AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunnick, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Korobkin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunnick, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Korobkin, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 179:559-568
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Review

Imaging of Adrenal Incidentalomas: Current Status

N. Reed Dunnick1 and Melvyn Korobkin1

1 Both authors: Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0030.

Received January 11, 2002; accepted after revision February 26, 2002.

 
Address correspondence to N. Reed Dunnick.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Specific Imaging Features
Nonspecific Imaging Features
Adenoma Versus Metastasis
Adenoma Versus Carcinoma
References
 
Since the early 1980s, incidentally discovered adrenal masses have become a common clinical problem as a result of the more widespread use of high-resolution anatomic imaging procedures, especially CT and MR imaging. In patients without a known extraadrenal primary malignancy, most of these lesions are benign nonhyperfunctioning adenomas. Even in patients with a primary neoplasm in whom an adrenal metastasis is an important consideration, most adrenal masses are also benign. However, despite the high frequency of a benign lesion, especially adrenal cortical adenoma, as the cause of an incidentally detected adrenal mass, it is important to distinguish the benign lesions from the less common malignant masses, which require intervention, to establish the correct diagnosis.

An adrenal mass detected during a CT or MR imaging examination that is being performed for reasons other than suspected adrenal abnormalities is often referred to as an adrenal incidentaloma. The continuing uncertainty about the appropriate clinical and imaging management of adrenal incidentalomas was attested to by the National Institutes of Health consensus conference on this subject on February 4-6, 2002. The purpose of this article is to review the imaging features of nonhyperfunctioning adrenal masses and the recent advances in noninvasive imaging methods to help differentiate benign from malignant lesions. The changing role for percutaneous biopsy of an adrenal mass will also be addressed.


Specific Imaging Features
Top
Introduction
Specific Imaging Features
Nonspecific Imaging Features
Adenoma Versus Metastasis
Adenoma Versus Carcinoma
References
 
Myelolipoma
A myelolipoma is a benign tumor composed of bone marrow elements. Myelolipomas do not produce hormones, and most are detected as incidental findings. Occasionally, large tumors or those undergoing tumor necrosis or spontaneous hemorrhage may cause flank pain [1, 2]. Although most are adrenal in location, extraadrenal myelolipomas have been reported [3, 4].

Because of the large amount of mature fat, most myelolipomas are easily recognized on CT (Fig. 1). Elements of a soft-tissue density are found in varying amounts, and calcification is seen in up to 20% of the cases. Occasional myelolipomas have no recognizable fat, which precludes the diagnosis on imaging studies.



View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Myelolipoma in 69-year-old man. Large, fatty right adrenal mass can be seen on this contrast-enhanced CT scan.

 

The appearance of a myelolipoma on MR imaging reflects the proportion of fat and of bone marrow elements in the tumor. Fat has a high signal intensity on both T1- and T2-weighted sequences. The bone marrow elements have a low signal intensity on T1-weighted images and moderate signal intensity on T2-weighted images [5, 6]. Because a diagnosis of myelolipoma can usually be made with confidence using CT or MR imaging, most patients with myelolipoma are treated conservatively. In some cases, distinguishing a large myelolipoma from a retroperitoneal sarcoma may not be possible, and biopsy or surgery may be needed for definitive diagnosis.

Cyst
Adrenal cysts are uncommon lesions, and few reports about their CT appearance can be found in the literature. Adrenal cysts show a 3:1 female predilection. Four types of cysts are recognized on the basis of pathologic classification: endothelial, epithelial, parasitic, and posttraumatic pseudocysts [7].

The sonographic appearance of an adrenal pseudocyst can be complex, with multiple internal septations. CT is usually more useful to define the lesion and assess contrast enhancement. A recent report of 13 new cystic adrenal masses and review of 26 benign adrenal cysts from the literature included one cystic adrenal cortical carcinoma [8]. Of the 37 reviewed benign cysts, 19 had mural and seven had central calcification, 28 were unilocular, and seven had high attenuation values. The thickness of the wall of the lesion was 3 mm or less in 31 lesions. The authors concluded that the CT finding of a nonenhancing mass with or without wall calcification allows differentiation of an adrenal cyst from an adenoma (Fig. 2). A small adrenal cyst with near-water attenuation and a thin (<=3 mm) wall is likely to be benign.



View larger version (165K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. Adrenal pseudocyst in 35-year-old woman. CT scan shows homogeneous left adrenal mass that measured near-water density (8 H). Wall of mass is thickened but smooth and measures less than 3 mm.

 

Hemorrhage
Adrenal hemorrhage can be bilateral or unilateral. When adrenal hemorrhage is bilateral, the cause is usually associated with anticoagulation therapy or a blood dyscrasia; less commonly, it is associated with the stress of surgery, sepsis, or hypotension; and rarely, it is caused by trauma [9]. Unilateral adrenal hemorrhage is usually caused by blunt abdominal trauma and involves the right gland more often than the left [10]. Adrenal vein thrombosis may also cause unilateral adrenal hemorrhage. Adrenal vein thrombosis may result from catheterization performed to collect blood samples from the adrenal vein in patients with suspected adrenal endocrine disease [11, 12]. In the absence of catheterization or blunt trauma, unilateral adrenal hemorrhage may occur into a preexisting neoplasm, necessitating surgical exploration if follow-up imaging does not show a nearly normal adrenal gland.

Acute or subacute adrenal hemorrhage typically has an unenhanced attenuation value of 50-90 H (Fig. 3). Follow-up studies show diminution in size of the adrenal mass with a gradual decrease in the attenuation value [13]. The high attenuation value of a recent adrenal hemorrhage is usually readily apparent on unenhanced CT, but is indistinguishable from a solid adrenal neoplasm on contrast-enhanced CT. Detection of an adrenal mass on contrast-enhanced CT after trauma is usually assumed to result from a hematoma, but an unrelated adrenal neoplasm can be excluded only by unenhanced CT or serial follow-up CT. Similarly, MR imaging may indicate hemorrhage by the high signal intensity, which reflects the presence of methemoglobin, on T1-weighted images [14, 15].



View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. Adrenal hematoma in 75-year-old woman. Bilateral adrenal masses can be seen on this unenhanced CT scan. High density of masses suggests hematoma.

 


Nonspecific Imaging Features
Top
Introduction
Specific Imaging Features
Nonspecific Imaging Features
Adenoma Versus Metastasis
Adenoma Versus Carcinoma
References
 
Granulomatous Disease
Tuberculosis, histoplasmosis, and other granulomatous diseases are usually bilateral but often asymmetric. CT findings are nonspecific and can include soft-tissue masses, cystic changes, calcifications, or a combination of these findings [16] (Fig. 4). Although these adrenal lesions, which rarely occur unilaterally, are uncommon, they should be considered in the differential diagnosis of incidental bilateral adrenal masses in the absence of a primary neoplasm or coagulation abnormality. Biopsy is needed to confirm the diagnosis and identify the responsible organism.



View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. Histoplasmosis in 68-year-old man. CT scan shows that both adrenal glands are enlarged but maintain adreniform configuration.

 

Hemangioma
An adrenal hemangioma is a rare benign tumor. Hemangiosarcomas occur but are even less common [17]. Hemangiomas are composed of closely adjacent vascular channels lined with a single layer of endothelium [18]. These benign tumors do not produce adrenal hormones, and most are large when found as an incidental finding.

On CT, hemangiomas are seen as large well-defined masses. They have a soft-tissue density on unenhanced images and exhibit inhomogeneous enhancement. Most hemangiomas are calcified, either from phleboliths in the tumor or from previous hemorrhage [19].

The MR findings associated with hemangiomas include a hypointense appearance relative to the liver on T1-weighted sequences [20]. Central hyperintensity may be seen because of hemorrhage. On T2-weighted images, hemangiomas are hyperintense. Peripheral enhancement that persists on delayed images is characteristic. These tumors are usually removed because of the risk of hemorrhage and inability to exclude malignancy.

Ganglioneuroma
A ganglioneuroma is a benign tumor composed of Schwann cells and ganglion cells. These lesions occur anywhere along the paravertebral sympathetic plexus, and approximately 20-30% arise in the adrenal medulla [21]. Because they do not secrete hormones, most ganglioneuromas are detected as an incidental finding [22].

On CT, ganglioneuromas appear as a solid adrenal mass ranging from 4 to 22 cm in diameter [21]. Extraadrenal retroperitoneal tumors may be even larger. The density of the lesion on unenhanced images is often less than that of muscle. Contrast-enhanced images show homogeneous or mildly heterogeneous enhancement.

On MR imaging, the signal intensity of a ganglioneuroma is less than that of liver on T1-weighted sequences. Greater heterogeneity is seen on T2-weighted images than on enhanced CT images. Although the tumor may surround blood vessels, encroachment on the lumen is rare.

Neuroblastoma
Although neuroblastoma is the third most common malignant tumor seen in children, neuroblastoma is seen less frequently in adults. This tumor may occur anywhere along the parasympathetic plexus. Adults are more likely to present with disseminated disease than children [23].

The imaging findings of neuroblastoma in adults are similar to those in children. The lack of specificity of imaging features and more frequent disseminated involvement make lymphoma or metastatic disease likely possibilities in these patients. Calcification, which is commonly found in children, is less often present in adults.

Pheochromocytoma
Although most patients with pheochromocytoma present with manifestations of excess catecholamine production, approximately 10% of these tumors are silent and are detected by other means such as an imaging study [24, 25]. Approximately 90% of pheochromocytomas lie within the adrenal glands, although the incidence of extraadrenal tumors is higher among sporadic pheochromocytomas than those associated with the multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes [26].

On CT, pheochromocytomas appear as a well-defined mass with a density near that of muscle. After IV contrast medium has been administered, marked enhancement can be seen, reflecting the vascularity of the tumors. Larger lesions may be heterogeneous because of tissue necrosis or internal hemorrhage. Non-hyperfunctioning pheochromocytomas tend to be larger than functioning tumors [27].

MR findings may enable characterization of pheochromocytomas because the signal intensity of these tumors is sometimes very high on T2-weighted images [28]. This high signal intensity, which is probably caused by a cystic component [29], may be especially useful for extraadrenal tumors. If present, it can also help distinguish a pheochromocytoma from an adrenal adenoma.

Because manipulation of pheochromocytomas may induce a hypertensive crisis, diagnosis or exclusion of this entity should be achieved as noninvasively as possible. Nonhyperfunctioning pheochromocytomas may still produce an elevated level of catecholamine, although a lower level than that found in a symptomatic patient [27]. Thus, measuring catecholamine levels may be useful for patients with an incidentally discovered adrenal mass.

Radionuclide imaging is recommended for problem cases such as ectopic tumors not found in the abdomen or pelvis or those suspected of recurrent or metastatic disease [30]. Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is concentrated in catecholamine storage granules in pheochromocytomas and MIBG labeled with either iodine-123 or iodine-131 has a high sensitivity for detecting pheochromocytomas [31]. Although their experience was limited, a group of researchers found that performing positron emission tomography (PET) after administering FDG enabled them to localize a pheochromocytoma in two patients with false-negative findings on MIBG studies [32].

Adenoma
An adenoma is the most common adrenal tumor. Adenomas are reported to occur in from 1.4% to 8.7% of postmortem examinations, depending on the criteria used [33,34,35]. The incidence is even higher among patients with hypertension or diabetes mellitus [34,35,36]. Adenomas large enough to be recognized on survey abdominal CT examinations are found in approximately 1% of patients, but may be increasingly detected as CT technology improves [37].

Nonhyperfunctioning adenomas elaborate adrenal cortical hormones the same as other functioning adrenal cortical tissue. Thus, these lesions are seen to take up adrenal cortical labeling radionuclides.

On CT, adenomas may have the same density as normal adrenal tissue. Because most adenomas contain large amounts of intracytoplasmic lipid, many have a low density, often near that of water, on unenhanced examinations [38] (Fig. 5). Calcification is rare. Adenomas enhance after the IV administration of iodinated contrast medium (Fig. 6). Although the degree of enhancement does not significantly differ from that of other adrenal tumors, adenomas show more rapid washout of contrast medium than adrenal metastases [39,40,41].



View larger version (162K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. Lipid-rich adenoma in 74-year-old woman. Unenhanced CT scan shows 3-cm right adrenal mass. Attenuation value of -4 H allows confident diagnosis of benign lesion, either cyst or lipid-rich adenoma.

 


View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6. Adenoma in 74-year-old man. Contrast-enhanced CT scan reveals 4-cm mass in right adrenal gland. Attenuation value on enhanced scans is not sufficiently characteristic to distinguish benign from malignant causes.

 

The MR signal characteristics of adenomas are also similar to those of normal adrenal tissue. Although the signal intensity of an adenoma tends to be low on T2-weighted sequences, this finding is not useful for differentiating adenomas from metastases because the range of signal intensity of adenomas overlaps 20-30% with metastases. Chemical-shift imaging can be used to identify the intracytoplasmic lipid and can distinguish many adenomas from metastases [42, 43] (Fig. 7A,7B).



View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7A. Adenoma in 69-year-old woman. Left adrenal mass can be seen on this in-phase MR image.

 


View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7B. Adenoma in 69-year-old woman. Decrease in signal on this out-of-phase MR image compared with A indicates the presence of lipid.

 

Carcinoma
Adrenal carcinoma is a rare tumor, with a reported incidence of two cases per million [44]. Patients may present with abdominal pain, a palpable mass, or with Cushing's syndrome because approximately 50% of these tumors elaborate unregulated amounts of cortisol. Many adrenal carcinomas elaborate insufficient amounts of hormone to produce obvious clinical manifestations. Other endocrine manifestations of adrenal carcinoma include Conn's syndrome, virilization, and feminization, but these manifestations are rare. The tumors tend to be very large at presentation.

The CT appearance of an adrenal carcinoma is that of a large mass. Central necrosis is common, and calcification is seen in 20-30% of the cases [45, 46] (Fig. 8A). Enhancement is heterogeneous after IV administration of contrast medium. Venous extension of tumor into the left renal vein or inferior vena cava is common and can usually be identified on contrast-enhanced images [44] (Fig. 8B). Precisely defining the cephalad extent of the IV tumor is important because this point is where the surgeon can gain vascular control of the tumor [47]. Although defining the cephalad extent of the tumor can often be achieved with CT, MR imaging may be helpful in problematic cases [48].



View larger version (168K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8A. Carcinoma in 59-year-old man. Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows 9-cm right adrenal mass. Irregular wall and low-density center indicate necrosis.

 


View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8B. Carcinoma in 59-year-old man. CT scan obtained during same examination but more cephalad than A reveals tumor extension into inferior vena cava.

 

On MR imaging, carcinomas are usually heterogeneously hyperintense on both T1- and T2-weighted images, reflecting the frequent internal hemorrhage and central necrosis. Enhancement is also heterogeneous, revealing nodular areas of intense enhancement and other areas with no enhancement. IV extension of tumor is typically depicted well on MR imaging because data sets can be projected into multiple planes [48, 49] (Fig. 9).



View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9. Metastasis from renal carcinoma in 31-year-old woman. Small, homogeneous left adrenal mass can be seen on this contrast-enhanced CT scan.

 

Lymphoma
Primary lymphoma of the adrenal glands is rare [50], but secondary involvement when other retroperitoneal lymphoma is present is seen more commonly among patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma than Hodgkin's disease [51]. Involvement is often bilateral and other retroperitoneal disease is usually present.

The CT appearance of adrenal lymphoma may be of discrete masses (tumefactive) or of more diffuse involvement of the gland in which the shape of the gland may be maintained. There may be extensive retroperitoneal tumor that engulfs the adrenal glands, making them difficult to identify. The enhancement of lymphoma after the administration of intravascular contrast medium is less than that of the aorta or inferior vena cava.

On MR imaging, lymphoma has a signal intensity lower than that of the liver on T1-weighted images. Lymphoma is typically heterogeneously hyperintense on T2-weighted sequences.

Metastases
The adrenal glands are a common site of metastatic disease, found in approximately 27% of the postmortem examinations of patients with malignant neoplasms of epithelial origin [52]. The most common neoplasms with adrenal metastases are carcinomas of the lung and breast and melanoma [52, 53]. Adrenal metastases can be unilateral or bilateral, small or large. The CT and MR imaging features are nonspecific. Small metastases are often homogeneous on contrast-enhanced CT (Fig. 10) or MR imaging, whereas large metastases often have local regions that appear heterogenous as a result of necrosis (Fig. 11A,11B,11C), hemorrhage, or both. Calcification is rare in adrenal metastases.



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10. Metastases from adenocarcinoma of lung in 34-year-old woman. Bilateral adrenal masses with areas of central necrosis can be seen on this contrast-enhanced CT scan.

 


View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11A. Lipid-poor adenoma in 15-year-old girl. Left adrenal mass measured 40 H on this unenhanced CT scan.

 


View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11B. Lipid-poor adenoma in 15-year-old girl. Tumor enhanced to 114 H on CT scan obtained immediately after contrast administration.

 


View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11C. Lipid-poor adenoma in 15-year-old girl. Delayed CT image shows mass has attenuation value of 65 H. Thus, adenoma could be diagnosed on basis of washout of contrast material but not on basis of unenhanced attenuation value.

 


Adenoma Versus Metastasis
Top
Introduction
Specific Imaging Features
Nonspecific Imaging Features
Adenoma Versus Metastasis
Adenoma Versus Carcinoma
References
 
Although this section discusses the different methods that may be used to differentiate a benign (usually adenoma) from a malignant (usually metastasis) adrenal mass, not all lesions or patients require evaluation. The prevalence of adrenal adenomas is high; small, homogeneous adrenal masses discovered incidentally are likely adenomas. If a patient has other metastases and the presence of an adrenal metastasis will not alter therapy, evaluation is not justified.

Evidence has accumulated that unenhanced CT densitometry can be used to accurately differentiate adrenal adenomas from metastases [54,55,56]. Most adenomas have unenhanced CT attenuation values lower than metastases, and the scatterplot data from such studies were used to determine a threshold value that resulted in the calculation of the optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of adenoma. In an oncologic patient with an adrenal mass but no other evidence of distant metastatic disease, the goal of noninvasive diagnostic imaging is to characterize the adrenal mass as an adenoma with high specificity. High specificity of the diagnosis is important so that a metastasis is not mistakenly diagnosed as an adenoma, potentially resulting in a fruitless attempt at curative therapy of the primary tumor. In addition, a highly specific diagnosis of adenoma can obviate percutaneous biopsy of most adenomas. High sensitivity for the diagnosis of adrenal adenoma is not as critical, because the only deleterious consequence of an adenoma incorrectly diagnosed as a metastasis is that a percutaneous adrenal biopsy will be necessary to establish the correct diagnosis.

Using pooled data from multiple published studies of calculated accuracies and corresponding threshold values of unenhanced attenuation values, a group of researchers found that the most optimal sensitivity (71%) and specificity (98%) for the diagnosis of adrenal adenoma result from choosing a threshold attenuation value of 10 H on unenhanced CT [56]. There is less than two chances out of 100 that an adrenal mass with an attenuation of less than 10 H on unenhanced CT will not be an adenoma. Unlike unenhanced attenuation values, however, IV contrast—enhanced CT values show too much overlap between adenomas and metastases to allow an accurate differentiation between them [55].

Evidence has accumulated that chemical-shift MR imaging can also be used to differentiate adrenal adenomas from metastases. Taking advantage of the different resonant frequency peaks for the hydrogen atom in water and triglyceride (lipid) molecules, chemical-shift MR imaging results in a decrease in the signal intensity of tissue containing both lipid and water in comparison with tissue containing no lipid [57]. When a breath-hold gradient-echo technique is used, signal intensity loss on opposed-phase images compared with in-phase images indicates a mixture of lipid and nonlipid tissue; this finding is often present in adrenal adenomas but absent in metastases. The chemical-shift change can be detected by simple visual analysis or by quantitative methods using standard region-of-interest cursor measurements of the mass and often of an adjacent reference tissue on in-phase and opposed-phase images. Several different formulas have been proposed to quantify the amount of chemical-shift change and optimal threshold values determined by analysis of scatterplot data [58].

Although some investigators have used these quantitative measurements and formulas to detect the presence of lipid within adrenal adenomas, others have emphasized the advantages of simple visual analysis to detect relative signal intensity loss on opposed-phase images of adrenal adenomas. The ability to subjectively compensate for motion and other artifacts that are superimposed over an adrenal mass and the identification of local rather than diffuse lipid are two of the advantages cited in favor of visual rather than quantitative analysis of chemical-shift changes [59]. Several studies have shown a similar accuracy for detecting intratumoral lipid in adrenal masses using both visual analysis and quantitative methods in the same patients [58, 60]. The most rigorous assessment of visual analysis of in-phase and opposed-phase imaging of adrenal masses showed a sensitivity of 78% for the detection of lipid within adrenal adenomas with a corresponding specificity of 87% [59].

Two studies suggest that unenhanced CT densitometry and chemical-shift MR imaging both detect the presence and amount of lipid within adrenal adenomas. In one study of 47 adrenal masses that were imaged with both techniques, the inverse linear correlation between the CT attenuation value and the amount of chemical-shift change on MR imaging was good. In addition, six of the eightGo masses that were falsely negative for adenoma were incorrect on both examinations [61]. In a study with histologic—radiologic correlation of a small number of resected adrenal adenomas that were preoperatively imaged on CT, chemical-shift MR imaging, or both, there was good inverse linear correlation between the estimated number of lipidrich cells and the unenhanced CT attenuation value and good linear correlation with the relative change in signal intensity on opposed-phase MR imaging [38]. Taken together, these two studies suggest that unenhanced CT and chemical-shift MR imaging may not be complementary to each other in the diagnosis of adrenal adenomas, which may partly explain the paucity of published reports comparing the two techniques with each other.



View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8C. Carcinoma in 59-year-old man. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows large right adrenal mass with intracaval extension.

 

Standard contrast-enhanced CT images of the adrenal glands are obtained approximately 60 sec after the beginning of IV injection of a contrast bolus. Studies suggest this time point is the only one when the attenuation values of adenomas and metastases are nearly identical. Adenomas lose enhancement more rapidly, as early as 5 min after the injection of contrast material, so attenuation values at 10-15 min after contrast administration can be used to differentiate adenomas from other masses [9, 62] (Figs. 12A,12B,12C and 13). Although the threshold attenuation value for the diagnosis of an adenoma varies among series, masses with an attenuation value of less than 30-40 H on a contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained with a 15-min delay are almost always adenomas.



View larger version (171K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12A. Adrenal metastasis from adenocarcinoma of lung in 69-year-old man. Left adrenal mass (outlined by cursor, 1) measured 32 H on this unenhanced CT scan.

 


View larger version (190K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12B. Adrenal metastasis from adenocarcinoma of lung in 69-year-old man. Tumor (outlined by cursor, 1) enhanced to 83 H on CT scan obtained immediately after contrast administration.

 


View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12C. Adrenal metastasis from adenocarcinoma of lung in 69-year-old man. Delayed image shows washout (outlined by cursor, 1) of contrast material to only 57 H.

 


View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 13. Adenoma in 39-year-old woman. Right adrenal mass takes up radionuclide in this radioiodocholesterol scan using NP-59 (iodomethylnorcholesterol). Concordance of mass and radionuclide indicates adenoma.

 

A prior report indicated the more rapid washout of gadolinium enhancement on MR imaging of adrenal adenomas could also differentiate them from metastases [63]. Subsequent reports could not confirm these results, however [60, 64], and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging is not widely used for this purpose.

In addition to the delayed CT attenuation value itself, the percentage of washout of initial enhancement—which probably is independent of the type, amount, and injection rate of the contrast material—can be calculated [65, 66]. In our department, the optimal threshold enhancement washout at 15 min is 60%, resulting in a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 96% for the diagnosis of adenoma [65]. Of particular interest is the apparent independence of this rapid enhancement washout from the lipid content of an adenoma. Lipid-poor adenomas, those with attenuation values greater than 10 H on unenhanced CT, have enhancement washout features nearly identical to lipid-rich adenomas [67].

The percentage of enhancement washout of an adrenal mass is easy to calculate using the following equation:

where E is the enhanced attenuation value, D is the delayed enhanced value, and U is the unenhanced value. For example, if the unenhanced attenuation is 20 H, the enhanced attenuation is 100 H, and the 15-min delayed enhanced attenuation is 40 H, the percentage of washout is calculated as follows:

If a the threshold value of 60% is used, then the mass is likely a lipid-poor adenoma. However, if unenhanced CT has not been performed or if the unenhanced attenuation value is unknown, a relative enhancement washout can be calculated as follows:

In our department, the optimal threshold value for the relative enhancement washout calculation is 40%, resulting in a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 100% for the diagnosis of adenoma. Another study of the accuracy of using the relative enhancement washout to characterize adrenal masses reported an optimal threshold of 50% [68], resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 100%.

In the previous example, the calculation for relative enhancement washout is as follows:

Given the threshold value for relative enhancement washout of 40%, this calculation again indicates an adenoma.

The assessment of enhancement washout curves of adrenal masses is valid only for lesions with relatively homogeneous attenuation after contrast enhancement. Large regions of low attenuation, likely representing areas of necrosis or hemorrhage, were specifically excluded from evaluation in the articles that described and quantified the washout curves. The calculations apply only to solid tissue with an intact capillary bed. The diagnosis of adrenal adenoma cannot be determined in masses that contain prominent regions of necrosis or hemorrhage.

Combining the two independent CT properties of adrenal adenomas—rapid contrast enhancement washout and a propensity for intratumoral lipid—leads to a protocol that spares most adenomas from contrast enhancement. We recently reported the accuracy of combined unenhanced and delayed enhanced CT densitometry for the characterization of adrenal masses [69]. One hundred sixty-six adrenal masses were prospectively studied with unenhanced CT; those with attenuation values greater than 10 H underwent contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT with a 15-min delay. This protocol enabled the correct characterization of 160 (96%) of the 166 masses. When the five nonadenomas that were not metastases were excluded, the sensitivity and specificity for characterizing a mass as adenoma versus metastasis were 98% (124/127) and 97% (33/34), respectively.

Two radionuclide studies can also be used to characterize adrenal masses. Radioiodocholesterol scanning using NP-59 (iodomethylnorcholesterol) is an accurate method to characterize a unilateral adrenal mass as an adenoma because the radionuclide labels functioning adrenal cortical cells even in nonhypersecretory adenomas [70] (Fig. 14A,14B). The high positive predictive value of NP-59 scintigraphy has been known for approximately 20 years, but its lack of approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration and restricted commercial availability have severely limited its widespread use.



View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 14A. Adrenal metastasis in 46-year-old man with small cell carcinoma of lung. Contrast-enhanced CT scan reveals small, homogeneous left adrenal mass.

 


View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 14B. Adrenal metastasis in 46-year-old man with small cell carcinoma of lung. FDG positron emission tomography image shows radionuclide uptake, which indicates mass is metastatic tumor. (Courtesy of Bin C and Shreve P, Ann Arbor, MI)

 

Whole-body FDG PET is the newest imaging modality used to differentiate benign from malignant masses. FDG PET exploits fundamental biochemical differences between normal and neoplastic cells, and unlike the other imaging modalities discussed in this article, an FDG PET study with positive findings typically identifies a malignant mass (adrenal metastasis) rather than an adrenal adenoma (Fig. 14A,14B). Initial reports about the ability of FDG PET to characterize adrenal masses are promising [71, 72], but the small number of reported cases, current high cost of the examination, and the lack of widespread availability of the new modality make it difficult to predict its future role in the evaluation of incidental adrenal masses.


Adenoma Versus Carcinoma
Top
Introduction
Specific Imaging Features
Nonspecific Imaging Features
Adenoma Versus Metastasis
Adenoma Versus Carcinoma
References
 
In patients without a primary extraadrenal neoplasm, an adrenal mass without specific morphologic features is almost always an adenoma, especially if less than 3 cm in diameter. To obviate the common practice of serial CT imaging over several years to ensure a lesion is benign by showing stability in size, we often use the imaging techniques described earlier to confirm the findings characteristic of an adenoma. If these features are present, we make a diagnosis of adenoma and do not suggest follow-up imaging.

A unilateral adrenal mass larger than 5 or 6 cm is considered suggestive of adrenal cortical carcinoma, and many will show evidence of metastatic disease. In the absence of metastases, the differential diagnosis is usually that of carcinoma versus adenoma. The larger the mass, the greater is the likelihood of carcinoma, although on rare occasions adenomas can be larger than 5 cm and can have large regions of hemorrhage, necrosis, and calcifications. The size criterion for resection of adrenal incidentaloma varies widely, but most adrenal masses greater than 6 cm are resected for fear of possible adrenal carcinoma.

Little is known about chemical-shift MR imaging and CT densitometry of adrenal cortical carcinoma. In the reported series of attenuation values and enhancement washout curves on delayed enhanced CT, only one included three cases of adrenal carcinomas, but the carcinomas were included in the data set for nonadenomas and the locations of the individual cases in the scatterplots were not provided [62]. Adrenal carcinomas greater than 6 cm often have large regions of central necrosis or hemorrhage that invalidate attempts to assess contrast enhancement washout. Whether chemical-shift MR imaging, unenhanced CT, or delayed enhanced CT can reliably differentiate adenoma from carcinoma has not yet been established. The answer may depend on the histologic grade of malignancy involved.

In summary, most adrenal incidentalomas are cortical adenomas. Some adrenal masses have pathognomonic CT features such as hemorrhage, myelolipoma, and cysts, but most incidentalomas have nonspecific morphologic features. In patients with a primary extraadrenal neoplasm and no other evidence of distant metastatic disease, noninvasive imaging can reduce the necessity for percutaneous adrenal mass biopsy in most patients. Most adrenal adenomas are lipid-rich and can be correctly diagnosed on chemical-shift MR imaging or unenhanced CT. Most lipid-poor adenomas can be accurately characterized on delayed enhanced CT. Percutaneous biopsy can be limited to those masses whose imaging studies do not indicate an adenoma.


References
Top
Introduction
Specific Imaging Features
Nonspecific Imaging Features
Adenoma Versus Metastasis
Adenoma Versus Carcinoma
References
 

  1. Goldman HB, Howard RC, Patterson AL. Spontaneous retroperitoneal hemorrhage from a giant adrenal myelolipoma. (letter) J Urol 1996;155:639[Medline]
  2. Russell C, Goodacre BW, vanSonnenberg E, Orihuela E. Spontaneous rupture of adrenal myelolipoma: spiral CT appearance. Abdom Imaging 2000;25:431 -434[Medline]
  3. Sneiders A, Zhang G, Gordon BE. Extra-adrenal perirenal myelolipoma. J Urol 1993;150:1496 -1497[Medline]
  4. Kammen BF, Elder DE, Fraker DL, Siegelman ES. Extraadrenal myelolipoma: MR imaging findings. AJR 1998;171:721 -723[Free Full Text]
  5. Cyran KM, Kenney PJ, Memel DS, Yacoub I. Adrenal myelolipoma. AJR 1996;166:395 -400[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Rao P, Kenney PJ, Wagner BJ, Davidson AJ. Imaging and pathologic features of myelolipoma. RadioGraphics 1997;17:1373 -1385[Abstract]
  7. Cheema P, Cartegena R, Staubitz W. Adrenal cysts: diagnosis and treatment. J Urol 1981;126:396 -399[Medline]
  8. Rozenblit A, Morehouse HT, Amis SE Jr. Cystic adrenal lesions: CT features. Radiology 1996;201:541 -548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Xarli VP, Steale AA, Davis PJ, Buescher ES, Rios CN, Garcia-Bunnel R. Adrenal hemorrhage in the adult. Medicine (Baltimore) 1978;57:211 -221[Medline]
  10. Burks DW, Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K. Acute adrenal injury after blunt abdominal trauma: CT findings. AJR 1992;158:503 -507[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Bookstein JJ, Conn J, Reuter SR. Intra-adrenal hemorrhage as a complication of adrenal venography in primary aldosteronism. Radiology 1968;90:778 -779[Medline]
  12. Bayliss RIS, Edwards OM, Starer F. Complications of adrenal venography. Br J Radiol 1970;43:531 -533[Medline]
  13. Ling D, Korobkin M, Silverman PM, Dunnick NR. CT demonstration of bilateral adrenal hemorrhage. AJR 1983;141:307 -308[Free Full Text]
  14. Roubidoux MA. MR imaging of hemorrhage and iron deposition in the kidney. RadioGraphics 1994;14:1033 -1044[Abstract]
  15. Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Ernst RD, et al. Imaging of nontraumatic hemorrhage of the adrenal gland. RadioGraphics 1999;19:949 -963[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Wilson DA, Muchmore HG, Tisdal RG, et al. Histoplasmosis of the adrenal gland studied by CT. Radiology 1984;150:779 -783[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ferrozzi F, Tognini G, Bova D, Zuccoli G, Pavone P. Hemangiosarcoma of the adrenal glands: CT findings in two cases. Abdom Imaging 2001;26:336 -339[Medline]
  18. Honig SC, Klavans MS, Hyde C, Siroky MB. Adrenal hemangioma: an unusual adrenal mass delineated with magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 1991;146:400 -402[Medline]
  19. Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Fishman EK, et al. Spectrum of CT findings in nonmalignant disease of the adrenal gland. RadioGraphics 1998;18:393 -412[Abstract]
  20. Krebs TL, Wagner BJ. MR imaging of the adrenal gland: radiologic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 1998;18:1425 -1440[Abstract]
  21. Radin R, David CL, Goldfarb H, Francis IR. Adrenal and extra-adrenal retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma: imaging findings in 13 adults. Radiology 1997;202:703 -707[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Johnson GL, Hruban RH, Marshall FF, Fishman EK. Primary adrenal ganglioneuroma: CT findings in four patients. AJR 1997;169:169 -171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Feinstein RS, Gatewood OMB, Fishman EK, Goldman SM, Siegelman SS. Computed tomography of adult neuroblastoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984;8:720 -726[Medline]
  24. Sutton MG, Sheps SG, Lie JT. Prevalence of clinically unsuspected pheochromocytoma: review of a 50-year autopsy series. Mayo Clin Proc 1981;56:354 -360[Medline]
  25. Lucon AM, Pereira MAA, Mendonca BB, Halpern A, Wajchenberg BL, Arap S. Pheochromocytoma: study of 50 cases. J Urol 1997;157:1208 -1212[Medline]
  26. Whalen RK, Althausen AF, Daniels GH. Extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma. J Urol 1992;147:1 -10[Medline]
  27. Miyajima A, Nakashima J, Baba S, Tachibana M, Nakamura K, Murai M. Clinical experience with incidentally discovered pheochromocytoma. J Urol 1997;157:1566 -1568[Medline]
  28. Cirillo RL Jr, Bennett WF, Vitellas KM, Poulos AG, Bova JG. Pathology of the adrenal gland: imaging features. AJR 1998;170:429 -435[Free Full Text]
  29. Krebs TL, Wagner BJ. MR imaging of the adrenal gland: radiologic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 1998;18:1425 -1440
  30. Beierwaltes WH. A new method of identifying pheochromocytoma and proving that a "mass" is a "pheo." (editorial) J Urol 1985;134:105[Medline]
  31. Francis IR, Glazer GM, Shapiro B, Sisson JC, Gross BH. Complementary roles of CT and 131I-MIBG scintigraphy in diagnosing pheochromocytoma. AJR 1983;141:719 -725[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Shulkin BL, Koeppe RA, Francis IR, Deeb GM, Lloyd RV, Thompson NW. Pheochromocytomas that do not accumulate metaiodobenzylguanidine: localization with PET and administration of FDG. Radiology 1993;186:711 -715[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Commons RR, Callaway CP. Adenomas of the adrenal cortex. Archiv Intern Med 1948;81:37 -41
  34. Kokko JP, Brown TC, Berman MM. Adrenal adenoma and hypertension. Lancet 1967;1:468 -470[Medline]
  35. Hedeland H, Östberg G, Hökfelt B. On the prevalence of adrenocortical adenomas in an autopsy material in relation to hypertension and diabetes. Acta Med Scand 1968;184:211 -214[Medline]
  36. Russi S, Blumenthal HT, Gray SH. Small adenomas of the adrenal cortex in hypertension and diabetes. Arch Intern Med 1945;76:284 -291
  37. Aso Y, Homma Y. A survey on incidental adrenal tumors in Japan. J Urol 1992;147:1478 -1481[Medline]
  38. Korobkin M, Giordano TJ, Brodeur FJ, et al. Adrenal adenomas: relationship between histologic lipid and CT and MR findings. Radiology 1996;200:743 -747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Krestin GP, Friedmann G, Fischbach R, Neufang KFR, Allolio B. Evaluation of adrenal masses in oncologic patients: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR vs CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:104 -110[Medline]
  40. Dunnick NR, Korobkin M, Francis I. Adrenal radiology: distinguishing benign from malignant adrenal masses. AJR 1996;167:861 -867[Free Full Text]
  41. Korobkin M, Brodeur FJ, Francis IR, Quint LE, Dunnick NR, Londy F. CT time-attenuation washout curves of adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas. AJR 1998;170:747 -752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Reinig JW, Doppman JL, Dwyer AJ, Johnson AR, Knop RH. Adrenal masses differentiated by MR. Radiology 1986;158:81 -84[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Radecki PD, Piccoli CW, Mitchell DG. Distinction between benign and malignant adrenal masses: value of T1-weighted chemical-shift MR imaging. AJR 1995;165:579 -583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Hedican SP, Marshall FF. Adrenocortical carcinoma with intracaval extension. J Urol 1997;158:2056 -2061[Medline]
  45. Dunnick NR, Heaston D, Halvorsen R, Moore AV, Korobkin M. CT appearance of adrenal cortical carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1982;6:978 -982[Medline]
  46. Fishman EK, Deutch BM, Hartman DS, Goldman SM, Zerhouni EA, Siegelman SS. Primary adrenocortical carcinoma: CT evaluation with clinical correlation. AJR 1987;148:531 -535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Dunnick NR, Doppman JL, Geelhoed GW. Intravenous extension of endocrine tumors. AJR 1980;135:471 -476[Abstract]
  48. Lee MJ, Mayo-Smith WW, Hahn PF, et al. State-of-the-art MR imaging of the adrenal gland. RadioGraphics 1994;14:1015 -1029[Abstract]
  49. Schlund JF, Kenney PJ, Brown ED, Ascher SM, Brown JJ, Semelka RC. Adrenocortical carcinoma: MR imaging appearance with current techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:171 -174[Medline]
  50. Falchook FS, Allard JC. CT of primary adrenal lymphoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:1048 -1050[Medline]
  51. Paling MR, Williamson BRJ. Adrenal involvement in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. AJR 1983;141:303 -305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Abrams HL, Spiro R, Goldstein N. Metastases in carcinoma: analysis of 1000 autopsied cases. Cancer 1950;3:74 -85[Medline]
  53. Zornoza J, Bracken R, Wallace S. Radiologic features of adrenal metastases. Urology 1976;8:295 -299[Medline]
  54. Lee MJ, Hahn PF, Papanicolau N, et al. Benign and malignant adrenal masses: CT distinction with attenuation coefficients, size, and observer analysis. Radiology 1991;179:415-418
  55. Korobkin M, Brodeur FJ, Yutzy GG, et al. Differentiation of adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas using CT attenuation values. AJR 1996;166:531 -536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Boland GW, Lee MJ, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, McNicholas MM, Mueller PR. Characterization of adrenal masses using unenhanced CT: an analysis of the CT literature. AJR 1998;171:201 -204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Mitchell DG, Crovello M, Matteucci T, Petersen RO, Miettinen MM. Benign adrenocortical masses: diagnosis with chemical shift MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:345 -351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Mayo-Smith WW, Lee MJ, McNicholas MMJ, Hahn PF, Boland GW, Saini S. Characterization of adrenal masses (<5 cm) by use of chemical shift MR imaging: observer performance versus quantitative measures. AJR 1995;165:91 -95[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Radecki PD, Piccoli CW, Mitchell DG. Distinction between benign and malignant adrenal masses: value of T1-weighted chemical-shift MR imaging. AJR 1995;165:579 -583
  60. Korobkin M, Lombardi TJ, Aisen AM, et al. Characterization of adrenal masses with chemical shift and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1995;197:411 -418[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Huang AB, Birnbaum BA. Adrenal masses: correlation between CT attenuation value and chemical shift ratio at MR imaging with in-phase and opposed-phase sequences. Radiology 1996;200:749 -752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Szolar DH, Kammerhuber F. Quantitative CT evaluation of adrenal gland masses: a step forward in the differentiation between adenomas and nonadenomas? Radiology 1997;202:517 -521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Krestin GP, Steinbrich W, Friedmann G. Adrenal masses: evaluation with fast gradient-echo MR imaging and Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic studies. Radiology 1989;171:675 -680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Reinig JW, Stutley JE, Leonhardt CM, Spicer KM, Margolis M, Caldwell CB. Differentiation of adrenal masses with imaging: comparison of techniques. Radiology 1994;192:41 -46[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Korobkin M, Brodeur FJ, Francis IR, Quint LE, Dunnick NR, Londy F. CT time-attenuation washout curves of adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas. AJR 1998;170:747 -752
  66. Szolar DH, Kammerhuber FH. Adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas: assessment of washout at delayed contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 1998;207:369 -375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Caoili EM, Korobkin M, Francis IR, Cohan RH, Dunnick NR. Delayed enhanced CT of lipid-poor adrenal adenomas. AJR 2000;175:1411 -1415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Peña CS, Boland GWL, Hahn PF, Lee MJ, Mueller PR. Characterization of indeterminate (lipid-poor) adrenal masses: use of washout characteristics at contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 2000;217:798 -802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Caoili EM, Korobkin M, Francis IR, et al. Adrenal masses: characterization with combined unenhanced and delayed enhanced CT. Radiology 2002;222:629 -633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Francis IR, Smid A, Gross MD, et al. Adrenal masses in oncologic patients: functional and morphologic evaluation. Radiology 1988;166:353 -356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Boland GW, Goldberg MA, Lee MJ, et al. Indeterminate adrenal mass in patients with cancer: evaluation at PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Radiology 1995;194:131 -134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Marom EM, McAdams HP, Erasmus JJ, et al. Staging non-small cell lung cancer with wholebody PET. Radiology 1999;212:803 -809[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
A. Karagiannis, D. P Mikhailidis, V. G Athyros, and F. Harsoulis
Pheochromocytoma: an update on genetics and management
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2007; 14(4): 935 - 956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Song, F. S. Chaudhry, and W. W. Mayo-Smith
The Incidental Indeterminate Adrenal Mass on CT (> 10 H) in Patients Without Cancer: Is Further Imaging Necessary? Follow-Up of 321 Consecutive Indeterminate Adrenal Masses
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1119 - 1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S Bhatt, S Vanderlinde, R Farag, and V S Dogra
Pararectal paraganglioma
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2007; 80(958): e253 - e256.