AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siewert, B.
Right arrow Articles by Baum, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siewert, B.
Right arrow Articles by Baum, J. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2002; 178:1025-1027
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Case Report

Sonographic Evaluation of Subcutaneous Hemangioma of the Breast

Bettina Siewert1, Timothy Jacobs2 and Janet K. Baum1

1 Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02115.
2 Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.

Received December 11, 2000; accepted after revision July 19, 2001.

 
Address correspondence to B. Siewert.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Sonography of the breast has become an invaluable adjunct in the characterization of breast lesions identified on mammography or at physical examination [1]. According to Stavros et al. [1], the sensitivity for the detection of indeterminate or malignant masses is as high as 98.4%, and the negative predictive value for masses is 99.5%, although these data, to our knowledge, have not been reproduced by other researchers. The development of higher frequency transducers, 10 MHz and greater, has allowed better evaluation of smaller lesions, including those of the skin and subcutaneous tissues [2, 3]. With careful attention to technique, optimizing evaluation of the skin, and breast anatomy, lesions presenting as palpable findings can be appropriately located and described. We describe a case in which the accurate localization of a lesion, as well as its benign sonographic characteristics, help to guide clinical and surgical treatment.


Case Report
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
A 42-year-old woman with a round, firm 5-mm lump in the lower inner quadrant of her right breast, several days after discovery of the lump, underwent mammography which revealed scattered fibroglandular opacities, bilaterally. No mass was identified in the region of the palpated finding. On sonography, performed immediately after the mammography, slight bruising was noted on the skin in the area of the palpable 5-mm nodule. Sonography, using a 3000 scanner (Advanced Technology Laboratories, Bothell, WA) with a 10- to 5-MHz compact linear array transducer, disclosed an ovoid mass in the subcutaneous fat, anterior to the most anterior layer of the superficial pectoral fascia (Figs. 1A and 1B). The lesion measured 4 x 4 x 6 mm, with a long axis not parallel to the skin and a margin that was distinct, smooth, and thin. The mass was homogeneous in echotexture and was slightly hypoechoic to the surrounding fat. No calcifications were present in or near the mass. The mass did not show shadowing. Minimal vascular flow was identified on power Doppler imaging.



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 42-year-old woman with subcutaneous hemangioma. Transverse (A) and sagittal (B) sonograms using 10- to 5-MHz compact linear array transducer show echogenic dermis (black arrow), hypoechoic subcutaneous tissue (thick white arrow), hypoechoic mass with well-defined thin capsular margin (thin white arrow), wavy anterior layer of superficial pectoral fascia (small white arrows), and fatty tissue in breast tissues behind it.

 


View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 42-year-old woman with subcutaneous hemangioma. Transverse (A) and sagittal (B) sonograms using 10- to 5-MHz compact linear array transducer show echogenic dermis (black arrow), hypoechoic subcutaneous tissue (thick white arrow), hypoechoic mass with well-defined thin capsular margin (thin white arrow), wavy anterior layer of superficial pectoral fascia (small white arrows), and fatty tissue in breast tissues behind it.

 

The differential diagnosis included hematoma in the subcutaneous soft tissues and an early sebaceous cyst not yet involving the dermis; close follow-up rather than biopsy of the lesion was suggested. At clinical followup 2 months later, the skin changes had completely resolved, but the lesion was still palpable. Sonographically, the lesion was unchanged, but the patient elected to have it surgically removed.

At surgery, the nodule was located by palpation in the lower inner quadrant of the right breast. Dissection was carried through a minimal amount of subcutaneous tissue with total excision of the nodule. Another piece of tissue deep relative to the lesion and its fascial plane was then removed and sent separately for pathologic examination. The excision specimen consisted of a fibrofatty fragment of tissue, which on gross examination revealed a circumscribed tan—gray nodule, measuring up to 5 mm in maximum dimension. Microscopically, the lesion was composed of small vascular spaces arranged in a lobular pattern. The vascular channels were lined by unremarkable endothelial cells without cytologic atypia (Figs. 1C and 1D). Scattered larger vascular spaces were also identified in the lesion. Endothelial cell atypia, papillary tufting, mitotic figures, necrosis, or other features suggestive of an atypical vascular lesion or angiosarcoma were not identified. The lesion was surrounded by adipose tissue without mammary ducts or lobules showing focal fat necrosis. These findings were diagnostic of a hemangioma, predominantly capillary in pattern, in the subcutaneous tissue of the breast.



View larger version (191K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 42-year-old woman with subcutaneous hemangioma. Photomicrographs at low power (C) and at high power (D) show small vascular spaces, arranged in a lobular pattern, with scattered larger spaces surrounded by adipose tissue without mammary ducts or lobules (C). Vascular spaces are lined by unremarkable endothelial cells without cytologic atypia (D). (H and E, x40 [C]) (H and E, x400 [D])

 


View larger version (174K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. 42-year-old woman with subcutaneous hemangioma. Photomicrographs at low power (C) and at high power (D) show small vascular spaces, arranged in a lobular pattern, with scattered larger spaces surrounded by adipose tissue without mammary ducts or lobules (C). Vascular spaces are lined by unremarkable endothelial cells without cytologic atypia (D). (H and E, x40 [C]) (H and E, x400 [D])

 


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Sonography of the breast, with careful attention to technique, clearly depicts the location of a palpable lesion in relation to breast and subcutaneous tissue. Breast tissue is located between the anterior and posterior layers of the superficial pectoral fascia. This fascia can be shown on sonography with the use of the appropriate high-frequency transducers [4] (such as the 10- to 5-MHz compact linear array transducer used in this report), and, therefore, a lesion can be classified as being located in breast tissue or separate from it.

Lesions can be seen anterior to the anterior layer of the superficial pectoral fascia and in the subcutaneous fatty layer, with or without dermal layer involvement. Localizing a lesion and its relationship to adjacent tissues aids in accurately formulating a differential diagnosis; in the present case, the mass is clearly located anterior to the anterior layer of the superficial pectoralis fascia. Thus a primary breast mass, in particular, breast cancer, can be excluded from the differential diagnosis (Figs. 1A,1B,1C,1D and 2). A sebaceous cyst, a more common subcutaneous lesion, can be eliminated because this typically also involves the dermis (Fig. 3).



View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. 38-year-old woman with fibroadenoma. Sonogram using 10- to 5-MHz compact linear array transducer shows hypoechoic mass (long white arrow) located in thin area of breast tissue that is displacing anterior layer of superficial fascia (black arrows) and extending through most of depth of breast tissue in this region. Note deep layer of superficial pectoral fascia (short white arrows).

 


View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. 45-year-old woman with sebaceous cyst. Sonogram using 10- to 5-MHz compact linear array transducer shows hypoechoic mass in subcutaneous fat (thick white arrow) extending into dermis (black arrow). This mass is also in front of anterior layer of superficial pectoral fascia (thin white arrows) and breast tissue.

 

In our experience, the superficial layer of the pectoral fascia can be identified in most cases using 10-MHz transducers that are widely used in clinical practice (for sonographic evaluation of the breast). However, to our knowledge, no large study has yet established the level of confidence with which the fascia can be shown, thus confirming the superficial location of a lesion and perhaps predicting histology. This may be a fruitful subject for further study.

The use of a high-frequency 20-MHz transducer with a maximum depth of penetration of 2 cm and a focal zone centered in the region of interest has proved helpful in the differentiation of the layers of the skin and subcutaneous tissues, facilitating the evaluation of lesions such as the one reported here [5]. However, the use of a high-frequency 20-MHz transducer is not the current standard of clinical care. Another potential problem is the size of the lesion. In the present case, the small size (5 mm) of the lesion made the identification of surrounding structures easy. With a larger lesion, it may be difficult to determine whether the mass is separate from the dermis, and its relation to the superficial pectoral fascia may be obscured.

Benign mesenchymal tumors in and adjacent to the breast tissues have been described [6], including several types of hemangioma. Although such lesions occur only rarely, hemangiomas may be detected more often with the increased use of breast self-examination, physician-performed breast examination, and more intensive imaging of the breast.

Although gray-scale sonography has been shown to be sensitive in the detection of subcutaneous lesions, the differentiation of malignant and benign lesions has been more problematic. Betti et al. [2] have described gray-scale sonography criteria that may be helpful in allowing further analysis of proliferative vascular lesions of the skin; high-resolution sonography reveals hemangiomas as small hypoechoic areas separated by thin, echogenic septae. In contrast, malignant vascular lesions, such as Kaposi's sarcoma, reveal a mixed sonographic pattern with illdefined margins. These criteria could not be applied in the present case because a lower frequency transducer (10- to 5-MHz compact linear array transducer) was used.

With color Doppler sonography, tumor neovascularity can be analyzed, and the presence of arteriovenous shunting and distortion of internal vessels, as well as increased tumor vascularity relative to the surrounding tissue, can be assessed. Although there is some overlap between benign and malignant lesions and no general consensus exists about the significance of the vascularity of breast masses, some distinguishing features have been described in breast lesions [7]. Giovagnorio et al. [3] were able to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions of the skin and subcutaneous soft tissues using different patterns of vascularity. Lesions were classified as avascular (type 1), hypovascular with a single vascular pole (type 2), hypervascular with multiple peripheral poles (type 3), and hypervascular with internal vessels (type 4). They reported a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 90% for hypovascularity in benign lesions and a sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 100%, respectively, for malignant lesions. Some malignant lesions had a type 1 pattern, but a type 2 pattern was seen only in benign lesions. Applying these authors' criteria for benignity, the lesion reported here would be classified as a type 2 pattern, considered benign, and surgery could have been averted.

In conclusion, sonography of the breast using commercially available high-frequency transducers can help to distinguish the types of breast masses and to determine whether a lesion shown on mammography or at clinical examination is actually in the breast tissues. Sonography with highfrequency transducers may also predict lesion histology, although this will require further study.


References
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 

  1. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196:123 -134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Betti R, Nessi R, Blanc M, et al. Ultrasonography of proliferative vascular lesions of the skin. J Dermatol 1990;4:247 -251
  3. Giovagnorio F, Andreoli C, De Cicco M. Color Doppler sonography of focal lesions of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. J Ultrasound Med 1999;18:89 -93[Abstract]
  4. Guyer PB, Dewbury KC. Sonomammography: an atlas of comparative breast ultrasound. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1987: 5-7
  5. Fornage BD, McGavran MH, Duvic M, Waldron CA. Imaging of the skin with 20 MHz US. Radiology 1993;189:69 -76[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Rosen PP. Benign mesenchmal tumors. In: Rosen PP, ed. Rosen's breast pathology, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:651 -708
  7. Raza S, Baum JK. Solid breast lesion evaluation with power Doppler ultrasound. Radiology 1997;203:164 -168[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
E. Y. Kim, E. Y. Ko, B.-K. Han, J. H. Shin, S. Y. Hahn, S. S. Kang, E. Y. Cho, M. J. Kim, and S. Y. Chun
Sonography of Axillary Masses: What Should Be Considered Other Than the Lymph Nodes?
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2009; 28(7): 923 - 939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Mesurolle, V. Sygal, L. Lalonde, A. Lisbona, M.-P. Dufresne, J. H. Gagnon, and E. Kao
Sonographic and Mammographic Appearances of Breast Hemangioma
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): W17 - W22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
K. N. Glazebrook, M. J. Morton, and C. Reynolds
Carcinoma of the Breast Mimicking an Areolar Dermal Lesion
J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2007; 26(8): 1083 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. H. Kim, J. H. Lee, D. C. Kim, and B. J. Song
Subcutaneous Venous Hemangioma of the Breast
J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2007; 26(8): 1097 - 1100.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. J. Kim, H. S. Han, J. S. Kim, J. H. Park, H. J. Jeon, and J. G. Yi
Cavernous hemangioma of the breast parenchyma with unusual features.
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2006; 25(10): 1343 - 1346.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. A. Shi, D. Georgian-Smith, L. D. Cornell, E. A. Rafferty, M. Staffa, K. Hughes, and D. B. Kopans
Radiological Reasoning: Male Breast Mass with Calcifications
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6_Supplement): S205 - S210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. N. Glazebrook, M. J. Morton, and C. Reynolds
Vascular Tumors of the Breast: Mammographic, Sonographic, and MRI Appearances
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 331 - 338.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siewert, B.
Right arrow Articles by Baum, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siewert, B.
Right arrow Articles by Baum, J. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS