AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lui, Y. W.
Right arrow Articles by Balthazar, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lui, Y. W.
Right arrow Articles by Balthazar, E. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 178:1292-1293
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Gastroduodenal Mucosal Prolapse

Diagnosis Using Conventional Abdominal Radiographs

Yvonne W. Lui and Emil J. Balthazar

New York University Medical Center New York, NY 10016

Gastroduodenal prolapse of antral mucosa is a well-recognized entity commonly encountered on upper gastrointestinal examinations in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Incidence of this entity among the adult population has been reported as ranging from as low as 0.1-7.7% [1, 2] to as high as 14% [2]. Diagnosis on an upper gastrointestinal study is based on the detection of a transitory concavity at the base of the duodenal bulb or, in severe forms, on the presence of a large duodenal filling defect extending through the pylorus.

During the last 10 years, we have noticed an unusual, complex mass in the right upper quadrant on several abdominal radiographs obtained with the patient in the supine position. Conventional radiographs show a round soft-tissue mass surrounded by a well-circumscribed round or oval radiolucency (Figs. 3 and 4A). Fluoroscopic left posterior oblique spot images obtained in three patients showed the soft-tissue mass at the base of the air-filled duodenal bulb, protruding into its lumen (Fig. 4B). Upper gastrointestinal examinations available for two of the patients were consistent with marked gastroduodenal prolapse (Fig. 4C). Reports of nonspecific abdominal pain were elicited from two patients, and endoscopy performed in one patient revealed mild antral gastritis.



View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. Asymptomatic 62-year-old woman. Complex soft-tissue mass (arrows) in right upper quadrant was incidental finding seen on conventional abdominal radiograph. Diagnosis of gastroduodenal prolapse was confirmed by subsequent upper gastrointestinal examination.

 


View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. 48-year-old man with abdominal pain. Fluoroscopic supine spot image shows round soft-tissue mass (open arrows) surrounded by well-circumscribed oval radiolucency (solid arrows). Central punctate high density probably represents residual contrast medium.

 


View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. 48-year-old man with abdominal pain. Fluoroscopic left posterior oblique spot image shows mass (open arrow) at base of duodenum (large solid arrows). Air is seen in antrum (small solid arrows).

 


View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C. 48-year-old man with abdominal pain. Spot image from upper gastrointestinal examination confirms marked gastroduodenal prolapse (arrow). Thickened folds (arrowheads) in distal stomach (S) are consistent with endoscopically confirmed gastritis. D = duodenum.

 

Severe gastroduodenal prolapse can occasionally result in the appearance of a complex mass in the right upper quadrant that is visible on supine abdominal radiographs. The finding appears mainly in patients with transverse stomachs if the air-distended duodenal bulb (located above the hepatic fixture) is viewed en face (Figs. 3 and 4A,4B,4C). The central soft-tissue density and surrounding radiolucent halo represent prolapsed gastric mucosa and air within the duodenum, respectively. In our experience, this appearance is characteristic of marked gastroduodenal mucosal prolapse. Less likely is the possibility of a prolapsed distal gastric mass or a duodenal tumor. Obtaining fluoroscopic left posterior oblique spot images of the suspected lesion or performing an upper gastrointestinal examination can easily confirm the diagnosis (Figs. 4B and 4C).

Factors implicated in the development of this abnormality include redundant antral folds, increased peristalsis, and antral gastritis. The clinical implication of gastroduodenal mucosal prolapse is controversial. Feldman and Myers [2] found that 46% of symptomatic patients with prolapse also had associated gastritis. More recently, hypertrophic antral-pyloric folds have been described as being associated with gastritis. One radiographic series [3] found that of 40 patients with such hypertrophic folds, 15 (38%) had prolapse of an enlarged fold into the duodenal bulb.

Because gastroduodenal prolapse is often seen in patients with nonspecific symptoms but is also often associated with gastritis [2,3,4], detection of the prolapse on conventional radiographs may elucidate the patient's clinical complaints. In addition, care should be taken to ensure that gastroduodenal prolapse found incidentally is not misinterpreted as other abnormalities.

References

  1. Scott WG. Radiographic diagnosis of prolapsed redundant gastric mucosa into the duodenum, with remarks on the clinical significance and treatment. Radiology 1946;46:547 -568
  2. Feldman M, Myers P. The roentgen diagnosis of prolapse of the gastric mucosa into the duodenum. Gastroenterology 1952;20:90 -99[Medline]
  3. Arora R, Levine MS, Harvey RT, et al. Hypertrophied antral—pyloric fold: reassessment of radiographic findings in 40 patients. Radiography 1999;213:347 -351
  4. Glick SN, Cavanaugh B, Teplick SK. The hypertrophied antral—pyloric fold. AJR 1985;145:547 -549[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lui, Y. W.
Right arrow Articles by Balthazar, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lui, Y. W.
Right arrow Articles by Balthazar, E. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS