AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sabaté, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Flotats, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sabaté, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Flotats, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 179:277-278
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Osteosarcoma of the Breast

Josep M. Sabaté, Antonio Gómez, Sofía Torrubia and Albert Flotats

Hospital de Sant Pau Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 08025, Barcelona, Spain

A 42-year-old woman presented with a 2-month history of a rapidly enlarging mass in the right breast. Clinical examination revealed a large, hard fixed mass with skin ulceration. Helical CT revealed a large, heterogeneous, relatively well-circumscribed mass, with central hypodense nonenhancing areas that were suggestive of necrosis, interspersed with peripheral and central zones of intense contrast enhancement and punctate calcifications (Fig. 2A). Laboratory tests revealed a highly elevated serum alkaline phosphatase at 951 U/L (normal range, 82-198 U/L).



View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. 42-year-old woman with osteosarcoma of breast. Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows large heterogeneous mass with central hypodense nonenhancing areas, suggestive of necrosis, interspersed with peripheral and central zones with intense contrast enhancement. Punctate calcifications (long arrow) and skin involvement (short arrows) were also observed. Fewer calcifications are depicted than on mammogram (B).

 

Mammography performed 2 weeks after the CT examination showed a large 9-cm mass with lobulated borders and well-defined margins that contained several calcifications closely resembling bone. In addition, fine eggshell calcifications at the periphery of the tumor were also noticed (Fig. 2B). Compared with the findings on the initial CT scan, the number and size of calcifications had clearly increased significantly. High-resolution sonography showed a complex mass with both cystic and solid regions interspersed with focal areas of intense acoustic shadowing that were interpreted as coarse calcifications. Because a bone-forming neoplasm was suggested, 99mTc-diphosphonate bone imaging was performed, revealing an intense focal area of high activity in the region of the right breast. On T2-weighted MR images, the mass appeared well circumscribed and partially delineated by a fine low-signal peripheral band. This structure resembled a capsule and had a markedly heterogeneous internal signal with high-signal-intensity areas interspersed with low-signal zones, which were interpreted as necrohemorrhagic and bone-forming areas, respectively (Fig. 2C). On the two-dimensional dynamic images, the tumor showed nonhomogeneous rapid enhancement and washout phenomenon, suggesting malignancy.



View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. 42-year-old woman with osteosarcoma of breast. Mammogram obtained 2 weeks after A shows large 9-cm mass occupying virtually entire mammary gland with lobulated borders and well-defined margins (arrows), containing several calcifications that closely resemble bone.

 


View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C. 42-year-old woman with osteosarcoma of breast. Sagittal T2-weighted MR image (TR/TE, 8400/105) shows heterogeneous well-circumscribed mass with areas of predominantly high signal intensity, suggesting necrosis and hemorrhage, and areas of low signal intensity, paralleling bone-forming tumoral zones. Mass is partially delineated by low-signal peripheral band (arrowheads).

 

Pathologically, the tumor was composed of pleomorphic spindle cells, osteoblastlike cells, and osteoclastlike giant cells, among areas of necrosis and malignant osteoid. Epithelial elements were excluded after extensive sampling, including negative results for cytokeratin and positive results for vimentin (Fig. 2D).



View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2D. 42-year-old woman with osteosarcoma of breast. Photograph of surgical excisional biopsy specimen shows well-circumscribed appearance of tumor and large areas of ossification (asterisks) among cystic or necrotic zones (stars). Infiltrative margins (not shown) were clearly depicted at microscopic examination.

 

A modified radical mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection were performed, and no lymph node metastases were found. At follow-up 16 months later, the patient showed no evidence of metastatic or recurrent disease.

Primary pure osteosarcoma of the breast is an uncommon malignancy that has been only briefly reported in the radiology literature [1, 2]. The neoplasm we described fulfills the requirements for the diagnosis of extraosseous osteosarcoma [3]. The presence of bone in breast lesions is not diagnostic of osteosarcoma because osteoid tissue has been reported in epithelial and mesenchymal neoplasms, both benign and malignant, such as fibroadenoma, phyllodes tumor, and metaplastic carcinomas. Thus, a diagnosis of mammary osteosarcoma can be established only after metaplastic carcinoma or biphasic tumor has been adequately excluded [3].

The previously reported [1,2,3,4] mammographic appearances of breast osteosarcomas vary, although most of the tumors presented as large masses with relatively well-defined margins and lobulated borders, often containing calcifications. Calcifications were usually coarse, dense, and sometimes similar to fibroadenomas. Masses with irregular margins have also been described [1, 2]. The imaging features seen with our patient, particularly the pattern of calcifications, are quite distinctive. Large areas of necrosis have been found in only 10% of breast osteosarcomas. This feature, which has been correlated with a bleak prognosis, was easily observed on sonography [1,2,3]. 99mTc-diphosphonate is a specific radionuclide marker for osteoid tumoral tissue [4]. Intense focal uptake of this radionuclide in a soft-tissue tumor is strongly suggestive of bone-forming neoplasms. In addition, alkaline phosphatase has been found to be elevated in patients with osteoid-forming neoplasms.Go



View larger version (170K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2E. 42-year-old woman with osteosarcoma of breast. Photomicrograph reveals pleomorphic high-grade spindle cell sarcoma, including foci of malignant osteoid (stars) and multinucleated osteoclastic giant cells (arrows).

 

Treatment is surgery. Axillary node involvement is rare, and axillary dissection, although commonly performed, is not recommended. Overall, the prognosis remains poor because of early local recurrence and hematogenous metastases [3].

References

  1. Brown AL, Holwill SDJ, Thomas VA, Sacks NPM, Given-Wilson R. Primary osteosarcoma of the breast: imaging and histological features. Clin Radiol 1998;53:920 -922[Medline]
  2. Watt AC, Haggar AM, Krasicky GA. Extraosseous osteogenic sarcoma of the breast: mammographic and pathologic findings. Radiology 1984;150:34[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Silver SA, Tavassoli FA. Primary osteogenic sarcoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic analysis of 50 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1998;22:925 -933[Medline]
  4. Lumsden AB. Demonstration of a primary bone tumor of the breast by technetium-99m diphosphonate bone imaging. Clin Nucl Med 1986;11:362[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Harvey
Unusual Breast Cancers: Useful Clues to Expanding the Differential Diagnosis
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 683 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. A. Shi, D. Georgian-Smith, L. D. Cornell, E. A. Rafferty, M. Staffa, K. Hughes, and D. B. Kopans
Radiological Reasoning: Male Breast Mass with Calcifications
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6_Supplement): S205 - S210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sabaté, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Flotats, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sabaté, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Flotats, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS