activation measure was then recalculated. This procedure was repeated 1000 times, generating a distribution of the null hypothesis. The proportion of times that the observed activation measure (calculated without sign reversal) was more extreme than a randomized value represents a p value; it is the proportion of times we would expect to obtain a mean activation as great as or greater than the one obtained if the null hypothesis (no difference between tasks) were true. The p value for each voxel (p = 0.01, uncorrected) was overlaid on the mean anatomic image (a group composite of the T1-weighted images) for display. Two theoretic considerations support uncorrected t values. First, t values of spatially proximate voxels are highly correlated so that the actual number of independent comparisons is several times fewer than the number of voxels. This intercorrelation among nearby voxels results from physiologic coupling, the smoothing of data before the calculation of individual t maps using a gaussian filter with a full width at half-maximum of 6.5 mm, and the smoothing of data when combining data across subjects incidental to interindividual differences in structural and functional anatomy. Second, a cluster requirement was applied to the final composite activation maps that resulted from the randomization procedures so that a voxel was considered to show a significant difference between conditions only if it was in a cluster of voxels that met the same significance criterion. We used a cluster requirement that identified clusters of five significant voxels, rather than individual significant voxels, with a significance threshold of p = 0.01. To determine if a change in heart rate could account for activation changes, we compared the average pulse rate calculated from the entire period of the baseline task, cold task, and pain task.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
No systematic changes in pulse rate were found. The average pulse rate was 67 ± 2/min for the baseline phase, 69.2 ± 1.8/min for the cold phase, 68 ± 2/min for mild pain, 68.3 ± 2/min for moderate pain, and 69 ± 2.2/min for severe pain.

Figures 1A,1B,1C,1D,1E and 2A,2B,2C,2D show regional brain activation during cold- (Fig. 1A,1B,1C,1D,1E) and pain-related tasks (Fig. 2A,2B,2C,2D). In each figure, the red—yellow areas represent brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) during the cold task compared with the baseline task (Fig. 1A,1B,1C,1D,1E) or during the pain task compared with the cold task (Fig. 2A,2B,2C,2D). The blue—purple areas indicate brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) during the baseline task than during the cold task (Fig. 1A,1B,1C,1D,1E), or during the cold task compared with the pain task (Fig. 2A,2B,2C,2D). The cold task resulted in anterior cingulate activation in one slice location (Fig. 1A). Cold-related activation was seen in bilateral postcentral gyri (Figs. 1B and 1C), including a site in the right subcentral gyrus that is in or slightly superior to the secondary sensory cortex (Fig. 1D). The postcentral gyrus activity was lateral and inferior to the typical location of the foot motor-sensory area. Additional areas activated include sites in the bilateral middle frontal gyri (Figs. 1B and 1C), the right inferior frontal gyrus (Fig. 1C), the left anterior insula (Fig. 1D), and the anterior aspect of the left thalamus (Fig. 1E). Greater activation in the baseline task than in the cold task was seen in the right middle frontal gyrus (Fig. 1A), the superior frontal gyrus bilaterally (Figs. 1A, 1B, and 1D), the anterior cingulate gyrus (Figs. 1D and 1E), the precuneus (Fig. 1A), the angular gyrus bilaterally (Figs. 1A and 1B), the middle temporal gyrus bilaterally (Fig. 1C), the left superior occipital gyrus (Fig. 1C), the left posterior cingulate gyrus (Fig. 1D), and the middle occipital gyrus bilaterally (Figs. 1D and 1E).



View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. Functional MR images (group composite) of regional brain activation during cold task. Red—yellow areas represent brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in cold task compared with baseline task. Blue—purple areas indicate brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in baseline task than in cold task. Arrow indicates only site in which anterior cingulate gyrus was active during cold task; z-axis slice location is 40.

 


View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. Functional MR images (group composite) of regional brain activation during cold task. Red—yellow areas represent brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in cold task compared with baseline task. Blue—purple areas indicate brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in baseline task than in cold task. Cold-related activation is seen in postcentral gyrus, bilaterally (arrows) and in right middle frontal gyrus (arrowhead); z-axis slice location is 32.

 


View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. Functional MR images (group composite) of regional brain activation during cold task. Red—yellow areas represent brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in cold task compared with baseline task. Blue—purple areas indicate brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in baseline task than in cold task. Activation in cold task occurs in left middle frontal gyrus and adjacent superior frontal sulcus (arrowhead), right inferior frontal gyrus (curved arrow), and left postcentral gyrus activation (arrow); z-axis slice location is 24.

 


View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. Functional MR images (group composite) of regional brain activation during cold task. Red—yellow areas represent brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in cold task compared with baseline task. Blue—purple areas indicate brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in baseline task than in cold task. Left anterior insula (arrowhead) and right subcentral gyrus (arrow) are active during cold task; z-axis slice location is 12.

 


View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E. Functional MR images (group composite) of regional brain activation during cold task. Red—yellow areas represent brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in cold task compared with baseline task. Blue—purple areas indicate brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in baseline task than in cold task. Activation with cold stimulus is seen in left thalamus (arrowhead); z-axis slice location is 4.

 


View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. Functional MR images (group composite) of regional brain activation during pain task. Red—yellow areas represent brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in pain task compared with cold task. Blue—purple areas indicate brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in cold task compared with pain task. Activation during pain task is depicted in anterior cingulate gyrus (arrows) and superior frontal gyri (arrowhead); z-axis slice location is 40.

 


View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. Functional MR images (group composite) of regional brain activation during pain task. Red—yellow areas represent brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in pain task compared with cold task. Blue—purple areas indicate brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in cold task compared with pain task. Pain-related activation is seen in anterior cingulate gyrus (straight arrow), in superior frontal gyrus bilaterally (arrowheads), and in right cuneus (curved arrow); z-axis slice location is 32.

 


View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C. Functional MR images (group composite) of regional brain activation during pain task. Red—yellow areas represent brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in pain task compared with cold task. Blue—purple areas indicate brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in cold task compared with pain task. Anterior cingulate gyrus (arrow) is activated by pain stimulus; z-axis slice location is 24.

 


View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D. Functional MR images (group composite) of regional brain activation during pain task. Red—yellow areas represent brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in pain task compared with cold task. Blue—purple areas indicate brain regions that were more active (p < 0.01) in cold task compared with pain task. Region of right superior frontal gyrus and sulcus is active (arrowhead) during pain task; z-axis slice location is 12.

 

The pain task resulted in anterior cingulate gyrus activation that was seen on multiple slices (Figs. 2A,2B,2C). On the more superior slice (Fig. 2A), the anterior cingulate gyrus activation was posterior to the activation seen in the cingulate gyrus with the cold task. A greater area of frontal lobe activation was seen in the pain task compared with the cold task, including sites in the medial aspect of the superior frontal gyrus bilaterally (Figs. 2A and 2B) and more laterally in the right superior frontal gyrus adjacent to the superior frontal sulcus (Figs. 2B. and 2D). Of the five areas activated in the superior frontal gyrus, two were in the right hemisphere, one was in both hemispheres, and one was in the left hemisphere. At a lower threshold (p < 0.05, not shown), activation in the right superior frontal gyrus and sulcus regions was also seen at the same slice location as Figure 2C, suggesting further that the right frontal lobe is engaged by the affective dimension of pain more than the left frontal lobe. The pain task also activated a site in the right cuneus (Fig. 2B).


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Several features of the experimental design suggest that the brain regions active in the cold and pain tasks are those common to both sensory and affective components of pain and that those regions active in the pain task represent the affective component of pain that is beyond the basic sensory processing of the pain-evoking stimulus. First, tonic pain in general and the cold pressor test in particular have been shown to produce higher ratings of affective displeasure than of intensity of sensory stimulation [28, 29]. By using the cold pressor test, we were likely to produce activation related to the experience of pain in addition to activation related to sensory processing. Second, and more important, in half the trials, the pain stimulus was applied to the right foot and in the other half, to the left foot. Activation common to both left- and right-foot trials is more likely to be associated with the sense of pain irrespective of the side stimulated than with basic sensory processing, which follows different, lateralized neural processing pathways. Only one previous fMR imaging study of pain balanced the side stimulated as we did, with the left foot injected with ascorbic acid in half the subjects and the right foot injected in the other half [30]. That study, however, acquired functional images at only two slice locations, and the data analysis focused on the hemisphere contralateral to the injection. A third important feature of the experimental design was the use of a cold comparison period that matched the pain period in regard to many aspects of the sensory stimulus and the attentional demands of monitoring and reporting subjective experience. Contributions to apparent pain-related activations other than the subjective experience of pain itself were thereby minimized. Finally, because pain increased over the course of the experiment, a linear upward drift in fMR imaging signal over the course of the experiment could conceivably look like pain-related activation. We minimized the effects of signal drift by removing the effects of linear trends [26].

The pain-related activation we report in the anterior cingulate has been noted in previous functional imaging studies of pain [7, 8, 12, 13, 15, 18, 22, 31]. The ascending pathways that transmit painful stimuli—the spinohypothalamic pathway, the spinopontoamygdaloid pathway, and the spinothalamic pathway—have components that converge to limbic structures, especially the anterior cingulate gyrus [32,33,34]. A positron emission tomographic study that used hypnosis to increase or decrease the ratings of unpleasant pain found more activation in the anterior cingulate gyrus during the strongly unpleasant condition compared with the less unpleasant condition [18]. Another positron emission tomographic study using noxious heat suggested that the anterior cingulate gyrus is important in the encoding of pain unpleasantness [19]. Our results are consistent with these recent functional imaging studies that emphasize the importance of the anterior cingulate gyrus in the affective dimension of pain.

Although the anterior cingulate appears to be active in pain-related tasks, imaging studies of cognition have also reported activation of the anterior cingulate gyrus, suggesting a possible role for this area in more general aspects of arousal and attention [35]. The impulse to withdraw from the noxious stimulus is also likely to be an essential feature of the experience of pain. In the laboratory setting, inhibition of that impulse is concomitant with the experience of pain. An fMR imaging study compared activation in patients with Tourette's syndrome when they inhibited their urge to tic with activation when they allowed themselves to tic freely [36]. Activation associated with the effort to inhibit movement was marked in the anterior cingulate gyrus. The function of the anterior cingulate gyrus in pain processing may include determining emotional valence and response priorities [4].

We found pain-related activation in the superior frontal gyri, slightly lateralized to the right side, and in the right cuneus, confirming that cortical systems other than the anterior cingulate gyrus are associated with the experience of pain. In an imaging study that used the cold pressor test to induce pain [37], right frontal activation was also noted, although that study was limited by use of low-resolution xenon inhalation and the absence of a nonpain sensory-stimulation comparison condition. Right superior frontal gyrus activation has been reported previously in studies that compared warm and painfully hot conditions [31], although these activations were more posterior than those noted in our study. In other positron emission tomographic studies, heat stimuli have been applied to the dorsal surface of the left hand [22] and to the dorsum of the right hand [7, 38]. The study using a left-hand stimulation task found stronger contralateral (right hemispheric), rather than ipsilateral, activation in the anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, as well as bilateral activations in the thalamus and insula [22]. In both studies with right-hand stimulation, increases in regional cerebral blood flow in the contralateral cingulate cortex, thalamus, and lenticular nucleus were seen, but ipsilateral (right hemispheric) activations also occurred in the frontal pole, medial frontal area, inferior parietal cortex, and inferior frontal gyrus [7, 38]. Other studies have reported greater subjective and physiologic responses when stimuli are presented to the right rather than the left hemisphere [39] and greater activation of the right rather than the left hemisphere with emotion-related stimuli [40]. The right lateralized pain-related activation observed in our study is also consistent with previous electroencephalographic studies showing lateralized frontal activation in association with unpleasant or negative affective experiences [39, 40] and a predominance of right hemisphere activation independent of side of stimulation with painful carbon dioxide administration to the nasal mucosa [41]. The activation in the right cuneus is adjacent to the posterior parietal cortical areas which, in primates, have neural connections with somatosensory regions [42]. A previous imaging study of heat-induced pain in humans reported activation in a similar region [18]. This region's function may be to integrate somatosensory input with other sensory stimuli and with cognitive processes like attention, learning, and memory [4].

It has been proposed that the right hemisphere mediates withdrawal-related behaviors, whereas the left mediates approach behaviors [43]. That a right hemispheric dominance might also hold for painful experiences and associated emotional processing has been suggested by studies of patients with ongoing peripheral neuropathy and cluster headaches [17, 44]. In patients with peripheral neuropathy, brain activation in the right anterior cingulate gyrus was independent of the origin of the pain from the right or left leg. Patients with cluster headaches who had painful attacks provoked by nitroglycerin showed a preferential role of the right hemisphere (caudal anterior and rostrocaudal cingulate, temporopolar regions, and the supplementary motor area) in processing the affective—cognitive dimensions of clinical pain syndromes [17].

The brain regions active during the cold task, similar to the insula, thalamus, and the second somatosensory site, an area near the subcentral gyrus, have been active during pain tasks in other studies [7, 8, 10, 13, 31, 45]. Brain regions with increased signal intensity in the baseline task compared with the cold task could result from anticipation of the stimulus or other mental processes active during the baseline task. Three sites, the left superior frontal gyrus, the right cuneus, and the right superior frontal gyrus, had increased signal intensity in the baseline condition compared with the cold task and in the pain task compared with the cold task. These three areas might be involved in both the anticipation and the subjective experience of the painful stimulus. Negative activation also occurred in the pain task that was centered primarily over the choroid plexus of the ventricles. The cause of this ventricular activation is unclear because it is not seen in both tasks, but it might represent a paramagnetic effect in a structure that is extremely vascular.

Previous studies have reported painrelated activation in the thalamus [7, 10, 46] and variable activation in the somatosensory cortex [7, 8, 10, 18, 46]. We found left thalamic activation during the cold period, consistent with the role of this structure in processing sensory information. The absence of pain-related activation in either the left or right thalamus suggests that the area of the thalamus showing increased activation during the pain period may have also shown activation from baseline to cold, or the increased activation could result from the low level of new sensory stimulation during the pain period. We did not find activation in the primary somatosensory area of the foot during either the cold or pain conditions. This lack of activation might be due to modulation of the activation of the primary sensory area by cognitive factors such as attention and previous experience [47] or to habituation to the relatively constant somatosensory stimulation during both the cold and pain conditions.

In conclusion, our study used fMR imaging and the cold pressor test to identify brain regions that were active during the cognitive component of the pain experience. The anterior cingulate gyrus, the right frontal lobe, and the right cuneus are regions that play a role in the affective dimension of pain.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Melzack R. Neurophysiological foundations of pain. In: Sternbach RA, ed. The psychology of pain, 2nd ed. New York: Raven, 1986: 1-24
  2. Fernandez E, Turk DC. Sensory and affective components of pain: separation and synthesis. Psychol Bull 1992;112:205 -217[Medline]
  3. Chen ADN. Human brain measures of clinical pain: a review. II. Tomographic imaging. Pain 1993;54:133 -144[Medline]
  4. Price DD. Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain. Science 2000;288:1769 -1772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Handwerker HO, Kobal G. Psychophysiology of experimentally induced pain. Physiol Rev 1993;73:639 -671[Free Full Text]
  6. Ryding E, Eriksson MB, Rosen I, Ingvar DH. Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in man during perception of radiant warmth and heat pain. Pain 1985;22:353 -362[Medline]
  7. Jones AK, Brown WD, Friston KJ, Qi LY, Frackowiak RS. Cortical and subcortical localization of response to pain in man using positron emission tomography. Proc R Soc London Biol Sci 1991;144:39 -44
  8. Talbot JD, Marret S, Evans AC, Meyer E, Bushnell MC, Duncan GH. Multiple representations of pain in human cerebral cortex. Science 1991;251:1355 -1358[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. DiPiero V, Farracuti S, Sabatini U, Pantano P, Cruccu G, Lenzi GL. A cerebral blood flow study on tonic pain activation in man. Pain 1994;56:167 -173[Medline]
  10. Casey KL, Minoshima S, Berger KL, Koepper RA, Marrow TJ, Frey KA. Positron emission tomographic analysis of cerebral structures activated specifically by repetitive noxious heat stimuli. J Neurophysiol 1994;71:802 -807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Jones AP, Hughes DG, Brettle DS, et al. Experiences with functional magnetic resonance imaging at 1 Tesla. Br J Radiol 1998;71:160 -166[Abstract]
  12. Davis KD, Wood ML, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ. fMRI of human somatosensory and cingulate cortex during painful electrical nerve stimulation. Neuroreport 1995;7:321 -325[Medline]
  13. Davis KD, Taylor SJ, Crawley AP, Wood ML, Mikulis DJ. Functional MRI of pain- and attention-related activations in the human cingulate cortex. J Physiol 1997;77:3370 -3380
  14. Apkarian AV. Functional imaging of pain: new insights regarding the role of the cerebral cortex in human pain perception. Semin Neurosciences 1995;7:279 -293
  15. Casey KL, Minoshima S, Morrow TJ, Koeppe RA. Comparison of human cerebral activation patterns during cutaneous warmth, heat pain, and deep cold pain. J Neurophysiol 1996;76:571 -581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Derbyshire SW, Jones AK, Gyulai F, Clarke S, Townsend D, Firestone LL. Pain processing during three levels of noxious stimulation produces differential patterns of central activity. Pain 1997;73:431 -435[Medline]
  17. Hsieh JC, Hannerz J, Ingvar M. Right-lateralized central processing for pain of nitroglycerin-induced cluster headache. Pain 1996;67:59 -68[Medline]
  18. Rainville P, Duncan GH, Price DD, Carrier B, Bushnell MC. Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science 1997;277:968 -971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Tolle TR, Kaufmann T, Siessmeier T, et al. Region-specific encoding of sensory and affective components of pain in the human brain: a positron emission tomography correlation analysis. Ann Neurol 1999;45:40 -47[Medline]
  20. Coghill RC, Sang CN, Maisog JM, Iadarola MJ. Pain intensity processing within the human brain: a bilateral, distributed mechanism. J Neurophysiol 1999;82:1934 -1943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Roland PE. Cortical processing of pain. Trends Neurosci 1992;15:3 -5[Medline]
  22. Vogt BA, Derbyshire S, Jones AK. Pain processing in four regions of human cingulate cortex localized with co-registered PET and MR imaging. Eur J Neurosci 1996;8:1461 -1473[Medline]
  23. Lovallo W. The cold pressor test and autonomic function: a review and integration. Psychophysiology 1975;12:268 -282[Medline]
  24. Barrell JJ, Price DD. The perception of first and second pain as a function of psychological test. Percept Psychophys 1975;2:163 -166
  25. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline J-B, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Map 1995;2:189 -210
  26. Skudlarski P, Constable RT, Gore JC. ROC analysis of statistical methods used in functional MRI: individual subjects. Neuroimage 1999;9:311 -329[Medline]
  27. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York: Thieme, 1988:1 -122
  28. Price DD, Harkins SW, Baker C. Sensory-affective relationships among different types of clinical and experimental pain. Pain 1987;28:297 -308[Medline]
  29. Rainville P, Feine JS, Bushnell MC, Duncan GH. A psychophysical comparison of sensory and affective responses to four modalities of experimental pain. Somatosens Mot Res 1992;9:265 -277[Medline]
  30. Porro CA, Cettolo V, Francescato MP, Baraldi P. Temporal and intensity coding of pain in human cortex. J Neurophysiol 1998;80:3312 -3320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Coghill RC, Talbot JD, Evans AC, et al. Distributed processing of pain and vibration by the human brain. J Neurosci 1994;14:4095 -4108[Abstract]
  32. Burstein R, Cliffer KD, Giesler GJ Jr. Direct somatosensory projections from the spinal cord to the hypothalamus and telencephalon. J Neurosci 1987;7:4159 -4164[Abstract]
  33. Bernard JF, Besson JM. The spino(trigemino)pontoamygdaloid pathway: electrophysiological evidence for an involvement in pain processes. J Neurophysiol 1990;63:473 -490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Craig AD. Supraspinal projections of lamina I neurons. In: Besson JM, Guildbaud G, Ollat H, eds. Forebrain areas involved in pain processing. Paris: Eurotext, 1995:13 -25
  35. Devinsky O, Morrell MJ, Vogt BA. Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain 1995;118:279 -306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Petersen BS, Skudlarski P, Anderson AW, et al. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of tic suppression in Tourette's syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998;55:326 -333[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. DiPiero V, Fiacco F, Tombari D, Pantano P. Tonic pain: a SPECT study in normal subjects and cluster headache patients. Pain 1997;70:185 -191[Medline]
  38. Derbyshire SW, Jones AK, Devani P, et al. Cerebral responses to patients with atypical facial pain measured by positron emission tomography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:1166 -1172[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Spence S, Shapiro D, Zaidel E. The role of the right hemisphere in the physiological and cognitive components of emotional processing. Psychophysiology 1996;33:112 -122[Medline]
  40. Roschmann R, Wittling W. Topographic brain mapping of emotion-related hemispheric asymmetries. Int J Neurosci 1992;63:5 -16[Medline]
  41. Hari R, Portin K, Ketenmann B, Housmaki V, Kobal G. Right-hemisphere preponderance of responses to painful CO2 stimulation of the human nasal mucosa. Pain 1997;72:145 -151[Medline]
  42. Friedman DP, Murray EA, O'Neill JB, Mishkin M. Cortical connections of the somatosensory fields of the lateral sulcus of macaques: evidence for a corticolimbic pathway for touch. J Comp Neurol 1986;252:323 -347[Medline]
  43. Davidson RJ. Cerebral asymmetry, emotion, and affective style. In: Davidson RJ, Hugdahl K, eds. Brain asymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995:361 -368
  44. Hsieh JC, Belfrage M, Stone-Elander S, Hansson P, Ingvar M. Central representation of chronic ongoing neuropathic pain studied by positron emission tomography. Pain 1995;63:225 -236[Medline]
  45. Svensson P, Minoshima S, Beydoun A, Morrow TJ, Casey KL. Cerebral processing of acute skin and muscle pain in humans. J Neurophysiol 1997;78:450 -460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Davis KD, Chun LK, Adrian PC, Mikulis DJ. Functional MRI study of thalamic and cortical activations evoked by cutaneous heat, cold and tactile stimuli. J Neurophysiol 1998;80:1533 -1546[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Bushnell MC, Duncan GH, Hofbauer RK, Ha B, Chen JI, Carrier B. Pain perception: is there a role for primary somatosensory cortex? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:7705 -7709[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. V. Saarela, Y. Hlushchuk, A. C. d. C. Williams, M. Schurmann, E. Kalso, and R. Hari
The Compassionate Brain: Humans Detect Intensity of Pain from Another's Face
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2007; 17(1): 230 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C.-s. Ray Li, C. Huang, R. T. Constable, and R. Sinha
Imaging Response Inhibition in a Stop-Signal Task: Neural Correlates Independent of Signal Monitoring and Post-Response Processing
J. Neurosci., January 4, 2006; 26(1): 186 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. S. Matharu, T. Bartsch, N. Ward, R. S. J. Frackowiak, R. Weiner, and P. J. Goadsby
Central neuromodulation in chronic migraine patients with suboccipital stimulators: a PET study
Brain, January 1, 2004; 127(1): 220 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. A. Strigo, G. H. Duncan, M. Boivin, and M. C. Bushnell
Differentiation of Visceral and Cutaneous Pain in the Human Brain
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 3294 - 3303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fulbright, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wexler, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fulbright, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wexler, B. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS