AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ly, J. Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ly, J. Q.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2002; 179:537-538
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Rare Bicornuate Uterus with Fibroid Tumors: Hysterosalpingography-MR Imaging Correlation

Justin Q. Ly

Wilford Hall Medical Center Lackland AFB, TX 78236-5300

Note.—The opinions and assertions contained in the article above are the private views of the author and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Air Force or the Department of Defense.

A 24-year-old woman was referred to our fertility clinic after more than a year of unsuccessful attempts to become pregnant. She had no children and reported a history of a prior spontaneous abortion several years earlier. The findings of the physical examination were unremarkable, and the patient was otherwise healthy. Hysterosalpingography was performed as part of the initial fertility workup. The examination revealed a single cervix with two long, narrow, and widely separated uterine cavities (Fig. 3A). Although this appearance is consistent with a bicornuate uterus, a septate uterus could not be definitively ruled out, prompting further evaluation with MR imaging. The axial T2-weighted MR images of the pelvis revealed the incidental findings of two rounded heterogeneous fibroids (Figs. 3B and 3C), each originating from a separate horn of the uterus.



View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. 24-year-old woman with fibroid tumor involvement at each bicornuate uterine horn. Frontal hysterosalpingogram shows single cervix and two long and narrow uterine cavities that are separated by angle of approximately 80°. Although this appearance is consistent with bicornuate uterus, it could not be used to definitively rule out possibility of septate uterus.

 


View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. 24-year-old woman with fibroid tumor involvement at each bicornuate uterine horn. Axial T2-weighted MR images of pelvis reveal incidental findings of two rounded heterogeneous fibroids (arrows), each one originating from upper aspect of separate uterine horn. B was obtained inferior to C.

 


View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C. 24-year-old woman with fibroid tumor involvement at each bicornuate uterine horn. Axial T2-weighted MR images of pelvis reveal incidental findings of two rounded heterogeneous fibroids (arrows), each one originating from upper aspect of separate uterine horn. B was obtained inferior to C.

 

Uterine anomalies are congenital malformations caused by fusion or resorption defects during embryogenesis. The bicornuate uterus is caused by the incomplete fusion of the two mesonephric ducts and is characterized by an indented fundus. As a result, the uterine body is divided into right and left cavities, which join just above or at the cervix. Although not a specific finding, the angle between the horns of the bicornuate uterus is usually not more than 105° [1]. The septate uterus has a normal fundal contour but is characterized by a persistent longitudinal septum that partially divides the uterine cavity. If the angle between the uterine cavities is less than or equal to 75°, a septate uterus is present. If the angle is larger than 75° but less than 105°, it is still probable that the uterus is septate, but sonography performed during the luteal phase of the patient's menstrual cycle can rule out the possibility of a bicornuate component. If the angle is equal to or more than 105°, a bicornuate uterus is probably present; sonography can be helpful in ruling out the presence of a septum or septal component [2]. The didelphic uterus is different from the bicornuate uterus in that it contains not one but two endometrial and two cervical canals. A unicornuate uterus contains only a single horn and adnexa that point to either side of the pelvis, and on transverse images, the uterus appears as a circular structure above the cervix, with a diameter similar to that of the cervix. Clinically, each of these congenital malformations can result in infertility and recurrent miscarriages.

The case of the patient described is rare and interesting in that both horns of the bicornuate uterus each contained a single fibroid projecting into the pelvic cavity, which likely contributed to the patient's infertility problems. To my knowledge, no report of such a case has appeared before in the literature. MR imaging of the pelvis is an excellent noninvasive modality for the assessment of the internal and external contours of the uterus [3]. Moreover, pelvic MR imaging can aid in differentiating patients who require surgery from those who do not, which in many cases obviates invasive diagnostic procedures [4].

References

  1. Zwiebel WJ. Pelvic congenital anomalies and pubertal disorders. In: Zwiebel WJ, ed. Introduction to ultrasound. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1983:294 -296
  2. Reuter KL, Daly DC, Cohen SM. Septate versus bicornuate uteri: errors in imaging diagnosis. Radiology 1989;172:749 -752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Carrington BM, Hricak H, Nuruddin RN, Secaf E, Laros RK, Hill EC. Mullerian duct anomalies: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1990;176:715 -720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Pellegrito JS, McCarthy SM, Doyle MB, Glickman MG, DeCerney AH. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology 1992;183:796 -800

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ly, J. Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ly, J. Q.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS