HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kim, E.-K. Articles by Yoo, H. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kim, E.-K. Articles by Yoo, H. S. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

New Sonographic Criteria for Recommending Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Nonpalpable Solid Nodules of the Thyroid

¹ Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, #134, Shinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea.
² Department of General Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, Korea.

Received August 23, 2000; accepted after revision September 12, 2001.

 
Address correspondence to E-K Kim.

Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to provide new sonographic criteria for fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable solid thyroid nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sonographic scans of 155 nonpalpable thyroid nodules in 132 patients were prospectively classified as having positive or negative findings. Sonographic findings that suggested malignancy included microcalcifications, an irregular or microlobulated margin, marked hypoechogenicity, and a shape that was more tall than it was wide. If even one of these sonographic features was present, the nodule was classified as positive (malignant). If a nodule had none of the features described, it was classified as negative (benign). The final diagnosis of a lesion as benign (n = 106) or malignant (n = 49) was confirmed by fine-needle aspiration biopsy and follow-up (>6 months) in 83 benign nodules, by fine-needle aspiration biopsy and surgery in 44 malignant and 15 benign lesions, and by surgery alone in five malignant and eight benign lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated on the basis of our proposed classification method.

RESULTS. Of 82 lesions classified as positive, 46 were malignant. Of 73 lesions classified as negative, three were malignant. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy based on our sonographic classification method were 93.8%, 66%, 56.1%, 95.9%, and 74.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION. Considering the high level of sensitivity of our proposed sonographic classification, fine-needle aspiration biopsy should be performed on thyroid nodules classified as positive, regardless of palpability.

Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The introduction of high-resolution sonography has made it possible to detect many nonpalpable nodules in the thyroid [1, 2]. The incidence of such lesions in the general population appears to be high—approximately 10-40% [3,4,5]. Most of these incidental thyroid nodules are benign, but the discovery of nonpalpable nodules raises concerns about their possible malignancy. Many studies have documented considerable overlap of characteristic findings in benign and malignant lesions [2, 6,7,8,9]. Some authors have recommended that sonography be used solely to determine the presence of the focal lesion, to determine whether a lesion is cystic or solid, and for needle guidance [6,7,8,9]. To our knowledge, no reports on specific sonographic characteristics of nonpalpable thyroid malignancy have been published to date.

We undertook this work to assess the potential role of sonography in the differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable thyroid lesions and to provide new sonographic criteria for the indication of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in nonpalpable solid thyroid lesions.

Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Between December 1997 and May 1998, sonography of the thyroid was performed on 1,140 patients for nonthyroid indications, including thyroid screening during breast sonography (n = 1,057) and complaints of swallowing difficulties, hoarseness, or neck discomfort (n = 83). We found 322 focal thyroid nodules in 170 patients: 199 solid nodules, 108 cystic nodules (anechoic), and 15 lesions with mixed cystic and solid portions. We included only solid nodules in this study. When experienced surgeons palpated the thyroids of patients with solid nodules, 155 nodules in 132 patients were nonpalpable (a single thyroid nodule in 119 patients and multiple nodules in 13 patients). The resulting study group consisted of 120 women (90.9%) and 12 men (9.1%). Their ages ranged from 20 to 77 years (mean age, 48 years).

Sonography was performed by one radiologist with an HDI 3000 scanner (Advanced Technology Laboratories, Bothell, WA) using electronically focused near-field probes with a bandwidth of 7-12 MHz.

Malignant sonographic characteristics were defined as microcalcifications, an irregular or microlobulated margin, marked hypoechogenicity, and a shape that was more tall than it was wide. Microcalcifications (Figs. 1 and 2) suggesting malignancy were defined as tiny, punctate hyperechoic foci—either with or without acoustic shadows. Peripheral, eggshell-like calcifications were not considered malignant. Irregular (Fig. 3) or microlobulated (Fig. 1) margins were also considered to be malignant findings. Microlobulation was defined as the presence of many small lobules on the surface of a nodule. Marked hypoechogenicity (Fig. 4) was defined as decreased echogenicity compared with the surrounding strap muscle. Most nonpalpable thyroid nodules were hypoechoic, and most of them were benign. Subsequently, we discriminated between markedly hypoechoic and hypoechoic lesions and considered marked hypoechogenicity as a malignant finding. A nodule with a shape more tall than wide (Fig. 5) was defined as being greater in its anteroposterior dimension than its transverse dimension. We considered this finding to be positive for malignancy if any part of the nodule was more tall than wide.

View larger version (146K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Fig. 1. —39-year-old woman with papillary carcinoma. Sonogram of right thyroid gland shows 12-mm mass with internal calcifications that is markedly hypoechoic. Calcifications appear as bright punctate echoes but are not large enough to create acoustic shadowing. Microlobulation (arrows) can also be seen.

View larger version (121K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Fig. 2. —36-year-old woman with papillary carcinoma. Sonogram of right lobe of thyroid gland reveals 4-mm, well-defined hypoechoic nodule (calipers). Two tiny hyperechoic foci suggesting microcalcifications within nodule are only sign of malignancy.

View larger version (89K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Fig. 3. —39-year-old woman with papillary carcinoma. Sonogram shows 10-mm nodule on medial aspect of right thyroid gland. Nodule has irregular margin, especially in portion abutting trachea (arrow). Tracheal wall invasion was confirmed at surgery.

View larger version (92K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Fig. 4. —51-year-old woman with papillary carcinoma. Sonogram shows nodule (arrows) with more hypoechoic echogenicity than that of strap muscle (arrowhead).

View larger version (165K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Fig. 5. —53-year-old woman with papillary carcinoma. Sonogram shows nodule (arrow) in posterior aspect of right thyroid gland. Its shape is more tall than wide, which is only sign of malignancy.

The sonographic characteristics we used were based on previously published criteria [6,7,8,9] and on nonpublished criteria from our retrospective study. We prospectively classified nodules as positive or negative. If a single feature suggestive of malignancy was present, the nodule was classified as positive. If a nodule had no suspicious features, it was classified as negative (benign). The final diagnosis of benign (n = 106) or malignant (n = 49) was determined using fine-needle aspiration biopsy and follow-up (>24 months) of 83 benign nodules. Follow-up was done by fine-needle aspiration biopsy and surgery on 44 malignant and 15 benign lesions and by surgery alone on five malignant and eight benign lesions. All solid nodules were aspirated in patients with two or more solid nodules. Diagnoses of malignancy at histology included papillary carcinoma (n = 48) and metastasis from carcinoma of the breast (n = 1).

We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for individual sonographic characteristics and classifications.

Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The size of the 155 nodules ranged from 3 to 28 mm (mean size, 7.5 mm). We found no statistical difference between the benign and malignant nodules with regard to size. The sonographic findings in malignant and benign nodules are summarized in Table 1. All findings appear to be statistically significant. The correlation of sonographic classifications with histologic findings is shown in Table 2. The sensitivity of the sonographic classification was 93.8%, specificity was 66%, positive predictive value was 56.1%, negative predictive value was 95.9%, and the overall accuracy was 74.8%. Table 3 summarizes the diagnostic index for individual sonographic criteria of malignant nodules. Most malignant nodules had multiple sonographically suspicious findings. The mean number of suspicious findings per malignant nodules was 2.6. The accuracy of each sign was 72.9-77.4%, but the sensitivity was low, ranging from 26.5% to 59.1%.

Three nodules classified in the negative category were confirmed at pathology as papillary carcinoma. On sonography, a well-defined, oval hypoechoic nodule was seen in two of these lesions, and a well-defined, oval isoechoic nodule was seen in the third (Fig. 6).

View larger version (155K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Fig. 6. —42-year-old woman with papillary carcinoma. Sonogram shows 6-mm, well-defined, oval, isoechoic nodule (arrow) in right lobe of thyroid gland, classified in negative category. However, pathologic diagnosis at fine-needle aspiration biopsy and surgery was papillary carcinoma.

Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Increased use of high-frequency sonography has led to the identification of nonpalpable thyroid nodules during nonthyroid sonographic examination of the neck. The discovery of one or more nodules in an otherwise clinically normal thyroid gland raises concerns about malignancy. Most such incidental lesions are histologically benign. Kuma at al. [10] examined the long-term outcome of benign thyroid nodules that were untreated. Among 134 patients with cytologically benign thyroid nodules who were followed for 9-11 years, most nodules (133/134, 99.3%) remained benign. This finding clearly shows that benign thyroid nodules remain benign for a long time.

Many reports have discussed sonographic findings of the thyroid mass; however, a considerable overlap of characteristics in benign and malignant lesions was found [6,7,8]. Although most surgeons recommend fine-needle aspiration biopsy for palpable thyroid nodules [11], the optimal method for managing nonpalpable thyroid nodules is a matter of controversy [11,12,13].

We tried to identify the characteristic sonographic findings of nonpalpable malignant nodules because, to our knowledge, no studies on sonographic characterization of nonpalpable solid thyroid nodules are available. Recently, Brander et al. [14] reported on their 5-year follow-up of thyroid nodules detected on sonographic screening. No thyroid malignancies were detected among patients in whom echo abnormalities were found during the primary sonographic screening, and these researchers concluded that incidentally found thyroid nodules were clinically unimportant. However, their series was restricted by the size of the study group (n = 69) and the small number of solid hypoechoic nodules that were found (n = 16). Brander et al. did not provide the details of their sonographic findings.

Microcalcification is a common finding in patients with palpable thyroid papillary carcinoma. It is not often seen in a nonpalpable nodule; however, microcalcification was found to be the most sensitive and accurate criterion in our study. Sonography is not highly sensitive in revealing microcalcifications unless they occur within masses. At pathology, tiny, punctate microcalcifications are correlated with the calcification of psammoma bodies. Solbiati et al. [15] suggested that detection of microcalcifications in thyroid nodules with high-frequency sonography, although uncommon, can be considered nearly specific for malignancy.

An irregular or microlobulated margin is a general finding of malignancy. Microlobulation is more common than an ill-defined margin in nonpalpable thyroid malignancy, and it may be associated with smaller mass and a less invasive character.

Several studies have mentioned hypoechogenicity as a finding suggestive of malignancy [6,7,8,9]. However, most nonpalpable thyroid nodules are hypoechoic—and most of those are benign. Therefore, we attempted to differentiate markedly hypoechoic lesions from other hypoechoic lesions, and only markedly hypoechogenic lesions were considered a finding indicative of malignancy. We defined markedly hypoechoic nodules as being much less echogenic than the medium-level echogenicity of the strap muscles. The healthy thyroid gland shows homogeneous hyperechogenicity compared with the surrounding muscle. Because most thyroid nodules show hypoechogenicity when compared with the parenchyma of the thyroid, this comparison does not provide much useful information. Subcutaneous fat on the anterior aspect of the thyroid gland shows uniform hypoechogenicity, but the amount of fat varies among individuals. Furthermore, the comparison is difficult in patients with little fat. The strap muscle is uniformly present in all patients; therefore, we chose the strap muscle as the comparative standard for the evaluation of the echogenicity of solid nodules.

We regarded a nodule shape more tall than wide as a finding suggestive of malignancy. Researchers have documented that nodules in the breast that are taller than they are wide are more likely to be malignant [16,17,18]. The growth of most benign nodules has been found to remain within normal tissue planes, whereas malignant nodules grow across normal tissue planes [16]. We applied this finding in thyroid nodules and showed that it was not a sensitive but a very specific finding, and thus it could be used as an ancillary finding of nonpalpable thyroid malignancies. In three cases, a shape more tall than wide was the only sign of malignancy (Fig. 6).

Surprisingly, sonographic findings suggestive of malignancy in our thyroid study were very similar to those in the breast. To our knowledge, our study is the first to report this assumption; additional and extensive studies are required to validate this hypothesis.

The goal of treatment should be to avoid extensive and costly evaluations in the most patients with benign disease without missing the minority of patients who have thyroid cancer. In this study, we found no single criterion that could distinguish benign from malignant thyroid nodules with 100% reliability. However, although individual suspicious findings had low-to-moderate sensitivity, our sonographic classification, by which a nodule is classified as positive if even a single suspicious sonographic finding is present, was found to be highly sensitive, reaching 93.8% sensitivity. Only 6.2% of malignant lesions were misclassified as benign. These results, if widely reproducible, could have a substantial impact on the evaluation of incidental thyroid lesions.

Controversy exists on the optimal treatment for occult papillary carcinomas. Most papillary carcinomas show an indolent course and excellent prognosis, but the condition is sometimes associated with local or even distant metastases [12, 13]. Occult or incidental papillary cancers detected after surgery for benign thyroid disease and confined within the total capsule of the thyroid are also indolent tumors with little, if any, clinical significance [19]. If the original surgery involved a lobectomy, a complete thyroidectomy is unnecessary [19]. The problem lies in the treatment of lesions incidentally discovered at sonography. Traditionally, when impalpable nodules are incidentally detected by sonography, two imaging criteria have been used to determine whether further diagnostic workup is needed: size and the overall sonographic appearance. Nodules equal to or exceeding 1.5 cm in the maximal diameter should be further evaluated, and nodules smaller than 1.5 cm may be followed by palpation [5].

However, using size as the criterion is dangerous because thyroid nodules smaller than 1 cm may also show early lymph node metastasis or extranodal invasion [12, 13]. Our sonographic criteria of malignant nonpalpable thyroid nodules are highly sensitive, allowing the recommendation of a new algorithm: If a thyroid nodule has even one criterion of malignancy, regardless of the size of the lesion, fine-needle aspiration biopsy should be performed. If no indication of malignancy is found, a simple follow-up procedure is required (Fig. 7).

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Fig. 7. —Diagram of algorithm for evaluation of incidental thyroid lesions.

In conclusion, the sonographic findings of nonpalpable thyroid nodules are different for benign and malignant lesions. We think that sonography can be helpful in the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions. With the high sensitivity of our sonographic classification, minimal invasive diagnostic methods such as fine-needle aspiration biopsy should be performed on thyroid nodules classified as malignant, although they are nonpalpable.

References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Ezzat S, Sarti DA, Cain DR, Braunstein GD. Thyroid incidentalomas: prevalence by palpation and ultrasonography. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1838 -1840[Abstract]
2. Watters DAK, Ahuja AT, Evans RM, et al. Role of ultrasound in the management of thyroid nodules. Am J Surg 1992;164:654 -657[Medline]
3. Brander A, Viikinkoski P, Nickels J, Kivisaari L. Thyroid gland: US screening in a random adult population. Radiology 1991;181:683 -687[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Harach HR, Franssila KO, Wasenius VM. Occult papillary carcinoma of the thyroid: a normal finding in Finland—a systemic autopsy study. Cancer 1985;56:531 -538[Medline]
5. Tan GH, Gharib H. Thyroid incidentalomas: management approaches to nonpalpable nodules discovered incidentally on thyroid imaging. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:226 -231[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Katz JF, Kane RA, Reyes J, Clarke MP, Hill TC. Thyroid nodules: sonographic—pathologic correlation. Radiology 1984;151:741 -745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Propper RA, Skolnick ML, Weinstein BJ, Dekker A. The nonspecificity of the thyroid halo sign. J Clin Ultrasound 1980;8:129 -132[Medline]
8. Solbiati L. Thyroid gland. In: James EM, ed. Diagnostic ultrasound. St.Louis: Mosby, 1998:703 -729
9. Brkljacic B, Cuk V, Tomic-Brzac H, Bence-Zigman Z, Delic-Brkjacic D, Drinkovic I. Ultrasonic evaluation of benign and malignant nodules in echographically multinodular thyroids. J Clin Ultrasound 1994;22:71 -76[Medline]
10. Kuma K, Matsuzuka F, Yokozawa T, Miyauchi A, Sugawara M. Fate of untreated benign thyroid nodules: results of long-term follow-up. World J Surg 1994;18:495 -498[Medline]
11. Rosen IB, Azadian A, Walfish PG, Salem S, Lansdown E, Bedard YC. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the management of thyroid disease. Am J Surg 1993;166:346 -349[Medline]
12. Mazzaferri EL, de los Santos ET, Rofagha-Keyhani S. Solitary thyroid nodule: diagnosis and management. Med Clin North Am 1988;72:1177 -1211[Medline]
13. Noguchi S, Yamashita H, Murakami N, Nakayama I, Toda M, Kawamoto H. Small carcinomas of the thyroid: a long-term follow-up of 867 patients. Arch Surg 1996;131:187 -191[Abstract]
14. Brander AE, Viikinkoski VP, Nickels JI, Kivisaari LM. Importance of thyroid abnormalities detected at US screening: a 5-year follow-up. Radiology 2000;215:801 -806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Solbiati L, Arsizio B, Ballarati E, et al. Microcalcifications: a clue in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancies. (abstr) Radiology 1990;117[suppl]:140
16. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Denniss MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196:123 -134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Fornage BD, Sneige N, Faroux MJ, Andry E. Sonographic appearance and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of breast carcinomas smaller than 1 cm³. J Ultrasound Med 1990;9:559 -568[Abstract]
18. Fornage BD, Lorigan JG, Andry E. Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonographic appearance. Radiology 1989;172:671 -675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Patwardhan N, Cataldo T, Braverman LE. Surgical management of the patient with papillary cancer. Surg Clin North Am 1995;75:449 -464[Medline]

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Mendez, S. E. Rodgers, J. I. Lew, R. Montano, and C. C. Solorzano Role of Surgeon-Performed Ultrasound in Predicting Malignancy in Patients with Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2008; 15(9): 2487 - 2492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Kim, E.-K. Kim, J. Y. Kwak, C. S. Park, W. Y. Chung, K.-H. Nam, and J. H. Youk Differentiation of Thyroid Nodules With Macrocalcifications: Role of Suspicious Sonographic Findings J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2008; 27(8): 1179 - 1184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. McCartney and G. J. Stukenborg Decision Analysis of Discordant Thyroid Nodule Biopsy Guideline Criteria J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2008; 93(8): 3037 - 3044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Y. Kwak, E.-K. Kim, M. Yun, A. Cho, M. J. Kim, E. J. Son, and K. K. Oh Thyroid Incidentalomas Identified by 18F-FDG PET: Sonographic Correlation Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 598 - 603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Erbil, U. Barbaros, A. Salmaslioglu, O. Mete, H. Issever, S. Ozarmagan, D. Yilmazbayhan, and S. Tezelman Effect of Thyroid Gland Volume in Preoperative Detection of Suspected Malignant Thyroid Nodules in a Multinodular Goiter Arch Surg, June 1, 2008; 143(6): 558 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W.-J. Moon, S. L. Jung, J. H. Lee, D. G. Na, J.-H. Baek, Y. H. Lee, J. Kim, H. S. Kim, J. S. Byun, D. H. Lee, et al. Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules: US Differentiation--Multicenter Retrospective Study Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 762 - 770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Y. Kim, C. H. Lee, S. Y. Kim, W. K. Jeon, J. H. Kang, S. K. An, and W. S. Jun Radiologic and Pathologic Findings of Nonpalpable Thyroid Carcinomas Detected by Ultrasonography in a Medical Screening Center J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2008; 27(2): 215 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Yeung and J. W. Serpell Management of the Solitary Thyroid Nodule Oncologist, February 1, 2008; 13(2): 105 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Y. Yoon, J. W. Lee, S. K. Chang, C. S. Choi, E. J. Yun, Y. L. Seo, K. H. Kim, and H. S. Hwang Peripheral Calcification in Thyroid Nodules: Ultrasonographic Features and Prediction of Malignancy J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2007; 26(10): 1349 - 1355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Shin, B.-K. Han, E. Y. Ko, and S. S. Kang Sonographic Findings in the Surgical Bed After Thyroidectomy: Comparison of Recurrent Tumors and Nonrecurrent Lesions J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2007; 26(10): 1359 - 1366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Y. Kwak, E.-K. Kim, E. J. Son, M. J. Kim, K. K. Oh, J. Y. Kim, and K. I. Kim Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Manifested Solely as Microcalcifications on Sonography Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 227 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. K. Hoang, W. K. Lee, M. Lee, D. Johnson, and S. Farrell US Features of Thyroid Malignancy: Pearls and Pitfalls RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 847 - 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R Jones, R Spendiff, S Fareedi, and P S Richards The role of ultrasound in the management of nodular thyroid disease Imaging, March 1, 2007; 19(1): 28 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Are, J. F. Hsu, H. Schoder, J. P. Shah, S. M. Larson, and A. R. Shaha FDG-PET Detected Thyroid Incidentalomas: Need for Further Investigation? Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2007; 14(1): 239 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. Shetty, M. M. Maher, P. F. Hahn, E. F. Halpern, and S. L. Aquino Significance of incidental thyroid lesions detected on CT: correlation among CT, sonography, and pathology. Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): 1349 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. K. Oh, J. S. Park, and E.-K. Kim Reply Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): W449 - W450. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Frates, C. B. Benson, P. M. Doubilet, E. Kunreuther, M. Contreras, E. S. Cibas, J. Orcutt, F. D. Moore Jr., P. R. Larsen, E. Marqusee, et al. Prevalence and Distribution of Carcinoma in Patients with Solitary and Multiple Thyroid Nodules on Sonography J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2006; 91(9): 3411 - 3417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Wilson, Q. Chen, J. A. Zagzebski, T. Varghese, and L. VanMiddlesworth Initial clinical experience imaging scatterer size and strain in thyroid nodules. J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2006; 25(8): 1021 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Burman Micropapillary Thyroid Cancer: Should We Aspirate All Nodules Regardless of Size? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2006; 91(6): 2043 - 2046. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Y. Kwak and E.-K. Kim Sonographic findings of zenker diverticula. J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2006; 25(5): 639 - 642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Frates, C. B. Benson, J. W. Charboneau, E. S. Cibas, O. H. Clark, B. G. Coleman, J. J. Cronan, P. M. Doubilet, D. B. Evans, J. R. Goellner, et al. Management of Thyroid Nodules Detected at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Statement Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 794 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Kuntz and D. J. Youngs Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Classic Example Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, May 1, 2005; 21(3): 262 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Liebeskind, A. G. Sikora, A. Komisar, D. Slavit, and K. Fried Rates of Malignancy in Incidentally Discovered Thyroid Nodules Evaluated With Sonography and Fine-Needle Aspiration J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2005; 24(5): 629 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Lyshchik, V. Drozd, Y. Demidchik, and C. Reiners Diagnosis of Thyroid Cancer in Children: Value of Gray-Scale and Power Doppler US Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 604 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Stojadinovic, S. I. Fields, C. D. Shriver, S. Lenington, R. Ginor, G. E. Peoples, H. B. Burch, T. Peretz, H. R. Freund, and A. Nissan Electrical Impedance Scanning of Thyroid Nodules Before Thyroid Surgery: A Prospective Study Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2005; 12(2): 152 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. R. Sajjadieh, V. Sajjadieh, A. Aminorroaya, M. Amini, S. Oveisgharan, M. Reisifar, A. Adibi, M. Siavash, M. Nazem, and M. Peyman Value of Sonography in Determining the Nature of Thyroid Nodules: Evaluation of the Sonographic Characteristics Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, January 1, 2005; 21(1): 38 - 44. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. D. Iannuccilli, J. J. Cronan, and J. M. Monchik Risk for Malignancy of Thyroid Nodules as Assessed by Sonographic Criteria: The Need for Biopsy J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2004; 23(11): 1455 - 1464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Wienke, W. K. Chong, J. R. Fielding, K. H. Zou, and C. A. Mittelstaedt Sonographic Features of Benign Thyroid Nodules: Interobserver Reliability and Overlap With Malignancy J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2003; 22(10): 1027 - 1031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. K. Chan, T. S. Desser, I. R. McDougall, R. J. Weigel, and R. B. Jeffrey Jr Common and Uncommon Sonographic Features of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2003; 22(10): 1083 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				AIUM Practice Guideline for the Performance of a Thyroid and Parathyroid Ultrasound Examination J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2003; 22(10): 1126 - 1130. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Titton, D. A. Gervais, G. W. Boland, M. M. Maher, and P. R. Mueller Sonography and Sonographically Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of the Thyroid Gland: Indications and Techniques, Pearls and Pitfalls Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2003; 181(1): 267 - 271. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Figures Only Full Text (PDF)