|
|
||||||||
Western Deep Levels Hospital Western Levels 2501, South Africa
I read with interest the article by M. J. O'Neill et al. [1] on the use of tunneled peritoneal catheters placed under sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance for the palliative treatment of malignant ascites. This practive appears to offer significant advantages over repeated paracenteses. However, both tunneled catheter drainage and repeated paracenteses have the disadvantage of removing protein and electrolytes along with the ascitic fluid. Because this unwanted result is not mentioned as a complication in the article, one assumes that it was not a problem in the relatively short periods that these terminally ill patients survived, but loss of protein would potentially be a problem in patients with a longer life expectancy.
The alternative treatment of intractable ascites is peritoneovenous shunting, which has until now been problematic because it requires invasive surgery and because blockage of the prosthetic shunt tubing frequently occurs. The recently described technique of peritoneosaphenous shunt placement [2, 3] which can be performed under local or spinal anesthesia and does not use prosthetic shunt tubing) requires relatively minor surgery and has the potential to conserve protein and avoid the risk of peritoneal infection. (The shunt placement uses more invasive surgery than tunneled peritoneal catheter placement but considerably less invasive surgery than LeVeen shunt insertion.)
I was fortunate to be involved in a peritoneosaphenous shunt program and reported preliminary experience at our institution in Doppler sonography assessment of these shunts in the initial description of this technique [3]. At this stage, our patient numbers are still too small for a more definitive report on the use of Doppler sonography in this setting. The role of Doppler sonography in the assessment of peritoneosaphenous shunts and the place of these shunts and of tunneled peritoneal catheters in the management of refractory ascites remains to be fully established. I look forward to further publications on these issues and would appreciate any comments that the authors of the article on tunneled peritoneal catheter placement [1] may have.
References
Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA 02114-2696
The procedure described by Blaylock et al. [1] is another useful and alternative means of therapy of refractory ascites, but it is more invasive than the procedure described in our article [2] and better suited for patients with longer life expectancies. The procedure we described is meant to be used only in patients with limited life expectancy, for whom palliation is the indication for therapy.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. B. Hunter and M. S. Taljanovic Medical Devices of the Abdomen and Pelvis RadioGraphics, March 1, 2005; 25(2): 503 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |